once had a girlfriend named heather...she was the anti-christ.
Open Countdown! Mini 487! GAME OVER!
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
ugh, only if the SK waited a little longer we could have had more information to go on (i.e. seen who might have been working with the dead mafia)..
any thoughts on the SK's timing (page 1)?
Well, my thoughts is that the SK will probably be mostly quiet...so starting for the top of the list, who have we not heard from...
unvote.
vote deepsouth
pressure vote to get you talkingNO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
I thought the rules read that he/she could only lynch if a week went by AND there had been a lynch.Kinetic wrote:I half expected this. The SK is on a timer, and he just put the town on one. Basically we have a 7 day deadline to lynch before he kills again. I expected him to kill as soon as possible so that he could kill again as soon as possible. However, I think this kill blew up in his face. Since he killed a mafia he now has to target townies or else he could end the game prematurely if town lynches a mafia and gets a scent...NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
right i guess I can see this..Kinetic wrote:
As I read this, he can kill again if EITHER one week (real time) passes OR a lynch has occurred.Pooky wrote:1 Daykilling SK(can kill once per "day" or week)(If a week in time has passed since the last SK kill, he may kill again, if a lynch has occured since the last SK kill, he may kill again)
week has passed, can kill again.
if a lynch as occured, can kill again..
yeah, then it makes since that he/she would kill asap.
which I then take to mean, the SK is probably someone who just realized that the game started...of course, we dont know how long the request (day choice) was sitting in the Mod box...
at any rate, you are right, we are on a time table.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
sort of a silly post isnt it? You think that the SK has posted? How often?deepsouth wrote:Sorry I'm late. I had a busy weekend and wasn't able to play much. Friday, was the last day I checked to see if the game had started.
FOS: curiouskarmadogfor saying that the serial killer hasn't posted yet. I think ckd might be the SK.
vote: Rafflesfor not posting yet.
Why did you pick Raffles over HazzelQ?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
questions were not for you, this one is though,Stewie wrote:
I'm not going to answer the first two questions, but the last one is kinda silly. He can't vote for both, so he has to pick one over the other. Since neither of them posted, it's pretty obvious that he just picked one arbitrarily.curiouskarmadog wrote:
sort of a silly post isnt it? You think that the SK has posted? How often?deepsouth wrote:Sorry I'm late. I had a busy weekend and wasn't able to play much. Friday, was the last day I checked to see if the game had started.
FOS: curiouskarmadogfor saying that the serial killer hasn't posted yet. I think ckd might be the SK.
vote: Rafflesfor not posting yet.
Why did you pick Raffles over HazzelQ?
why did you feel the need to answer them?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
which one?Mgm wrote:Why did you feel the need to ask that question?
comment on questions in general: We are in Day 1, all questions (even apparent irrelevant ones) a.) provide information for the town and b.) gets the town talking.
I found it curious that Stewie decided to answer a question that wasn’t even directed toward him. What provoked him to do so? I asked deepsouth why he picked Raffles over HazzelQ…both have been inactive so far, so what was his method? If it was random, that is fine…but I wanted to hear it from deepsouth, not Stewie.
So question: Stewie what provoked you to answer a question that wasn’t directed to you?
Also..since deepsouth has posted…
Unvote: deepsouth…I have noted that HazzelQ has been posting in other threads, not this one yet…so again a pressure vote to get you talking.
Vote: HazzelQNO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
Um, you did not answer my question. I asked you why you answered a question that was directed to deepsouth (ie not you)…Stewie wrote:
I'm not going to answer the first two questions, but the last one is kinda silly. He can't vote for both, so he has to pick one over the other. Since neither of them posted, it's pretty obvious that he just picked one arbitrarily.
How do you know it was random? Maybe he metagamed. (if you metagamed, you would find one of them is active the other is not) Maybe he has a grudge from a previous game…who knows….but now it is moot because you took it upon yourself to answer it for him.Stewie wrote:
I'm not going to answer the first two questions, but the last one is kinda silly. He can't vote for both, so he has to pick one over the other. Since neither of them posted, it's pretty obvious that he just picked one arbitrarily.
Again, why did you feel it necessary to answer a question that was not directed to you?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
since you metagamed I am sure you noted that Raffles has stated he/she will be on vacation until the 15th..Mgm wrote:
So did Raffles. He posted extensively in Carthage mafia on Saturday. He could've posted here.I have noted that HazzelQ has been posting in other threads, not this one yet…so again a pressure vote to get you talking.
and that HazzelQ actually posted this morning (and posted on Sunday)...NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
You are wrong, there are several answers he could have given...(as I have stated before)..I wanted to see what he had to say...but Stewie obligated to answer it for him.Mgm wrote:Stewie correctly identified it as a dead end question. I don't see the problem.
There's no problem with answering someone else's questions when there's only one likely answer they'd give (regardless of what their intentions are).
Another example, if I ask you to claim, it would be perfectly all right for someone else to point out you'd claim townie. There's no other claim, unless the SK can convince us he wants to help kill the mafia, but I for one would lynch him on the spot if it doesn't make us lose instantly.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
this is the second time you have spoke without reading or doing a little leg work, it is getting old..Mgm wrote:
Several answers? Name one then.curiouskarmadog wrote:
You are wrong, there are several answers he could have given...(as I have stated before)..I wanted to see what he had to say...but Stewie obligated to answer it for him.Mgm wrote:Stewie correctly identified it as a dead end question. I don't see the problem.
There's no problem with answering someone else's questions when there's only one likely answer they'd give (regardless of what their intentions are).
Another example, if I ask you to claim, it would be perfectly all right for someone else to point out you'd claim townie. There's no other claim, unless the SK can convince us he wants to help kill the mafia, but I for one would lynch him on the spot if it doesn't make us lose instantly.
please read post 46 (AGAIN)NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
not sure what is sigificant about whether the SK posted before or after the SK post by the Mod. We do not know how long the request from the SK to the mod set in the Mod's box. So actually, that "list" could be cut in half, we have no way of telling.Mirth wrote:
If we're going into whether the SK posted before the kill or not, the following people posted pre-kill (in order of first post):
Kinetic
CKD
MGM
Mirth
D3sisted (obviously not the SK, being dead)
Heatherlou
Stewie
NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
I truly do not think she knew the game was on.M4yhem wrote:Is it metagaming to point out that HazzelQ is almost certainly not the SK?
Unless you think Jeep was collaberating with her, she has an alibi; she can't have sent the pm, since she didn't even know she was in the game. She could still be mafia, of course.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
Vote: MGM
I think his play has been scummy. For little reasons that are beginning to add up.
1.) Both d3sisted and MGM voted for each other off the get go. I see mafia doing this so often as a distancing maneuver. Again, this really doesn’t mean anything alone and by itself is an incredibly weak argument.
2.) Then, he places his vote on me with little explanation. When Mirth and I asks him about..he does provide his random reasoning, which is fine because we were still in that random vote stage at the time. However, he later adds this:
he “random” voted someone who happened to be mafia on a hunch..what sort of hunch can someone get 3 posts into the game when his hunchie has not even posted yet? So now he has a hunch about me? That is crap logic. I now think that he got lucky when the SK killed d3sisted with MGM’s vote on him. Now he is trying to convince us that his hunches find scum...that I think is scummy.Mgm wrote:
I mentioned him as a possible suspect and since the first suspect I mentioned died, I had an unused vote lying around. I might as well place it somewhere and since my hunch on d3sisted was correct, I might as well continue to trust my hunches for the time being.Mirth wrote:MGM you mentioned the dangers of dogs before the kill was announced. So do you have any after kill explanation for your vote?
3.) then this exchange occurs:
He just contradicted himself.Mgm wrote:Mirth wrote:
We are on page two. None of us have said very much yet, and all the votes up to this point have been random. We are all possible suspects. Why does he merit special attention here? He had a whole two posts when you first mentioned him as a "possible suspect." Your vote on d3sisted seemed to be a joking random vote which just happened to get lucky, as he hadn't posted anything when you voted for him. Then he voted for you. I'm weary of "hunches" that are formed without anything to back them up.It should be pretty clear that my vote was random/arbitrary too. I didn't say the vote was based on a hunch. My hunch was about whether the SK posted.
He just said…Mgm wrote:I might as well place it somewhere andsince my hunch on d3sisted was correct, I might as well continue to trust my hunches for the time being.
Seeing his flawed logic on my vote he back tracks and lies (stating his hunch was about the SK not the vote).
4.) Then post 47, he tries to implicate something.
which I quickly address (without further comment from him on the subject)Mgm wrote:
So did Raffles. He posted extensively in Carthage mafia on Saturday. He could've posted here.I have noted that HazzelQ has been posting in other threads, not this one yet…so again a pressure vote to get you talking.
5.) Seems like he is getting antsy. Again, this is not a big thing by itself, but since we are nightless, the mafia really would be antsy and might start trying to push a case.curiouskarmadog wrote: since you metagamed I am sure you noted that Raffles has stated he/she will be on vacation until the 15th..
and that HazzelQ actually posted this morning (and posted on Sunday)...
6.) Finally he unvotes me without reason, when asked he states:Mgm wrote:We should start focussing. If we don't have a lynch target by the deadline, we're losing the town headstart the dead scum got us.
this seems very anti-town to me. Seems like he has information that he does not want to share with the town. Shouldn’t you provide the information to help the town?Mgm wrote:
Of course there is a reason. But I'm quite happy to hold it under my hat right now.HazzelQ wrote:... no reason?
At any rate, I think he has had the scummiest plays and posts thus far.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
the little things had been adding up...I saw two votes and thought I better analyze MGM more to weigh in either way (honestly though, I figured it would be on the scummy side)...Mirth wrote:First, CKD, what prompted your vote on MGM just now? Most of the stuff you pointed out has been around for a bit, and yet you didn't vote for him.
once a did the reread, he did come out quite scummy...and I posted why in my post.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
I can see that it looks scummy, or at least suspicious. I guess I am not in that mind set “should I post (or vote) because it might look scummy?” As I said before, I went back and read MGM’s post and thought it warranted a vote.Mirth wrote:
What I don't like: Kinetic also voicing his suspicion of MGM. I called MGM out on the hunch thing 2 pages back. Nobody else commented. Then Hazel voted. And CKD and Kinetic seem to take this as a cue that its okay to voice their suspicions. MGM hasn't done anything particularly earth shattering (or worthy of note even) in the last page. Granted, I still think he is the most suspicious person here, of people whove actually said something. But that can obviously change.
Here is the current problem with this game. We a.) don’t have enough active posters and b.) don’t have a Mod that can check the internet regularly. In a game set up like this one where we have a deadline, we need a Mod who is on top of this game. WE NEED PRODS! What should we do? Is there a back up Mod? DO we just grin and bear it?
We need the thoughts, votes, and feed back of every person in this game. If not, this game is heavily slanted in favor of the the SK and mafia.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
[quote="HazzelQ']I agree on the last part. But since we do have some people posting, we should focus on them. I see no reason not to lynch mgn, if he is vanilla we have not lost the most important player, and if he is mafia it's a big step forward.
About the other part- well, we can do a vote count ourselves I guess..[/quote]
whoa wait a minute...I do not want to lynch anyone who might be townie. who is our most important player? Do you think MGM might be townie?
Hazzle this post has come off quite scummy, almost seems like you are covering your butt if he comes up town..please address..NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
I asked the Mod in a PM to prod DFN....unfornately we do not have the time to wait for others to join actively....we are on a SK deadline...Mirth wrote:Thoughts on what? (if you mean lynching, scroll up for my opinion.) I've commented on all that I feel needs commenting on, honestly. I'm just more or less waiting for more people to join in on the discussion, because it doesn't seem to me that very many people are actively playing.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
I am still for the MGM lynch (for reasons stated in post 100)..nothing has changed this view. However, if we do lynch MGM and he comes up mafia, big FoS on Kinetic.
How exactly is the SK trying to frame MGM with a M4yham kill? Seems to me that there are better people to daykill that would “frame” MGM. The SK just wants to be the last man standing, why would he need to frame MGM? Given the current votes, it looks like there is a huge suspicion on MGM. I think that if MGM was the SK he might take out someone voting on him (because he is at 3 votes). That being said, the SK would have probably taken out someone who is voting for MGM to make it look like MGM was the SK trying to get rid of votes on him.Kinetic wrote:After that I'm even more convinced that the SK is trying to frame MGM. HazzleQ seems like the best suspect imo.
So, who was m4yham’s vote on? Had to go back to page 3 to find it, but it was on Mirth. So if the SK was trying to frame anyone, wouldn’t the SK be trying to frame Mirth, instead of MGM?
How does killing M4yham speed up the MGM lynch?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
to me, it looks like he is defending MGM...by stating that the SK is framing MGM is a ploy to either get votes off of his scumbuddy or stop more votes compliing. I do not trust anybody enough in this game to defend anyone yet. Looks like Kinetic is sticking his neck out there for MGM by posting this comment. Why?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
OK officially FOS Kinetic.
Well, this is inaccurate or an out and out lie. Please post where MGM jokingly targeted M4yham. He jokingly target d3sisted and me.Kinetic wrote:
So far both SK kills have been on people MGM jokingly targeted. Coincidence?curiouskarmadog wrote:
How exactly is the SK trying to frame MGM with a M4yham kill?Kinetic wrote:After that I'm even more convinced that the SK is trying to frame MGM. HazzleQ seems like the best suspect imo.
Did you actually answer my question or just scoot around it? AGAIN, how does killing M4yham speed up the MGM lynch? So far it has done absolutely nothing.Kinetic wrote:
Exactly how it is working. Now don't get me wrong, I never said I don't think MGM could be scum, but I also think that it is mighty suspicious that the scummiest players in the game seem to be piling on MGM. The only reason I'm not attacking MGM is not because I don't think its possible for him to be scummy, but because I'm more suspicious of the people attacking him.curiouskarmadog wrote: How does killing M4yham speed up the MGM lynch?
Interesting. Why did you feel it necessary to point it out now? Who was that post for? As it stands you say the people attacking MGM are scummier…but MGM could be scum. Looks like you have cleared yourself both ways. If the MGM lynch goes down (or if he is Nked) and he comes up scum, you can always fall back on “well, I never said I don’t think MGM could be scum”. By stating you think the people “pushing” then lynch are scummier, is a way of defending MGM. I could go into a deeper analysis of why (or how rather) you are defending him, but you are not an idiot. You know you are defending him.Kinetic wrote:
You are misconstruing my intentions and placing words in my mouth. I never defended MGM, I pointed out what I think is happeningcuriouskarmadog wrote:to me, it looks like he is defending MGM...by stating that the SK is framing MGM is a ploy to either get votes off of his scumbuddy or stop more votes compliing. I do not trust anybody enough in this game to defend anyone yet. Looks like Kinetic is sticking his neck out there for MGM by posting this comment. Why?
I am directly asking you, do you think MGM is scum or not?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
Anybody who plays mafia realizes why the SK did not want to hit MGM. So that point is obvious. But by saying it the way that you did (with your false or inaccurate information, whatever the case may be), it made it look like lynching MGM was scummy. When indeed it is not. It was a defense rather you want to admit it or not.Kinetic wrote: Plus, my original point still stands, the SK wants MGM lynched no matter what his alignment. He's going to leave the people voting him alone so that they can continue to push him.
Fine you do not know. Now that I call out your fence sitting on the issue, you start to suggest I am scum. I am not surprised. This was not a logic trap. You think he is town, ok I understand why you would defend him…you think he is scum, well, why are you not voting for him. Currently you want us to believe you are fence sitting. “I just don’t know”. Personally I think you are scum with MGM. You are not certian that he is going to be lynched yet, so you are afraid to commit either way.Kinetic wrote:
I.Don't. Know. I'm telling you directly, I DON'T KNOW! Maybe he is, maybe he isn't. But I am not going to be pressured by you into saying one way or the other. This sort of high-pressure tactics is what I've seen scum use millions of times to try and force someone to make a choice when both choices are rigged to lose..
I just wanted to know why you were defending him. Now, I want to know why you cant admit you were/are defending him.
Interesting that the 3 people voting for him you are calling scummy…Why is that? Why is MGM not in your scummy radar, but HazzleQ, myself, and Mirth are? Again you paint a MGM lynch as scummy..I wonder if he gets another vote, well that person be scummy too?
I still think MGM is the lynch of the day…when he comes up scum, I know where I want to go next.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
ok I do not understand this post...are you going in circles or are you NOT getting meaningless results?HazzelQ wrote:
post #114 explains it.Mgm wrote:
I'm discussing meaningless things? Now you're just being silly. It's fine you find my ideas weird, it's okay to disagree with me, but claiming I'm stalling is plain wrong. I'm doing everything I can to get meaningful discussion started.he discuss meaningless things (IMO to stall),
Are you talking about my idea the mafia is more dangerous than the SK?
Ok, screw this. I am going to reset here. My tactic is only going in circles, I am not getting any meaningless results. My vote stays for now though.
What was your tactic before? What exactly are you trying to reset?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
OK 1.) why did you post this? Just to show you are an ass?HazzelQ wrote:
...ookey. We don't really care, sorry.Mirth wrote:Gah Im really sorry I havent posted or finished reading. I have family visiting and I didn't expect that they would drive me absolutely insane. I'll be able to post late tomorrow evening, when they finally leave. Again, I'm really really sorry about this, because they're usually not this annoyingly clingy, and I didn't forsee this as a problem.
2.) everyone should care, because WE ARE ON A SK DEADLINE...we need everyone commenting and posting...and voting, or the SK will pick us off one at a timeNO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
jesus man, you do this in every game...I just finished reading that, how long did that take you to type..
there is a couple items I think I want to address, but it will require me going abck and rereading your reread, which I dont have time for at the moment.
one thing I noted I wanted to mention.
I know, which was my point. The whole SK is trying to frame MGM was ridiculous on many levels...I dont think the SK would try to frame anyone...Think you might be missing my point on this post.Mirth wrote:
Says the SK would probably get rid of someone voting for MGM to try and frame him. Wouldn't the SK be trying to frame me instead since M4yhem's vote was on me. How does killing M4yhem sped up MGM lynch.
(Should have called CKD out on this, but why assume the SK is stupid enough to kill someone voting for a suspect, because its not very likely someone would eliminate a person voting for them as that would be suspicious, so why assume the SK would use that to frame if its not solid logic. Actually this is all WIFOM.)
NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
You just did that reread and you dont know I am joking? I never thought the SK was trying to frame MGM. Kinetic is the one that said that...I thought that was crap....It was sarcasm, mostly poking fun at Kinetic who spun the last SK kill as the SK trying to fram MGM..Mirth wrote:Why are you convinced it was used to frame MGM? DeepSouth had two posts. The first post he FOSed you for something you didn't say in regards to the serial killer posting (you didnt correct him). And he voted Raffles for not having posted yet. The second post he unvotes. No connection to MGM whatsoever, why bring it up?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
its cool sarcasm gets lost over the net sometimes..Mirth wrote:Sorry, I spent most of the night awake and my sarcasm detector is not at all functional in the wee hours of the morning. What is the point of joking about it though?
I joke as more of a jab to Kinetic
(still in a reread)NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
honestly I didnt want the town to forget it (Kinetic's silly thoery that sounded like a defense for MGM).Mirth wrote:Stewie: yes, I understand what you were saying. I did every single post because it helps me understand stuff. I would, however, like to hear your opinion of everybody still alive, if you don't mind.
CKD: I get that it was a jab at Kinetic, but what did you hope to gain from it?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
if this thread does not pick up, we will all be picked off one at a time..PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:DeepSouth is killed mercilessly by the Serial Killer!
Which is nice because I was having a helluva time finding a replacement for him.
He was a Townie!
VC:
3 HazzelQ(Kinetic, MGM, Stewie)
2 MGM (CuriousKarmaDog, HazzelQ)
1 Stewie(Raffles)NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
been doing some rereading in the game....after reading this post and trying to form a case I find myself thinking that it is not that strongMirth wrote:Oh, and one more thing, since MGM asked for a vote from all the non-voters, I'd just like to ask each person voting to individually explain why they're voting whomever they are voting (yes I know you all probably have already, but, please, humor me on this) and also explain who they think is most probably the serial killer and/or mafia members.
unvote MGM
I feel like MGM and Kinetic are buddying up to each other...but in the reread it seems like Kinetic is mostly buddying up with MGM (however MGM has had his comments defending Kinetic)...I think that one of the two is scum...but through out the game my biggest problem is actually with Kinetic's play over MGM's....now, it would be silly for me to post a PBP after MGM's, but I think I might have too to display my case...I dont have time at the moment, but I know that we are on a deadline so I will try to get it as soon as possible..
the short of it is, Kinetic seems to be defending and buddying up with MGM..almost like he is mafia and knows that MGM is town..if MGM comes up town, then this might give Kinetic some town cred...
However, I do not think that mafia is our biggest problem right now...that SK is popping us off...(which is a problem for both mafia and town)....I would like to see the MOD say I have prodded so and so...so I can get a clear picture of who is lurking and who isnt...this might take a little metagaming...so I will jump on that first, then look more closely at Kinetic.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
so I guess my real question is are the people voting for Hazzel voting for her because she is mafia or because she is the SK. Personally I think we need to find the SK immediately. How do we do that? I do not know (first time in a game with a SK)....Mirth, in the huge PBP did anything stick out that was SK like?
I see both sides of the No lynch arguement for this game. I see MGM point (which I think he means, it will be hard to win if the SK is not killed and the only way to do that is to lynch)...however, I am with Mirth in the fact that I do not want to lose another townie..we have to make sure Hazzel is the one to hit, for when we lynch we are essentially losing two people (because the SK gets another kill)...at the point, I do not think Hazzel is our SK...so I am against this lynch!
I am still in my reread (with a new interest in who could be the SK)...hopefully I will have something in the next 24 hours...NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
Again you are twisting my words around..another scumtell.
I said I think we should lynch the SK..I do not think it is possible for Hazzel to be the SK..simple as that...if we lynch now and we do not hit the SK (we lose two more people from the pool) Why dont you think it is important to look for the SK now Kinetic?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
when we lynch, that Daykilled is really sped up isnt it?Kinetic wrote:If she comes up town, yes, that sucks. Wanna know what is worse? A town that is paralyzed and refuses to lynch with a DAYKILLING SK loose! One whose Daykills refresh weekly! At this point we need to stop with the crap and start with the lynching.
If you think HQ is town: EXPLAIN WHY!
If you think you have a better choice for SK: EXPLAIN WHY!
Don't just say "o no, he might not be, we should wait guys until the SK kills again..".......
I dont think that Hazzel is the SK because she a.) didnt know this game was going on until after the first Daykill and b.) she was having problems posting here in general. If you actually read the thread you would know this…
I think you might be the SK or at least scum!
Vote: Kinetic
Your lack of desire to find the SK immediately. You appear lynch hungry. You have seemed to attach yourself to MGM. You assumed the SK was trying to frame MGM? Your overall play in this thread is scummy. I think this is our best bet for a lynch today…Especially if Hazzel is lynched and come up town.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
again with the words in my mouth..I have not defended Hazzel..hopefully the town notes you are trying to set me up for something...Kinetic wrote:And your twisted defense of HQ is noted CKD. If he does come up teamscum we know who his partner might be.
that being said, SK feel free to pop me off next Daykill...I think once the town sees I am town...much of this conversation will be telling. Matter of fact I dare you to Daykill me!NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
what? I have admitted Hazzel and I are mafia? TOWN IF YOU DO NOT SEE KINETIC FOR WHAT HE IS YOU ARE BLIND!? He is trying to prod me into voting someone...I do not think Hazzel is the SK..we need to hit the SK immeidately..it is just logical...the game is called "countdown" for a reason....I think Kinetic is the SK (or at least mafia)...did you see his reaction once I placed a vote on him...now he is out and out lying..trying to push a case against me....Kinetic wrote:I'm pretty sure I've been against CKD/HQ this entire time. And I have no problem with lynching CKD if we can get it done before Sunday... But at this rate if we don't lynch SOMEONE this Sunday we are going to lose. Either to the mafia or the SK. There are 9 people left, 3 of who are mafia, 1 who is the SK. That basically means that if we don't lynch this Sunday and the SK doesn't hit a Mafia, then the mafia will basically control the vote and can start hunting the SK for the virtual win. That is what makes me even MORE scared that CKD is mafia. He has all but admitted that HQ and him are mafia, but says we should avoid that because the SK is still around. Well guess what, for the mafia the SK IS the biggest threat, but at this rate the Mafia may be a bigger threat to the town than the SK...
that is why I am daring the SK to pop me off next....find out my alignment...SK, you want to push the town one way or the other..KILL ME...I would rather the town not lynch me today, and use the lynch toward someone that might actually help us fight the scum...like Kinetic.
you have got to see what I am talking about...please read his posts.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
I discourage a lynch if it is town...I do not believe the case against HazzelMgm wrote:
This together with post 299 -->Kinetic wrote:
If we continually derail lynches the only person who wins is the Serial Killer. Lynching is the only way the town gets concrete information.curiouskarmadog wrote: when we lynch, that Daykilled is really sped up isnt it?Unvote: HazzelQ; Vote: curiouskarmadog
You don't actively discourage lynching if you're town. Especially not when the mafia is such a threat compared to the SK.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
bold are my responses to Kinetic's crap
Kinetic wrote:CKD, stop calling for yourself to be killed. If youwerea townie as you claim that would be a bad thing, no? I'm sorry, I don't believe you.if I am scum, why do you care? Please tell us why you care if a goad the SK into killing me.
I realize you seem to have trouble with the english language. What I said is you have done everything except admit you two were mafia. But to me, all the signs are there. Also, if you are a townie, stop talking to the town like you are not a part of it
Nice insults, seems the more pressure that is on you the uglier your play gets
I am not lying. I have explained everything I have seen to the best of my ability. Stop calling me a liar just because you have trouble understanding grammer.
yes, yes you are..more insults..good for you
And what part of my case am I lying about? You are actively discouraging trying to find mafia! You are actively discouraging lynching!
Now that you have moved your votes away from Hazzel, we are that much further away from a lynch, who is actively against lynching now? please show me where I am actively discouraging trying to find mafia? THIS...IS...A...LIE. Unless you are saying that you know HazzelQ is mafia? How do you know that Kinetic? Are you trying to sacrifice one of your own?
And Mirth, its this simple, I am willing to lynch either CKD or HQ. I prefer CKD and if we CAN get a lynch going on him before deadline then I would like to go with that. If we can't, I know we can get a lynch on HQ. I will be around and will switch my vote back if so. But I would like to see how far this will go first.
I want everyone to remember Kinetic was strongly pushing my lynch!!! The SK is going to kill someone...why do you care if he hits me Kinetic? If you lynch HazzelQ and the SK hits me...then your proposed scum group is gone (uh oh Kinetic, looks like your arguement has hit a wall)....I want the SK to hit me, so the town sees you for what you are...I would rather the town lynch scum today..not lynch me.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va