Ironic, isn’t it?Nero Cain wrote:Everyone over 100 posts should die a slow painful death
This explains things effectively.In post 3610, Drixx wrote:The situation is that he's scum on KM's team and he did the NK. He's trying to counterclaim me to try and somehow save his skin.In post 3605, Elsa Jay wrote:So your saying all the Mafia and SK kills hit blanks? The fuck?
I... Acknowledge the balls to claim such a thing.
UNVOTE:
Probably gonna revote soon but im interested in what he's gotta say. Go on Black. Explain the situation.
He literally posted a post meant for another PT in the neighborhood during the night.
"If you're going to paranoia post about me drop a meta read otherwise it is fake as fuck" just doesn't make any sense in any way. Nobody in the neighborhood has expressed even an idea of who BR's main is. He's clearly talking to someone who knows who he is. He's panicking now because once he eats rope it will be pretty simple to go point out the "paranoia" post and find his scum buddy too.
Except those slot will NEVER generate associatives outside of a wagonIn post 4178, chkflip wrote:Should also lynch where we can find associatives but hey wtf do I know
And what the fuck might you be doing dear sir? I happen to know my role is not ascetic, nor anything that might return a “red” result.In post 4518, insomnia wrote:I’ll take that as an ascetic claim
Already voting that guy. And I think a Kodak Moment for whomever drew that out from Garmr might be okay, although it seems mean-spirited.In post 4523, Titus wrote:@Gamma, We're lynching ar98mubarik.
@chkflip, Closest is Kodak moment. Nomming to haze people is mean.
There’s a highlight reel?In post 4536, Elsa Jay wrote:Gamma you caught up? Ot have you atleast found the highlight feel?
Still wondering about the apposed ascetic thing.
This is my perspective. I think Nero just needs to let it go until like Day 5, barring the consensus agreeing to lynch Titus before that point.In post 4620, chkflip wrote:Nero, with all due respect, please stop.
You've said your piece. She said hers. Let people respond.
Please call SausausaurusRex Rex instead of Sauce, there’s another account out the called sauce and this confused meIn post 4656, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Town to scum
Chk, Nero, Hectic, bob, fonz, Alyssa, Pink Ball, gobble
A50, Amrun, egix, clidd, drixx, dave, insomnia
Null
RCEnigma, pk, nk15, Quantum
Sauce, AF, Titus
I completely forgot Rce was even in this game so he’s probably scum
Everyone else null
In post 4662, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Clidd has a bad habit of flaking out of scum games last time I meta’d him, and he’s still here
Egix I think he made a good post about nk15 ages ago and also because I liked his vote just now lol
Pretty solid indictment on clidd I would say.In post 4663, Nero Cain wrote:I just played with Clidd that replaced out as town. But here he's very active lurk and I'm not seeing any scumhunting. Not my biggest scumread but im not town reading him.
It is way too early for this imo.
Yes but both conclusions lead to a solid point of “clidd shouldn’t be this quiet”. Scum flake meta is pointed out, countered, and then the true grounds for suspicion is determined, the active lurking.In post 4702, Nero Cain wrote:you do realize that we are using different meta to come to different conclusions, right?In post 4701, Gamma Emerald wrote:Pretty solid indictment on clidd I would say.
2/3s of his ISO is naked votes.In post 4711, pisskop wrote:OH, also, Doodles hammered. I didnt think too highly of that, but he didnt know he did?
Thoughts on DrDoodles?
Isn’t that scummy? If not, then what are you trying to say?
How is Drixx “obvtown”?In post 4724, davesaz wrote:Titus and Drixx.In post 4723, Nero Cain wrote:no I don't. Stop being coy and answer the question.In post 4722, davesaz wrote:I think you know who I mean.
I meant to say “Is that”, dunno what happened. But I’m more concerned what point you’re trying to make.In post 4803, davesaz wrote:Do you want it to be scummy?
Are you an alt? Idc who but I’ve never played with you to my knowledge.In post 4757, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Welcome back GammaIn post 4699, Gamma Emerald wrote:Please call SausausaurusRex Rex instead of Sauce, there’s another account out the called sauce and this confused me
Can you describe what Rex said with more detail? As is I think his action was badly played out but not de facto scummy.In post 4769, bob3141 wrote:Yep rex then enquired about what role elsa had and why she was asking for protection.In post 4765, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:bob you're in Rex's hood right? can you corroborate what Elsa said about Rex's action last night?
He then responded that based on his result he didnt know of a role that would require protection and that he thought he was scum trying to live longer. Next sentance was saying that he was new.
Felt very much like digging.
He is new but his action is very odd. And he is off his town meta so far this game.
I agree with Nero that Drixx’s claim isn’t worth obvtown status, especially in multiball. As for his actions iirc he got into a fight with KM that wasn’t very good-looking, but I’m open to a fuller synopsis of Drixx’s play.In post 4809, davesaz wrote:When I read his posts, I think he's obviously coming from a town motivation.In post 4804, Gamma Emerald wrote:How is Drixx “obvtown”?In post 4724, davesaz wrote:Titus and Drixx.In post 4723, Nero Cain wrote:no I don't. Stop being coy and answer the question.In post 4722, davesaz wrote:I think you know who I mean.
Also see my recent response to Nero regarding how he played his role.
That was Smarty, not me.In post 4811, Titus wrote:Large Normal 223 | New Beginnings | GAME OVER
Recent scumgame.
Pedit:Gamma, I'll try to avoid it but I do need to be honest when such behavior triggers me.
Why the caveat?In post 4823, davesaz wrote:I'm absolutely fine with lynching an active lurker, if we all work together to lynch the same active lurker.
Fair but having competing wagons helps create associations.In post 4848, davesaz wrote:Don't want 10 wagons of 3 each. That's worse than useless.In post 4842, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why the caveat?In post 4823, davesaz wrote:I'm absolutely fine with lynching an active lurker, if we all work together to lynch the same active lurker.
What the actual fuck.In post 4890, QuantumQuasar wrote:Can Elsa like lynch both neighborhoods and call it a day, plus arsonist is in game, norwegianboy claimed vigi when he was a bus driver, Dolly was again linked to the deaths on night one and ultimate plank / he was probably sleeping in a supermarket during the quarantine so he got zapped by motion sensors, who can be trusted now because it's already day 3 and the minority will perpetuate chaos so everyone should stay calm and play their role, I know that I'm town and I can be trusted. So just lynch both neighborhoods with Elsa who asked to be protected to be the lone survivorIn post 3985, PenguinPower wrote:
When bus driver swaps with bus driver and gets role-blocked? Did anyone take action on NorwegianboyEE who was quite popular in his time
I kinda want to run this in the future with a “radioactive decay” spin on it. Was it a mountainous game?In post 4996, BBmolla wrote:I'll just leave my post from the mafia pt
Subject: Blue Mafia Hideout
BBmolla wrote:The only way I've seen a 50 player game effectively done is Myko's game
1) You get an amount of lynches equal to amount of players/10 per day, rounded down. I'll do the math for you. This means you have 5 lynches d1. From 19 players on, this becomes normal again.
2) Lynches go by majority as normal, but the maximum amount of players needed for a lynch is 10. So, the first day you need only 10 to lynch, from 19 players on this becomes normal as well.
3) You get an equal amount of weeks per day as the amount of lynches you got. So day 1, you get 5 weeks to make 5 lynches.
4) Within a day, lynches do not reset the votes on other wagons.
5) People offered to help with the votecounts as players. That would help a lot. If you would do this, please use the color blue
Even that one was a bit of a slog, but it felt like you could actually make a difference because wagons were maxed at 10.
