Mafia 90-Lolwat? Mafia, Game Over, Mafia Win

roflcopter · Post Post #9 (isolation #0) » Sun Jan 04, 2009 8:27 am

confirmation

roflcopter · Post Post #25 (isolation #1) » Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:56 pm

so who´s up for a good old fashioned mafiassk bandwagon?

vote: ssk

roflcopter · Post Post #27 (isolation #2) » Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:03 pm

but lurking takes such a long time, and i hate waiting

roflcopter · Post Post #54 (isolation #3) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:25 pm

why isn´t there a bandwagon on mafiassk yet

roflcopter · Post Post #60 (isolation #4) » Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:35 am

MafiaSSK wrote:
roflcopter wrote:why isn´t there a bandwagon on mafiassk yet
Because I'm putting in input this game.

actually all you´re doing is iioa and stifling activity

roflcopter · Post Post #62 (isolation #5) » Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:33 am

seriously though, more people should be voting ssk

roflcopter · Post Post #69 (isolation #6) » Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:44 am

crywolf20084 wrote:I tend to ignore most of what roflcop has to say because it always comes out scummy...

and yet, in our only game together, you were scum and i was town. hmm...

roflcopter · Post Post #73 (isolation #7) » Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:33 pm

i <3 alvinz

roflcopter · Post Post #91 (isolation #8) » Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:12 am

that quote wall thing. stop it.

fos: gnkoichi

roflcopter · Post Post #95 (isolation #9) » Wed Jan 14, 2009 4:32 am

GnKoichi wrote:Rofl, are you FoSing me for the quote wall? If so, why me and not the two people after me? If not, why FoS me without giving a reason?

not for the quote wall, that would be infantile. and i'd like to see if anyone else sees what i see before giving reasons.

roflcopter · Post Post #96 (isolation #10) » Wed Jan 14, 2009 4:39 am

crywolf, stop lurking

roflcopter · Post Post #111 (isolation #11) » Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:04 pm

GnKoichi wrote:Actually, Yosarian, it makes perfect sense. Scum will sometimes "misunderstand" something so that they can push a vote without a good reason. It's a safe lie, because when it's pointed out they can just say "that was just a misunderstanding" and remove their vote. That was my initial idea, Coug, that you couldn't possible have misunderstood that, so it had to be a lie. However, for now,
unvote
because of:

rofl wrote:not for the quote wall, that would be infantile. and i'd like to see if anyone else sees what i see before giving reasons.

vote: Rofl

It was odd enough for you to FoS me for no reason. It's just plain scummy for you to cop out on backing it up.

i loled

roflcopter · Post Post #118 (isolation #12) » Thu Jan 15, 2009 3:39 am

MafiaSSK wrote:
StrangerCoug wrote:
GnKoichi wrote:OH MY GOD! Coug, please read more carefully.
I'm trying. (In fact, I went back and made sure that I was already voting MafiaSSK before I did so.)
Yos2 was doing a paraphrasing of you not telling you what to do.

hey look more information instead of analysis. why aren't there more votes on this scum yet?

roflcopter · Post Post #120 (isolation #13) » Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:21 am

GnKoichi wrote:That conversation was tied to my analysis that Coug was faking misreads in order to cover his scumminess. Stop trying to stifle conversation, Rofl.

once again, i loled

roflcopter · Post Post #122 (isolation #14) » Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:28 am

what do you want me to say... no i'm not stifling conversation, i'm pointing out that ssk's posting is once again inane and not related to scumhunting, he's just posting bullshit to look active without actually participating

you should probably stop chainsaw defending ssk though its not gonna be good for you when that scum gets lynched

roflcopter · Post Post #127 (isolation #15) » Thu Jan 15, 2009 6:50 am

what part of information instead of analysis aren't you getting?

roflcopter · Post Post #131 (isolation #16) » Thu Jan 15, 2009 7:45 am

whoever this penguins of the serengeti is, she's onto something

roflcopter · Post Post #183 (isolation #17) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 4:16 pm

this game gets my full and undivided attention a la maÃ±ana

i agree that lurkerhunting is v scummy, especially with so much else going on in the game

roflcopter · Post Post #192 (isolation #18) » Sun Jan 18, 2009 3:15 am

despite nat's warning that there could be jesters in this game, i will not be playing as though there is one.

yos, we obviously disagree on a point of game theory. i think lurkerhunting is as good as lurking in plain sight, it allows one to remain active but take part in absolutely zero real scumhunting and interact negiligibly with anyone who will actually respond.

anyway,

unvote, vote: litral

and

fos: vino

for being his scumpartner

roflcopter · Post Post #196 (isolation #19) » Sun Jan 18, 2009 3:53 am

Yosarian2 wrote:
roflcopter wrote: yos, we obviously disagree on a point of game theory. i think lurkerhunting is as good as lurking in plain sight, it allows one to remain active but take part in absolutely zero real scumhunting and interact negiligibly with anyone who will actually respond.
Eh; lurkerhunting is a neccessary thing for the town to do, though. If the town lets lurkers get away with lurking, then the town usually loses in endgame to a lurkerscum. I can find about a hundred examples of that...

personally, i find the best response to straight up lurkers is a good old mod prod request. active lurkers are a different story, but that is not what litral was after.

roflcopter · Post Post #197 (isolation #20) » Sun Jan 18, 2009 3:53 am

Penguins of the Serengeti wrote:
roflcopter wrote:anyway,
unvote, vote: litral
and
fos: vino
for being his scumpartner
WOW great minds sure do think alike.

yes we do

roflcopter · Post Post #201 (isolation #21) » Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:09 am

*sits back to wait for a lynch*

while we're at it, can we discuss how obvtown penguins of the serengeti and yosarian2 are?

my personal opinion on both is "extremely obv town"

roflcopter · Post Post #203 (isolation #22) » Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:33 am

vino wrote:I'm also not liking #201.

well that was vague

roflcopter · Post Post #205 (isolation #23) » Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:48 am

vino wrote:Do I have to be specific?

yes, actually

roflcopter · Post Post #206 (isolation #24) » Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:51 am

again, where is crywolf? her lurking is extremely uncharacteristic. and she has said exactly zero in this game that has bene in any way helpful.

roflcopter · Post Post #209 (isolation #25) » Sun Jan 18, 2009 7:42 am

StrangerCoug wrote:The vote at #199 is the only thing keeping me from seeing a strong Litral/Vino connection, and I actually like the reasoning for the vote.

don't let the desperate late distancing fool you

roflcopter · Post Post #216 (isolation #26) » Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:05 am

and numberfourteen joins the ranks of the obviously town

roflcopter · Post Post #217 (isolation #27) » Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:11 am

oh hey lowell claimed mason. i believe him.

lowell, how large? and i'm guessing based on the wording of your post that your role pm does not gaurantee the alignment of your partners?

roflcopter · Post Post #221 (isolation #28) » Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:33 am

vino wrote:Reason I don't like 201 is the willingness to unilaterally pardon two other players so early in the game. Serengeti and Yosarian don't read as scum to me either, but I'm not going to write them off as town so soon

i thought it might be as much. scum really just can't stand when town recognize other town, it makes getting mislynches so much more of a problem later.

yep, stick a fork in this one, he's done

roflcopter · Post Post #232 (isolation #29) » Sun Jan 18, 2009 1:43 pm

gnkoichi wrote:If you're not scum, you're a distraction of the highest order, and the town will be better off without you either way.

this sentence is a

huge, glaring scumtell

roflcopter · Post Post #254 (isolation #30) » Mon Jan 19, 2009 5:57 am

and my town read on yosarian goes up in smoke

but lowell and penguins are both town, so thats good

roflcopter · Post Post #255 (isolation #31) » Mon Jan 19, 2009 6:02 am

willing to lynch: (litral, gnkoichi*, yosarian*)

*if a consensus on lynching this player is reached by penguins and lowell

roflcopter · Post Post #258 (isolation #32) » Mon Jan 19, 2009 6:31 am

Yosarian2 wrote:
roflcopter wrote:and my town read on yosarian goes up in smoke
Huh? So, you go from thinking I'm town to thinking I'm scum, because I'm really annoyed one of my mason partners outed me as a mason, in a situation where it's pretty obvious there was absolutly no good reason to do so?

actually, i think there was definitely a good reason for what penguins did, but what really killed my read was your ridiculous reaction post. lets break it down:

yos wrote:Jesus...why the hell would you out me like that? Or yourself?

this exasperation doesn't seem faked, but also isn't at all diagnostic of your alignment. yos-mason is very likely unhappy about being outed whether he is town or scum.

yos wrote:You were right, when you asked me earlier if I had "not read my PM carefully". When I saw the PM, I glanced at it, said..."wait...what the hell...I'm in another large game? I never signed up for that." Then I went back, looked at the queau, and said "Oh...I guess I did." And somehow I never actually read the whole role PM in the process, until you pointed it out to me.

ok, you haven't got much reason to lie about this either way, so i'll take it at face value

yos wrote:Not that my vote on Llowell put him in any actual risk, anyway. And, yeah, I do agree that it's likely there's a scum in our mason group.

here's the part where you very quickly start sounding like a hypocrite. you're all like "i didn't even know he was a mason buddy" but at the same time you're making shitty excuses for your vote ("doesn't put him in any actual risk") AND agreeing with the basic premise which was the reason for penguins to out you in the first place, namely that there's probably scum in your group, and using that to try and retroactively bolster a vote which you just admitted you placed without realizing lowell was even your mason buddy. ummm... what?

yos wrote:Still...ugh. Why the hell would you claim, AND claim your partner at the same time? It was bad enough, and anti-town enough, when Lowell claimed just on his own; you just compounded the error severely.

If you out any more members of the group, then mason buddy or not, I am going to vote for you and keep my vote on you until you are dead. You DO NOT GIVE AWAY ROLES ON DAY ONE FOR NO REASON!

and now the exasperation sounds forced, and is certainly way overboard. we got the idea that you're unhappy about this at the start of your post. and i really don't take you for the kind of emotional player who would even make the threat of keeping their vote on someone until they're dead based on something which makes you angry and is, in your opinion at least, anti-town at best, but certainly not certifiably scummy.

my opinion: yos is either scum mason or anti-town 3rd party mason, and he's very, very upset that his cushy position suddenly got shot to hell over what he percieves to have been poor play on the part of lowell and penguins.

so like i said, willing to lynch yosarian2

roflcopter · Post Post #284 (isolation #33) » Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:26 am

oh jesus

unvote, vote: vino

roflcopter · Post Post #293 (isolation #34) » Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:12 am

sorry yos forgot to respond to this because i was overwhelmed by the obvscummery of vino

Yosarian2 wrote:I didn't know he was a mason buddy. She didn't know that, though, so I don't blame her for that. I do blame her for outing me as a mason for no good reason, even though my vote didn't put Lowell at any risk at all.

you're just reiterating what i already mentioned was a shitty excuse here.

yos wrote:It's not "way overboard", and there is absolutly nothing "emotional" about my statement that if she outs any more mason partners that we will have to lynch her, and that I will vote for her until she is dead. At the point I made the post, my #1 priority was to stop her insanity before she outed the rest of the mason group for absolutly no bloody reason, and to make it absoltuly, 100% crystal clear that that will absoluty not be tolerated. I'm sorry if you think it was a little over the top, but I think it was necessary I made myself absolutly clear here before she did any more damage.

it is though, because its like you're trying to project enough anger through your post to vote penguins without having to worry about repercussions because "look how freaking anti town she was guys srsly!"

yos wrote:It's not like I can make her un-reveal what she already reveals, and I don't get how you think it makes me scummy that I don't want her to reveal the REST of our mason group.

And, considering that I threatened her, not to protect myself, but to protect the rest of my mason group from her insanity, this last comment of yours makes no sense at all:

my opinion: yos is either scum mason or anti-town 3rd party mason, and he's very, very upset that his cushy position suddenly got shot to hell over what he percieves to have been poor play on the part of lowell and penguins.
Especally since you just admitted that I would be very, very upset about her outing both herself and me as masons no matter what else was happening. There's clearly no pro-town reason for her to do so, and that makes me uncomfortable with how both she and Lowell apparently wanted to get themselves confirmed as masons early on day 1; that makes me wonder abuout both of them.

this part really slays me. you're appealing to emotion/the rest of your mason group to take your side against penguins because "seriously guys i'm just trying to protect you!" you seem to think its cut and dry that there could be no protown reason to out masons at this stage, but i disagree with you and agree with penguins, and she laid out in a pretty starkly mathematical manner how it was a good idea on her part.

roflcopter · Post Post #316 (isolation #35) » Mon Jan 19, 2009 1:50 pm

head honcho is town too. this game is too easy.

vino, penguins did not in any way suggest indiscriminately killing masons. if you read her omgmaths post, its basically "x% chance at random" is worse than "x% chance out of mason group minus penguins and lowell who are obvtown" and she went from there to the next logical leap, picking out who she thought was scummiest from her mason team and outing him so we could discuss the merits of lynching him.

i really can't wait to read the mason thread after this game btw its going to be hi-larious

roflcopter · Post Post #317 (isolation #36) » Mon Jan 19, 2009 1:53 pm

MafiaSSK wrote:Gah. Too much posting. Guarantee an actual good post tomorrow.

remember everybody, mafiassk is not allowed to lurk through this game

roflcopter · Post Post #331 (isolation #37) » Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:36 am

i'd rather lynch vino

roflcopter · Post Post #338 (isolation #38) » Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:23 am

good to see lowelltown being active

roflcopter · Post Post #341 (isolation #39) » Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:52 am

vino, the mason thing is not the only reason you're getting lynched

roflcopter · Post Post #346 (isolation #40) » Tue Jan 20, 2009 7:23 am

hmm

upon reconsideration, litral lynch and vino lynch are equally good in my mind

roflcopter · Post Post #353 (isolation #41) » Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:37 pm

more convinced than ever that yos is scum

roflcopter · Post Post #361 (isolation #42) » Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:54 pm

Yosarian2 wrote:
roflcopter wrote:more convinced than ever that yos is scum
Based on what? Especally considering how your entire attack on me was apparently based on you either completly not reading or totally misrepresenting everything I said, and then the way you completly ignored my response when I pointed that out, I'm not really that concerned with what you think right now.

thank you for letting me know how much i'm getting to you

carry on

roflcopter · Post Post #364 (isolation #43) » Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:39 pm

you seem unduly paranoid about the possibility of being lynched today, when a quick glance at the vote count makes that seem very unlikely

roflcopter · Post Post #366 (isolation #44) » Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:43 pm

you are 3rd party scum, aren't you

roflcopter · Post Post #374 (isolation #45) » Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:06 pm

strangercoug is scum everybody

roflcopter · Post Post #377 (isolation #46) » Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:25 pm

Yosarian2 wrote:Well, that was one of the reasons I didn't want you to out the masons; I thought I had already mentioned it. Yes, if there's a scum mason, then the mafia will find out (or may have already found out) who all of us are; but if there's a second scum group; like say a SK (and I have a hard time imagining Nat not putting a SK his game, based on my meta of him as a mafia player) then he wouldn't know who the masons were, until you told him, Penguins.

unless you're the sk

roflcopter · Post Post #379 (isolation #47) » Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:28 pm

that is the antithesis of everything i am as a person

but maybe i'll get around to it tomorrow

roflcopter · Post Post #382 (isolation #48) » Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:36 pm

so many people i want to lynch

roflcopter · Post Post #393 (isolation #49) » Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:18 am

guys penguins is town stop being stupid

roflcopter · Post Post #396 (isolation #50) » Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:50 am

yosarian is a very funny sk mason

roflcopter · Post Post #400 (isolation #51) » Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:39 am

Yosarian2 wrote:
roflcopter wrote:yosarian is a very funny sk mason
Let me know when you intend to stop screwing around and start playing mafia.

i'm not screwing around. my vote is where it needs to be, and i'm commenting on my other opinions as they form. in this case, your mad lib line actually made me laugh, so i said so.

roflcopter · Post Post #402 (isolation #52) » Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:12 pm

MafiaSSK wrote:Will keep reading. Too many pages popping up at once.

...not lurking, right?

roflcopter · Post Post #407 (isolation #53) » Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:41 pm

gnkoichi wrote:Town needs to work as a team.

gee, thats strange. where i come from, each individual member of the town doesn't know who is on his team, so he isn't working as a team, he's scumhunting as an individual. so stop trying to browbeat me away from going after your scumbuddies.

roflcopter · Post Post #411 (isolation #54) » Wed Jan 21, 2009 1:03 pm

StrangerCoug wrote:I'm seeing a very strong link between roflcopter and Penguins of the Serengeti, and they both need to get real or die. If we have a vig and one of those people get lynched, I want him or her to target the other.

megascumpost

roflcopter · Post Post #435 (isolation #55) » Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:24 pm

God I want to vote StrangerCoug right now. Who'd be willing to hit that wagon?

roflcopter · Post Post #439 (isolation #56) » Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:59 pm

StrangerCoug wrote:I find it interesting that roflcopter is unwilling to vote me seemingly because he knows he's got practically nothing to back it up with, yet he got MafiaSSK to do so. What is the case on me?

well thats a hell of a mischaracterization. i'm unwilling to vote you because my vote is doing a hell of a lot more good on a wagon than it would be alone on you.

roflcopter · Post Post #440 (isolation #57) » Wed Jan 21, 2009 6:01 pm

[quote="orangepenguin"Also, PoS, I made the same mistake for agreeing with everything rolf said in Fire and Ice mafia, and I only got burned. rolf was town, but he was still wrong on all his suspicions. [/quote]

jesus what an underhanded way to try and discredit anything i'm saying in this game

roflcopter · Post Post #451 (isolation #58) » Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:43 am

Penguins of the Serengeti wrote:
MafiaSSK wrote:Vino: I'm just getting scum vibes from SC.
According to some people in this game, you are displaying anti-town behavior with this post. They'll let it slide, though, because you don't make the scum as nervous as I do.

qft'd for great justice

roflcopter · Post Post #455 (isolation #59) » Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:18 am

num14 wrote:@everyone, is there a secret code of not voting for your mason buddies?

seems more like common sense than a secret code

roflcopter · Post Post #457 (isolation #60) » Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:22 am

koc, what have you actually done this game? the only thing i can see from reading your posts is an fos on gnkoichi which you never followed through on and your cocked up vote for me because i make you angry.

roflcopter · Post Post #460 (isolation #61) » Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:40 am

Knight of Cydonia wrote:^^^ That's what I've done.
And unlike you, I don't spew out the first half-formed, half-witted idea that pops into my head. Rest assured, I'm not done with Koichi yet. I just think there aare better lynches - and yours is one of them.

Let me put it this way people - if we get to the final day, with 2 confirmed townies, and 3 unconfirmed, including roflcopter - do you
really
want him pissing on this game and making it impossible to read?

appeal to emotion. you're not even arguing that i make a good lynch because you think i'm scum. you're trying to lynch me because you find me annoying, or maybe hard to read, i can't tell which. thats straight idiotic, and superscummy.

roflcopter · Post Post #513 (isolation #62) » Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:47 pm

ok sreiously, i'm really durnk and haven't read the recent posts but why is penguins getting voted when she's so obvious town? i don't understand this at all.

this is not a lynch that should be happening. for reals.

roflcopter · Post Post #516 (isolation #63) » Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:00 pm

Penguins of the Serengeti wrote:
roflcopter wrote:ok sreiously, i'm really durnk and haven't read the recent posts but why is penguins getting voted when she's so obvious town? i don't understand this at all.

this is not a lynch that should be happening. for reals.
Be a friend, hammer me.

nuh uh

roflcopter · Post Post #519 (isolation #64) » Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:02 pm

Penguins of the Serengeti wrote:
roflcopter wrote:
Penguins of the Serengeti wrote:
roflcopter wrote:ok sreiously, i'm really durnk and haven't read the recent posts but why is penguins getting voted when she's so obvious town? i don't understand this at all.

this is not a lynch that should be happening. for reals.
Be a friend, hammer me.
nuh uh
No really you'd be putting me out of my misery. A hammer of mercy.

i'd miss you too much

roflcopter · Post Post #521 (isolation #65) » Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:09 pm

said logic impaired players will try to make me seem scummy regardless of what i do in this situation, so if its just the same i'm not gonna hammer someone who is so obviously town.

roflcopter · Post Post #522 (isolation #66) » Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:10 pm

scum vino is all of the sudden stalling. i'm not surprised.

roflcopter · Post Post #523 (isolation #67) » Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:10 pm

why do scum always think it looks so pro town to say hey wait we've got x time before deadline we should use it!!!!

come on dudes we're lynching vino.

roflcopter · Post Post #578 (isolation #68) » Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:06 am

unvote, vote: knights of cydonia

now we've got one

roflcopter · Post Post #622 (isolation #69) » Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:29 am

penguins wrote:although I momentarily took leave of my senses yesterday until I baked my cheesecake

i love you

roflcopter · Post Post #624 (isolation #70) » Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:34 am

gonna go ahead and call it now. the scumteam is found within {strangercoug, knights of cydonia, litral, vino, gnkoichi}, possibly all five of them though that would be a big team, and the serial killer/other flavor of third party anti town role is {yosarian2}

the most incredibly obvious town are {penguins, lowell, head honcho, alvinz}

roflcopter · Post Post #666 (isolation #71) » Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:10 pm

yos: well i'm certainly not

roflcopter · Post Post #686 (isolation #72) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:04 am

penguins - i strongly agree

roflcopter · Post Post #689 (isolation #73) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:41 am

gnkoichi, if you read a game played by penguins or her army of alts where she is scum, you'll see the same meta i see. she's town this time. and i'd be very willing to call her on it if she wasn't.

roflcopter · Post Post #694 (isolation #74) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 5:00 am

if strangers meet
life begins-
not poor not rich
(only aware)
kind neither
nor cruel
(only complete)
i not not you
not possible;
only truthful
-truthfully,once
if strangers(who
deep our most are
selves)touch:
forever

(and so to dark)

roflcopter · Post Post #728 (isolation #75) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:21 am

Penguins of the Serengeti wrote:
BSG wrote:Rofl and PotS, any reasons why you started to post poems?
Contagion?

I very much doubt KoC is post-restricted.

i just like e e cummings

roflcopter · Post Post #731 (isolation #76) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:25 am

unvote, vote: litral

roflcopter · Post Post #740 (isolation #77) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:00 pm

jesus, gnkoichi, you are way too obviously scum

roflcopter · Post Post #743 (isolation #78) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:14 pm

i'm wondering who even read that passage from glork that bsg quoted

roflcopter · Post Post #757 (isolation #79) » Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:02 am

as brilliant as she is, penguins can make a mistake. letting you off the hook is one of those mistakes.

but the fact that num14 basically made himself obvtown makes litral even more obvious scum based on those interactions which brought him into the spotlight in the first place. he should be lynched today.

roflcopter · Post Post #780 (isolation #80) » Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:07 pm

Penguins of the Serengeti wrote:BSG is blindingly town. It's like staring at the sun.

ayup. qft.

dear vino, stop trying to undermine penguins' (or anybody else's) town reads, it makes it exceptionally obvious that you're worrying about how to arrange for future mislynches.

roflcopter · Post Post #790 (isolation #81) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 5:34 am

gnkoichi, stop trying to unclear lowell, its just not gonna work.

empking, stop defending vino, seriously

my lynch preference is litral. i'd switch to emp, gnkoichi or vino to prevent a no lynch.

roflcopter · Post Post #804 (isolation #82) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:15 am

not obvtown yos, just obv not on vino's scumteam, so its still a very large scum tell.

roflcopter · Post Post #838 (isolation #83) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:23 am

should we just go ahead and lynch gnkoichi today or what?

roflcopter · Post Post #843 (isolation #84) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:37 am

841 really felt like 'i did what you asked now you can't vote me nah nah nah'

roflcopter · Post Post #891 (isolation #85) » Tue Feb 03, 2009 7:54 am

litral lynch before deadline plox

roflcopter · Post Post #904 (isolation #86) » Tue Feb 03, 2009 8:07 pm

does this day really have to drag on for that much longer, or can we just lynch litral already?

roflcopter · Post Post #918 (isolation #87) » Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:57 am

koc, that smear attempt was failsauce. i thought the deadline was on top of us because people were saying so in thread.

roflcopter · Post Post #954 (isolation #88) » Sat Feb 07, 2009 8:40 am

yep, litral/admiral is scum, carry on

roflcopter · Post Post #962 (isolation #89) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:32 am

whats so decidedly pro-town about admiral calling me scum like in every other game we've ever been in together?

i haven't been scum in a game with thadmiral yet

roflcopter · Post Post #975 (isolation #90) » Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:16 pm

admiral, no i'm not a dgb alt, i can only strive to be half as awesome as a dgb alt

roflcopter · Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:27 am

i'll switch to empking at deadline if necessary

roflcopter · Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:44 am

Lowell wrote:
roflcopter wrote:i'll switch to empking at deadline if necessary
ditto this. although I'm not sure why it would be. What has ThAd done that's taken him off the chopping block?

i don't get it either

roflcopter · Post Post #1018 (isolation #93) » Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:22 pm

i commend you for actually reading all 40 pages of this carnival

roflcopter · Post Post #1022 (isolation #94) » Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:03 pm

admiral, could you link back to what it is you're talking about me not doing?

roflcopter · Post Post #1027 (isolation #95) » Fri Feb 13, 2009 7:31 am

oh please, you don't think its possible that just like you i forgot to go back to it because so much was going on?

and admiral, i asked for a link so i could go see it in situ, but i guess i'll just have to go back and trawl through the early game to see what the hell was going on

roflcopter · Post Post #1028 (isolation #96) » Fri Feb 13, 2009 7:36 am

it was for your shitty attack on strangercoug/defending ssk all in one. the latter doesn't mean what i thought it meant at the time as ssk is probably not scum at this point, but the strangercoug attack was still bullshit.

rooting around on the same page i noticed a really scummy "me too" vote from empking onto sc for your bad reasons, which makes the possible emp lynch today more delicious.

but you and admiral arbitrarily voting for me for not elaborating on a fucking fos i made 40 pages ago is really fucking stupid.

roflcopter · Post Post #1030 (isolation #97) » Fri Feb 13, 2009 7:43 am

i notice that your highly conditional vote (he didn't explain this specific bit way back when!) hasn't evaporated now that i have explained, nor have you said anything regarding what i actually had to say about your actions from way back. instead you just take up a metagripe with me and penguins.

roflcopter · Post Post #1032 (isolation #98) » Fri Feb 13, 2009 7:49 am

so, whats your reason for voting me now that there is an explanation for what had been unexplained?

roflcopter · Post Post #1034 (isolation #99) » Fri Feb 13, 2009 7:55 am

you're defeatist attitude towards an impending no lynch is hella scummy. if you really think we're in danger of no lynching at deadline your vote should be on one of the vote leaders to make it in any way possible to get a majority, not thrown away on someone who, lets face it, isn't getting lynched today no matter what you do.

and where exactly did i say the second point was

moot

? i said it didn't mean what i thought it meant at the time.

roflcopter · Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:01 pm

unvote, vote: gnkoichi

i think its worth trying to get enough votes. its not like the active people won't keep being active to switch back to admiral if necessary.

roflcopter · Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:27 am

ThAdmiral wrote:I don't know his alignment, I just wanted to make my stance on the issue clear.

There are plenty of other people I am willing to vote.

so vote one of them. if there's one thing that won't stop a no lynch any time this century, its not having your vote on anyone.

roflcopter · Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:36 am

well all right

unvote, vote: admiral

roflcopter · Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:42 pm

oh i think you can

there's something very important missing from that role pm

confirm vote: admiral

roflcopter · Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:14 am

i don't think it was a mod given fakeclaim. if it was, nat needs to do a better job writing scum fakeclaims so they don't look so fake.

roflcopter · Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:48 am

hider could be a mafia role. its not safe to just assume there will be a vig. you still being alive in the morning would prove nothing, and if that really is your role but you're mafia then you are just trying to get a hypothetical vig to waste their shot.

roflcopter · Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:09 pm

i prefer lynching the not hider

roflcopter · Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:45 pm

dudes better lay down those votes before then, y'hear?

roflcopter · Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:02 am

i believe it is

roflcopter · Thu Mar 05, 2009 3:58 am

vote: yosarian2

lynch the mason cult recruiter / maybe sk

roflcopter · Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:50 pm

i'd like to lynch the cult recruiter today, but since nobody else seems willing to go after yosarian with me i'll lynch the obv scumpartner of deadscum instead

vote: gnkoichi

roflcopter · Fri Mar 06, 2009 6:41 pm

erk. yosarian2=3rdparty feelings coming back strong.

roflcopter · Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:48 am

agreed that koc probably got recruited and died all at once last night. there was no night zero, so unless there's a dayrecruiter, which seems even less normal than just a cult recruiter, he had to have been recruited last night.

roflcopter · Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:30 pm

so, lowell, if deadline were imminent, the only two conceivably reachable deadline lynches were yos2 and gnkoichi, and you were the only person capable of moving your vote to one of these two people, which of them would you lynch?

once you've answered that, be a doll and vote for that person

roflcopter · Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:32 pm

on an unrelated note, if mafiassk doesn't post in say, the next 24 hours, i advocate an all out balls to the wall lurker lynch

roflcopter · Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:50 am

@vino: do you think litral/admiral + gnkoichi is a plausible scumpair? if no, why not?

roflcopter · Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:17 am

vino, i'm just going by memory because if half the players in this game can't be assed to play then i can be assed to reread 50 pages of stupidity, but from what i recall when the suspecting of litral first began way back when, gnkoichi was one of the first people i suspected of being his possible scumpartner. interestingly, i'm pretty sure you were the other.

there is way too much talking about what is or is not a good move for the cult recruiter to make and not nearly enough scum hunting going on in this game.

roflcopter · Thu Mar 12, 2009 11:48 am

unless its a scum team of only three people i was obviously wrong about the whole team being within those five, but i still think its a pretty good possibility you and koichi are scum together, and on litral's team. your out and out defence of koichi is further hardening my resolve.

roflcopter · Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:55 am

Vino wrote:Real men don't pull out.

LOL

roflcopter · Sat Mar 14, 2009 5:22 am

um... wow. nice work alvinz.

unvote, vote: numberfourteen

roflcopter · Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:15 am

this game very badly wants more attentive modding

roflcopter · Sun Mar 15, 2009 1:47 pm

unvote, vote: yosarian2

roflcopter · Sun Mar 15, 2009 3:17 pm

a town mason has no way of knowing beyond absolutely wild and baseless conjecture whether or not it is possible for one of the masons to be the cult recruiter

therefore, for a town mason to hypothesize in thread that this is not possible (and on top of that, then admit that trying to outguess the mod is a BAD FUCKING IDEA), would be beyond stupidity. if a town mason said this and was wrong, they would just be giving the cult recruiter mason a free ride for the rest of the game.

i very much doubt that anyone in this game is stupid enough to do so, i am absolutely certain that yosarian2 is not stupid enough to do so

the only person who benefits from the town believing that the cult recruiter could not possibly be a mason is a CULT RECRUITER WHO IS A MASON.

now, please, for the love of god, start voting for yosarian2

roflcopter · Sun Mar 15, 2009 3:28 pm

here you go guys, silver platter

teh scumzorz: vino, gnkoichi

teh recruiter: yosarian2

this post brought to you by the town's obvious lack of trying, so that on future days when i'm dead you can look back and be reminded that vino and gnkoichi need to get lynched

yosarian is getting lynched today

lowell and penguins, you're both obvtown and have been since forever, please get off the empking wagon and join me in lynching yosarian2 for great justice. voting along with scumvino is just making you look silly.

roflcopter · Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:58 pm

16 players to start means the scumgroup was probably 4 players. i'm gonna venture a guess and say the 4th is ssk. vino and gnk are locks though.

roflcopter · Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:52 am

Yosarian2 wrote:
roflcopter wrote:a town mason has no way of knowing beyond absolutely wild and baseless conjecture whether or not it is possible for one of the masons to be the cult recruiter
I've explained like 3 times why I think that, for setup reasons, it's unlikely for a mason to be a cult recruiter. If you disagree with my logic, then explain why. I'm not going to go along with some stupid mason lynch that I think is a bad idea just because you get all freaking paranoid every time I say what I think.

Call me "stupid" all you want, rofl, it dosn't prove your damn point.

Also, dosn't this whole paranoid "Oh, he's just trying to make us think a cult recruiter mason is unlikely thing to protect himself" theory of yours totally conflict with how I was trying to lynch a mason yesterday because I thought he was a scum mason?

i didn't call you stupid yos, i called you scum

roflcopter · Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:18 pm

mod, please do a round of prods/replacements

Mass Prod Done
-armlx

roflcopter · Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:47 am

GnKoichi wrote:PotS is now trying to stay under the radar, since I caught her being tricky. One post with nothing of value in it.

There is way too much talk about the set-up and too little about the players. Rofl seems like the biggest pusher of that, which could be a power role trying to act like a thoughtful vanilla. Let's move past this. The set-up is strange, whatever it is, and speculation is useless. Get back to people or be scum from here on in.

lol speculating that i'm a power role in thread huh? you could not be more obvious scum.

roflcopter · Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:14 pm

no alvinz its very simple, scum mason is gnkoichi and cult recruiter mason is yosarian

roflcopter · Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:54 am

or maybe the cult recruiter just believed koc's claim and therefore was sure he'd be recruitable.

also, head honcho is obvtown, stop trying to railroad him

more yos votes are necessary people

roflcopter · Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:53 am

roflcopter · Sun Mar 22, 2009 2:26 pm

alvinz, just vote for yos

roflcopter · Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:15 pm

fantastic

roflcopter · Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:45 pm

yos wrote:even though your entire argument was proven to be complete crap logic.

thats your opinion

roflcopter · Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:45 am

mod,

no deadline before replacements are taken care of plox

roflcopter · Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:09 am

yos wrote:I don't get how you're now pretending that me getting frustrated over the scum-tactic of "repeat yourself over and over again with no logic" somehow reflects badly on my alignment.

you know, i could have sworn i once read a comment you made in md about how "pounding the table" could be a good pro-town tactic. maybe i'll go try to find that.

roflcopter · Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:18 am

this post and this post too, both from day one, are when i nailed him as third party scum

and this one was the beginning of the tradition yos carries on today of trying to brush me off with exasperation

lets not forget this gem either, or this

other than that you can just read what i already wrote about him today

roflcopter · Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:05 pm

what did you guys talk about in masonland last night?

roflcopter · Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:15 am

well i'm not at all surprised koichi scum tried to call my question about mason chat underhanded

roflcopter · Sun Mar 29, 2009 1:56 pm

is this fucking game over yet?

roflcopter · Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:02 am

good stuff

roflcopter · Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:41 am

there is no good reason to eliminate masons as cult suspects whatsoever

roflcopter · Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:07 pm

dgb wrote:It does look like your current strategy is to attack absolutely everybody.

is that what it looks like to you? because i'm pretty sure i'm just attacking a specific group of people that happens to include you, and i've been going out of my way to shut down attacks on people i don't think are scum. viqles for example, before his untimely demise.

Seraphim wrote:Rofl: You continue to say you will kill me. You've been saying it all game. Now that there's support on it, why aren't you killing me despite the fact that I've been "obvscum" all game? Why are you going after Nuwen despite the fact that he's been obv town for most of the game until he hammered Walt?

rofl, your actions are inconsistent with your words. Answer my questions.

as i've been saying for a long time now, i'm going to finish what i started with xyl, then i will finish you. i'm not even sure what you're talking about re: nuwen there. you're flailing.

roflcopter · Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:13 pm

oh shit. well thats the first time i've made that mistake.

roflcopter · Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:59 am

k. lynch yosarian. deadline shmeadline. that is all.

roflcopter · Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:50 am

guys i already broke this game open.

just remember when i'm dead tomorrow that gnkoichi and vino are both mafia.

roflcopter · Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:11 am

listen, yos. i don't blame you for trying so hard not to get lynched. but you're not going to convince me to move my vote. you are today's lynch.

roflcopter · Thu Apr 09, 2009 8:12 am

seriously, is this game over yet?

roflcopter · Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:34 pm

no, dammit, lynch yosarian

roflcopter · Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:40 pm

Penguins of the Serengeti wrote:
DrippingGoofball wrote:Yosarian can wait.
qft

he can't wait he's the damn cult recruiter

roflcopter · Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:37 am

fine.

unvote, vote: empking

don't blame me if yos recruits me tonight and we go on to win in spectacular fashion.

roflcopter · Sat Apr 11, 2009 3:52 pm

because gnkoichi is a part of the mafia. we had almost certainly already established that he and vino are both scumbags.

roflcopter · Sun Apr 19, 2009 5:40 pm

trying to find the cult recruiter is infuriating when there are two blatant scum sitting right in front of us. i want to lynch them, but that only lets the cult get further ahead.

fos: koichi, vino

god damnit

vote: alvinz

for best chance of hitting cult recruiter. would also be willing to throw in on a head honcho lynch. i'd give them a 50/50 split on which is the recruiter.

note that if we miss the cultist today we probably just fucking lose, because cults are stupid and this game was not big enough / had too many kills to balance a cult.

also, if we miss the cult today then tomorrow just becomes a decision between letting the cult win and letting the mafia win.

roflcopter · Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:39 pm

unvote, vote: head_honcho

roflcopter · Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:36 am

lowell is still obvtown. so its penguins.

roflcopter · Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:49 am

Head_Honcho wrote:It's looking very likely that at least one of the remaining scum/CR is a mason.

well gnkoichi is certainly a scum mason, so there you go

roflcopter · Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:52 am

roflcopter wrote:lowell is still obvtown. so its penguins.

this should say "so

is

penguins," not its. penguins is town.

roflcopter · Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:33 am

Lowell wrote:@rofl- wasn't yos obvscum?

yos was obv cult recruiter. i was wrong, clearly.

roflcopter · Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:02 am

i'm not really concerned at this point with how you feel about decrees. i know you are town, but its not going to help much because i'm pretty sure if we don't lynch the cult recruiter today, we either lose immediately to the cult or the town has to choose which anti town faction to award victory to tomorrow.

roflcopter · Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:40 am

i wouldn't know if she was recruited. i will just blindly hope it didn't happen.

roflcopter · Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:49 pm

GnKoichi wrote:I'm here. Like I said, no matter what I do at this point, You, Rofl, and PotS are going to call me scum because of it. I'm going to observe, and move my vote if I find a better target. Until then, PotS is the best vote in my opinion.

who do you think is the cult recruiter

roflcopter · Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:55 am

i'm not sure i'm actually recruitable. or at least i'm very hopeful that i'm not recruitable.

roflcopter · Wed Apr 22, 2009 10:14 am

head honcho and alvinz should both claim right now

roflcopter · Wed Apr 22, 2009 2:18 pm

Vino wrote:Let's not be so hasty. We need a general consensus that a massclaim is good, and then we need everybody to claim or nobody at all.

wrong. we do not need a massclaim. we need those two players to claim because they are the ones who are almost at lynch minus one. they are the consensus suspects for cult recruiter. if either of them has a confirmable claim, now is the time to claim so we can lynch the other one.

roflcopter · Wed Apr 22, 2009 2:35 pm

unvote, vote: alvinz

lets hear a claim alvinz

roflcopter · Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:38 am

unvote, vote: vino

obvious recruiter-not-voting-for-his-recruit is obvious

pro town killing role has his/her target for tonight (alvinz)

roflcopter · Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:52 am

lol owned

roflcopter · Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:53 am

we have our recruiter gentlemen. lock all weapons on vino.

roflcopter · Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:00 am

alvinz95 wrote:I can see a Mason Cult Recruiter possibility now with a SK mason.

says the cult recruit, so we know the recruiter is not a mason

vino votes head honcho for recruiter out of the gate today. ignores alvinz completely.

when he points out (incorrectly it turns out) that both honcho and alvinz are at minus two, i call for both of them to claim, and he says this:

Vino wrote:Let's not be so hasty. We need a general consensus that a massclaim is good, and then we need everybody to claim or nobody at all.

i posit that he is worried about alvinz making a bad claim. cult recruiter vino very badly needs alvinz to live through today to make endgaming tomorrow possible with a successful recruit.

and then there's this post, which is just hilarious:

alvinz95 wrote:wtf, vino? I thought everyone thought that he was scum?

Lowell stop following rofl, and rofl is really confusing me by now.

its vino

roflcopter · Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:01 am

and on the bright side, if vino isn't the cr, he's mafia with gnkoichi

roflcopter · Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:02 am

and somebody (mafia/vigilante) will be shooting alvinz tonight, thats for damn sure. mafia and town alike need to delay a cult win.

roflcopter · Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:09 am

because head honcho was not at lynch minus one

now shush, you're a claimed cult recruit, we can't take anything you say at face value anymore

roflcopter · Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:49 pm

vino is at l-1 as far as i can tell

roflcopter · Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:56 pm

you're already voting vino, so you can't hammer

the h_h wagon dissolved after alvinz claimed cult recruit and it became very, very obvious that either he's a) telling the truth, and therefore vino is recruiter based on the post i made outlining the reasons or b) lying, and therefore actually the recruiter, in which case he'll get nked tonight, because both town and mafia have a very good reason to want to take out the cult.

roflcopter · Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:57 pm

hey, alvinz, hammer vino! it'll be great!

roflcopter · Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:58 pm

(note that with vino at minus one, if he were anything but the cult recruiter then alvinz-cult-recruit would almost certainly be hammering right now)

roflcopter · Thu Apr 23, 2009 1:20 pm

alvinz may have claimed cult recruit, but he certainly hasn't bailed on the cult. if you were not the recruiter, alvinz could hammer you, leaving the cult recruiter alive another night to get another recruit, therefore maintaining the possibility for the cult to win. if you are the cult recruiter, alvinz hammering you would literally be hitting an i lose button.

roflcopter · Thu Apr 23, 2009 1:48 pm

i think i smell the "you suck at mafia so you can't possible be right about me" defense. thats a powerful, powerful defense. [/sarcasm]

roflcopter · Fri Apr 24, 2009 4:07 am

did anybody read that post made by alvinz at the start of the day? the recruiter is officially not a mason.

roflcopter · Fri Apr 24, 2009 4:34 am

or its the old "this is effectively lylo for the cult and that was before alvinz was outed as recruit so he's trying to keep the lynch away from his non mason recruiter"

roflcopter · Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:07 pm

no guys it vino reread the day for yourself its incredibly obvious

roflcopter · Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:45 am

so, someone remember to shoot alvinz

roflcopter · Fri May 01, 2009 9:51 am

seriously? god i fucking hate cults so much.

roflcopter · Mon May 11, 2009 5:49 am

lowell, i protected you every night

you were the most obvtown

good job mafia

fuck this game

roflcopter · Mon May 11, 2009 9:38 am

Vino wrote:Wait a minute. There's still one unaccounted for night kill in N1. There were three kills that night but we only have one mafia group and an SK, what gives?

huh. thats interesting. more proof that natirasha is the greatest failure ever to grace this website? perhaps.

forgot to say that i really do have a lot of respect for the gambit alvinz ran, claiming recruit as recruiter. totally awesome.

i was going to be really pissed if the town managed to pull out a win and i lost by getting recruited the same night i died.

roflcopter · Mon May 11, 2009 7:12 pm

as far as i know thats not even what an alarmist is supposed to be. an alarmist is supposed to just be an unrecruitable townie.