Mafia 37: Werewolves - Game over!

mikehart · Post Post #357 (isolation #0) » Thu Jun 09, 2005 7:35 am

Dranko is seeming very suspiscoius at the moment. Esme makes a very good point. Id like to hear something from Dranko before i vote though.

mikehart · Post Post #377 (isolation #1) » Fri Jun 10, 2005 6:07 pm

rolandofthewhite wrote:Eh... PB's getting too riled up about this. If he were Mafia he'd shut his yap and be a bit calmer.

very much agreed. no reason to trip out about this. i cant personally comment because i have yet to play with coron or PB. but man seriously chill.

mikehart · Post Post #403 (isolation #2) » Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:23 am

i believe i see esme's reasoning. 3 posts.

however esme should have said

why

she voted. its not our job to look up information you should have quoted to begin with and thence explain your vote.

for that reason,

vote: esme

[/quote]

mikehart · Post Post #439 (isolation #3) » Sun Jun 19, 2005 2:00 pm

agreed. that was rather stupid Dranko. never reveal an innocent unless that player is in danger of being lynched.

GOD!!!! my too big games have dumb ass claimed cops

mikehart · Post Post #442 (isolation #4) » Sun Jun 19, 2005 6:17 pm

because it gives you a rather large bullseye on your back. as you should know coolbot, scum loves to kill confirmed townies. its better to kill a confirmed townie than an unconfirmed anything and their target turn out to be evil.

mikehart · Post Post #446 (isolation #5) » Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:57 am

ummmm, maybe because scum wants to keep evil alive to help them kill off the townspeople?

mikehart · Post Post #455 (isolation #6) » Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:39 pm

i appologize Dranko. i considered it a boneheaded move and i spoke my mind about it. it wont happen again

mikehart · Post Post #457 (isolation #7) » Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:06 pm

i can understand better. and i am sorry bout it. my job was having me pissed off and i took it out on you.

mikehart · Post Post #473 (isolation #8) » Sat Jun 25, 2005 9:18 pm

You know, i just noticed something on the first page. IS was a doctor with wolfsbane. Which means werewolves can't kill him if i understand the roles correctly. Is it possible we have two killing groups on alternating nights?

mikehart · Post Post #480 (isolation #9) » Sun Jun 26, 2005 5:49 pm

Phoebus - I'm not really sure, in the PDF Mr. Flay gave us it was mafia and werewolves. granted that would be a much bigger game but im just speculating.

milkman - wolfsbane is the ability to not die by werewolves.

mikehart · Post Post #483 (isolation #10) » Mon Jun 27, 2005 1:52 am

Ok. After re-reading Mr.Flay's posts, I don't think there is enough evidence to point to a second mafia. I believe the Wolfsbane note was meant to mean he used wolfsbane on other people. What confused me is that wolfsbane isnt a herb if i remember correctly. Its a certain inate ability some people have. I'm thinking i was mistaken. I apoligize to the town for the wild goose chase.

mikehart · Post Post #499 (isolation #11) » Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:42 pm

Nonchalance wrote:and why is that? I've read her posts a couple of times now and I don't see anything especially scummy about them. What exactly are you basing your suspicions on, milkman?

i was rather suspiscious of esme as well and i just think the way she wasnt truly explaining her votes and accusations had me suspiscious of her.

mikehart · Post Post #571 (isolation #12) » Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:01 pm

so, does anyone wanna claim the magistrate? it seems thats what happened.

rather scarce on info. will reread tomorrow

mikehart · Post Post #585 (isolation #13) » Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:04 pm

Well, it has to be a magistrate role Nanook thats the only thing that makes sense.

mikehart · Post Post #609 (isolation #14) » Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:58 pm

hmmmmm i tend to believe pooky atm. it seems plausible kinda. as for milkman i dont know. im not catching really scummy vibes off of him. ill hold my vote for now.

@nanook: yes the magistrate can stop a lynch and then observe the person he saved that night for werewolfness

mikehart · Post Post #644 (isolation #15) » Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:01 am

yes, WIFOM means Wine In Front Of Me. given dragyn mages post im inclined to believe the pair. even if it is a gambit its a hell of one. besides given pokky's assurance they will both be dead tomorrow if they aren't we could always lynch them. could someone please explain the cases against milkman or roland. im too lazy to go back and look. plus my fiance is here so im getting off the comp.

mikehart · Post Post #685 (isolation #16) » Wed Jul 27, 2005 7:10 am

VOTE: Roland

for reasons stated by others.

mikehart · Post Post #695 (isolation #17) » Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:48 pm

well to be honest i believe him and i hope the magistrate is willing to save him like he did the last lynch. but i hate slow games almost as much as lynching vanilla townies so i chose the lesser of two evils.

mikehart · Post Post #698 (isolation #18) » Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:13 am

why nanook? you yourself said his claim does not make you want to stop this lynch. I said essentially the same thing as you did. I was trying to be honest with the town by saying I'd rather lynch a claimed vanilla townie whom i think the magistrate will save from lynch than to let this game to stagnate.

mikehart · Post Post #701 (isolation #19) » Sat Jul 30, 2005 5:29 pm

ah. i don't believe you said you didn't believe him but i could be wrong. and yes i am supporting this lynch purely to move the game on. i believe the magistrate will save roland.

mikehart · Post Post #705 (isolation #20) » Sun Jul 31, 2005 6:02 pm

rolandofthewhite wrote:Magistrate, save me from these lynch-happy dorks?

if he doesn't hes an idiot

mikehart · Post Post #710 (isolation #21) » Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:49 pm

stupid stupid werewolves!!!!!! well thems the breaks... *digs grave* *jumps in* catch y'all on the flipside *covers self with dirt*