and yet your vote remains on Tierce.
VOTE: umoms
In post 107, AGar wrote:Seriously, anyone who had reasons for thinking umoms was scummy... for fucks sake, die already.
In post 58, nhammen wrote:Do you realize that this appears very much like trying to stifle discussion, right? This is very odd, especially after your comment that the game has a slow start.
In post 131, Flameaxe wrote:Unvote, Vote redFF. Found somewhere better for my vote. I don't like the general brushing aside of the wagon just because it was quick. Justifying the fact that he and everyone else was only in it for the lol quicklynch, and there was generally nothing behind it. Giving people shit for prying into the votes on a bandwagon (spoiler alert: kind of the result of early bandwagoning, brah).
Quilford wrote:You seem to be beingreallyconservative and cautious with your language.
In post 176, redFF wrote:In post 174, iamausername wrote:that is absolutely beside the point.
you didn't have a problem with Rhinox until other people did.
I can't be suspicious of someone if someone else is suspicious of him?
In post 178, redFF wrote:I don't see where I said I had no suspicion of Rhinox?
Quilford wrote:
iunno either, I was just reading through your posts and I noticed you called nhammen out for really contrived language -- which is a super legit point -- and then I realised you'd been posting more conservatively and cautiously too, but more subtly to the point where it could be subconscious, even? nhammen smacks of someone using contrived language because he's not comfortable with this playerlist, whereas you smack of someone using contrived language because you don't want to draw attention to yourself.
In post 183, redFF wrote:@iaun
I don't really remember how I felt towards Rhinox when I made post 99, though it was definitely his posting on the next page that made me think more about him, so no I wouldn't say I was suspicious of him around post 99.
redFF wrote:You're putting words in my mouse and trying to get an wagon going on "easy pray" now that people are calling you out for lurking.
In post 227, nhammen wrote:I claim VT.
In post 425, Simenon wrote:Iam's post on nhammen is potentially great. How big is this sample size?
singersigner wrote:then you came back and claimed when it was pretty much agreed that the MC was dead at that point.