NY 167: COMPLETELY NORMAL Mafia (GAME OVER)


User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Wed Oct 30, 2013 3:26 am

Post by Toomai »

Vote: Wake88
for being the only player with a number in their name.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #23 (isolation #1) » Wed Oct 30, 2013 6:00 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 17, RadiantCowbells wrote:[quotestack]

VOTE: Cabd / MC Makara
Um so you get on a policy lynch and then make a random vote?
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #61 (isolation #2) » Wed Oct 30, 2013 7:43 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 43, MC Maraca wrote:Actually, good question for everyone. SK is found day one. Lynch or leash? Give reasoning, there will be a grading rubric.
I don't see the point in trying to control a third party who has essentially already lost all hope of winning. There's no reason for them to follow along.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #93 (isolation #3) » Wed Oct 30, 2013 10:19 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 84, Sakura Hana wrote:Well that's better...

And that post doesnt seem faked anyway, now I'd rather lynch this guy

Unvote
Vote: Wake
In post 90, yessiree wrote:VOTE: Wake88
Any particular reason why?
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #96 (isolation #4) » Wed Oct 30, 2013 10:23 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 94, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 93, Toomai wrote:Any particular reason why?
Reactions.

Why do you care?
Because I see votes without reasons, and I like people to have reasons so I can better follow what they're thinking.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #148 (isolation #5) » Wed Oct 30, 2013 4:55 pm

Post by Toomai »

In post 97, TheIrishPope wrote:Ah, the goody two shoes player. This is confirmed Town.
No it ain't.

Vote: TheIrishPope
for that needless buddying.
In post 117, PeregrineV wrote:He can be confirmed town when he makes his avatar spin.
I'll figure out transparent .gifs with the GIMP and get back to you.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #172 (isolation #6) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 9:40 am

Post by Toomai »

I am having a very hard time separating serious posts from joke posts right now, and this is my first Large game, so I have to ask: Are third-parties common enough in Large games that discussing them Day 1 without much justification is helpful?
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #195 (isolation #7) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 12:06 pm

Post by Toomai »

In post 188, MVP wrote:
In post 23, Toomai wrote:
In post 17, RadiantCowbells wrote:[quotestack]

VOTE: Cabd / MC Makara
Um so you get on a policy lynch and then make a random vote?
Why don't you pursue this more? You placean accusation without pursuing it further, why?
Well to be honest I often forget what I was last doing when I previously posted, if no one responds to it. Since you reminded me I'll-
In post 186, RadiantCowbells wrote:Please don't lynch me.

I'm town.
In post 194, RadiantCowbells wrote:I'm town guys.

Don't lynch me please.
...
Vote: RadiantCowbells
until he gives a decent answer as to why those posts were necessary, in addition to answering the quoted question.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #247 (isolation #8) » Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:47 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 199, RadiantCowbells wrote:Seriously though I'm town.

Lynch someone else !
A real town player would have a definite lynch target, not just say "someone else".
In post 216, RadiantCowbells wrote:No but seriiiiiiiiiiiously I'm a town sided player >:(
How about you be town rather than claim town. I see no reason this kind of behaviour helps either alignment at all.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #252 (isolation #9) » Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:41 am

Post by Toomai »

Mod: I voted in , I think you missed it.


Fixed.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #267 (isolation #10) » Fri Nov 01, 2013 5:39 pm

Post by Toomai »

In post 255, RadiantCowbells wrote:How sure are you that I'm not an octuplevoter who just selflynched?
100% sure, because neither you nor the mod and reviewers are blithering idiots.

You sure are blithering though. How about you comment on other players instead of parading yourself around.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #354 (isolation #11) » Sun Nov 03, 2013 5:24 pm

Post by Toomai »

In post 350, RadiantCowbells wrote:Because I am group scum and know for a fact that he isnt one of us, and something in the way our scumteam is set up suggests that there are no other full scumteams, but we have reason to believe that there is a SK because one of us has bulletproof.

Duh.
You're just being obtuse at this point. I'm going to attempt to ignore you until you start being useful.

I'm not quite getting where the Sakura Hana votes are coming from.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #411 (isolation #12) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:55 pm

Post by Toomai »

I like AFB's overall presence so far.

caledfwitch needs to do something.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #496 (isolation #13) » Tue Nov 05, 2013 12:15 pm

Post by Toomai »

Can we continue to skewer RadiantCowbells to play properly instead of musing about previous games?
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #536 (isolation #14) » Tue Nov 05, 2013 6:29 pm

Post by Toomai »

In post 512, yessiree wrote:TIP still not having the most postcount

VOTE: TIP
The heck is this, there's 7 players below him in postcount, some of which have pretty much zero content.

Vote: yessiree

In post 523, likeabauss wrote:Here's what I hate about this game so far... There's about a half dozen players doing this meta/history/relivingtheglorydaysofanotherepicgame/casual but deliberate buddying/bs. It's obfuscating real conversation and sorting. I get it, we're all friends here. And I understand we all have our own methods of scumhunting... But this has gotten far away from productive in my opinion. Sure, there's a number of players barely posting, but this non-productive banter is enabling that behavior. It's easy to hide or lurk when the cool kids club is attracting all the attention. So, fellow cool kids, let's focus the conversation a bit better.
Quoted for truth.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #635 (isolation #15) » Wed Nov 06, 2013 9:50 am

Post by Toomai »

I don't like the tone of that defeatism.

Vote: Guyett
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #798 (isolation #16) » Wed Nov 06, 2013 5:03 pm

Post by Toomai »

In post 785, MVP wrote:The preachy ex-Bronco who now plays for Canada (eh)
Sorry but you have to know how to pass to play in the league up here.

Guyett does seem too easy a lynch right now.

Unvote


Leaning towards voting JacobSavage, just to make him do something.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #890 (isolation #17) » Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:07 pm

Post by Toomai »

Not sure what to make of this "likeabauss vs. Rank-slot" thing.

I guess I can ask: likeabauss, are you so sure on your meta-replace-read that you would be willing to go 1-for-1? I'm not saying it's a good idea or anything, I'm asking if you're that confident.

I will be V/LA the majority of Friday and Saturday.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #1101 (isolation #18) » Fri Nov 08, 2013 5:12 pm

Post by Toomai »

I've decided I'm currently in favour of the likeabauss case. I just feel like he's making more sense right now.

Vote: Angry Fat BROs


Still V/LA.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #1193 (isolation #19) » Sat Nov 09, 2013 12:40 pm

Post by Toomai »

V/LA done.

I'll vote for whichever of o_to or AFB is necessary to lynch, since I believe fairly solidy at this point that likeabauss is town. If either target happens to be town we can just lynch him Day 2 since I see no way there's a bus here.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #1233 (isolation #20) » Sun Nov 10, 2013 6:24 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 1232, RadiantCowbells wrote:Scum don't want to upset people who they know are town [...]
This line of thinking assumes that Guyett is scum and AFB is town, yet by your vote you think it's more likely the other way around.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #1308 (isolation #21) » Sun Nov 10, 2013 6:16 pm

Post by Toomai »

In post 1251, MC Maraca wrote:
In post 1193, Toomai wrote:V/LA done.

I'll vote for whichever of o_to or AFB is necessary to lynch, since I believe fairly solidy at this point that likeabauss is town. If either target happens to be town we can just lynch him Day 2 since I see no way there's a bus here.
...Lol. You lining up lynches?
If nothing happens to change my current opinion, then yeah I guess you could say that.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #1312 (isolation #22) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 4:11 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 1309, Cephrir wrote:So, therefore, you expect the target in question to be town...?
I do not. I'm just stating my opinion of what I would do should it occur.

To put it another way - I currently believe that likeabauss is town. I'm currently convinced that [likeabauss, AFB] and [likeabauss, orcinus] are pairs of differing factions (whether I'm right about which one is town or not), and by extension that there is 1 scum in each pair.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #1392 (isolation #23) » Tue Nov 12, 2013 6:42 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 1358, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:15. Toomai:lurking shitsack
Is a consistent ~1.0 posts per day not good enough for you? As of this post I have 1,291 things that need doing on my primary website, some of which no one else in the world is capable of doing, and I had a graduation in the past week. Shut up.
In post 1374, RadiantCowbells wrote:I, like my avatar, suck early and scale well into late game.
That doesn't mean you can phone it in.
In post 1391, likeabauss wrote:Alright, so at this point, the FratBros lynch is failing.
Vote: orcinus_theoriginal


Also, at least one guy who voted RC in the last 24 hours is scum, just so we're clear.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #1397 (isolation #24) » Tue Nov 12, 2013 9:39 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 1394, PeregrineV wrote:
In post 1392, Toomai wrote:Also, at least one guy who voted RC in the last 24 hours is scum, just so we're clear.
If you listed who voted him in the last 24 hours and gave thoughts on those people, it would become even more clearer.
Yeah okay.
  • MC Maraca in . I don't blame this vote. MCM has been harping RC to do stuff all game with no result.
  • TheIrishPope in . I know several people are meta-reading TIP as town, but I lack that knowledge. This, as his third vote of the game, does not help; he'd he liked RC for town, and nowhere in his ISO do I see his opinion on RC changing.
  • RadiantCowbells in . Yet more obfuscating stupidity.
  • Cephrir in . I currently feel that Cephrir is town because of how willing he is to call out what he doesn't like about the current gamestate; I don't think he's scummy for this vote because he's been saying he doesn't like any other active wagon.
  • orcinus_theoriginal in . In a vacuum I think this guy has been null if not slightly scummy, gut feeling more than anything.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #1424 (isolation #25) » Wed Nov 13, 2013 10:32 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 1422, likeabauss wrote:Anybody notice anything strange about Orcinus's reads list?
You mean where 5 names are missing? I didn't think that was a reads list more than a complaints list.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #1521 (isolation #26) » Thu Nov 14, 2013 9:51 am

Post by Toomai »

I think at least it's inconsistent. If you want to lynch someone without a claim you're implying you'd want to lynch them no matter what they claim.

Unvote
for now.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #1577 (isolation #27) » Fri Nov 15, 2013 9:49 am

Post by Toomai »

caledfwitch is a bad lynch. He's been basically sitting out most of the day and has a fraction of the interactions available for analysis compared to almost anyone else.

I'm not sure what a good alternative would be at this point though. I don't want to lynch the Cop claim without forcing him to provide a result of some sort, despite buying into likeabauss's opinion and mindset, and there isn't really a strong wagon on anyone right now.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #1640 (isolation #28) » Sat Nov 16, 2013 4:36 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 1635, JacobSavage wrote:It almost seems like he is pushing the lynch more now we have the claim rather than re-evaluating.
Considering , , and , I think he both re-evaluated and started pushing more.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #1647 (isolation #29) » Sat Nov 16, 2013 9:57 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 1645, yessiree wrote:@TIP, Toomai, sangres, your opinions on caledfwitch?
Not exactly impressed. For sitting out 1,000+ posts was rather meager, and the wording of was poor; I'm not sure how orcinus is exactly an "easy wagon" now that his claim came out. That said I think lynching him today is suboptimal for reasons previously stated.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #1675 (isolation #30) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:29 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 1674, likeabauss wrote:BP = bulletproof? Did I use an incorrect acronym? 1shot BP is a town role?
Town role yes. Extremely convenient way of explaining why you're not dead also yes. Policy lynch candidate.

I'm heavily undecided on who to lynch. I won't support caledfwitch unless it's that or no lynch. JS would be a lurker lynch which I guess is tolerable Day 1 with this kind of indecision. orcinus I'm in favour of letting live for this day. AFB probably won't happen but I could go for him. RC would be a policy lynch, but honestly not a bad one and I'd vote it. I personally think TiP is scummy but there won't be any support there.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #1785 (isolation #31) » Mon Nov 18, 2013 4:45 am

Post by Toomai »

Vote: caledfwitch
[L-1]


I still do not agree with this lynch; the wagon sprang up rather quickly and seems to exist for no reason other than to be a counterwagon to orcinus. But at this point it's either that or orcinus, and I'm not voting orcinus.

Deadline is in less than 2 days. caledfwitch should claim.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #1954 (isolation #32) » Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:31 am

Post by Toomai »

I'm really conflicted now. Sangres' case on orcinus is pretty good but I still can't make myself believe it's a good idea to lynch a D1 Cop claim.

Unvote
since that's not useful anymore.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2008 (isolation #33) » Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:00 pm

Post by Toomai »

Theory question: If the deadline runs out, is it better to let no lynch happen and allow things to sort out, or to lynch the heavily-disputed PR claim and at least get something out of the day?
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2014 (isolation #34) » Wed Nov 20, 2013 7:23 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 2009, RadiantCowbells wrote:Is it better to lynch scum or not lynch scum.

>Toomai 2013
I asked a generic strategy question that may apply to this game, not one tailored to the specific situation.

Reason being, I need to know whether it's a good idea to make sure a lynch goes through even if I disagree with it, under the pretense that no lynch Day 1 does not help town.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2053 (isolation #35) » Wed Nov 20, 2013 6:06 pm

Post by Toomai »

In post 2050, MC Maraca wrote:I do, but my phone doesn't!
Then stop using inferior technology to post.

Vote: Sakura Hana


My SH read is pretty null right now, but it looks like the only viableish wagon right now, and no lynch Day 1 is just bad all around. I'm voting now because the deadline's in 8.5 hours and I generally sleep for 9-9.5.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2111 (isolation #36) » Sun Nov 24, 2013 5:13 pm

Post by Toomai »

In post 2106, Angry Frat BROs wrote:That's L-2. Nobody put him at L-1 for the self hammer until we decide that we've gotten in all the taking we want.
Okay then.

Pseudovote: orcinus_theoriginal


No way does he share alignment with likeabauss.

Oh there was an action claim on him too. Interesting.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2144 (isolation #37) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 3:10 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 2143, Guyett wrote:Hai cabd I'm quite hungover and not feeling that bright at the moment but when did you get a PR?
See .
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2146 (isolation #38) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 6:10 am

Post by Toomai »

So anyway.
In post 2106, Angry Frat BROs wrote:VOTE: orc

That's L-2. Nobody put him at L-1 for the self hammer until we decide that we've gotten in all the taking we want.
In post 2126, Hermy wrote:VOTE: Orcinus
[predictable results]
Vote: Hermy
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2160 (isolation #39) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 11:22 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 2155, yessiree wrote:Toomai, you know you're better than this
You're such a comedian.
In post 2149, Cephrir wrote:
In post 2147, sangres wrote:Toomai, what's your graph looking like?
Graph?
I (apparently) have a meta of using numerics to track my thoughts on players throughout the game, which others have realized is useful for reading and questioning my thought process. I have been attempting to supplement this with a less-mathematical playstyle in this game, given that it's somewhat poor at capturing interactions (of which there are significantly more in larger games), so it'll be a bit more divergent from some of my actions than usual.
Spoiler: as requested
Image
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2161 (isolation #40) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 11:24 am

Post by Toomai »

Incidentally, I'm kinda leaning towards being maybe a coaching effort to tell a less-competent scumbuddy to prehammer.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2172 (isolation #41) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 1:39 pm

Post by Toomai »

In post 2165, sangres wrote:What were the drops in the TiP scumread about?
There was ("you should claim [at L-8]"), (that whole wagon was suspect, and I believe at the time I decided he had the least reason to go along with it, though admittedly I can't remember why right now), ("hammer without claim"), and (the mentioned inconsistency about previous).
In post 2170, Guyett wrote:What does each colour mean on the graph
Colours = players, see legend on right.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2175 (isolation #42) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 6:06 pm

Post by Toomai »

The gist is that I alter my read based on the contents of posts made by or about each player. It doesn't have to be the same jump each time (a comprehensive case is probably worth more than a one-liner), though in practice it usually is.

The raw data is currently 3.9MB and contains all my other games in a somewhat interdependent way, so I don't think it's practical to just give out as-is.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2178 (isolation #43) » Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:59 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 2177, JacobSavage wrote:Can you explain your delta functions in your MVP and AFB reads then
MVP: +7% (↗)
  • +1% Asks correct question.
  • +1% The non-joke parts have a good vibe.
  • +2% Good stuff overall, makes several good points.
  • -1% Brought up all the "you get a townread" in the previous, which I didn't really notice.
  • +1% I just don't see scum making this post; they wouldn't be trying to stop RC from being a dolt, they'd probably let it run for lulz.
  • +1% The callout.
  • +1% Good defense.
  • +1% All facts, no opinion.
Angry Frat BROs
(← Wake88)
: +1% (↘)
  • -1% Don't totally remember why, but I think the tone seemed off.
  • +1% Agreed with sentiment at the time.
  • +1% Catchup post, mostly matched my thoughts.
  • +1% Trufax.
  • +1% Agreed with, again.
  • +1% More astute observations.
  • +1% The third-last paragraph. At this point he was my strongest townread in the game.
  • -1% Brings up things I had not thought of.
  • +1% Another pointed observation.
  • -1% I knew something was up with the Guyett wagon and this sums it up.
  • -1% Metattacking the replaced. Seems legit.
  • -3% The big case. I see little if no fault in it.
  • +2% The majority of responses and opinions in this post look town to me.
  • -1% Not 100% convinced by the VCA, but very suspicious at least.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2198 (isolation #44) » Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:04 pm

Post by Toomai »

In post 2197, yessiree wrote:regarding Hermy, the responses she provided so far seem honest. When she said she didn't read the entire thread before voting, she probably meant she didn't see 2016. This, and coupled with the thought that a scum could self-hammer which did not go through her mind were the reasons why. It boils down to whether or not you let her play the newb card. Based on her recent posts, I'm willing to let this one slide.
Would have to have not read 2111 either, where 2106 was quoted. Makes it a bit less likely. Not quite ready to give a pass yet but it is reasonableish to only see the votecount.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2271 (isolation #45) » Wed Dec 04, 2013 3:57 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 2269, RadiantCowbells wrote:
here is no way Hermy is getting anywhere near LyLo.
I will make sure she does.
Big talk from you.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2324 (isolation #46) » Thu Dec 05, 2013 4:35 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 2303, MC Maraca wrote:
Toomai
- Meta read. MOstly from simimlarity of his play here to the Harry Potter mini theme. I'd like him to elaborate on his tippy scumread, though, because I heavily disagree with it.
The simple explanation for the disconnect is that you have him as town based on meta alone, whereas I have no meta knowledge and no real time to acquire some, so I see all his short posts and relative lack of intelligent insights and decide he's scum.
  • : Junk list.
  • : Needless buddying.
  • : Way to filler.
  • : "Claim [at L-8]"
  • : Helps get the RC crazywagon going
  • : "Hammer without a claim"
  • and so on: "Oh hey he claimed something large, better backtrack"
  • : "Hey let's out our protective role with 12 players to go"
  • His avatar's Yoshi colour has changed from green to red. Q.E.D.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2335 (isolation #47) » Fri Dec 06, 2013 4:11 am

Post by Toomai »

What's the case on Guyett? I currently have him as a total null.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2354 (isolation #48) » Fri Dec 06, 2013 11:51 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 2340, Hermy wrote:14. RadiantCowbells - Town - General play looks great.
What the peppermints?

Not liking the rest of that reads list. It's mostly "general stuff" with no specifics.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2362 (isolation #49) » Fri Dec 06, 2013 2:44 pm

Post by Toomai »

In post 2355, MC Maraca wrote:http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=30103

In that thread, mara and I nail scum-tip on page one within his first five posts. Entire game is done three pages later.
As proof of knowing TIP's meta, I can accept that, but because I can't see a lick of difference between that and this, it doesn't much affect my own read on him.
In post 2356, Hermy wrote:Define 'general stuff'.
In post 2340, Hermy wrote:2. Cephrir - Leaning Scum -
Your play yesterday
was pretty good.
Your play today
is nowhere near as good.
In post 2340, Hermy wrote:11. Angry Frat BROs - Scum -
General play
, plus meta from one or two others, plus likeabauss's good case on him/them.
In post 2340, Hermy wrote:13. PeregrineV - Null/Leaning Town - Ever so slight townread for
recent stuff
, but please post a bit more.
In post 2340, Hermy wrote:14. RadiantCowbells - Town -
General play
looks great.
"Your play", "general play", "recent stuff". No specifics.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2370 (isolation #50) » Sat Dec 07, 2013 3:39 am

Post by Toomai »

In post 2363, yessiree wrote:Toomai, Hermy is not the optimal lynch today. It's easy to jump on her wagon using the anti-town L-1 vote on orc. This is the problem; both towns and scums can use this reason to push for her lynch and it is very difficult to differentiate one group from the other.
Wellllllllll okay you've got me there.

Unvote
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2391 (isolation #51) » Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:10 pm

Post by Toomai »

Vote: Angry Frat BROs


The two wagons right now are him and Guyett, and given the Day 1 stuff, I think he's more likely to be scum.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2468 (isolation #52) » Sun Dec 08, 2013 2:22 pm

Post by Toomai »

I'll withold my opinions on this claim until RC puts forth all his actions, and I think we might want to cut down on the discussion a bit until he does so.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2509 (isolation #53) » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:43 pm

Post by Toomai »

In post 2494, TheIrishPope wrote:No, you're literally insane. That's what I'm saying. Your results are mixed up. Hermy's the scum.
Because that's totally allowed in Normal games.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2594 (isolation #54) » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:32 pm

Post by Toomai »

I believe the sangres claim. Therefore, TIP is probably legit. Therefore, AFB is unlikely to be scum. Therefore:

Unvote


Debating whether to pick RC or Hermy now.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2626 (isolation #55) » Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:49 pm

Post by Toomai »

I've made my decision.

Vote: RadiantCowbells


We have 4 days, let's get this done.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2681 (isolation #56) » Tue Dec 10, 2013 3:55 am

Post by Toomai »

What even.

Did sangres claim scum? I believe I saw that in this mess.

Vote: sangres
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2826 (isolation #57) » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:55 am

Post by Toomai »

Wait what? The site goes down and by the time it's back up the scum have quit?
Spoiler: Reaction
Image
I respect you for walking away from what you believe to be an unwinnable situation, but I still don't like it.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2835 (isolation #58) » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:01 am

Post by Toomai »

I'll be marking this down as a "no contest", not a win.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.
User avatar
Toomai
Toomai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Toomai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 734
Joined: January 12, 2013
Location: Ontario

Post Post #2844 (isolation #59) » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:36 am

Post by Toomai »

I'm also disappointed that, not only did I not get the chance to activate the Innocent Child (first PR drawn as a player here), but I couldn't even get it set up by being suspicious enough to vote for because of all the other stuff flying around.
This should be required reading for...everyone for anything, really.

Return to “Completed Large Normal Games”