And I happen to think that other players (Chevre, kab) are more likely to flip scum than Thor, not to say that he is a townread.In post 2154, Rainbowdash wrote:If you think he is scum that is a spectacular reason to vote him. Thor flipping town would mean you are town, which would probably save a mislynch. Realistically though we shouldn't be lynching for information today, we should be lynching for a scum flip.
<3In post 2155, Thesp wrote:This is my favorite post of the last several pages.
Yes.In post 2157, Bulbazak wrote:You do know that associative tells are more than just who a person voted for? It's also how that person interacted with others, and how others interacted with them.
No, as I said.So you want to lynch Chevre just to keep Emo from tunneling, even though she will likely tunnel on someone else?
No, as I said several times. Feel free to read my ISO.You seem to purposely avoid giving a read of Chevre here.
I have stated multiple times I think Chevre is scum.Why? If she's a townread to you, or even null, why sacrifice her just to keep Emo happy?
It is for the purpose of finding scum, as I have stated more than once.Why is that a good trade off when it's not for the purpose of finding scum?
Get your eyesight checked, then.In post 2172, Bulbazak wrote:It looks like it's more for the purpose of placating Emo to me.In post 2161, Aegor wrote:It is for the purpose of finding scum, as I have stated more than once.Why is that a good trade off when it's not for the purpose of finding scum?
Die in a fire, Bulbazak. At no point did I state that I wanted to lynch Chevre simply because it would placate emo. At no point did I state that placating emo was a necessary condition for my vote. At no point did I state that placating emo was a sufficient condition for my vote. At no point did I deny that a Chevre lynch would placate Emo.In post 2188, Bulbazak wrote:So you've gone from "I'm not placating Emo." to "That would be placating if I said that." finally to "Yes, I'm placating Emo, but that's not my main reasons for the lynch."?
You have yet to point out where I am calling for a compromise lynch. Or are all lynches compromise lynches to you? If not, how can you claim that a desire to avoid a deadline speechwagon is the same as calling for a compromise lynch?In post 2182, Aegor wrote:Well, we have four days. So we should decide on a lynch soon.
I am saying that we should agree on a lynch. You have yet to point out where I am calling for a compromise lynch. Or are all lynches compromise lynches to you? If not, how can you claim that a desire to avoid a deadline speechwagon is the same as calling for a compromise lynch?In post 2193, Bulbazak wrote: Oh, you want to get into a semantics argument? Sure, you didn'ttechnicallysay compromise lynch, but when you point out that deadline is coming up and that we need to lynch somebody, you're essentially saying "We need to compromise on a lynch guys!".
I want it on the record that I find Thesp's posts odd and think he could very well be scum.In post 2296, Thor665 wrote:Because I'm pretty indifferent on the Bulb wagon, whereas these other people are listing RBD as an acceptable lynch for them?In post 2294, Sotty7 wrote:Or to put it another way, there are two people on the Rainbow wagon and five of us on the bulb wagon. What is stopping you from swinging over and putting him at lynch -1 at this point?
That would seem to be the prime motivator for why I think they should move and not me.
Exactly. ASAP. Which has not happened, so let us not waste the effort we have spent. Lynch today and we can NL tomorrow since it does no harm to lynch today.In post 2303, Rainbowdash wrote:All basic mountainous logic says no lynchIn post 2302, Aegor wrote:RBD, that is blatantly anti-town given that we have spent this entire day talking. Compromise today and then bring up your dumb-ass no lynch plan tomorrow so we can just end the day immediately instead of after twoooooooooooo looooooooooooooong weeeeeeeeeeeeeeks.in games with an even number of players.ASAP
Its correct play.
Are you fucking kidding me?In post 2338, HighShroomish wrote:Care to explain?In post 2336, inHimshallibe wrote::confirmed:
VOTE: AEGOR
You posted several times before this saying you would vote for a lynch. And yet you refuse to join the Bulba wagon (while joining the less-popular RBD wagon, which very well could have failed) for no good reason? No me gusta.In post 2305, petroleumjelly wrote:Vote: Rainbowdash
I did not care for Maestro, I think your insistence on pushing kabooooom on Day Three over Albert B. Rampage was an attempt to divert pressure (and awkwardly done, likely for the sake of "loyalty"), and your claim that you did not realize there was a modkill that shifted the balance of the game is not believable.
I will check the thread again in the morning before leaving for my flight (so in about four hours). After that I do not think it likely I will be able to log on before the deadline hits.
Concerning the two other players most likely to be lynched: I am not opposed to a bulbazak lynch, but I would not be in favor of an Aegor lynch.
Why? Maybe I missed the reason; if so, just tell me to ISO you.
Given kab's play, I find it unlikely that scumkab would not be on either of the town wagons but on both of the scum wagons. Either he is opportunistic and mercurial or he is not; you cannot have it both ways.What do you mean on developing those lines of thought? kabooooom votes for ABR at the sort of time you would bus your partner when they were probably going to be lynched anyway, and doesn't push hard for ABR at all. ABR votes for kabooooom, but doesn't push the wagon at all either. They look like they want their votes to show up on each other, but I see no real effort from either to get the other lynched. Notably, Bulbazak doesn't vote on either, but stays on the sideline between the two of them.
That was really questionable, and he only ever explained that switch after harshly pressed by me this game day. Reviewing Garmr, he is meh and he had a really bad non-case against me early on.In post 2486, Rainbowdash wrote:Only reason I am voting Thesp is that he was on Bulb until my wagon took off where he bailed before the resigned return mixed with I know its going to be pointless to try and argue that you or Sotty is scum today
Put him at L-1. RBD needs three votes to lynch. You are telling us the day is going to end soon without doing jack shit to help it end productively.In post 2631, kabooooom wrote:Pj is not in L-1. If she were, I would have ended or something.
I would be willing to lynch RBD. But kab has done nothing to suggest he is town, and I would much rather he die now.In post 2681, emeraldemon wrote:Aegor, what is your read on Rainbowdash?In post 123, Maestro wrote:ABP don't leave me hangin' I was looking forward to playing with you
In post 2306, Huntress wrote:@ petroleumjelly:Re your post 2297.
1) I am offended that you think I would show partiality in this way.
2) I had to choose between mod-killing Matias or leaving the game in night until I had found a replacement as I couldn't start the new Day with two slots unfilled. In view of the length of time I had already been looking I decided on the first option and so removed the earliest one to require replacement. Any further discussion of this must wait till the game is over.
3)
