Oh boy, quote wall time (Starting at my post #58)
Glad to see people use FOS still, but this is pretty weak. A vote would have been better.
In post 68, TheAdrienC wrote:Ah fuck it. I wouldn't hammer yet until we get some more info, but here's my vote.
Unvote
Vote: Wake88
And see, this is why I don't like Adrien, especially when Wake flips scum. This is what we like to call bussing, for all those that are new to this game. Also we are NOWHERE near hammer, so why bring it up?
Wake wrote:Alright, if you guys run me up give me time to talk.
OK, let's get down to brass tacks. I voted NM because I wanted to pressure him for him maybe-slip. Because that's what ii is, a potential slip.
If you were town, you would say that NM was being overly defensive over a "slip", followed by more pushing. Since you called him town, I am pretty sure you are scum for this.
Wake wrote:
Salamence et al should explain themselves a bit more, too. I vote NM for what looks like a gaffe, and then FoS another guy doing the same thing, to gauge reactions. You can call that bad all you want, but you'd be incorrect. It's not hypocritical in the slightest if you're trying to Scumhunt.
Also, Salamence's 64 needs to be remembered. That he's seen other people called Scum for the maybe-slip NM did is immaterial, I'm not sure NM's Scum at this point, but I want to see more of his reactions regarding it.
And why is he town? Paranoia? Yeah, ok.
Wake wrote:Reinoe's vote is crappy, too. This is Day 1, folks. Day 1 is nothing but paranoia and speculation.
Step back and breathe a bit, mob.
Now add more reasoning for why you're voting the way you're all voting, and be very specific. I want more details
just in case
Town shoots itself in the foot.
Wait until LYLO, and compare the paranoia and speculation from D1 to the Paranoia and speculation in LYLO.
Also, I don't like the way you joking discredit your wagon, especially since this is a serious wagon. Oh yeah, the bolded? Just in case? Shouldn't it be "when town shoots itself in the foot" if you are town being wagoned? FUCKING GET ROPED.
VOTE: WAKE
Wake wrote:Well, yeah, I'm still reaction testing.
I'm gonna milk this cow for all it's worth.
"I've been pinned, better do whatever I can to look town"
In post 83, Aegor wrote:VOTE: Wake88 for obvious reasons.
Scum, if you want a quicklynch, run up reinoe.
Many pages later, and still don't know wtf this is.
Adrien wrote:I've got my vote on my best scum-read.
Yeah, after a weak fos, still bussing.
There is nothing wrong with this. Obviously he is busy IRL and just wanted to post that he was there. All the people after him are stupid or scum trying to counterwagon.
Why? This is sheeping, just in case you newbies didn't know that.
In post 113, Salamence20 wrote:What are you doing in a big game like this little boy?
But i digress. Vote Wake and you will be on your way
If this is manipulation, I suck at manipulation.
In post 125, Clusk92 wrote:
I thought you was talking to Alina but I now see you posted at the same time, so sorry.
But still, manipulating a newbie in to voting for someone is still suspicious.
I wont argue it is bad. But it definitely isn't manipulation.
Adrien wrote:He's still my top scumread. Boonskiies is number two, HunterSeeker is a scum lean for me because of this post then disappearing.
PEOPLE HAVE LIVES.
Your two scumreads are people that haven't provided content WHEN THE GAME HASN'T BEEN OPEN FOR MORE THAN TWO FUCKING DAYS. WHAT. THE. FUCK.
You die next.
Alina wrote:
I'm just trying to get him to post. I don't think it should be considered a "counterwagon." When I think wagon, I think multiple votes. I don't think one stray vote.
Two votes plus Adrien.
Counterwagon.
In post 143, TheAdrienC wrote:Love the detailed analysis, Burning. So much information. A lot of people are really only posting the bare minimum.
Give me more of that "detailed analysis" on why Boonsikes is scum, please.
Farside wrote:I'm reading wake as bad town currently.
I would love to here abut more about scum motivation
Farside, I'm begging you. Do not convince me of Wake VI.
We already have VI Soren and VI Sala and VI Newbies. Do not make scumwake a VI.
He slipped earlier. He dropped the pressure and suddenly called NM town. Then he claims reaction testing, and continues to do so, also jokingly discredit me and this wagon against him. He dies, followed by his buddy adrien.
In post 152, Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:seriously, you all put Wake to L-3. Fair warning if you are playing run him up and let things sit without a claim that does not happen when I am in the game. I will post Intent to hammer as soon as someone is at L-1. It is how I play and what I am used to.
The run up of wake seems silly to me, but hey it is a day one make up a reason to run someone up on the first page stuff anyway.
Is it possible I found 3 scum this early? Its possible
Also intent to hammer is stupid, because
scum can create counterclaims or
scum will bullshit their way to endgame.
Seriously SKOT. Lets go. I'll win this. Your turn to make an edit.
Agor wrote:General call for a policy lynch on SKOT unless he sets aside his moronic policy of pressing for claims on policy at L-1 regardless of whether someone is willing to hammer legitimately. Please respond to this directly if you would be willing to PL him unless he relents.
No no no and shut up. Hes vigbait with the other VI's. Also I agree with everything else he said.
SKOT wrote:ah, trying to take out the Bully stick, I do not respond well to bully stick behavior
Vote Aegor... non-sense....but this probably means you are town but absolute bullying behavior meant to enforce and engage in group think and "borg mindset." (FYI for those that engage in HoS, this vote is meant at as slap in his face)
Also you have already been in games with me but do not know what has and has not finished.
FUCKING
VIGBAIT
DIE
In post 167, Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote: In post 161, Aegor wrote:General call for a policy lynch on SKOT unless he sets aside his moronic policy of pressing for claims on policy at L-1 regardless of whether someone is willing to hammer legitimately.
Please respond to this directly if you would be willing to PL him unless he relents.
In post 144, farside22 wrote: In post 100, Aegor wrote:
Because they perpetuate the nonsense that he posted in his initial post (50, I think).
&@ sal:
I'm reading wake as bad town currently.
I would love to here abut more about scum motivation.
Scum motivation? The self-contradiction in
50 has been handwaved as "checking reactions." Do you need more detail? We all need to decide whether Wake is horrible at checking reactions (by telling us that is what he is doing) or scum trying to cover himself by hiding under a bogus defense. Right now, I think he is the latter. That could change. The game has not even been running for a day.
Are you serious?
oh and aegor, such nonsense by and large is playing against win condition at the core... also I was in the game 1st...
FUCKING
VIGBAIT
DIE
In post 171, TheAdrienC wrote:Scum or not, Sharp, your actions and posts are anti-town. You have to see that.
Hmmmm maybe SKOT is town.
But not because he is scum?
FUCKING
VIGBAIT
DIE
In post 183, TheAdrienC wrote:Dude, what you are doing is NOT helping the town no matter how much you think it is. Let me repeat that...NOT...HELPING...THE TOWN!! Now both of you need to get the votes off each other and start lynching scum and not people you hate for other reasons. Because we are NOT going to win if you two keep this up. Understood?
Shut the fuck up and quit trying to look townie
In post 208, Scarab wrote: In post 190, Mirhawk wrote:Wake's intro is kinda out there. But it seems in character for me.
I'm more interested in the people on his wagon, BP's vote was purely oppertunistic, also Scarab slipped on there in the butter zone as soon as it looked like other people were interested.
Vote: Scarab
You are literally voting me for not sitting at my keyboard refreshing this game. I voted wake
18 minutes after his post
because that's when I saw it. This post of yours is just absolutely blatant opportunism. You acknowledge that there's something off with wake's intro post, then discredit its potential scumminess due to meta that other players may or may not have (hint: I've never read a game that had wake in it), then call people scummy for voting him for that post straight out of the RVS? Yeah, sure.
Unvote: Wake88
Vote: Mirhawk
Wake may or may not be scum, but this guy almost certainly is.
Regarding the SNOT stuff, I actually would be fine with being part of a policy lynch on him. I like policy lynches and this game feels way bigger than I expected.
*Head explodes*
In post 220, Clusk92 wrote:How is a player ordering/pressuring somebody (twice) to vote for someone
not
manipulative?
Are you new too? Other people have done it. Its not manipulative.
In post 223, TheAdrienC wrote:My top townread is Alina at the moment. Despite his anger and my annoyance at him, I'm pretty sure Aegor is town too. Slightly lesser town reads of mine are farside and not_mafia.
My other scumreads not named Wake are HunterSeeker and boonskiies. Both of them have posted and been online but have not contributed at all or helped us scumhunt. Everyone else I see is pretty null at the moment.
SCUMSCUMSCUM. Seriously, your two scumreads are people that haven't even played/looked at this game yet!
Wake wrote:Not sure which post Salamence was referring to in 54 regarding a WIFOM bomb. I say he feels opportunistic in 58.
54 was RVS, 58 was serious for reasons already stated
MY READS wrote:
1. Sharpest-knife-on-tree = VIGBAIT
2. Salamence20 = LOLTOWN
3. TheAdrienC = SCUM
4. reinoe
5. Wake88 = SCUM
6. Burning_TowN = I don't like TN, but BE is cool
7. shaddowez
8. Damon_Gant = WHO?
9. Mirhawk
10. Not_Mafia = TOWN
11. Aegor = TOWN
12. Scarab
13. farside22 = TOWN
14. Boonskiies = WHO
15. BroodKingEXE = WHO
16. Soren = NOOB
17. Aeronaut = WHO?
18. HunterSeeker = WHO?
19. Clusk92
20. BP
21. Alina = TOWN?