NY175: Sycamore Scuffle
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
MY GOD, you guys posted while I was slavin away. Let's see if I can post on the phone...
VOTE: VOTE: Wake88
FoSing and voting all that people reads scum! scattering Town apart so we lose ourselves on misinformation rather than actually scum hunting. It is meant to keep people confused and to be a sort of town leader in case he "detects" a scumread among all his FoSes.
It is a lie.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
About my vote. The minute I read Wake's post with all the FoS's it immediately rang as scummy. There's nothing more scummy than spreading doubt around. What he did was draw out some people out of RVS and use them for reactions, but when you put so many people on the black list it basically says that all those people are supposed to be possible scumread, but in opens fair game for him to lynch any one of those without raising much suspicion.
It's scum play 101.
What I meant with the spreading the votes around town was that by putting so many people on the spotlight he could generate some divisions among the town as to who they should persecute as scum. Creating different bandwagons, if you get my drift.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
Sorry if my vote looked opportunistic but I do not control the frequency at which people participate in the discussion while I'm gone... But that looked way too scummy to me to pass.
Now I am actually sorry for posting without quoting and all but my computer broke so I'm doing this off my phone and it's a lot harder than it looks x)-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
I don't know if not_mafia has disregarded the votes on him because he wants to scum hunt even if he's being looked at or if he's pretending there wasn't heat on him.
I just don't know. Town or mafia, no read on him.
Same for AdrienC. Don't know if his jumpyness is because his scum or plain newb.
Eyes on Scarab.
Like Alina as town.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
COMPUTER IS BACK. MY OVERJOYNESS IS KILLED OFF BY THE WALL OF TEXTS I HAVE TO READ NOW. #fuck
Let's go.
I hate this. That's all I have to say. I've explained myself here: 198In post 50, Wake1 wrote:Welcome everyone. Finally I have a few drops of energy to spare.
First of all, Toomai, I'm stealing your damned little icons because they're neat.
It's a normal game, but last I checked they're allowed at most two unique roles.
OK, pardon my paranoia, but I tend to distrust comments by new accounts like HS. Could be alt faking it, or not. I can never tell.
Hey now, that's ridiculous Farside. 5:16 seems way too unbalanced. I'm iffy even on 4:17. I can see 4:16:1, or 3:3:15 even. And, Farside, don't be too quick to judge a book by its cover. Take some time getting to know the person first, I always say.
Also let's get a discussion going: is it moreso Town or Scum that tends to confirm later in time?
You get those fuckers, Toomai.
Let's put some on this little nut for his maybe-slip: VOTE: Not-Mafia.
Now, Scarab, why exactly are you voting NM? He may be a nut, and an innocent one at that, so why be such a hardass on him? Probably capitalizing on the gaffe, eh?FoS: Scarab.
Alina, my dear, Mr. Wake has been very busy bandaging festering wounds, cleaning debilitated old folk, and everything else that comes with the wonderful, back-breaking world of health care. And it's SO worth it. Hey, are you an alt? Oh, and I'd like to know if you're Scum, too, 'cause you're cheeky, and I'm trying to read it.
FoSFarsideandTheAdrienCfor dubious actions needing explanation. Get cracking.
Then Wake is so right: so much OMGUS. Freud + Freud = Freud.In post 55, Not_Mafia wrote:You vote me for my "slip" and then in your very next sentence FoS someone for doing the very same thing. You posted also fluff about balancing that could be you trying to look like you're contributing and you called pretty much everyone who posted something that was not "/confirm" scum.
And then bandwagon on the suspicions you create? Or actually lynching scum? You tear me apart, Wake.In post 63, Wake1 wrote:Checking reactions.
Why is that, buddy? I don't like you very much, Clusk.In post 121, Clusk92 wrote:Trying to get two different people to vote for Wake doesn't reflect well on you, Salamence.
Is it tho? When it's that blatant and obvious? When it really is just a statement on how much Salamence thinks Wake is scum?In post 132, Clusk92 wrote:
Regardless of my opinion on Wake, I find trying to force votes on to people without letting them come to their own conclusions first pretty scummy, in my opinion.In post 129, Alina wrote:@Clusk92
Why does it not reflect well on Salamence? You're voting wake too, right? I assume he's your top scumread, so shouldn't you be happy people are pushing other people to vote for him?
Come on. It's not scummy at all. It's so stupid it cannot be scum. He's Town. That's why he's so comfortable saying smth like that.
@Adrien!!123. Why? 143. Why? 149. WHYYYYY. You're so weird.
SKOT is dumb and I like Salamence a bit more.
Then SKOT's 153 confirms he's bad Town and 154 overlaps the previous assumption. All of the FoS' on Adrien.
This is fucking weird, Aegor. Fucking weird. Just looks like you're petty-voting him. Don't like it much.In post 168, Aegor wrote:
VOTE: SKOTIn post 163, Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:Vote Aegor... non-sense....butbut absolute bullying behavior meant to enforce and engage in group think and "borg mindset." (FYI for those that engage in HoS, this vote is meant at as slap in his face)this probably means you are town
[/quote]In post 169, farside22 wrote:
Not really what I was thinking but interesting POV.In post 165, Alina wrote:
It's actually kind of hard for me to put my suspicion into words, I sat here for like 5 minutes trying to figure out how to phrase it. It just feels kind of off in general. It might be the wording. It feels like he's setting up so that he can say "oops," if wake flips town.I'm a bit paranoid when people follow me.
Can you explain what you don't like about that post?
*puts SNOT on ignore*
Sigh that's better maybe a stuff drink too.
That just looks like "I'm sorry I looked scummy", Farside. She literally said there was no way to word it. Why is it an interesting POV? I can only imagine you took it as an advice not to look scummy. If you're Town, you have no reason to fear this. If you're scum, that makes it interesting.
I'm still on Page 7. I'll read up while you run up you're reactions to this. Looking at you, Wake. Reaction-test this.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
Then there's SKOT's style of play discussion, which I will not engage. I don't really care until it's relevant. That isn't just yet.
We will. I still don't know how to read you. You're either scum or just that looney guy in the village that always tries to make up conversation with the other people in the cafés and that goes to the hardware store on purpose to make friends and to pretend he's having a conversation but that no one takes seriously ultimately. So you're either that or you're scum trying to look that way.In post 206, TheAdrienC wrote:Never mind, I saw the vote count reversed. Please ignore me.
I mean, you're just so- WEIRD. 183
Scarab does so nice in exposing Mirhawk's awful post on him, but then he does the same and prematurely votes him. And it's not even the vote, it's the actual explanation- he doesn't want to put pressure for a scum read, his scumread is Mirhawk because he didn't look at the time the vote was put.In post 208, Scarab wrote:
You are literally voting me for not sitting at my keyboard refreshing this game. I voted wakeIn post 190, Mirhawk wrote:Wake's intro is kinda out there. But it seems in character for me.
I'm more interested in the people on his wagon, BP's vote was purely oppertunistic, also Scarab slipped on there in the butter zone as soon as it looked like other people were interested.
Vote: Scarab18 minutes after his postbecause that's when I saw it. This post of yours is just absolutely blatant opportunism. You acknowledge that there's something off with wake's intro post, then discredit its potential scumminess due to meta that other players may or may not have (hint: I've never read a game that had wake in it), then call people scummy for voting him for that post straight out of the RVS? Yeah, sure.
Unvote: Wake88
Vote: Mirhawk
Wake may or may not be scum, but this guy almost certainly is.
Regarding the SNOT stuff, I actually would be fine with being part of a policy lynch on him. I like policy lynches and this game feels way bigger than I expected.
Meh... Don't like it much. Like his stance on PL's tho.
I'm exhausted of scanning and gotta go eat, cuz food is important for proper reads. Be back later today. Tootles.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
Don't quote me without context. Context is the most important thing in this game.In post 328, farside22 wrote:
She explained it just fine in the quote. You know I have ADD and skim read post because of it, did you miss how she explained what she saw?bp wrote:That just looks like "I'm sorry I looked scummy", Farside. She literally said there was no way to word it. Why is it an interesting POV? I can only imagine you took it as an advice not to look scummy. If you're Town, you have no reason to fear this. If you're scum, that makes it interesting.
I may have missed it. You tend to do that when you're squeezing so much text and analysis on only one hour. Would you care to explain again and properly rather than just fighting off who doubts you? Interesting departure from your previous stance on being attacked. Is it because you were called out for it?-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
In post 379, TheAdrienC wrote:
You should considering changing that if you're gonna be playing mafia.In post 378, Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:I do tend to not think things out fully when I get pissy...
First wise thing he's said the whole game. The first. But he's right.
Those posts between Salamance and SKOT got me on my nervy giggles.
SKOT. You Jester?-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
Depends on his play as scum tho. We don't know how he plays AT ALL let alone how he would disguise being scum.In post 403, Not_Mafia wrote:I feel like skot would continue trying to rationalise his claim if he were scum-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
You get weirder and weirder. I don't know how to read weird.
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
Always thought Sala was Town.In post 414, Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:well after being berated from my stupidity and it being clear no one else will follow and sala being called town as a result, well, it is what it is...
Don't get too excited. I will hammer people on my weird list. They make me jolly-ly uncomfortable.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
In post 333, Scarab wrote:
How hard is it to read the thing you're quoting before making incorrect statements? Mirhawk was voting people for "oppertunistic" (incorrect spelling is his, not mine) votes on wake. In order to set up his claim of people having voted opportunistically, he preceded his accusations with a statement that wake's post wasn't scummy (if it was scummy, town should be voting for it, so it would be stupid to accuse voters of opportunism). However, his statement that wake's post wasn't scummy was made purely from knowledge of wake's meta, with an acknowledgment that wake's post seemed off ("out there" was his exact wording). Ergo, he would have no reason to believe that other people wouldn't take issue with wake's post! The thought process makes a ton of sense coming from scum, with the "Wake's intro is kinda out there. But it seems in character for me." line coming as an afterthought (I would even guess it was edited or rewritten after the rest of the post had been made).BP wrote:he doesn't want to put pressure for a scum read, his scumread is Mirhawk because he didn't look at the time the vote was put.
So no, I don't feel like my vote was premature or that I should be voting Mirhawk for "pressure". I'm voting him because his post was hella scummy. The fact that my post came 18 minutes after wake's is just icing on the cake - Mirhawk used the term "butter zone" to describe when I voted which is a vague term that dodges the issue of timing completely. It's entirely possible (heck, even probable) that Mirhawk didn't notice the timestamps, but that just means to me that he wasn't worried enough about context to check. Something town might do? Yeah, it is. Something scum might do? More yes.
oh, that.
OK. That post was hella weird. I had to read it several times (information overflooding is scum, btw) to make a sense of what you were saying.
So I went back. All Mirhawk did was suspect both YOU AND ME for jumping on the wagon, according to him.
To make it easier to you and everyone else. He voted for something very believable, so much that I actually went ahead and explained myself, along with a sarcastic remark about precisely what you said with the timing and all. But I never voted him for itIn post 190, Mirhawk wrote:/confirm
Wake's intro is kinda out there. But it seems in character for me.
I'm more interested in the people on his wagon, BP's vote was purely oppertunistic, also Scarab slipped on there in the butter zone as soon as it looked like other people were interested.
Vote: Scarab
@SKOT
If you declare the intent to always hammer we'll just end up with everyone hovering around L-2 all the time, which is even worse then hovering at L-1.because asking for explanation for jumping on a wagon is something completely believable.
You did this tho:
Jumped off Wake's wagon (acting hella guilty) and joined in on the guy who called you out on it. Hella scum.In post 208, Scarab wrote:
You are literally voting me for not sitting at my keyboard refreshing this game. I voted wakeIn post 190, Mirhawk wrote:Wake's intro is kinda out there. But it seems in character for me.
I'm more interested in the people on his wagon, BP's vote was purely oppertunistic, also Scarab slipped on there in the butter zone as soon as it looked like other people were interested.
Vote: Scarab18 minutes after his postbecause that's when I saw it. This post of yours is just absolutely blatant opportunism. You acknowledge that there's something off with wake's intro post, then discredit its potential scumminess due to meta that other players may or may not have (hint: I've never read a game that had wake in it), then call people scummy for voting him for that post straight out of the RVS? Yeah, sure.
Unvote: Wake88
Vote: Mirhawk
Wake may or may not be scum, but this guy almost certainly is.
Regarding the SNOT stuff, I actually would be fine with being part of a policy lynch on him. I like policy lynches and this game feels way bigger than I expected.
I don't think you're as scummy as Wake. Wake is aggressive scum, the kind that likes to be noticed and pretend he's Town's Guardian Angel. You are just off on your reads. If you had said like "pressure on you bud I wanna know what's scummy on me", ok. You called him scum for calling you scum for jumping on a wagon.
Bro. Srsly.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
I listed you as town, gurl. Sup?In post 417, Alina wrote:I just looked at the playerlist and I realized I don't know who the hell like six of those people are.
VOTE: Damon_Gant
I remember you posting earlier. Are you there? Who are you? Do you have any scumreads or...anything?
ALSO BP I'M NOT WEIRD STOP HURTING MY FEELINGS GOSH
Pedit: I've also thought Sala was town for a while, so...-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
Very true, Wake will do smth hella weird. Prolly claim Jester.In post 427, Salamence20 wrote:Im done with this game.
The VI's are giving me a headache.
My vote stays on SKOT until Wake does something stupid (probably his next post).
SKOT vote is also optimal because I do not want Wake to claim another PR on DAY ONE.
Who are the VI's for you? Make a list. Make a list of reads. I will follow you anywhere.
@Alina. It is possible. Weird is just a null read because I cannot see past the weirdness. I may lean on the read towards town or scum but I still count them as null. And I love weird, btw. Just not on Mafia.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
I'll jump on any. Leaning towards Wake a lot right now tho.In post 435, Salamence20 wrote:
Youre a fucking troll. Also youre a dumbass. How about Aegor? SKOT? Farside? Seriously fuck off.In post 432, Burning_TowN wrote:I'm townreading Alina and Wake, slightly scumreading reading boonskiies and VI reading salamence.
~tn5421
BP. Ill get to you when I cool down. But know that I want Adrien/Wake/SKOT dead today and any wagons towards Boonsikes/lurkers/non-confirms are most likely scum motivated.
So you believe me on the Farside thing?
I'm online on my computer I'm so happy I wanna post stuff.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
You are such an idiot. I'm online so I'll humour you.
In post 431, Scarab wrote:
I will make a mental note that trying to give someone a more detailed explanation when they don't understand the more minimalist explanation makes me scummy.BP wrote:OK. That post was hella weird. I had to read it several times (information overflooding is scum, btw) to make a sense of what you were saying.
I said explain yourself better. Never said explain yourself more lengthly. God.
That's a nice story. Now where in that post you quoted does he ask for an explanation? Stop making excuses for him.BP wrote:But I never voted him for it because asking for explanation for jumping on a wagon is something completely believable.
I'm not saying he asked for one. I'm not saying defend him. I'm saying defend what you post, explain your votes, don't ve vague because that reeks of scum. God.
Mirhawk didn't call me out for jumping off the wake wagon, so....what? Or am I just scummy for voting someone who was voting me?BP wrote:Jumped off Wake's wagon (acting hella guilty) and joined in on the guy who called you out on it. Hella scum.
No he didn't. I think by myself sometimes, ya know? I'M calling you scum for: correcting a behaviour that caused someone to vote on you, in this case, going on a wagon. Mirhaws said kill Scarab because he just jumped on a wagon. Scarab says wait what? Guyz, that's scummy let's kill him instead. Everyone knows asking for explanations isn't scummy. It's reading exercises. God.
Okay, are you serious? I'm scum for being off on my reads and for voting based on it? And god, go back and read post 333 5 or 6 more times until you actually understand it. Y'know, that post that you said was "overexplaining" that I made to be nice to you because you were too stupid to understand the initial explanation.BP wrote:I don't think you're as scummy as Wake. Wake is aggressive scum, the kind that likes to be noticed and pretend he's Town's Guardian Angel. You are just off on your reads. If you had said like "pressure on you bud I wanna know what's scummy on me", ok. You called him scum for calling you scum for jumping on a wagon.You know nothing because you fail hard at interpreting, as shown above. GOD
All of the LOL's. That the sole reason I quoted this. LOL.In post 437, Scarab wrote:
I'm missing nothing. You gave a weakass "feels off" scum read on me after a less-than-half-hearted interaction with me. In responding to my questioning of it, you defended Mirhawk, who you've previously said I made good points against. Your interactions reek of Mirhawk-buddy. You're were trying to soft-defend him by going after me.In post 433, BP wrote:Scarab, you're missing many things, but here's one.
I don't need you to believe me. I don't like you anymore.
FoS Scarab
Wake's post will decide if I change my vote.
I miss nothing
Oh, also, I thought by myself. I said your vote would've been okay if your thought process was different. It was stoopid. You just made me create a whole new list. The stoopid list.
STOOPID: Scarab
^ Here, see?-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
I'm just saying I thought it felt off to me when you said she had an interesting POV. I explained myself as to why that felt off. What didn't you understand from my post? I think it was an acceptable thought process.In post 440, farside22 wrote:In post 330, BP wrote:
Don't quote me without context. Context is the most important thing in this game.In post 328, farside22 wrote:
She explained it just fine in the quote. You know I have ADD and skim read post because of it, did you miss how she explained what she saw?bp wrote:That just looks like "I'm sorry I looked scummy", Farside. She literally said there was no way to word it. Why is it an interesting POV? I can only imagine you took it as an advice not to look scummy. If you're Town, you have no reason to fear this. If you're scum, that makes it interesting.
I may have missed it. You tend to do that when you're squeezing so much text and analysis on only one hour. Would you care to explain again and properly rather than just fighting off who doubts you? Interesting departure from your previous stance on being attacked. Is it because you were called out for it?
The post I'm referring to is this post and what you said at the end.
I didn't get your point at all since you directlyquote(sic) Alina's response that I was responding to. Hence my did you read the post question.
I don't even know what you want me to explain.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
What exactly is hard to understand?In post 442, Scarab wrote:In post 424, BP wrote:So I went back. All Mirhawk did was suspect both YOU AND ME for jumping on the wagon, according to him.
[...]
To make it easier to you and everyone else. He voted for something very believable, so much that I actually went ahead and explained myself, along with a sarcastic remark about precisely what you said with the timing and all. But I never voted him for itbecause asking for explanation for jumping on a wagon is something completely believable.
Hey, BP, you may not care if I believe you, but you might want to explain this to the rest of the class~In post 329, BP wrote:Scarab does so nice in exposing Mirhawk's awful post on him, but then he does the same and prematurely votes him.
Exposing as in showing that Mirhawk's post was stupid for saying people did it on a wagon so oppertunistic when the time period between the votes was so short. You did that good, Scarab. What you failed at was the REASON for the vote. It was because he voted for you instead of being like "Hey, buddy, explain yourself". You jumped to a scumread immediately - no, it wasn't a read, you actively said HE'S SCUM. It was premature. It was a reaction on edge. It wasn't interested in scumreading. It was stoopid.
It was scummylike. What exactly is hard? Please pinpoint if needed.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
You're so stoopid it hurts.In post 451, Scarab wrote:
That's your list of reads and you think you have any right to try to smear someone who's given real reasons for their reads? Go back to Little League.BP wrote:SCUM: Wake M.D.( I haven't given up on you)
Farside (just something, urghhhh)
Scarab feels off to me-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
This was so...I'm gonna use the word ODD, to humour Adrien, that I forgot the fallacy in it.In post 451, Scarab wrote:
That's your list of reads and you think you have any right to try to smear someone who's given real reasons for their reads? Go back to Little League.BP wrote:SCUM: Wake M.D.( I haven't given up on you)
Farside (just something, urghhhh)
Scarab feels off to me
Even if I hadn't explained my scumreads, which I have, that doesn't let you off the hook.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
VOTE: Scarab. For everything, which is mainly threefold:
1. for scumreading only the people that go after him. i mean, we're 21, and his scumreads happen to be people that have questioned his behaviour. As I stated, I firmly believe that questioning people's behaviour is Town. You gotta, in order the filter out the bullshit and get to the actual scum. He doesn't do this, he just tries to find reasons to attack people that have attached him. This goes to such an extent that he refuses to scumlist on a non-existing reason (vide 451).
2. for the explanation I have previously on posts 424 and 439.
3. for this:
Fucking Jesus.In post 477, Scarab wrote:
Oh come on. It's an open game, so there is literally nothing that anyone can learn from me having said that I flipped in it that wasn't already 100% known. Don't be such a hardass.In post 475, Toomai wrote:
Regardless of my vote on him, I would like to apologize for my nervy insults-of-sorts. In my culture insults are a statement, not exactly an insult. (Swear to god). We don't take this sort of insults very seriously, but I can see how it would to other people. I don't want anyone to feel bad about anything at all other than poor gameplay (we are playing a game tho), so I am withdrawing my frustration-reacting insults with an apology to those that may have felt unconfortable with them.
Onto other stuff.
It seemed to be that jumping off a wagon as soon as someone tells you that your vote was wagon-motivated is something that scum would do, because scum like to avoid scum-tells. Mirhawk said his vote had been oportunistic, and Scarab's reaction wasn't to explain his vote a little better, he straight up accused him of being scum. I saw that as an opportunity for him to get off the wagon he was accused of being in to join another one. That read scum to me. Also, I never said his explanation didn't exist, rather, that it wasn't the best one out there, and the vote was poorly motivated.In post 472, Aegor wrote:@BP re:424: Do you suspect Scarab for 208 because of the OMGUS? I do not really see the leaping off the wagon unless you are claiming that Scarab's vote on Mirhawk was an actual attempt to move off Wake, in which case I would ask you how you could know that.
Also, Scarab's vote on Mirhawk was clearly explained in the very post in which the vote was made.
Further play from Scarab told me he just attacks people that suspect him. That also makes me suspect him. So having suspected him, I prompty got attacked. The only reason he hasn't voted me was because he thinks me and mirhawk (the people who attacked him the most) are the scum so far, and his vote's already on one of us.
As Salamence has said, in this game, communication is the key. What we needed to do so early in the game is put pressure on people to see how they respond. That's what Wade was supposedly trying to do. But that doesn't seem to be Scarab's style. SO there.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
So it's safe to assume you feel the same for Wake?In post 523, Aeronaut wrote:
Hmm.... so you're telling us that every time you seem scummy, it's alright because you're just scumreading? Seems a bit shady.In post 519, reinoe wrote: Hey farside. Anything I do that looks scummy is a reaction test to generate discussion.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
Who else are you referring to?In post 527, Not_Mafia wrote:Yeah not liking either of those reactions, Clusk in particular-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
NM, you mean this? What's so wrong with it?In post 523, Aeronaut wrote:
Hmm.... so you're telling us that every time you seem scummy, it's alright because you're just scumreading? Seems a bit shady.In post 519, reinoe wrote: Hey farside. Anything I do that looks scummy is a reaction test to generate discussion.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
#lolIn post 536, HunterSeeker wrote:Hey we are not letting the scums coast to victory here are we. Let's push on some of the lurkers here.
Alright then!FoS HunterSeeker-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
Why is everyone forgetting this?In post 504, Aegor wrote:Everyone:
TOP SCUMREAD. GO.
Boosnkiies, for clear active lurking, self-voting, useless votes, and AtE.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
That's fair enough, but only a small number of people did it. And there was a lot of them posting stuff.
No one wants to give out reads. I wonder why.
I'm going back and watching who did and didn't out of those who posted.
Freudian Slip did.
Burning Town head TN posted and did.
Alina gave a full list, and so did Adrien.
Aeronaut posted a quick review of what he found noteworhty but said he would give out reads later.
Farside did.
Boonskiies didn't.
Sal did.
Reinoe didn't and said everything he would do would be to provoke reactions.
I did and voted for mine.
Clusk didn't and focused on reinoe's weird vote instead.
Brood said his brain couldn't manage to.
HunterSeeker basically said lurkers, so I guess he put himself up on the chopping block.
And Clusk finally did after I asked again.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
In post 549, Clusk92 wrote:Top scumreads atm are Boon, Wake and Scarab
Interesting at least.In post 534, TheAdrienC wrote:Scum read count:
Boonskiies: 3 (Aegor, BurningTown, Me)
Scarab: 5 (Not Mafia, BurningTown, Alina, farside, BP)
Me: 2 (Alina, Sal)
Clusk: 2 (Alina, farside, BP)
BP: 1 (farside)
SKOT: 2 (Me, Sal)
Wake: 3 (Me, Sal, BP)
Farside: 1 (BP)
We're not agree much. And most of the people stating Scarab (who has the highest with five) aren't even pushing for him to be the lynch.
Wanna say something about this there, Clusk?-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
I'm happy with that.In post 563, Clusk92 wrote:
Or it shows that those 3 are the ones that are coming across as most scummy - which they are.In post 560, BP wrote:So what you give you explanations for them whatsoever. Saying they scumread without saying why is weird.That your top scumreads are the group's means setting up to wagon a lynch.
Explain yourself.
Other people haven't explained their scumreads either so I don't see why its weird.
I'll explain mine later if it makes you happy, can't be bothered atm.
In the meantime: HunterSeeker's post is too much of a shot in the own foot to be scum. My vote stays put.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
I'm sorry. I was jest- joking.In post 565, Alina wrote:What roles are typically allowed in normals btw? Is there a link that I could read? I read someone say that jesters aren't normal earlier but I just want to make sure that none of that is going on and I can actually be happy finding people scummy-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
HunterSeeker said "let's lynch the lurkers!". HunterSeeker is a lurker.In post 571, farside22 wrote:
You are one of the few not saying much in the game since I called you out.In post 563, Clusk92 wrote:
Or it shows that those 3 are the ones that are coming across as most scummy - which they are.In post 560, BP wrote:So what you give you explanations for them whatsoever. Saying they scumread without saying why is weird.That your top scumreads are the group's means setting up to wagon a lynch.
Explain yourself.
Other people haven't explained their scumreads either so I don't see why its weird.
I'll explain mine later if it makes you happy, can't be bothered atm.
I'd love to see a reason.
What do you mean shot in the own foot scum?In post 564, BP wrote:
I'm happy with that.In post 563, Clusk92 wrote:
Or it shows that those 3 are the ones that are coming across as most scummy - which they are.In post 560, BP wrote:So what you give you explanations for them whatsoever. Saying they scumread without saying why is weird.That your top scumreads are the group's means setting up to wagon a lynch.
Explain yourself.
Other people haven't explained their scumreads either so I don't see why its weird.
I'll explain mine later if it makes you happy, can't be bothered atm.
In the meantime: HunterSeeker's post is too much of a shot in the own foot to be scum. My vote stays put.
It looks like too much of a shot in the own foot for a mafia member. At least to me.
Also, I'm happier with my vote on Scarab, but I'm totes eager to hear from Wake again.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
Good point, btw.
HS's vote was done still on Page 2, during RVS, and hasn't taken it off it after 21 pages. Actually, on 209, he reiterated his vote.
Gosh darnit, son, speak up!-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
In post 25, Not_Mafia wrote:Not_Mafia*, I meant Not_Mafia!
Don't let the paranoids get to you, Wake.In post 607, Wake1 wrote:
Sure you didn't.In post 606, Not_Mafia wrote:Didn't mean it as an accusatory question
It's not like we're playing Mafia where murderous people look anywhere they can for BS reasons to lynch Townies.
No, I will play at my own pace. I don't have to read every single post in this huge game just to be caught up.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
let's see if I can use the spoiler tag properly.Apparently not :P, so Toomai fixed it.
Here's Farside's take on me:
Spoiler: spoilered text
OK, so.
First of all, I did not cherry pick that thing you said. It rang phoney to me, and it felt as if you were trying to make amends with people who look the most Town (in my pov, those are Alina and Sal, fyi), and it felt like you took it as a piece of advice. I was not looking through the thread for something that might resemble scumsmoke. I read and it felt scumsmoke. Period.
My 198 was a request of enlightment made by ... <checks who> shaddowez on 157. So, yeah, it felt exagerated because I was overexplaining myself to try and say things clearer.
Then you mention the number of FoS's I placed whilst noting the fact I called Wake scum mainly for that - which is explained on 198 (again), and interpret it as me being incosistent. It isn't. Wake, 50 was his first post for srs voting, and he does it the way we all saw. The first, with a vote and 3 FoS's based basically solely on RVS. Not the same as being on page twenty-something and actually having scumreads on people. Also, is it OK to have a list of 3 scumreads but not OK to have 3 FoS's on people? Are those not the same? If they are, as they should, why don't you have a problem with my 408 ?
Then you apparently have a problem with my 327... For my points against Scarab? Or with the fact that I thought Adrien was being weird and therefore unreadable to me (as explained later when my spamtime).
I'm actually gonna quote this again to check that's the post we're talking about...Did you not notice the italics on my 439, which you called "hand waves points against him"? I italicized my response directly in Scarab's quote on my post. Check again.
520: Lots of words with a vote? Shall I vote and not say why? What is this?
And finally you return to the fact I FoS'ed 3 people more than 15 pages after I attacked Wake for doing it. Different situations. Different reasons for FoS'ing.
Get your shit straight, Farside.Last edited by Toomai on Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:06 am, edited 1 time in total.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
OH MY GOD. THEY'RE ONTO ME AND USING MY NAME SEVERAL TIMES. OOOOH SHIT, WHAT DO I DO NOW THEY HAVE ADDRESSED TO ME IN DEROGATORY TERMS. DAMN I'M SCARED.In post 632, Wake1 wrote:*Rolls sleeves up*
You don't suspectwho, Salamence? 610
BP's either Anti-Town or he's got something to hide. He completed disregarded my 577 and then pretended it didn't exist. Probably pissed himself a bit at the thought of giving his thoughts on my post. Yeah, I know, it'sso hardto respond to direct questions. You WILL answer me on this, BP, or I'll pester you for answers for the remainder of the game. Don't youdarethink for one minute you can run and hide from questions, little buddy. I'll be on you like a daschund in heat.
Explain yourself, Adrien. 578 has you saying you're listening but taking my reasoning with a grain of salt. Yeah. OK. Why? Walk us through this for us all why don't you? Hey, don't look at me like that. You're the one who made the comment, so you might as well explain the thought behind it.
Guys, I'm thinking we should put some pressure on BP.Or Boonskies. Or whoever else that's not really doing anything.
I want some fucking answers, so VOTE: BP.
Mirhawk I don't know much about that issue in 618. It's a matter of debate what the psychology is around telling people to vote, and whether it's on a sub-conscious level or not. I do know that barking for people to vote someone else a certain way is a deliberate act to get them to behave a certain way. Or maybe Salamence is just flexing his spirit muscles, trying to get players to bend to his will a bit. I necver thought of it before, but I've got to thank that cheeky fucker for the idea. I don't know about your vote atm, and it's too early to weigh it accurately. Now stop being so careful and get more active.
@ shaddowez621: Oh, ok. Thanks for the elucidation. Anything else?
Like hell you're obvtown, Boonskies. What you are is impotent. 301: "Oh myyyy, they're voting meeee.... I guess I should vote myselffff... waaah..." Do not make excuses in my presence, Boonskies. You'll get no sympathy from me. I get none in general, and I expect you and everyone else not to, either. Have a spine and show an interest in the game, yeah? You've done NOTHING to be obvtown. All you've done is whine about how incompetent and Scummy you are. Newsflash: That's not being Townish. That's called being a Weenie. Show you've got some damned spirit and actuallyquestionpeople for once, why don't you?
629: I highly doubt that. More than once in my time playing Mafia has some uptight swamp eunuch asked me that question to try and use it to lynch me. So what if I'm not caught up. If I don't want to read every single post I'm sure as hell not going to.Oh, I don't get offended, either. I reveal my latent abrasiveness.
You do not scare me, Wake, and I am not intimidated by your play. You think you can just bullshit and intimidade your way through the game, but fortunately there are players here that can't see past the pseudo-anger and pseudo-vindictive struggle for anti-scum justice.
For someone who described themselves like they did on 266, you're either incredibly oblivous or lazy.
580.
Or maybe you want my take on the entirety of your post of the first 100 posts of the game? I'm not gonna do that. It's way too lengthy and way more has happened since #266, most of which you haven't addressed.
You have squat on me. You quoted nothing of what I said, and your whole #632 is a festering piece of bullyness that has no depth to it. No analysis, just straight up threats and the sort.
I don't care at all for your little tantrums, Wake.-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
May I also say, no Clusk yet?In post 555, BP wrote:In post 549, Clusk92 wrote:Top scumreads atm are Boon, Wake and Scarab
Interesting at least.In post 534, TheAdrienC wrote:Scum read count:
Boonskiies: 3 (Aegor, BurningTown, Me)
Scarab: 5 (Not Mafia, BurningTown, Alina, farside, BP)
Me: 2 (Alina, Sal)
Clusk: 2 (Alina, farside, BP)
BP: 1 (farside)
SKOT: 2 (Me, Sal)
Wake: 3 (Me, Sal, BP)
Farside: 1 (BP)
We're not agree much. And most of the people stating Scarab (who has the highest with five) aren't even pushing for him to be the lynch.
Wanna say something about this there, Clusk?-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
My response to that is:In post 649, TheAdrienC wrote:
DEFINE FUCKING FAKE, FOR CRYING OUT FUCKING LOUD AND STOP FUCKING REPEATING YOURSELF!!! WHAT THE FUCK MAKES MY POSTS FAKE?! BECAUSE I HAVE PUT MY HONEST TO GOD OPINION ON EVERY SINGLE FUCKING POST THAT I HAVE FUCKING DONE EVERY SINCE I STARTED THIS FUCKING GAME1 SO EXPLAIN TO ME HOW THE FUCK MY POSTS ARE FAKE IN SPECIFIC FUCKING DETAIL OR SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT IT!!In post 648, Salamence20 wrote:Because everything you say is FAKE AS SHIT
Fucking dumbass!
In post 149, TheAdrienC wrote: Whoa, whoa, whoa!! What the hell is this?-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT
Do me again Wake. This time seriously, pls. No derogatives or threats. Just try.
-
-
BP Goon
-
-
BP Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 624
- Joined: February 9, 2012
- Location: Braga, PT