NY 179: Cute and Fluffy Mafia (Town Win)

FakedBlogger · Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:06 am

Man do I fucking hate Garmr and DS. Seriously, guy votes me naked and then keeps posting the deadline countdown. What douchebagery is this?

FakedBlogger · Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:11 am

And how he hammered SC. That was just whack. If Kthx is town then then jailkeeper, odd-night tracker, even-night rolecop, fruit vendor + VTs vs tracker + goons with a slightly scumsided ratio looks like a decent setup.

FakedBlogger · Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:14 am

An all town Neighborhood adds some confusion to town, fruit vendor can attract a NK if tracked by scum and can confirm himself in the endgame if left alive by scum. I really like the whole dynamic and would run this if I was mod, probably going to run it too.

FakedBlogger · Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:17 am

But let's say we switch fruit vendor from town to scum and add masons. That would increase town confusion but also add more confirmation power to town. But fruit vendor and masons for town? WHY?! That's just fugly

FakedBlogger · Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:23 am

That's pussy mouth (PM). She's ok.

FakedBlogger · Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:29 am

nope.

FakedBlogger · Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:33 am

In post 2788, Nero Cain wrote:Talk about your lack of good town play.

?

FakedBlogger · Fri Mar 13, 2015 4:04 am

Garmr, link me TTH's posts that back up your theory that she rolecopped you.

FakedBlogger · Fri Mar 13, 2015 11:51 am

Hello?!

FakedBlogger · Sat Mar 14, 2015 3:04 am

Heloooooooooo

FakedBlogger · Sat Mar 14, 2015 8:24 am

In post 2833, dragonspawn wrote:It helps if you post something to respond to.

You mean like this?

In post 2814, FakedBlogger wrote:Garmr, link me TTH's posts that back up your theory that she rolecopped you.

FakedBlogger · Sat Mar 14, 2015 8:27 pm

Why don't you respond to it?

FakedBlogger · Sun Mar 15, 2015 3:20 am

In post 2842, Garmr wrote:
In post 2841, FakedBlogger wrote:Why don't you respond to it?

It's been explained before if you were town you would be paying attention to it.

You can answer it or let him answer it. Why choose to be annoying and tell town he's not town?

FakedBlogger · Sun Mar 15, 2015 10:50 am

I seriously don't get the hate on my avy, unless people jelly.

I'm also town and for the record I didn't have a scumread on pen or ABR. I had a townread on Stranger based on one post, so it wasn't very serious. Flubber and Stranger were lurkers and I agreed to lynch lurkers/no reason providers and I thought I hammered Ika.

I've tunneled d3x but nobody cared to follow me so that didn't effect the game too drastically.

Garmr could be scum for trying to make me look scummy with his 'NJ tried to diffuse my push on RM' shit day2, and weak-speculation vote and no comment on Kthx yesterday.

But I can't decide who I think is scummiest. So I'll just vote VOTE: DGB

FakedBlogger · Tue Mar 17, 2015 9:18 pm

I can confirm this ^

FakedBlogger · Wed Mar 18, 2015 11:22 pm

In post 1442, TellTaleHeart wrote:
In post 1440, dragonspawn wrote:If rm isn't lynched id rather see Nero lynched than ika at this point than ika.

*Throws computer out window*

In post 1529, TellTaleHeart wrote:No, I was actually wrong about DS, Nero. Please try to keep up.

i.e. TTH changed her stance on DS before the day was over.

FakedBlogger · Thu Mar 19, 2015 3:48 am

In post 2885, Garmr wrote:@Naked failure
Also would like to point out We have been crumbing masons from day 1 me and dragonspawn. If we were scum the other scum members would of played along with the plan or shown a reaction and known about it. If you can't get basic logic like that you are a failure at this game.

Can you provide valid arguments for TTH having rolcopped you or not. Because the read change on DS isn't it. And that verbal diarrhea you call logic is verbal diarrhea.
Played along how, with what plan, what reaction, known about what? They were lurking most of the time, how can you use the lack of a specific reaction as argumentation and drop the word logic anywhere near it.

FakedBlogger · Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:15 pm

In post 2887, Garmr wrote:Can you provide a valid argument we are not masons.

You're retreating Garmr. You went from claiming to be confirmed town to being unable to comply with providing a single argument as to why you are a mason and not scum claiming to be mason.

If you were indeed masons with DS then I presume scum would've challenged your claim. Therefore you must be scum because the only one 'casting doubt' on you is me.
VOTE: DS

FakedBlogger · Thu Mar 19, 2015 11:57 pm

The only way this game would do a 180 and turn out to be awesome is if DS flips scum and we have a whole day with nothing else to do except for me to post animated gifs along with your quotes to mock the shit out of you.

FakedBlogger · Fri Mar 20, 2015 12:13 am

Alright then.

unvote

VOTE: Kthx or

unvote

VOTE: DGB

FakedBlogger · Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:51 am

Spoiler: DS really doesn't want a no lynch

In post 2918, dragonspawn wrote:Is there someone that four of us can lynch because I really don't want a no vote today and you guys can't seem to get behind one.

Just when I was wondering when DS was going to not want a no lynch again he calls it no vote instead. What a radical fucking twist.

FakedBlogger · Fri Mar 20, 2015 6:26 pm

If you two are acting stupid to piss me off it works.

FakedBlogger · Fri Mar 20, 2015 9:31 pm

So Nero and TDA are advocating a Kthx lynch. Garmr, DS and Kthx are advocating a TDA lynch. DGB is advocating a NJ lynch and NJ is advocating a DGB. Conclusion: let's lynch DGB.

FakedBlogger · Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:26 am

What? Lynch me?! Oh no. Prepare to get hammered TDA.

FakedBlogger · Sat Mar 21, 2015 10:36 am

In post 2948, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 2946, FakedBlogger wrote:What? Lynch me?! Oh no. Prepare to get hammered TDA.

This troll, however... is scum.

^ caught scum.

FakedBlogger · Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:37 pm

We are lynching DGB today.

FakedBlogger · Sat Mar 21, 2015 10:53 pm

Good job.

FakedBlogger · Fri Mar 27, 2015 8:13 am

That was some flawless modding.

MVP was TDA imo. Among his feats were managing town's comeback after the controversy around Nero with accurate reads and sheepworthy arguments, awareness and behavior. Scum's biggest mistake was not to cap him.
TTA didn't get the chance to outshine Dude and Nero's fakeclaims would've done a hell of a lot more damage if Dude hadn't stood up for him.

I had fun talking to Kthx and I'm thankful for it. Garmr not so much but hey, .. whatever. Good game.

FakedBlogger · Fri Mar 27, 2015 8:32 am

EBWOP: TTH.

FakedBlogger · Fri Mar 27, 2015 9:23 am

No, he won the right to say whatever the fuck he wants by investing in this game, whereas you're more invested in post-game talk than you were in the game itself. Booo!

FakedBlogger · Fri Mar 27, 2015 11:36 pm

In post 3090, d3x wrote:I'd recommend finding a different tactic

The data by which to make a clear judgment on its efficacy is insufficient as of yet. There are various variables, the outplay of which need to be cross-referenced; for instance I need to see how it plays out when my scumread is in fact scum. Also game victory or loss, alignment of scumread's scumread and everything there ever existed as a consequence of everything existing needs to be taken into consideration. I.e. a lot of work and I should get to it. *rolls up sleeves*. Jk, I don't have any sleeves.