In post 3093, goodmorning wrote:and Mah cannot be with Red.
I disagree.[/quote]
Give me reasons why.
Also who is Mah's werewolf buddy since Anna is conftown?
In post 3093, goodmorning wrote:and Mah cannot be with Red.
In post 3099, Nosferatu wrote:If she's an odd night vig, why haven't there been three kills other than on the first night?
In post 3103, Lapsa wrote: you surely are quite magical, Fro99er
In post 3108, goodmorning wrote:Tell me why he can't. You keep asserting that it's not possible, but I don't see any reasons why not.
In post 2668, Fro99er wrote:well, I made it through post 363, and I'm pretty sure that post confirms mahonster and red are not scum together. But I do think one of the two is scum based off that post.
We could leash T S O, lynch red and have T S O vig Mahonster to guarantee we hit scum, then get T S O when the time is right. This gives us two scum dead for sure, and possibly three if we're somehow in SK+scum+scum (like 2-2-1).
Or we could just lynch claimed SK, but that only guarantees us one dead anti-town.
In post 3122, Mahonster wrote:And I don't see your point of godfather balancing out Ascetic? How?
In post 3082, goodmorning wrote:[Neighborizer] definitely wouldn't balance as a Scum role in this game, because there's no role so comparatively weak for it to balance with on the other team.
In post 3305, SilverWolf wrote:Have all the scum agree'd to have their PT's released yet?
I think Fro99er did.
Kop-you didn't say anything.
It'd be nice if you guys said something one way or another.
Keep in mind, I never have a problem with releasing any of my scum PT's, even the one in 185 that was 24 pages long and has a lot of info. in it about how I think and play as scum.
So do me a favor and don't hold back. TIA
In post 3275, SilverWolf wrote:I will never assume neighborizers are town ever again.
I will never try to leash again.
I will never out my PR earlier than I have to.
I will try to keep my temper under better control.
Lessons Learned.