In post 1793, ronit wrote:
Care to explain?
Gamr quote where DS was scummy, seeing as you made the best case in the game it shouldnt be that hard.
How about you actually iso me and look.
In post 1793, ronit wrote:
Care to explain?
Gamr quote where DS was scummy, seeing as you made the best case in the game it shouldnt be that hard.
In post 1790, Shazam wrote:In post 1789, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 1786, ronit wrote:In post 1785, Garmr wrote:That makes me want to lynch you more
Because your argument about me being a noob just crumbled?? I do this test in nearly every game I play in. Couldn't do it in my first one as I replaced into the last day of the game but this is my 3rd game, I am currently in 2 games.
And yet STILL have failed to provide any actual logic and conclusions other than a naked shizam is town statement or addressed the long list of grievances that I posted to shizam about how this 'test' is BS.
Your "long list of grievances" relied on oversimplification of the situation to question the reliability of the test. I was in fact the only one to whom his particular logic applied, and it made me look town to him, and made nobody look scum to him. That is reasonable considering the actual logic he is using. I have played on epicmafia before, and I know how these reaction tests tend to work there. ronit's story about what he was doing is 100% believable now that he has specifically brought up that site.
In post 1872, Titus wrote:Too risky IMO. Thoughts on Hermit please?
In post 1849, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I wonder why myself or Garmr didn't die. I'm also wondering why there was only two kills.
I wish I hadn't got so fucking annoyed at start of D2.
In post 1873, Aeronaut wrote:I could get behind kitty. She hasn't done a lot.
I don't think I could get behind BBT, though. I actually do see the Odd-night vig claim as plausible, but I feel like he would have said Odd-night to begin with if he were lying. I sort of wonder why he'd still be alive, though at this point.
Garmr what do you think of Key? I feel like he was really prominent and talkative early on and now he's basically nowhere.
In post 1875, Firebringer wrote:In post 1866, Garmr wrote:Ok lets try this from a new angle
People I know are town-
Me
People who I feel are town
Titus
Blue waffle-maybe a sk still with his power role scum need to be shooting him soon anyway.
ank- feels like his you could be anyone 2&3
I feel like
Aero
Kitty
Faq2
Are pretty good candidates for scum. In fact
VOTE: KittyGalore
Can I be added to your town list?
I will be your best friend
No but seriously, why Kitty?
In post 1879, Aeronaut wrote:
Bulb's crumb.
In post 1878, Garmr wrote:
I'll probably die after a couple of scum have dropped. Scum team a(daves) Need to kill the other scum to = the field scum team B need to kill scum team a to have breathing room.
Why are you assuming it's two scum teams?
In post 1917, Kitty Galore wrote:Bit suspicious was going to wait a little longer to see what he does.
In post 1875, Firebringer wrote:In post 1866, Garmr wrote:Ok lets try this from a new angle
People I know are town-
Me
People who I feel are town
Titus
Blue waffle-maybe a sk still with his power role scum need to be shooting him soon anyway.
ank- feels like his you could be anyone 2&3
I feel like
Aero
Kitty
Faq2
Are pretty good candidates for scum. In fact
VOTE: KittyGalore
Can I be added to your town list?
I will be your best friend
No but seriously, why Kitty?
Kitty attacking DS day 1 wagon early is a trait shared with dave
Her staying away from the two wagons day 2 (me and dave) is a pretty good indicator she didn't want to be on any of the lynches. Espically since she had a scum read on me which makes me think she knew I was going to flip town and she didn't want the negative attention on her for tipping the scales towards me.
That is terrible. DS was town? I was attacking a wagon on town. Lol
Also, I explained why I joined neither wagon. I didn't like the people on the wagons and I didn't feel confident enough to make a vote on either one. Nice try though.
In post 1916, FA_Q2 wrote:Well, apparently I suck this game.
I do have to wonder why BBT is still alive though.
I am thinking that may be the point of him still being alive.
But...
@BBT-why did you vig kill Bulbs?
In post 1938, Kitty Galore wrote:Adding Garmr to my scum list. Not because he is voting or accusing me. Mostly for trying to make the argument that I didn't vote him because I "knew he would flip town". Actually I was scum reading him more and town reading Dave more. I was wrong, and I was surprised. I was leaning the opposite of the people on the wagons. I am not, and was never certain he would flip town.
So Boon, you gonna play this game or not?
And I have been feeling Aero scummy for awhile now, that train had lost steam.
VOTE: Aeronaut
In post 1953, Kitty Galore wrote:Oh by the way, with a possible secret vote, my vote may be L-1 for Aero?
In post 1958, Kitty Galore wrote:In post 876, Kitty Galore wrote:I have posted questions and just got one of them answered, thanks Bulba. I only asked since you seemed ultra defensive, but were calling defensiveness scummy.
Aero, whare are ya?
I didn't vote at all, secret or otherwise. I came back to vote and all of a sudden it is night, as I explained before. I know nothing of any hidden mechanics.
I realize I have been coasting, yeah I am playing the newbie card, but I am, so there is that.
Here is a bare read list.
RC-null
Boonskies- lean scum
Swordmaster/Titus- lean scum
Aeronaut- lean scum
Bulbazoor- lean town
Kop- lean scum
dragonspawn- did lean town- more null
FA_Q2 -lean scum
Shazam- lean town
TheDominator37 Bellaphant- lean town
Garmr -lean scum
TheCow lean scum
davesaz -null
duppin - lean town
Keyser Söze -lean town
BlueBloodedToffee -lean scum
I think a BBT lynch would answer a lot of questions. I think he is scum, and in the slim chance he is town, it will give us more direction. He has had a good amount of interactions with other players, not me so much. I have a feeling that is about to change.
VOTE: BBT
Just a reminder.
In post 1845, Kitty Galore wrote:Scum = Aero, Titus, Boon....somewhere in there.
I wasn't clear, you are right. I meant I was adding you to here.
In post 1938, Kitty Galore wrote:Adding Garmr to my scum list.
In post 1970, Kitty Galore wrote:Again Garmr, site me where I have town read you. Please.
I actually dgaf what people think, I'm just saying what I like and don't like. Scum likes to make a big deal out of small misunderstandings. This is what we have here. If you can get me lynched for it, be my guest. I explained which "scum" list I was talking about, the one that I posted off the top of my head. The one where I name three people I'm suspicious of, but you are saying that means I'm town reading everyone else?
@Titus-I thought that was obviously sarcasm. I will tag it next time./sarcasm
@ Aero-Because I like your posts better. You are back in the game and scum hunting. I like the questions you are asking. I don't see a reason for you to be at L-1 at the moment. Just in case you were.
In post 1994, Garmr wrote:In post 1970, Kitty Galore wrote:Again Garmr, site me where I have town read you. Please.
I actually dgaf what people think, I'm just saying what I like and don't like. Scum likes to make a big deal out of small misunderstandings. This is what we have here. If you can get me lynched for it, be my guest. I explained which "scum" list I was talking about, the one that I posted off the top of my head. The one where I name three people I'm suspicious of, but you are saying that means I'm town reading everyone else?
@Titus-I thought that was obviously sarcasm. I will tag it next time./sarcasm
@ Aero-Because I like your posts better. You are back in the game and scum hunting. I like the questions you are asking. I don't see a reason for you to be at L-1 at the moment. Just in case you were.
You really are a special type of person aren't you. I never said you town read me I'm saying you used two different type of languages that contradict each other meaning that one of them is a lie. Town had no reason to lie in that position. Now your just playing it offwith the"I never said I town read you thing" when that's not even the point.
In post 1998, Ankamius wrote:What makes it not null?
In post 2002, Kitty Galore wrote:@ Garmr -Yeah, the game was a little over whelming and daunting. That's why I really focused on a few things that bothered me. I have been playing 3 games, one off site and another here. This is the only one I have going atm. Plus, busy with RL...kids, school. If anyone really cares.
Anyway, this is getting fun. It's adorable that you see me as such a threat because I added you to my short list for scum. Are you trying to say I'm lying about how many varied scum lists I have going on in my head? I don't even see that as possible. But if you don't have anything better to do, it's cool.
You are reaching with a weak case, cutie.
so what do you think kittyIn post 2014, Ankamius wrote:In post 1999, Garmr wrote:In post 1998, Ankamius wrote:What makes it not null?
The fact its when she's brought into the spotlight. She showed barely any initiative the previous days.
Yeah, that's exactly what's null about it.
In post 2019, Ankamius wrote:idk
I think we'd have to engage on something for me to get a particular read on her.
In post 2019, Ankamius wrote:idk
I think we'd have to engage on something for me to get a particular read on her.
In post 2022, Ankamius wrote:I have no idea what you're even talking about.
In post 2024, Aeronaut wrote:Where did she say she's always scumread you Garmr? Like which post?
In post 2036, Kitty Galore wrote:I scum read you and added too to my short list of scum. That isn't honest? What is so hard to understand?
In post 2046, Kitty Galore wrote:In post 2038, Garmr wrote:In post 2036, Kitty Galore wrote:I scum read you and added too to my short list of scum. That isn't honest? What is so hard to understand?
Why didn't you say that earlier instead you let me go on. If you could see what I was thinking why didn't you correct me.
I did. See below.
And in another post also, I believe.
In post 1958, Kitty Galore wrote:In post 876, Kitty Galore wrote:I have posted questions and just got one of them answered, thanks Bulba. I only asked since you seemed ultra defensive, but were calling defensiveness scummy.
Aero, whare are ya?
I didn't vote at all, secret or otherwise. I came back to vote and all of a sudden it is night, as I explained before. I know nothing of any hidden mechanics.
I realize I have been coasting, yeah I am playing the newbie card, but I am, so there is that.
Here is a bare read list.
RC-null
Boonskies- lean scum
Swordmaster/Titus- lean scum
Aeronaut- lean scum
Bulbazoor- lean town
Kop- lean scum
dragonspawn- did lean town- more null
FA_Q2 -lean scum
Shazam- lean town
TheDominator37 Bellaphant- lean town
Garmr -lean scum
TheCow lean scum
davesaz -null
duppin - lean town
Keyser Söze -lean town
BlueBloodedToffee -lean scum
I think a BBT lynch would answer a lot of questions. I think he is scum, and in the slim chance he is town, it will give us more direction. He has had a good amount of interactions with other players, not me so much. I have a feeling that is about to change.
VOTE: BBT
Just a reminder.
In post 1845, Kitty Galore wrote:Scum = Aero, Titus, Boon....somewhere in there.
I wasn't clear, you are right. I meant I was adding you to here.
In post 2039, Garmr wrote:Also I don't care how you read me kitty it obvious I'm town to the competent players.
I'm not the one who is tunneling a townie.
In post 2056, Kitty Galore wrote:Voting for me because of associations with Dave... it is stretching. I have no problem being questioned, but that isn't what you did. You spun a narrative. I was against the dragon wagon because to me he wasn't acting scummy. And he was town. I was pretty vocal about it, so giving me a hard time about being against the wagon on town is not great. And yes, scum reading you for it, is because it is bad, and adding the narrative is just so not pro town. Telling a story that fits what you want it to say, and hoping people won't go back and see what really happened. It is a scummy move IMO. I am guessing dave was against the wagon for town cred, I was doing it because I was town/null reading him, and had reason to. Then when you added all the scum narrative, well, just eww.
And I have already explained why I had not put a vote down between you and Dave. I was town leaning dave and scum leaning you, however, I looked at the wagons and not all, but some of the people I was leaning opposite on were on those wagons. I had not made a decision yet. If you see that as scummy, that's your opinion. Didn't that day end early too?
Your actions reminded me of my first game here where Nacho tunneled me mercilessly, so my claws were out, so to speak.
If you or anyone else would like to continue to discuss it, cool. Now I would like to get back to my refresh.
I do want to say, I am going to look at this fire thing. I thought it was a good case that floated into limbo. I want to try to figure out why that happened. I think there was another too.
In post 708, Kitty Galore wrote:
In post 46, Aeronaut wrote:Clearly scum.
So I was supposed to think this was a serious vote?
In post 60, Aeronaut wrote:In post 39, dragonspawn wrote:So he omgus and you vote for me? And you guys don't offer any reasoning. Interesting. I'll have to make a note of that for later.
This ^ is what bothers me. A few votes into an RVS wagon and he's already guarded in this post.
So it's a serious vote for me. And it should be for you too.
OK, I missed this, so it IS serious. Why is this "being guarded"? It seems to me like he is just taking note of the behavior for later, not that he took it seriously as being against him at this time. I can see it looks defensive, but again, it feels like basic DS to me.
@Aeronaut- What is "clearly scum" about that post?
In post 94, Aeronaut wrote:In post 82, dragonspawn wrote:Saying omgus is defensive?
No, not really.
In post 83, Annadog40 wrote:I thought about it and I shall make that wagon on that good old dragonspawn a little bigger (Too much rhymes FTW)
VOTE: dragonspawn
So, you were happy with your RVS like two posts before this. What makes you change your mind?
In post 85, TheCow wrote:
I mean, I don't even think it was OMGUS, more like "you too". Though it wasn't saying OMGUS that the bandwagoners are latching onto, but the post after:
In post 39, dragonspawn wrote:So he omgus and you vote for me? And you guys don't offer any reasoning. Interesting. I'll have to make a note of that for later.
The tone isn't really that defensive -- it actually sounds fairly relaxed -- though the meaning behind it is, in the end, defensive. At least, that's what it looks like, I think.
If my understanding of what OMGUS may or may not mean is incorrect, please, someone correct me.
It's not about the OMGUS mention at all, it's the post where he's like "Oh you're voting me and not providing reasoning in RVS? Better put that in my notes TSK TSK!"
In post 86, dragonspawn wrote:
Garmr is probably town. If he was scum hr would probably be bussing his partners right now.
What?
In post 89, dragonspawn wrote:In post 84, Garmr wrote:Defensive is your reaction to multiple RVs votes on yourself
Btw how can you make me being defensive the justification for your vote if you vote for me before the post that is supposedly defensive?
I mean it could be his justification for KEEPING his vote on you, but at the same time this is an interesting point.
I liked what the cow said about the DS thing.
@ Aero- concerning the bolded above, How is that alignment indicative? Is it lynch worthy?
I just didn't think any of the things DS did were lynch worthy, from my knowledge of him. I am a noob though, so what do I know?
This is the biggest game I have played, it is daunting. I have kept up with reading, but not able to post when I want to, this is why I am going back over stuff from the beginning.
In post 145, Kitty Galore wrote:Hey there, so in watching the dragon wagon show, I have a couple of thoughts. I like keysers and aeronauts analysis and questioning.
My opinion of dragons response is that it is not an OVER reaction, it is a dragon reaction. I have played with him before and it seems like a typical dragon response. I don't see it being alignment indicative. I think serious votes on the wagon are bad.
I apologize if if it comes across nasty not my intention but my claws are sunk in now I won't quite down.In post 2062, Kitty Galore wrote:Wow.. do you need to be so nasty?
It was cute before, but it's becoming just rude. If that's your play style idc, same gos for me, obviously you don't like it. I was just responding to you asking why I have been scum reading you. We may TvT here, but unless a wagon gets going on you, I am moving on. If you are so hot to lynch me, take your best shot. But I am gonna flip town, so please, continue your nastiness and tunneling, if that's what you want to do. I am done with it.
In post 2086, Kitty Galore wrote:What's your read on me Titus, and why?
In post 2666, Ankamius wrote:I had Aero pegged as SK for like 3 entire day phases, just didn't want to out it because it only helps scum. :/