Battle Mage wrote:Lastly, i just wanted to point out the way in which your last post had strong hints of OMGUS in it. I dont see why you would get so edgy over a theory discussion unless you had something to hide.
Vote: Garnasha
Edgy? Not the right word, or I'm bad at reading myself. More like explaining myself, then while I was writing about the wiki wondering why you didn't at least check if the wiki had an entry on it, and posting my suspicions.
OMGUS is also misplaced here, because OMGUS strictly means voting someone because they're voting you, and in a broader sense this translates to being suspicious of/building a case against someone because they are suspicious of you. Actually your vote is a perfect example.
I did neither, I'm suspicious of you because it occured to me that instead of looking it up in the wiki you gave everybody a signal you don't have a clue what an arsonist is.
Ps. Let's look at your post 906, just for the exercise:
1. This sounded to me to mean basically: "There doesn't have to be an arsonist". And whose reaction? It's not clear to me how this would affect whether or not you'd look it up.
2. Directing attention towards Phate. You did agree earlier though that it was prolly an SK. Haven't got a clue why it wouldn't be a mafia group. Because the flavor doesn't fit
? It's not clear to me how this would affect whether or not you'd look it up.
3. It cost me about 20 secs to look it up: 6 for opening the wiki, 2 to write arsonist, 2 waiting for the page and 10 reading. It does however indeed give us something to discuss, namely why you thought you had to make it crystal clear here you don't know what an arsonist is. So your excuse for not looking it up is laziness?
4. I didn't call it common, I called it commonly known. That's something entirely different, so you mixing them up is, in your own words, "a gross misrepresentation". It's not clear to me how this would affect whether or not you'd look it up.
Of course, this analysis is made
suspecting
you are an arsonist. If I would think you're a townie, we get this list:
1. good point here, but I disagree: the mention of a false alarm doesn't make sense if there isn't a firefighter.
2. So you think Phate is an arsonist? Build a case against her(?) please and if it is a good one I'll support the BW.
3. Is it so much trouble? File that one under "lazy".
4. No, indeed, I've never seen one. However, I've only completed two games in my entire life and have two ongoing, so I could only work with what the wiki told me. Since even I knew it I thought about everybody would.
PPs. I now notice this has become a rather large post.
?
