This from someone who claims not to be carbon-based.Random Vote: Silent Speaker for defying the laws of logic.
Looking over the playerlist,
This from someone who claims not to be carbon-based.Random Vote: Silent Speaker for defying the laws of logic.
contains a strong scumtell and is important to note.Interesting. A shame though, I don't get to see the ridiculous playstyle of DGB in action because you blow up today . So is there actually a voting phase? Seems kinda counter intuitive.
(This was DOS's third post of the game, btw, so there's a little bit of hypocrisy in complaining that Tar had made only two posts.)Tarhalindur doesn't seem like a terrible choice to me either given that he has had two posts that were completely without content, and has made a baseless accusation because of, according to him, IIoA.
The first quote suggests that DOS doesn't think IIOA is a basis for an accusation, but the second implies thatFL: Do you not agree with IIoA? and for that matter who do you feel is committing IIoA that Tar is ignoring?
Vote Crazy between him and some of the other players in this game there is just too much craziness going around!
A protest of "he was talking about content, not quality" does not, to my mind, create a distinction with a difference.I don't get why so many people are trying to bring this game back to how the bomb works/ why the scum would give it to a certain person. It doesn't make any sense to me and I feel like it is hindering the hunting of scum.
unvote vote Max
This looks like inside knowledge about the scum.Crazy wrote:I'm sure with this group, the scum have plenty of meta knowledge between them already.
M4yhem speaks wisely hee. But WTF is up with forbiddanlight in the same post?Fos: Battousai, alvinz95, anyone else who doesn't know how the bomb works.
Seriously, people, didn't you read the game rules before signing up? Noone is that ignorant, surely, I don't buy it.
It's called a "scumtell". Agree with it or don't, but Tar, who agrees with it, is voting on the basis of his scumtells. Since you know what it stands for, what are you asking here?forbiddanlight wrote:Finally, is no one gonna tell me what Information Instead of Analysis voting is all about?
If no one had said what it stood for, then how did you know to ask aboutNo one had SAID what it stood for or what it meant until AFTER I asked.
Max, please explicate the contradiction between your posts 511 and 524.Coron wrote:I suspect the scum are made up of people who have been around for around or under 2 years, but with at least one person with a good amount of experience. I could be right or wrong, but this is my general feel so far.