In post 407, Save The Dragons wrote:k so if we're at maybe, like what about it is coasting in a scum way and what about it is coasting in a potential playstyle way
Some of the things you say in
189 are not particularly useful and feel like filling the post out, especially just going "dunno" on a question asking about Elements, not you.
192 makes a point, then doesn't elaborate on it. That feels like scummy coasting. Repeatedly one-lining to ask "who would be scared of Frogster's BoP?" feels more like filler from playstyle and manner of speech.
One other thing to note however is how you hint at knowing/seeing something no one else does that motivates your vote against KJ in
127, and go on to not explain this in
130 and
134. Additionally, in
187, you appear to admit that you didn't really have any special knowledge:
Now. for killing joke. i wasn't really intending to do the same thing i did in temple to determine nancy's alignment, it wasn't a reaction test for nancy, it wasn't really a reaction test at all, i just wanted feedback on it. And to note, because of temple, it wasn't going to work again, so i didn't do it to test nancy.
You had essentially plopped a naked vote onto KJ, said you had an ace up the sleeve, and then when you pulled your sleeve up, there was nothing there. This one feels like the feedback period has passed, so please, if you do indeed have an ace in your hand, pit it against the Joker's joker for us.
sorry but this one was morally obligated to make card puns