Surye wrote:Vote: Vibecause Vim is better. Also, I got the first words
Wasting words.urielzyx wrote:Vote: xyzzy.
only I am allowed to have those three letters together in my nick...
That.Kiro wrote:A waste to tabulate.ortolan wrote:Proposal: can only use your share (250) of wordsArguments are needed, just make concise.
25 words, 1 hypocritical defense, unhelpful.Surye wrote:You wasted 2 words, reitterating what was said.
.....
Making a point. Does it make me scum?
.....
I helped town, got discussion. Otherwise no posts. thanks.
Explain 'no reason' bandwagon vote.xyzzy wrote:Also,Vote: Surye. No reason.
This. And for that reason:Raging Rabbit wrote:Nonsevere word wasting = null tell. Calling for kills because of it = easy scum move.
Patently useless. Isanimorpherv1 wrote:I think that ortolan or Surye is scum. They use too many words.
Wasting words on it = scummy.forbiddanlight wrote:No, not scummy. When has vig suggest EVER been scummy? Doc/cop, yes, vig, no.
Suggestion scummy regardless of existence.
Truth. Roflcopter's done this obscenely, even after decided we'd use enough words for clear discussion and less misunderstanding. Jumped on Surye wagon without case. Needs cite more for Animorpherv vote. Needs give substance, scumhunt. Suspicion.Surye wrote:People who hide behind wordcount, vote without a word. Scum loves that.
...
Lack of case/accountability for vote = bad
forbiddanlight wrote:Wrong. Depends of verbosity type.Raging Rabbit wrote:
Calling for verbose people's lynch = bad
"" vig - worse
Wasn't trying to speculate.
You'd rather give scum a free excuse to vote a townie without analysis or explaination?animorpherv1 wrote:So, you'd rather waste words?Raging Rabbit wrote:People use word restriction as an excuse to say nothing. Bad for town; easy hiding for scum.
vote: Raging Rabbit
animorpherv1 wrote:So, you'd rather waste words?Raging Rabbit wrote:People use word restriction as an excuse to say nothing. Bad for town; easy hiding for scum.
vote: Raging Rabbit
Explain. You vote RR for saying that not posting due to word restrictions is anti-town + scummy - pointing out a possible scumtell/town stumbling block, then come back and say you meant that scum could waste our quota early? Huh? RR did not suggest wasting words, just intelligent use thereof, and suggested nothing to do with scum spam. Explain contradiction and your vote well or you've earned my vote.animorpherv1 wrote:Woahwoahwoahwoahwoah (I'm NOT trying to break the rules here), hold on.
My point is, scum would, and I don't see why they don't, just waste words on the first post, they could use 120000 words in one postm and end the day, every day, then kill us all.
animorpherv1 wrote:So, you'd rather waste words?Raging Rabbit wrote:People use word restriction as an excuse to say nothing. Bad for town; easy hiding for scum.
vote: Raging Rabbit
animorpherv1 wrote:Woahwoahwoahwoahwoah (I'm NOT trying to break the rules here), hold on.
My point is, scum would, and I don't see why they don't, just waste words on the first post, they could use 120000 words in one postm and end the day, every day, then kill us all.
Saying wasting words = scum isanimorpherv1 wrote:I don't see why I need to.Ifeel like we should be saving our words, not wasting them. Is that a crime?
Mhm. See also Xtoxm.ortolan wrote:Agreed, very easy way for scum to slip under the radar.Raging Rabbit wrote:FOS: lurkers, too many people avoid speaking up.
According to my quick survey, skitzer strikes me as lurky. Also seems to make show of "conserving words" while using as excuse for large numbers of FoS
Post 55 wrote:FoS: veerus, ortolan, SuryesesquipedaliansPost 56 wrote:FoS Narsistoo
Fair enough.Caboose wrote:FoS: Everyone Who Hasn't Voted
We're on page 8 already. There's no reason not to have an opinion/vote on someone.
Gotcha - clearing up, that quote was originally Animorpherv's. Check.Caboose wrote:While we don't need to worry that much now, no articles (grammar).Plum wrote:My point is, scum would, and I don't see why they don't, just waste words onthefirst post, they could use 120000 words in one post and endtheday, every day, then kill us all.
Agreed.Raging Rabbit wrote:12000 word posts will result in modkill, obviously mod's capable of applying judgement.Special Rule 4 wrote:[4] Fuck with the rules, and I will fuck back. This includes looking for loopholes.
Ani's lynch should at least wait 'till we discuss stuff more. Can anyone link to another game of his?
Share please.Caboose wrote:Why not?Narsis wrote:i have my suspicions, but i'd rather not say right away...
Why sold on Veerus bu not Animorpherv - Veerus scummiest by association here.alvinz95 wrote:= typical scumpartner response and trying to lay off accusations staying under the radar, now he hops the wagon to satisfy the crowd.
Veerus = scum or scumpartner.
I'm liking a animorph lynch more now from his ridiculous play last few posts.
Yeah. No-lynch is like giving the other team the ball after winning the coin toss in overtime. In almost all situations, a very bad idea. Townie lynch = risk worth taking for scumhunting, info, and the chance to lynch scum.Narsis wrote:actually, yes. first, if the player is lurking and/or refusing to defend himself then it would be better to lynch him now. lurker at LYLO = bad. secondly, we learn 100% that he is townie. this allows us to more accurately read people based on how they reacted to the wagon against him, and after, how they react to his lynch.Percy wrote:No.Narsis wrote:lynching townie, although not good in it's own right, is better then no lynch.
on the flip-side, a no lynch, particularily on day 1, gives the town little to no information and the scum a free kill. yes, pro-town power roles can do stuff, but compared to good old fashioned scumhunting, they are worth little.
Elaborate???Meji Fan wrote:unvoteOkay, thats silly enough I can believe it
Absolutely. We have ~1500 words till then. We're okay for now. About theoretical Ani lynch:veerus wrote:I think the idea is to end the day before we hit 6k to give the benefits of the idle afternoon to whatever roles gain them.Caboose wrote:I think we're good on words, we've only used a third of them.
animorpherv1 wrote:Yes. What kind of mod would give a miller abilities anywayz?ortolan wrote:Also, are you a miller with abilities?
Being article police is unhelpful. Word wastage isn't severe if articles are used, though I don't much. Jester suggestion seems more like unhelpful musing about unlikely situation than anything else.Caboose wrote:NO ARTICLES!Sun Tzu wrote:Although I could see the jester suggestion as an attempted defense, it doesn't seem like a good idea if they're both scum since we're going to lynch animorph soon.
Also, he does seem like he is trying to get himself lynched, so it's a reasonable thought to have, although not something to worry about, imo.
Jester is unlikely and bringing one up is still scummy. I believe it more likely that ani is clumisly playing scum with miller claim.
Mod: Could we have a word count please?
animorpherv1 wrote:well, I'm sorry if I can't cnhage your mind.
That I'll do as well. I've held off vote for discussion long enough; talk's degenerated into asking why Ani's not been lynched yet. Unless Ani gives fair defense, suggests a better wagonJebus wrote:Go for it. Change my mind, or hammer shall fall.
unvote: forbiddanlight
Will hammer if unsatisfied with your appeal.
Meji Fan wrote:ort voted both Surye, Animo
In light of these, Ort doesn't look likely Ani's buddy.ortolan wrote:could plainly see veerus trying to lay justification to vote me today knowing what ani would flip:
Even though when I suggested jester I was already voting for animorphervveerus wrote:Agreed. If scum, ortolan is a likely scum buddy.
Raging Rabbit wrote:Total crap logic.veerus wrote:Ortotan fits that too -- lots of word wasting at the start.Vi wrote:lol, wordwaster #1 WAS scum~
That. Ortolan push is lacking substance. AlsoMeji Fan wrote:Can we get word count?
I think jester thought was unthought musing, not a scum tell
Bussing both scumbuddies possible, but unlikely. I plan to reread, see if Ortolan's possible Scum A, though.Vi wrote:animorpherv1 99 wrote:I think that ortolan or Surye is scum. They use too many words.
As Ort said, useless. As I said, also don't like his case on Ort; it's shaky, poor logic. Attack on Alvinz bad, claim suggestion nulltell.veerus wrote:You would.. scum.
This.alvinz95 wrote:Asking whether we should have a mason claim is definitely not a suggestion, because i ASKED FOR THE TOWN'S OPINION.
Clearly Veerus is just trying to find something scummy about me and ends up picking up crap scraps.
Noted. Earlier preffered Jebus lynch, but Veerus' behavior going downhill and wasn't good to begin with. Scummy.ortolan wrote:could plainly see veerus trying to lay justification to vote me today knowing what ani would flip:
Even though when I suggested jester I was already voting for animorphervveerus wrote:Agreed. If scum, ortolan is a likely scum buddy.
Vote: veerus
I blocked you. My Afternoon blocks were good for the Night, too, and I had a plain Night block as well, which I used on Roflcopter .forbiddanlight wrote:I blocked you and percy. Apparently I didn't block percy at the right time though. (At least I think I blocked percy). 50% accuracy with night actions ftw!I knew the veerus wagon was crap. Was wrong about FL, though, so sorry 'bout that.
And everyone thinks I'm scum when I'm town. I'm used to it.
I wasn't sure about it or anything, but I didn't have any better leads on a roleblocking target . . .forbiddanlight wrote:That is AWESOME! You all thought I was a vig. Now, an awesomer thing to do would have been if I were VANILLA and pulled that off. Since then, yanno, I wouldn't be losing a role action anyway .