Sushi Mafia! Game Over

Santos · Post Post #107 (isolation #0) » Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

/confirm

Sorry I was late. I just got back from Tahoe and realized roles and such went out while I was away.

Santos · Post Post #135 (isolation #1) » Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:12 pm

@raider, lol.

Santos · Post Post #199 (isolation #2) » Sat Jan 24, 2009 10:25 pm

@raider, the baby doesn't need food. It needs cocaine!!!! :p

Santos · Post Post #200 (isolation #3) » Sat Jan 24, 2009 10:25 pm

@raider, the baby doesn't need food. It needs cocaine!!!! :p

Santos · Post Post #223 (isolation #4) » Sun Jan 25, 2009 4:10 pm

Yes, I am semi-lurking, but I am not hesitating to post; I just don't have much to add at the moment as most of the discussion usually works itself out. I'm in no hurry to lynch anyone: If a decision needs to be made, then I don't mind being the deciding vote...

Santos · Post Post #247 (isolation #5) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:15 pm

I already did.

Santos · Post Post #248 (isolation #6) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:19 pm

Hmm, missed the next page. The 'I already did' was directed at Setanta.

Catching up on the next page I notice a lot of people would rather vote for me being honest as opposed to posting some BS excuse that I can't read a forum thread of a few pages and will do so in several days from now. Pathetic.

Santos · Post Post #272 (isolation #7) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:06 am

I guess no one got the hint that i am basically a plain townie, but can only deliver the deciding lynch vote, if i am going to vote at all today. And as you can see, i have not voted yet because i cannot or i will be modkilled.

Santos · Post Post #274 (isolation #8) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:35 am

Not really. That is why I had no problem dropping the hint earlier that I have a restriction.

Santos · Post Post #292 (isolation #9) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:28 pm

I believe my role is that of an 'actor', according to MafiaWiki. Otherwise, no, I am not third party( if you are thinking I win when I get to have the deciding vote, no I don't) and I win with the town. Also, I was given the okay to claim 'Kami' if that makes any difference if I have any case left to prove my innocence. I kind of got a jacked role

Santos · Post Post #293 (isolation #10) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:29 pm

...heh, pun...

Santos · Post Post #295 (isolation #11) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:22 pm

Santos · Post Post #298 (isolation #12) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:06 am

pr = post restriction? if so, i have no post restriction. i already said i must have an actor type role because i can only vote the deciding vote? what more clarification do you need?

Santos · Post Post #302 (isolation #13) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:17 am

[q]what is the consequence of you breaking your obligation to only vote when your vote will constitute a hammer?[/q]
The consequence is not stated. Its just advised that I don't; I'm worried it will trigger something if I do. What do you suspect it is?

What is a 'safeclaim' compared to what I am allowed to say regarding my role?

Santos · Post Post #303 (isolation #14) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:19 am

stupid tags.

going to bed. will post later after work.