Just letting you know I'm reading the game at the moment, I hope to be caught up soon.
In the meantime I will:
just a BS excuse that you came up with after the fact? Also who do you think is most scummy at the moment, who are you willing to lynch?qwints wrote:It was designed to illustrate that soft claiming need not be anti-town.
I'm not holding the cards to my chest permanently, I will give my general views about the game when I've got the majority of the answers (and a little more time). I will address the rest of this post in that post as well.DrippingGoofball wrote:I'm not liking Rogueben's asking of questions instead of stating his own opinions. Also, the questions are a bit off and not what I'd called 'pointed' or 'particularly relevant.' The whole exercise feels like fake scumhunting and giving the appearance of participation, cheating off other players while holding his own cards close to his chest.
The thing that concerns me about stark is that I think he is essentially a really lazy player and so the issues that people have with how he's playing are not necessarily scummy. I have seen him as useless town before. sam.samhorn seems much more likely to me to be scum.Xylthixlm wrote:Rogueben: Let's lynch stark today, and if sam.samhorn is alive tomorrow we can take care of him then.
I haven't seen him do anything wrong as yet and have seen a lot that I like. The only thing that could possibly bring him to neutral in my mind is the fact that he was on three townie wagons. But just because he's experienced that doesn't mean he can't have crap day ones with scum hunting as he's said himself. That's putting Burden of Proficiency on him. Also I liked camn's point about the fact that if he was scum he's not likely to have gone out bandwagoning so many townies. It's a bit WIFOMy but I think it still has merit. Essentially I've weighed up all this and I still think he is more likely to be town then scum, thus townish.Xylthixlm wrote:Oh, one thing. Yosarian2 is neutral, not townish.
scotmany12 wrote:Anybody want to post the case on Kmd in. or point me to where the case is? From what I get, the reasoning is jumbled among many posts and it would be easier if someone constructed the case in one post.
I really don't like these two posts. The fact that he puts a player at scummy that he doesn't even seem to understand the case about really sits poorly with me.scotmany12 wrote:Scummy:
Kmd (would still like someone to post an organized case on him