The Werewolves of Millers Hollow (Game Over)

Starbuck · Post Post #1132 (isolation #0) » Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:05 am

Hello everyone! I'm still in the midst of catching up.

Starbuck · Post Post #1146 (isolation #1) » Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:46 pm

I'm not liking Dramonic openly rolefishing at all.

Vote: Dramonic

Starbuck · Post Post #1297 (isolation #2) » Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:26 pm

Checking in. I'm a complete retard and never put this thread in my Watched Topics, but just received a prod today.

I'm getting ready for work and will be reading up this afternoon.

Starbuck · Post Post #1342 (isolation #3) » Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:23 am

My vote is also on Dramonic.

Currently, I really don't have any other suspicions.

Starbuck · Post Post #1370 (isolation #4) » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:53 pm

The Replacement wrote:I still like my case on MikeSC. Other players are sticking to their same very old cases, despite plenty of new things directly related to their case happening since then and their neglect to comment on it and also their ignoring of new things in the game that have happened since their cases that the town could benefit from their comments on.

I think Mike's vote on Dramonic was pretty horrible, like he was looking for a reason to vote rather than paying attention to a larger span of game content.

You can like your case on Mike, but maybe others don't and they aren't required to. You seem to think that it should be your way or no way.

If there's something you think that anyone should look at, you need to bring it up.

I know I've been rather quiet due to RL circumstances. I have also been trying to research the game this particular mafia game is based off of so I can get a clearer understanding. I still don't get some of it, but I know how to play mafia so that should counterbalance it.

Starbuck · Post Post #1372 (isolation #5) » Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:37 am

I didn't say that I liked it or didn't like it. It's rather null to me.

How was he not?

Starbuck · Post Post #1375 (isolation #6) » Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:16 am

I would think that asking which power roles were still alive would count as fishing as well.

Starbuck · Post Post #1384 (isolation #7) » Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:43 am

dramonic wrote:Now that this is clear...

could both of you vote and unvote the replacement?

I'm doing a case study ^^

?

Starbuck · Post Post #1392 (isolation #8) » Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:31 am

I don't understand what dramonic is trying to do with his "plan", especially if it involves rule-breaking and quite possibly game-breaking.

Starbuck · Post Post #1405 (isolation #9) » Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:41 am

Yeah, after that, my vote is not moving from dramonic.

Starbuck · Post Post #1427 (isolation #10) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:47 pm

I haven't posted because there is jack shit going on. We're at the same place we were.

Starbuck · Post Post #1434 (isolation #11) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 6:18 pm

Jahudo wrote:@Starbuck: What, there's no way to find scum in days 1-3? Because stuff happened back then and you still haven't commented on it. (and some other replacements too)

I have read through it, if there's something you need me to comment on, please bring it up.

Starbuck · Post Post #1438 (isolation #12) » Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:29 am

DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:Why haven't we lynched Dramonic yet? He's far too desperate to avoid being lynched to let him off the hook.

That's been my question.

Starbuck · Post Post #1449 (isolation #13) » Wed Jul 22, 2009 7:11 am

I said earlier, if you have something that you need me to comment on, please bring it up. Link me to the post, quote it. I'm not going to go on a wild goose chase for you.

Starbuck · Post Post #1453 (isolation #14) » Wed Jul 22, 2009 5:47 pm

My number one suspect at the moment is dramonic. He has been rolefishing more than once, and that whole thing with trying to out the lovers, I did not like at all.

dramonic wrote:I know nothing will happen, it's purely informationnal

dramonic wrote:oh wait, nvm, something could happen, rulebreaking and stuff <<

Purely informational and then it could be rulebreaking. Then he posts a whole bunch of voting and unvoting with I'm not sure what it was supposed to accomplish. We still don't know if he broke any rules because our mod has been absent.

dramonic wrote:Also, for the... nth time, one of the lovers could be mafia <<

And the goal was not to "trick" the lovers. My objective was to know the lovers without the mafia knowing.

He is right about the fact that one of the lovers could be mafia, but one or both of the lovers could still be village. I'd rather not out PRs and give them to the mafia on a silver platter.

I read through the game when I first replaced in, so it has been awhile especially now that we have been at the same place for a long while. So yeah, I have forgotten some of the main points of certain cases which is why I asked if there's something you need me to comment upon to please bring it up, or just link me to the post(s) that you want me to read. I can't read your minds to know what you guys want me to read.

Starbuck · Post Post #1455 (isolation #15) » Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:42 pm

I would think that the rules of Mafiascum would supercede the rules of whatever game this is based off of, which would mean that even if a lover votes his love, there would be no repercussions.

You seem very interested in this subject and have been for quite some time. Makes me wonder...

Starbuck · Post Post #1477 (isolation #16) » Sun Jul 26, 2009 6:11 am

Dramonic! You are dead! Quit posting here.

Starbuck · Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:00 am

I really don't know if I like that plan.

If Yos dies as mayor, would he choose his successor as well?

Starbuck · Post Post #1499 (isolation #18) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 6:35 pm

Battle Mage just posted up further.

Starbuck · Sat Aug 08, 2009 12:36 am

So we are going to go with this plan? Voting someone who may not even get replaced as executioner?

Starbuck · Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:22 am

You shouldn't have to promise that you will re-read if you are elected Executioner. You should do that on your own since you are playing this game.

Starbuck · Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:43 am

That's because I replaced in during your god-awful afk.

Starbuck · Post Post #1516 (isolation #22) » Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:20 am

I definitely am against the millar and BM propositions.

Starbuck · Post Post #1518 (isolation #23) » Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:37 am

Gorrad wrote:
Starbuck wrote:I definitely am against the millar and BM propositions.
Why?

BM seems very overexcited at the prospect of being Executioner after not being replaced for a very long time and if he becomes Executioner, he *promises* that he will catch up with the game. He shouldn't have to promise that, by signing up for the game, he should know what's going on and shouldn't use something like that in his campaign.

On Millar, what if he doesn't get replaced? I think it's rather flimsy to vote someone as Executioner when we don't know whether or not a replacement will be coming in.

Starbuck · Post Post #1520 (isolation #24) » Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:24 am

That's why I'm concerned about BM. He seems very overexcited to be Executioner, and I'm getting a very scummy vibe from him.

Starbuck · Post Post #1523 (isolation #25) » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:16 am

We need to stop waiting and pick an Executioner.

How about everyone make a list of the top 3 people they would want as Executioner (excluding yourself)?

I'll start:

Nabakov
Gorrad
Yosarian (if we absolutely have to, I really don't think he should be Executioner if he's already Mayor)

Starbuck · Post Post #1525 (isolation #26) » Wed Aug 12, 2009 4:14 am

Battle Mage wrote:
Starbuck wrote:That's why I'm concerned about BM. He seems very overexcited to be Executioner, and I'm getting a very scummy vibe from him.
then lynch me. *shrug*

But dont expect an easy job, given my status as confirmed-town and all. Anyway i'm really too busy to post here again. So, was nice playing with you all.

Mod: Please prod me if i become Executioner

BM

If you are too busy to post here, why are you asking for a prod if you are to become Executioner?

Starbuck · Post Post #1528 (isolation #27) » Wed Aug 12, 2009 6:01 am

Battle Mage wrote:
Starbuck wrote:
Battle Mage wrote:
Starbuck wrote:That's why I'm concerned about BM. He seems very overexcited to be Executioner, and I'm getting a very scummy vibe from him.
then lynch me. *shrug*

But dont expect an easy job, given my status as confirmed-town and all. Anyway i'm really too busy to post here again. So, was nice playing with you all.

Mod: Please prod me if i become Executioner

BM
If you are too busy to post here, why are you asking for a prod if you are to become Executioner?
what do you mean?

You just said that you are too busy to post here, and that the only reason you will post here is if you become Executioner.

If you want to be replaced, please do not post here, if otherwise then actually play the game. Please stop this in between bullshit because you are not helping.

Starbuck · Post Post #1530 (isolation #28) » Wed Aug 12, 2009 6:18 am

Battle Mage wrote:
Vote for executioner: Jahudo

I want to be replaced, but the Mod is not replacing. This "in between bullshit" represents where i actually AM.

BM

You made a goodbye post, which means you should technically be done with this game.

Starbuck · Post Post #1532 (isolation #29) » Wed Aug 12, 2009 6:41 am

Right now I feel that BM is detracting from the game.

Also, is it too early to get a mass prod on everyone?

Starbuck · Post Post #1534 (isolation #30) » Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:19 am

Zwet was a player in this game already. How can he replace in?

Starbuck · Post Post #1535 (isolation #31) » Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:19 am

Just curious.

Starbuck · Post Post #1538 (isolation #32) » Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:29 am

NabakovNabakov wrote:
Starbuck wrote:Zwet was a player in this game already. How can he replace in?
In large games where the prospect of a long read puts off fresh replacements, it's not uncommon for dead players who had no special knowledge in their past life (i.e. were a townie) to replace into a new role.

I'm perfectly fine with having Zwet in as our confirmed-treestumped-executioner. Not quite as swanky as "official town hammerer," but close.

Vote: Zwet for executioner

I was just curious. I haven't seen that happen before on this site yet.

Starbuck · Post Post #1557 (isolation #33) » Thu Aug 13, 2009 9:46 am

I really don't know the actual game that well. What does the Piper do and why would BM be the best choice if he's the Piper?

Starbuck · Post Post #1571 (isolation #34) » Sat Aug 15, 2009 4:53 am

As someone who hasn't been around much, you seem to be very defensive.

Starbuck · Post Post #1579 (isolation #35) » Sat Aug 15, 2009 7:31 am

I don't think that's a reason for you to vote him.

If something is screwed up with the game mechanic, then it should be fixed.

Starbuck · Post Post #1589 (isolation #36) » Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:43 pm

So what about the Executioner? If we don't vote for one, does it happen? Or if we do vote for one, it definitely needs to be someone confirmed.

Starbuck · Post Post #1592 (isolation #37) » Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:39 am

I know you're confirmed jackass, but the vote for it still hasn't happened.

Starbuck · Post Post #1597 (isolation #38) » Sun Aug 16, 2009 4:34 am

So now I'm guessing BM is going to re-ask for a replacement.

Starbuck · Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:48 am

Okay then.

Vote: Battle Mage

Starbuck · Post Post #1607 (isolation #40) » Sun Aug 16, 2009 6:07 pm

Battle Mage wrote:Starbuck is being silly.

You keep thinking that bud.

Starbuck · Post Post #1628 (isolation #41) » Tue Aug 18, 2009 9:33 am

Gorrad's age stands out a bit too, since everyone else is either in their 20s or teens.

Gorrad is in his 40s, and Jahudo is in his 70s.

Starbuck · Post Post #1635 (isolation #42) » Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:18 pm

Yosarian2 wrote:
Starbuck wrote:Gorrad's age stands out a bit too, since everyone else is either in their 20s or teens.

Gorrad is in his 40s, and Jahudo is in his 70s.
Everyone picked their own age and gender when they joined the game, starbuck.

Please remember that I replaced in when the game was very far in. I wasn't here at the beginning.

Starbuck · Post Post #1652 (isolation #43) » Fri Aug 21, 2009 9:05 pm

Why don't you care?

Starbuck · Post Post #1654 (isolation #44) » Sat Aug 22, 2009 1:02 am

Gorrad is now at L-1. My vote will definitely be for him, but I want him to defend himself first.

Starbuck · Sun Aug 23, 2009 10:18 pm

MafiaSSK wrote:Dramonic has now been lynched. He was a
Simple Villager
. The town is now vexed at their lousy results. You all must now immeadiately lynch a second person. To do so, send me one vote of whom you'd like to get lynched. Regular lynching rules apply.

You can't go by the front page, Gorrad. Dramonic's been dead for quite some time.

Starbuck · Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:41 am

Mod: Can we have a vote count, please?

Starbuck · Post Post #1691 (isolation #47) » Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:26 am

I thought I moved my vote to Gorrad. That's why I wanted the vote count. I tried to go back and count and kept screwing it up.

Unvote, Vote: Gorrad

Starbuck · Post Post #1712 (isolation #48) » Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:09 am

I'm definitely not the piper.

Starbuck · Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:45 am

I'm not a werewolf either, I'm just a simple villager. We need to be rid of the piper and it's not me. Zwet, you surprise me because I thought you were supposed to help the town win, not lead it astray.

Vote: Jahudo

Starbuck · Post Post #1731 (isolation #50) » Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:05 am

Unvote
Vote: No Lynch

I told you all I wasn't the Piper. Although, Jahudo's werewolf claim strikes me as odd. All will be revealed in the overnight.

Starbuck · Post Post #1732 (isolation #51) » Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:25 am

EDWOP: All will be revealed in the overnight, I hope.