Nativity Mafia - Game Over, Praise The Lord!

[Puzzle]

Hmmm, confiture...

[Puzzle]

This game, ladies and gentlemen, stinks badly of bastard modding.

On topic, #42 and the rest tell me to

vote This is not me

.

Oh and I didn't kill Pooky, I swear...

*hides avatar*

[Puzzle]

Unvote This is not me, vote PeaceBringer

.

[Puzzle]

Oh yes, I want to hear a claim indeed.

why? because someone has a night action that lets them give us a voice from the heavens? please. If enough sheep vote me, sure, I'll claim. But thats quite possibly the worst excuse I have ever seen to vote for someone.

Scapegoating sheeps is scummy. Just saying...

Hi, Peacebringer.

[Puzzle]

Makes sense with the "what if no doc comment" he made earlier.

Unvote Peacebringer, vote Baby Jesus

.

[Puzzle]

Unvote BabyJesus

. But first, would SSB! and the other mason (and BJ too) please check with the mod that their fellow masons are guaranteed town ?

The third mason doesn't need to speak up but should still check. SSB! could confirm BJ as town after checking.

[Puzzle]

Unvote BabyJesus

. But first, would SSB! and the other mason (and BJ too) please check with the mod that their fellow masons are guaranteed town ?

The third mason doesn't need to speak up but should still check. SSB! could confirm BJ as town after checking.

This whole being "investigated guilty" when I'm a pro-town mason is really getting old.

Well, if you stopped being a mason, we wouldn't be there, now would we ?

[Puzzle]

Unvote BabyJesus. But first, would SSB! and the other mason (and BJ too) please check with the mod that their fellow masons are guaranteed town ?

Lol... mods don't really give out information like that!

unvote: SSB, vote: VisMaior

Do you see much harm in asking ?

[Puzzle]

Vote Vismaior

.

[Puzzle]

@ Tyfo : Claiming mason on day 1 as a scum is suicidal : if there is a group of masons in the game (common occurence), only one of them has to counter-claim and BJ's bust. I don't think he'd take that risk if scum.

@ This is not me : mate, you are making me extremely uncomfortable about you. It's up to you to judge if your info is more valuable exposed now or kept for later (with risks of being night-killed), but teasing like you do + your unwarranted cop claim gives me chills in the back. Would you be trying to attract investigation and/or doc protection (GodFather ?), I don't think you'd act much different.

[Puzzle]

Well well well, This is not me...

Insane, paranoid or random? Pick your flavour.

What do you mean ?

[Puzzle]

Agreed.

!Vote Chucklez!

.

[Puzzle]

Sure, a vigging donkey killed a mage-king mason...

FOS Dybeck

[Puzzle]

Goddamnit, Vig.

Oh well, can't really blame him, seeing as a "confirmed" cop fingered an unconfirmed mason.

*Polishes wall in front of self*

[Puzzle]

Vote: Chucklez

Looks like scum to me..

I'm not even going to argue against retarded votes like this.

I fucked up

, live with it. Mistakes happen, and they are not scum tells.

I'm not going to claim off this wagon

, and if you lynch me anyway you deserve what you get.

That's incompatible for a townie.

[Puzzle]

I can state at 99% certainty that !Chucklez! is lying : his ability flavour is wrong.

[Puzzle]

So the ass that killed BJ last night shat all over the keys to the inn this time? Nice move...

No.

I can state at 99% certainty that !Chucklez! is lying : his ability flavour is wrong.

Care to explain?

No.

And I'm not in the mood for another short day, despite the target being Dybeck.

Vote Darquiel

.

[Puzzle]

Unvote Darquiel, vote Squonk

. Helpful, isn't it ?

[Puzzle]

Unvote

. Isn't it a bit early to claim, my friend ?

[Puzzle]

Yeah, cause the sheperds don't like rBabyJesus...

That sounds right, but isn't a vanilla townie a safer lynch than most?

We don't need safe lynches on day 3.

Vote Darquiel

.

[Puzzle]

Yeah, cause the sheperds don't like rBabyJesus...

That sounds right, but isn't a vanilla townie a safer lynch than most?

We don't need safe lynches on day 3.

Vote Darquiel

.

You are misinterpreting what I said. I didn't say that he was a safe lynch, I said that he was a safer lynch than most.

Sorry for that :
We don't need safer lynches on day 3 after lynching two townies. We need to lynch mafia, who we've not hit yet.
Better ?

As for Darquiel : #257 + her position just after Squonk (probable townie) on !Chucklez! wagon + general lurking and little personal input.

[Puzzle]

I'm not a shepherd but can say that there is very probably more than 1 shepherd in the game indeed. The possibility of GodFather is still here for Squonk but Fritzler wouldn't have backed him up like that if he was one.

[Puzzle]

#264 was crap because it scapegoats Dybeck lightly.

Your previous vote on Dybeck sounded a bit too eager also and the "cop-tell" reasoning falls in the bin considering that :
- we have lynched a paranoid cop.
- there is already another claimed cop.

[Puzzle]

Never say who you investigate. If he's innocent, he'll show up dead the next morning.

[Puzzle]

It's actually not such a bad thing for the town as a whole - but it really sucks for the person you investigate. It's kinda convention not to do it...

I'd rather have a cleared living townie than a cleared dead townie but maybe that's just convention.

[Puzzle]

It's actually not such a bad thing for the town as a whole - but it really sucks for the person you investigate. It's kinda convention not to do it...

Yea, I'll probably die tomorrow, your fault. Woe. At least I confirmed a townie before I left.

I think the question was even about who he'll investigate beforehand.

Now, a vanilla townie may not be big enough a fish for the Mafia to kill...

[Puzzle]

yeah,but on the other hand if i would die all my info would be gone.and oky it seems so that saying who are townies are pointless,so from now on i only say if i catch some scummy?

No, what I was saying is that you shouldn't say who you'll investigate beforehand.

Additionally, you should always wait until someone is about to be lynched before giving us the name of an innocent : it could help to see the said innocent be wagonned, in order to analyze who went after him, when and how.
And the town should always leave you the time to say who is innocent before concluding a lynch.

[Puzzle]

yeah and it sucks,i am not very far of making random lynch vote,but that would suck of course

Darquiel is a random player and a lurker to boot...

[Puzzle]

#81.

[Puzzle]

They didn't have laser-sabers...

[Puzzle]

Frankly... I think we're both lucky I'm not in your religion class

Pagan ! Isn't your avatar a photo of us (or should I say me ?) in a religious classroom, by the way ?

Oh and I know who Joseph and Mary are (irl, not in the game)...

[Puzzle]

In order to move before the deadline, could we please get a wagon rolling ?
I presented a case on Darquiel and haven't seen anything concrete on anyone else. If someone thinks he has anything better, please speak up. Else, please join for at least the sake to avoid a last-minute lynch before deadline, which is quite often disastrous.

[Puzzle]

Before a claim, I'd like explanations from him on his posts. However, I do agree on their scummy smell.

[Puzzle]

Hm. I had just typed a long post, and erased it, because I think I just talked myself out of the vote. OK. I would believe there are shepherds in the game, the shepherds would be a logical role. I would also say if there are shepherds, they would be good. The one scum role we've found so far hasn't been a "surprise" scum, if we were given a role name, the lynch would have been quick. Both "There are no shepherds and Squonk got lucky with a claim" and "The shepherds are evil" don't sound good to me, so I'm going to

Unvote: squonk

Far from good enough to me.

We have a deadline coming and little time to act. So first : can we have a

deadline retraction

, please ?

If not, I'd like a claim.

[Puzzle]

Just saw the simul-post from Werebear.

Happy or not, I want a claim now.

[Puzzle]

Oh, and

Unvote Darquiel

.

[Puzzle]

Actually,

vote Werebear

even. He's farther from lynch than I thought.

[Puzzle]

Even if he claims now, it's too late to :
- get a possible counter-claim.
- turn up against someone else and get a case / an answer.

So... bye Werebear, as far as I'm concerned. Please everyone vote him. I haven't checked the count, but we don't want a no-lynch.

[Puzzle]

Vote Iammars. Seeing the voting pattern on Werebear, I'd be fairly satisfied looking at his late-voters and non-voters today.
+ second votes are cool.

[Puzzle]

Vote Iammars

[/tard]

[Puzzle]

That sounds awfully, utterly wrong.
I wouldn't mind his role being different than mine (yeah, I'm a sheep), but there's just this little thing that bothers me a lot : "I'm

one of

the sheep in the inn.".
On the contrary of this claim, I had not only no indication that there may be other sheeps in my PM, although there were signs of at least two shepherds.
What bothers me is not so much that there could be more sheeps, but the fact that he would get to know through his PM and not me.

And I'm not neutral... I'm town.

[Puzzle]

Could you explain that once again, please ?

[Puzzle]

Uh, btw, so that it's not claimed later if I die, well, about the inn keys, you know. Well, I was sorta hungry that night and the grass was tasty near the lynch scene...

[Puzzle]

Vote Rajrhcpfreak

. It always helps.

Now for a re-read...

[Puzzle]

Unvote, vote Tyfo

: he's scum.

[Puzzle]

Yeah : you're a parking place and Tyfo is scum.

[Puzzle]

Just looking at your posts since the beginning :

-#88 : "I will unvote: VisMaior - I do not suspect him for now, and

I will not be guilty of lynching a possible townie

.". While the unvote could be explainable for not suspecting him (although there was no better target then apart from BJ), the second part of the sentence betrays a too big concern not about lynching an innocent but about being seen on a possible innocent lynch.
You also don't take any stance towards BJ when they are the only leads then, i.e. refuse to take any share of responsibility about what's happening then (2 innocents being under the spotlight).

- #91 : idem : concern about your apparence and too strong anticipation, presneted as a concern, of either being innocent. You're clearly not looking for scums there (seeing you're not after anyone else), you're looking not to compromise yourself if they turn up town.

- #125 : "bad guys could also easily clain mason" : bull.
"for now it seems that either BJ or VisMaior that will be lynched today" : too much anticipation to my taste here but okay.
"Vis has claimed cop, with counterclaim, and anyone could also claim this, (but he supposely meta-claimed BJ as scum - could this be a falsely reverse-truth-claim?)" : bull reason to avoid voting Vismaior but still pushing his wagon.
"I've still not decided who to vote for, but it is becoming clearer who the cop/cops should investigate tonight - so maybe the true/additional should not come out. " : directing cops to innocents.

- #132 : votes Vismaior when BJ is even further confirmed and Vismaior is clearly the goner. Then disappears a while.

- #235 : finishes !Chucklez!, who is the clear lynch then. Disappears again until...

- #328 : "It seems that we are running round in circles, eh? :Wink: ". Gives me a scummy vibe, although I'll grant that may be subjective. No real input after 100 posts. Disappears until...

- #383 : comes back to hypocritically focus on lurker just when the werebear wagon is taking place. Coincidence ? Would a townie lurker do that ?

- #398 : suddenly interested in post #336. Why not talking of it before ? Advises Werebear to claim, when he clearly has to.

- #401-402 : further fishes for info from TINM, when Werebear is the play.

- #406 : points at Werebear being in danger of being lynched and suggest unvoting him.

- #413-414 : finally votes Werebear, when he is already going anyway. Prepares to unvote if deadline is cancelled.


Here are my root arguments :

1. Your posts show a repeated pattern of concern about having innocent blood on his hands, particularly #88. The only insistance where you really take a position are ones where the lynch has already more or less been decided by the town.

2. Your attempt to side-track the Werebear attack onto lurkers is also a concern to me, seeing you didn't do so for BJ, Vismaior or !Chucklez!.

3. Finally, all the positions you have taken have been once the town had decided something. You always carefully avoided to start anything on your own, which denotes a lack of interest in active scum-hunting, and more in going-with-the-town-flow.


So, in short : you're scum.

[Puzzle]

<snip>

(And he'll probably find another thing that will make his scummy-sense tingle in this post).

Yep, the first sentence, in particular the rolleyes.

[Puzzle]

Needs more Tyfo lynch...

[Puzzle]

When did you inspect each, exactly ?

[Puzzle]

Anyway, if you really were a third cop, why wouldn't you have been more bothered about This_is_not_Me counter-claiming Vismaior on day 1 ? Your reaction (cf pages 5 & 6) really doesn't show any particular suspicion on either.
Additionally, if true, after Vismaior's lynch, you should logically have inspected the cop counter-claimer : TinM, not me (Puzzle).

I think I'll follow your plan. Vote stays.

[Puzzle]

Ooops, correct about TinM.

and #125 tells me to

unvote

, with apologies.

[Puzzle]

Vote diggy

then. If Tyfo is town, I'd expect at least 1 scum on the wagon, and I don't see any apart from him.

[Puzzle]

Unvote diggy

, re-

vote Tyfo

. If he has inspected me on night 0, it's just impossible that he would check TinM AND BJ the following night.

I guess his #125 was a preparation for a false claim.

[Puzzle]

Saying "the following night", I meant by day 2.

[Puzzle]

Hu-hu. You implied the contrary in #496.

[Puzzle]

I was talking of the other sentence : "Was the first game phase a night or a day?", which came in answer as to why you'd have inspected me before TinM after day 1.

[Puzzle]

... unless he's not truely Joseph...

[/blasphemy]

[Puzzle]

I will never say any other blasphemy again...

[Puzzle]

Sheep don't talk, much. Dead sheep don't talk, ever.

-- Mod

[Puzzle]

Why me ? Why kill an innocent sheep ? It wasn't even the time of year, nor the religion involved for that matter...

[Puzzle]

You were worse than paranoid : useless and dangerous by giving different results. Sorry, mate.

Nice to meet you, Orbiting.

*Sprays mint in throat*
*Suggests "Hello" kiss to Orbiting*
*Gets slapped by Orbiting*
*Gets punched by Mr Flay*
*Runs away crying*

[Puzzle]

I can read. 8)




Try #672...