From D3 onwards - Till end of page 51
- Scum chose elmo over KMD for the kill. Reposting suspicions of both:
KMD: Rhinox, Vas, mith, DGB
elmo: DGB, Vas
Thoughts: Nothing really useful from this
Also, Why wasn't KMD blocked if elmo was the scum kill?
It's suboptimal to try and block a possible role while you already have a claimed informational role. There's something wrong here.
Addn: 1264 - "Agree with Rhinox's point 3 that a second Vig remains a possibility, and that Kmd unblocked lends weight to that possibility, and that we shouldn't discuss this in detail - if we have a second Vig, we will likely know it for certain tonight."
Back to 1263 - might be a possible slip by Rhinox (and mith?) - JK blocking the Roleblocker might also explain why KMD was not blocked - the fact that this possibility was not considered might point to inside info that a JK might not have been added - Hence never considered as a scenario?
1255: @mith
- Decent point on the 1041
1256: @iam
Why did you vote elli over one of "Palumporom, Rhinox, Spyrex, DGB, mith"?
1257: @MMe mirrors my thoughts on mith
1259: @iam
- Why did you miss 1041 of DGB? (mith's case about a possible slip on tajo)
- DGB case seems stronger than the one against Rhinox but voted Rhinox in the end. Also
- "DGB/Rhinox pairing is so strong that a town flip on one would probably cause a drastic change of opinion on the other." - ??
1260: @SpyreX reactions to iam
- "I'm a little surprised to see ekiM that low, actually."
First I thought spyreX was saying "Why isn't ekim more scummy?" - Did an ISO to see that he never mentions ekim before that - Found it suspicious before I realized that "that low" means he thinks ekim is town
Reactions are fine.
Thoughts as of page 51:
- Pretty sure I was wrong about the mith-DGB pairing
- iam-DGB pairing looks very likely
-- Also 1273 looks like iam cheerleading mith-KMD town-town argument
-- Or I could be wrong and it's mith-Rhinox
- Anyway would prefer a DGB flip over mith
Vote: DGB