WARNING, REALLY BIG PBPA ANALYSIS RESPONSE. (Stuff xite has said about SSBF)
CLIFF NOTES AT BOTTOM.
xite wrote:0) Okay, so I just want to point out that SSBF has seen how millar plays. This is actually important considering millar's meta
Um no. He says he knows how millar is a mod, not a player. But whatevers, maybe he knows millar player too. IDK.
3) until you see this post. Diacra responded to him and told him one thing that could be going on, and he rebuttals with something that could very well look like an attack (but not enough of one just yet. Fence-sitting
)
I can see that.
4) Okay, at least the fence-sitting has stopped, but I'm not really liking this post. Call it gut though /shrug
The part about "being willing to apply pressure" never bothered me here. It was page 3 and I wouldn't expect anyone to be confident enough to throw a lynch vote down.
5&6) More attacks without attacking, this time on Richard
You mean on Shattered Viewpoint? I don't know what you mean here but his response to SV looks justified to me.
8) Looking for townie points?
From who? Yeah strategy is IIoA but he hadn't been using it as a crutch during this period to avoid scumhunting altogether so not a big tell for me.
9) Even MORE attacks without attacking.
It looks like a strategy argument to me and nothing more. I don't see what SSBF could use there to stealthily push a case on Richard.
10) Well at least you finally put an FoS on him. Also, where did your attack on dia go? I mean, she's getting votes now, wouldn't you pay a little bit of attention to her?
Isn't the point of that FoS that SV was continuing to ignore KMD? Time makes the tell grow stronger. Its normal. I agree its odd that SSBF stopped talking about Diacria for a few days when Diacria had continued to make posts that could be commented on.
11)
I would be up for a policy lynch on millar13. I personally don't like his behavior and his rule-breaking and if he were to continue being disrespectful to the game and the mod doesn't replace him, the next best solution is to lynch him.
Waitwaitwait... didn't he say that he'd seen millar play before?
I've talked before how arguing for a policy lynch sounds like a bad strategy for scum to take even if they were trying to gauge opinions. It places them way out in the open for criticism and scum don't want that unnecessary risk that anyone should think would come with a policy lynch suggestion. This was before millar claimed Beloved Princess, which made it even riskier when he continued to talk about the possibility. And yeah, ISO 0.
12) "How so? It's not even inside this game, therefore it is irrelavent."
it was not irrelevant... it had every bit to do with that game.
"But you did ask him a question. That means you're wanting RichardGHP to give him his scum reads AKA, explanations, no matter how minimal that may be"
That's not exactly true. Nice misrep
Diacria wrote:
"Unvote, Vote Supersmash
Picking and choosing targets."
SSBF wrote:
"Wow, at long last, you finally give an explanation for voting someone and you basically OMGUS'd me."
Actually, I'm sad I missed this. Dia had it even before I did. Remember the throwing spaghetti thing I was talking about?
I don't understand the first part but can agree with the last two points. I only think the third one looks scummy on SSBF's part, but yeah that's something.
13) One-game meta is not an acceptable meta. Ever.
"f you were talking about that last post, you should have noticed that I made a response to EGL at the end of that paragraph."
You were still tunneling, but at least responding to points against you.
"I did not ask millar to claim, I just said that he can claim if he wanted, just that I suggested he should wait until mylo/lylo or if he got put at L-1 and was asked to claim."
This was exactly what I knew you were going to do, because you covered all of your bases when you told him to claim.
I don't understand what the scummy thing is here.
42) "Please explain why this is rolefishing. I never asked millar13 to claim at all, I just said that he could claim if he wanted to, just that I'd recommend doing it at L-1/massclaim at Mylo/Lylo.
There was no scummy agenda for that quote.
"
And we're just supposed to believe you? Yah, ok
I believe SSBF here. Millar was the one to say he wanted to claim and that it could help town. Any alignment could have justification to follow-up on millar's softclaim.
Xite91 wrote:Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:I'm actually seeing a decent case on raider8169 being formed. A few posts from his hasn't been very good and Rhinox's case against raider8169 is nice as well. I like the bandwagon on both raider8169 and Shattered Viewpoint. I'm still suspicious of Diacria, but his play is improving. Unvote
Shattered Viewpoint and raider8169 are scummy, but raider8169 is scummier. Vote: raider8169
Whaaaaa?<snip>Seriously, the reason I went "Whaaaaa?" was because of the obvfence-sitting in that post. And I'm surprised no one else caught it.
Looks more like piggybacking on Rhinox's case. He's taking a stance but not making it his own, which could be something. I don't see fence-sitting though.
"I had a stronger read on Shattered Viewpoint then CSL at the time. I didn't have much to base off of CSL but I felt there was a lot more meat to the Shattered Viewpoint's bandwagon."
This is not reasoning for jumping on a wagon. What do you mean "meat to the [wagon]?"
Coming from you xite this looks disingenuous. At that point in day 1 you were talking about a twomz or charlie lynch and you had very little reasoning for twomz, and no reasoning for charlie. SSBF had more reasoning behind his SV suspicion.
"This is coming from someone that suspect CSL, RichardGHP, and millar13. Out of the four suspects I've mentioned in ISO: 24, only millar13 is really an easy target, which is why I dropped the case on him. The other three have quality cases put against them that makes them worthy of being lynched. I haven't simply sheeped off other people's case either. I have made my own effort toward trying to get my top five suspects {Charlie, CSL, RichardGHP, animorpherv1, and Chronopie in order from most suspected to least suspected} lynched."
Hoping people can see the scumminess in this post.
No I'm not sure I see it. What's going on here?
43) Is this an attack, or is it just throwing more suspicion around to see if it sticks?
That looks like an attack based on reasoning. I do not see any scummy behavior here.
44) "Rage quits are scummy, I will admit that. However, that doesn't always mean I'm going to switch my vote in that instance. I will need to see if RichardGHP comes back and becomes even scummier/successor is scummier before throwing down a vote."
Weren't you convinced he was scum before? What changed? Other than other people's reactions to him, i mean.
Well for one thing he hadn't been voting Richard for a while. A few posts earlier he labeled Richard as his 3rd suspect. So its realistic that he still wouldn't jump to #1 if this wasn't a strong enough tell for SSBF like he says.
48) Here's how we'll set up the mislynch for tomorrow.
Heh, maybe. But did any of us have a good plan on how to deal with Richard?
49) And back to the fence-sitting!
Where exactly? I don't see indecisiveness, just a plan that has variables that need to be explored before making a reasoned conclusion.
50) "Let's say that he attempts to attack his top suspect (In his case, Chronopie)."
Where the hell did chronopie come from?
I'm guessing post #882, where Richard voted Chronopie. It was his last vote before SSBF made this post.
55) "*facepalm*
You do realize that if he's telling the truth about his claim that we lose a Day, right? Me suggesting that millar13 should be policy lynched at the beginning of the Day was a terrible idea and I no longer think it's a good idea. Lynching him puts the town at a risk of losing a Day, something that is unaffordable to lose. This is also directed at CSL."
Wait... weren't you pushing the same person's lynch? And now you're (I think) attacking someone for the same idea? hmmm....
My reaction is that SSBF is just explaining things here, not attacking or throwing mud their way. The facepalm implies he thinks they're missing the point but not trying to do something inherently scummy.
57) This post alone should make you think he's scum. Read it a couple times.
Explain it.
66) IT'S A TARP!
Huh?
67) Another case on an already really suspected player. Wheeeeeeee
Lol, he does do that. In this case it doesn't look opportunistic because Richard had more votes and no one else was close to a lynch. So if someone not in your hypothetical scum group is sure to be lynched, why would scum need to support both wagons? If anything scum might be more worried about Richard having an NK by some means, or flipping some kind of scum and they'd want to show solidarity to that wagon should it succeed.
68) Youre @ me - no, just every time you attack someone without ACTUALLY attacking so that you can make sure that if they flip town you can say "well I never attacked them"
I don't think he could make that defense because it looks clear to me who he is labeling a suspect. Although on the whole I think he has been attacking with attacking.
70) But it happens all the time. This is also not the first time you've said "town would not have a reason to do this" or something to the like. For some reason this is scummy to me.
In theory SSBF has a point but in reality it just doesn't happen like that. And he's not digging that deep into the causes of the AtE and how it could be more scum than town or visa-versa, so this is a point against SSBF.
TL;DR
- I counted 25 points made by xite. I agree with 4, disagree with 15 and find 6 to be null or too confusing to understand. Overall I don't think the SSBF case is good enough to support.