I like Primate as the other Tribune. We should not make Jack a tribune anymore.
Consulmaker II: the Pyrrhic War - Game over.
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
It's hardly the only way to resolve the issue. We have you executed, then if you turn up town, we execute rib the next day.Jack wrote:
I understand the dictator concerns but it seems like the only way to resolve the issue. Unless rib just confesses before it comes to that.chamber wrote:
If you are telling the truth please don't do this. At this point we are likely going to just kill one of you 2, but really, don't do this.ribwich wrote:It's also an easy to prove role since I can announce who the new consuls will be before the next day starts.UnvoteUnsure on tribunes now.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Ahh okay. I must have read over that part of the rules.SensFan wrote:scotmany12 wrote:
It's a good thing you aren't a dictator.SensFan wrote:I will not allow an execution of either claimed Consulmaker to go through today.
I thought of the possibility that both of them are town. I find it highly unlikely. Town doesn't gain anything by fakeclaiming consulmaker.
I'm not willing to take a 50-50 shot today, and risk killing a confirmable PR, when we can ensure we get a 100% lynch of the liar on D3. Yes, I have a way to figure out which of them is lying by D3. No, I don't think its best to divulge it until just before we execute someone today.Rules wrote:They both have the power of a Day-ending execution and an absolute power to veto any such execution.
I still think one of them is scum. And I'm leaning towards Jack.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Hi. I'm just finished my long paper, so I'll have more time to devote to this game. Still think Jack is scum.
Unvote, Vote: Chamber
Interesting. Why me Chaz?Porochaz wrote:Yay to the hissy fit, Im going to narrow my list down to 5, SpyreX, Primate, Chamber, Scot and Jack. These 5 I feel semi confident they will be smart, I will narrow it down later.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Poor kitty . Sorry reck.xRECKONERx wrote:I started doing my reread.
Then my cat fucking died right in front of me.
So, not really in a frame of mind to read a mafia game right now. Sorry.
Sens is an idiot for putting in an execution so early. The fact that you wanted to end the day so quickly is scummy.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
I'm not pretending anything. And let's look at why my contribution to this game has been minimal. First few days of this week I had a big paper due for one of my classes. It just happened to be worth like 45% of my grade in the class, so I wanted to do good on it. Then...it might have been thanksgiving weekend, which I was spending with my family for the most part. So sorry that I didn't live up to your standards to posting requirements during a busy week.Jack wrote:chesskid should die.
Sens is an idiot for putting in an execution so early. The fact that you wanted to end the day so quickly is scummy.fos:scotmany
Has said zip today except talk about the consulmaker thing. Pretends to be semi-outraged about the idea that this day would be cut short. Someone who was actually disturbed by the idea of discussion being cut off so quick would have been actually scumhunting.
Also, what he did say about the consulmaker thing indicated that he thought it was simple, we should just "lynch one and if he's town lynch the other" or something like that. Which would be a very short day of course.
I also never once suggested we end the day within 48 hours of being able to execute. You putting words in my mouth is noted. I'm confident you are scum. That doesn't mean I think we should end the day right away.
You were still content with the day ending in 48 hours had chesskid not started contributing. Which would get rid of valuable time that we would have to discuss and scumhunt.SensFan wrote:
Yes. I submitted an execution after double-checking with the Mod to make sure there was no downside to it, since I could veto it myself. If you have a problem with that, you might as well extend your brush to include Nathan and chamber; both posted without immediately vetoing the execution.scotmany12 wrote:
Irrelevant. You still submitted an execution within two hours of being allowed to do so.SensFan wrote:Did you read the part where I explained that if chesskid started playing I would veto it?
Nathanial was asking a question to the mod before he wanted to veto chesskid, as he wanted to know if you could still execut chesskid if he vetoed. Chamber's veto is different, and would have made chesskid immune to being executed for the rest of the day (if I read the rules correctly), which is why I assume chamber came in and asked nathan to veto it. As he even said:
Don't act for a second that them not vetoing right away is equivalent to you submitting an execution within two hours being able to do so.chamber wrote:hey, nathan, wanna come and veto this so that we can still glrok him later if need be?-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
See my previous post. And to add onto it, you waived your right to veto 45 minutes after submitting your execution. You're scummy for submitting and execution so early and being eager to end the day. Its even more scummy that you try to divert my point against you onto both nathan and chamber.SensFan wrote:scot said I was scummy for nominating you for execution 2 hours into the day. I pointed out that it was a zero-risk solution, and that others clearly had no problem with you being up for execution, and so it is odd he focusses strictly on my part in it.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
True. But I'm against policy lynching, and even if you thought he was scum (I don't think you do) it's still a ridiculous move to submit an execution within two hours of being able to do so! Nice deflection, by the way.SensFan wrote:True or false: As it stands right now, chesskid is contributing absolutely nothing to the game even if he is Town.
I'm fully aware there is zero chance Sens dies today. However, I don't think that means I should refrain from pressuring him.chamber wrote:Hey ever, SensFan is clearly scummy as hell, but we can't do anything about it today, pick battles that can be won.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
It absolutely was a deflection. Ignoring pretty much everything I said and asking me if chesskid has been useful at all. As for you wanting him executed, that isn't the bad part. Its the fact that you wanted to execute him the first opportunity you had. I agree with you that it would have been very telling had one of the tribunals vetoed him immediately. However, I do not think that was your intention. You can say all you want about never doing any of this if you weren't console, but the it still doesn't change that your actions of late have been scummy.SensFan wrote:I don't believe it's a deflection. I happen to be strongly in favour of policy lynches, and this one seems to be an even better policy than the zwets ones of old. chesskid has admitted to being a "scummy VI" and hasn't shown anything to the contrary, so I don't see how I at least will ever be able to have a read on him. Therefore, coupled with his bragging about how he plans to coast today, and his continued attempts to egg me on, I absolutely want him executed today. Besides, do you disagree that it would have been very telling and informative if one of the Tribunals had immediately vetoed him?
As for pressuring me, feel free. I have nothing against it, and it won't affect my decision-making for today. You should know that I've already decided to play D1 in a way that I'm fully aware I would never get away with if I wasn't a Consul, though. I've been given immunity from lynching today, and I plan to fully abuse it to help me make a decision on who I want executed. To quote Tom from Survivor: "Tonight we make our move. Tomorrow we make our apologies."
On a different note, we need more input from:
Pretty much everyone but Sens, Jack, Primate, Chamber and Nathanael.
Mod: Can't we get some prods?
And I'm going to bed now.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Except this is all mute because you waived your right to veto.SensFan wrote:I think you'll find that I was able to answer Nathan's question immedately about if I could veto the execution. What reason would I have for having asked the Mod beforehand, if not that I wanted to make sure I could veto the chesskid execution? And if so, that suggests I was not, in fact, looking to get a quick execution.
Parama, your ad hominem is noted.
I would not be opposed to an inhim execution.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
I don't see a strawman on my part. You guys don't want that much power in ribwhich's hand. That's where I disagree. I'd rather have the power of execution and the power to veto said execution in the hands of a town player rather than give the power of veto to scum.SensFan wrote:
That's a strawman.scotmany12 wrote:Way to much wifom from reck here.
I understand why people don't want rib as a tribune. I still think its beneficial to have someone we know has the town's best interest at heart as a tribune.
I'm not saying I don't want a confirmed Town Tribune. I'm saying I don't want anyone, confirmed or not, to be deciding on who has the power of Executionand the power to veto said Execution.One wrong read on his part could be gg.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Drunk and high post.
I have no intention of vetoing Jack's execution. His case on me, lowell, and parama are incredibly contrived. And the fact the he did not say he fakeclaimed the post after we gave him the opportunity to do so is idiotic, and I see no reason town jack would do so. And if he is town, I am certain he has at least two of those reads wrong (i know i'm town, and parama seems sincere in everyone of his posts, lowell is a mastery though), which make his stupid fucking gambit a fucking idiotic move and he should never ever pull it again you fucking idiot. Thank god i'm positive you are scum.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Self-metas suck. It wouldn't really surprise me if both reck and dram are scum.xRECKONERx wrote:No, see, there's this sort of meta-meta with me and dram. If one of us is scum, we NEVER try to mislynch the other one. Which makes me think he's either breaking that meta right now in this game for some odd reason, or he honestly 100% believes I'm scum. Which would make him town.
I hate nathaneal's last post. Parama's post about executing ribwich was clearly a joke (a frustrated joke). And really, his whole case against parama does scream omgus to me.-
-
scotmany12
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
I never said us lynching reck was bad. It was a great move for the town. But I've lost faith in ribwich to make good decisions as tribune. I still don't think him vetoing jack was a good move. Sens is right. We're going to need to lynch jack, and sooner is much better than latter due to the information we can gain off of the lynch. There is too much risk to let jack live, and I don't trust ribwich to not veto and execution on jack.Lowell wrote:
Remind me how rib forcing us to lynch reck was bad for us?scotmany12 wrote:We are not letting ribwich be tribune after the shit he pulled yesterday.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
I'm sorry, I didn't realize I wasn't allowed to express my displeasure with something.Parama wrote:scotmany12 here, just going to point out the exact same thing Parama did except make it completely obvious what the problem is in case you are blind or cannot read for some reason, 'cause, y'know, I need to make it look like I'm doin' something.
And we should not have anyone claim right now.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
I would also like your words on why you think the three people you listed are scum. Stop stalling.Magua wrote:
If you think that two of the names I gave have no chance for being scum, why would my words make any difference at all?SpyreX wrote: Lack of understanding doesn't mean not giving words but sure I'll play along:
Of those three names one has any real chance of being scum. I'll let you figure out which one!
And are we really going to elect ribwich as tribune again? Come on guys.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Um..I think Jack is scum. You aren't even reading the game, are you?Magua wrote:
I'm not giving these words. This isn't stalling. This is me asking Spyrex why he cares what I say if he's already made up his mind on two of my reads (himself and Feysal).scotmany12 wrote: I would also like your words on why you think the three people you listed are scum. Stop stalling.
And are we really going to elect ribwich as tribune again? Come on guys.
I'll ask you a different question. You think ribwich is town. You think Jack is town. Who do you think is scum?
And you are stalling. I want you to explain why you think me, spyrex, and feysal are scum. Now.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
I'm voting for parama. I'm convinced you aren't reading anything that is not directly related to you or your predecessor.Magua wrote:Now, would both of you (that is, SensFan and scotmany) mind voting for tribune?
Why do you think we are the most likely to be scum? If you think we are scummy, you must have a reason.Magua wrote:I don't think you, Spyrex and Feysal are all scum, as I don't believe there's five scum in the game. You just strike me as the collectively most-likely-to-be-scum. I don't have any explanation to give at this point.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
How exactly is there not a risk? Let's assume we let him survive till endgame. Do you honestly think the thought that he was lying this whole time would not affect the actions of those in endgame? And the longer he lives, the less amount of time we have to analyze his posts if he is town. How do you honestly believe there is no risk in letting someone who fakeclaimed, and dragged on his facade rather than coming clean when we gave him the opportunity, live?Nathanael wrote:
What risk do you see exactly?scotmany12 wrote:I too do not see why people would want to let jack live. There is too much risk in letting him survive. And I don't know why anyone would think he would be town after how long he dragged on his facade.
I'm glad fonz quoted this. You are now considering this possibility nate. Why?The Fonz wrote:Nate wrote:case three, Jack and ribwich are both town. I am not going to consider this case because in this case one of them is a complete idiot. the only possible way this could be, is if the mod had forced one townie to claim consulmaker. (mod, is there anything bastardly in this game?)
The idiot comment was mostly out of frustration. I did find sens scummy during day one. I still do find him slightly scummy, but I think there are people out there that are even more scummy.The Fonz wrote:324 (Scot): Is he an idiot or is he a scum? I'm confused.
I really want to see more from both porochaz and primate. (Can you prod both of them, mod?)-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Yes it is. You're entire behavior about it is why scum would claim it. Saying scum gain no benefit from it is exactly what he would want you to say. He either gets away with being viewed as consulmaker until the real one is killed, or he successfully forces the majority of the discussion onto his fakeclaim, and turns the game into one big argument over it. Like what is happening now. Thinks for one second and realize scum have benefit for doing this.Nathanael wrote:THE FAKECLAIM IS NOT SCUMMY.
If all three of them are scum together, dram had no other choice but to bus both of them. He had already constantly expressed his belief that reck was scum, and jack had continued his gambit to the point where had dramonic gave him the pass, we would have known something was up. It is possible that there are two scumgroups though. Regardless, I believe jack to be scum and that he needs to be killed.Nathanael wrote:Also, I want everybody who thinks Jack is scum to tell me whether they believe dramonic would be double bussing like that.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
The constant contrived bussing between Dram and Reck did catch my eye. And sens was very scummy day one, plus the whole situation with jack. He should read all of the first day. Just like Fonz did. Are you saying its not beneficial for him to read all of day one?Nathanael wrote:
could you sum up the main reads you got from day 1? Which parts do you especially recommend to read?scotmany12 wrote:Magua, do you have any plans at all to read day one?
Why are people saying it is extremely unlikely that fonz is scum with dram and reck? What have any of them done to make it seem like jack could not be scum with them?
Fonz: Nath isn't going to change his opinion. He is so blatantly wrong, but he is being so stubborn and refuses to understand anything that is being said to him.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
But dram pretty much had to execute reck at that point. I'm thinking they wanted me to veto it, but had dram tried to execute someone else, after he was constantly saying reck is scum, everyone would have known something was up.SpyreX wrote:
Its that combination.I still don't understand why people are thinking this. Nath's explanation did nothing for me. Why is is so farfetched to think that Dram could have been bussing both of them?
Dram-scum throwing a quick shot out at Jack-scum would make sense because Jack SHOULD have been dead man walking.
When that got vetoed, considering the overall chance of Jack-scum actually making it to end game, throwing a shot out ANOTHER scum doesn't make a lot of sense.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Similar to why he had to shoot reck second. The majority of the town wanted jack lynched. Had he tried to kill reck first, we once again, would have known something was up. And I was the other consul, and I was pretty adamant during day one that I thought jack should be lynched. Its not crazy to think dram was afraid of me vetoing reck and then executing jack.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Nate, I want this answered. You have yet to explain why it is unlikely that Jack is scum with dram and reck. Saying that because dram bussed reck, and couldn't possibly do the same to another partner, is not an explanation.
scotmany12 wrote:
Why is is unlikely? You have yet to answer this.Nathanael wrote:It's exactly the fact that he bussed that hard once, that makes it unlikely to bus so hard another time, even in the same post.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
They were trying to confirm one of them as town by using their own meta, as evident by this post by reck:Feysal wrote:You do have a point though that dramonic's decision to execute first Jack and then reckoner does not preclude all three being scum, since dramonic really had no choice but to execute one of them. What I think is against them being scum together is the fact that they must have known Jack would not make it to endgame, and yet dramonic and reckoner continued to fight eagerly, making it inevitable they would have to bus each other. I would not be setting up a bus if I knew another of my teammates was about to be exposed.xRECKONERx wrote:No, see, there's this sort of meta-meta with me and dram. If one of us is scum, we NEVER try to mislynch the other one. Which makes me think he's either breaking that meta right now in this game for some odd reason, or he honestly 100% believes I'm scum. Which would make him town.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Well the Pyrrhic War just had two sides. Not to say its not possible that there couldn't be two scumgroups, but after briefly skimming over wiki (very very briefly), I'm thinking we have a vig. Still positive jack is scum though.ribwich wrote:Can someone explain to the historically challenged why two scumgroups is unlikely with this flavor?-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Why did you ignore Jack's post right above Lowell's? It is just as bad as his. Jack's last post was 8 pages ago, and he hadn't posted in four days.Nathanael wrote:
so you come back after one weak of not posting even once, during which time there were 9 pages of content and this is all you can come up with? I really like my scumread on you, after all.Lowell wrote:I recommend executing jack.-
-
scotmany12
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Yeah, to be fair, I don't recall Sens ever really suspecting reck, so its not like Sens double bussed if he was scum.
I really don't know what to think of nate right now. I can't decide if he is putting on an act, if he failed horribly to protect his scumbuddy jack, or if he actually believes what he believes. I was really leaning towards chaz as scum. I'd prefer a lowell lynch. I would not be opposed to a Magua lynch either. And sens still had a very scummy day one, though he has been much better.
Parama's recent contributions have looked pretty bad.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
I don't really know how you can call me a terrible consul. There wasn't really a lot I needed to do. Dram tried to execute Jack. I wasn't going to veto him as I was confident he was town. And initially, with reck, I was going to let the execution go to deadline, and if I felt he was townish, I would have vetoed. But there absolutely was super contrived bussing between them, and this is the post that tipped me off about it:Shanba wrote:Scot was a terrible consul, and has been pretty lazy. Like, I still don't really know who e thinks is scum beyond the obvious. (A note on that - counterclaims are 95% of the time town. How anyone can have decided that ribwich is scummier is beyond me, and by and large people didn't. But regardless, I think that anyone suggesting jack is townier (i.e. sensfan) was just wrong. Course, that kind of shit is why sens is town). I don't like how he suddenly turns around and says that dram/reck are probably both scum; I'll have to reread their posts to see if it really was super contrived bussing or not. Otherwise, looks like scum with foreknowledge. God knows scum have bussed a bit in this game. Eh. He's scummyish.
I'm pretty confident they were trying to make one of them look really townish, and Reck was trying to use this meta to make Dram look like town.xRECKONERx wrote:No, see, there's this sort of meta-meta with me and dram. If one of us is scum, we NEVER try to mislynch the other one. Which makes me think he's either breaking that meta right now in this game for some odd reason, or he honestly 100% believes I'm scum. Which would make him town.
As for who I think is scum. I think lowell is. I think it is an act about how he isn't paying attention.
See, that makes no sense since he acknowledged both claims by jack and ribwich at the beginning of the game. And no one has ever said that they thought rib is scum. He's making this whole act up. Plus he uses his own meta, and I hate self-metas.Lowell wrote:vote ribwich. The less I pay attention, the easier it is for town to win. That's not the best endorsement of my ability.Still not sure what I'm missing about rib that people think he's scum.
I'm guessing that there are five scum in this game. I posted earlier that I was stumped. If I had to pick one, I would pick Magua at the moment. I dont like how he refused to explain why he originally thought me, spyrex, and feysal were scum. And he really hasn't committed on anything, other than thinking jack is town.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Really? You don't think I provided anything during day 3?SpyreX wrote:
Overall. Yesterday late was the first spur of actual activity I remember.Hey SpyreX, you classified Scot as a lurker yesterday. Were you talking about at that point in the game only, or do you think he has been lurky overall?
And, once again, Nat's posts are survival oriented. In that seedy slimy way.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
I missed your answer. Sorry. I don't think it's very convincing, though. I'd like you to elaborate on your towel-around-head statement.
And i disagree with that sens. All you said was:
That's not a full case.SensFan wrote:Add on 'Does his damnest to undermine the credibility of anyone who isn't mod-confirmed Town' to the list of reasons why Nathanael is probably Scum.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
-
-