My FoSs are completely different from my votes. I wanted to make it clear to everyone in my first post that RF was vote-worthy.Magua wrote:In your skimming, you miss the size 200 "YES YES YES" and you focus on that.
Interesting.
@Empking:What's the point of voting RayFrost if you're going to unvote and vote Gud in the same post?
Hi guys, I disapprove of quick lynching. The faith given to seraphs is great and all, but they won't be able to use their freaking powers if we lynch before they send in a PM, just like all the other players that aren't on during this that have powers. This isn't a good strategy since it's essentially random lynching and putting all the faith in the seraphs (hehehehe, puntastic).
I promote a less random, willy nilly approach. Like actually playing mafia. Who knows, it might be a good idea.
Post for Andrius that I was typing before equi posted:
Seriously guys, the idea of quick lynching to hope for getting scum is stupid. I disapprove heavily. Saying "let's let the seraphs do all the work and not do anything but randomly lynch peoples and hope we get lucky" is the pinnacle of pro-scum play, in my opinion.
Regardless of the lack of PRs or such, continuing this path is beyond the edge of foolishness. I can (if stretching myself) understand D1, but the fact you are trying to extend this to D2 is bad (and you DO NOT KNOW if there are other PRs, IIRC - the mod hasn't confirmed either way).
To say that I've been pushing it continually (when I did so ONCE) is misrepresentation of the situation.
I'll tell you after you answer it.singersigner wrote:What do you hope to gain out of me answering that question?Empking wrote:A question that wants an answer.singersigner wrote:What kind of question is that?Empking wrote:Singer: Would you say your play has improved?
Yeah, pretty much.singersigner wrote:PREVIEW EDIT:How do you think I play town? Like crap?Empking wrote:FoS: Singer- She's not playing to how I think town Singer plays and when coupled with her avoidance andf poor answrr to my question I'm pretty confident that she's scum.
It was incredibly uncomitted.What made my answer so poor?
Your play in this game (I feel) is miles ahead of how I'm used to town Singer playing. Now I've you've improved in which case I'd expect you to be aware of such a massive jumpYou did say you'd tell me what you were looking for. Or did you forget?
Edit; RayFrost, how many "streams" have you posted in? When did that stream end?I told Andrius I'd play this game to show him that I don't suck that much anymore.
Yes or No. (Or more likely, I think so or I don't think so). If the explaination for Singer's different play was just improvement then I'd have expected the same answer from both. If the difference is scum play versus town play then I would have expected a "no".What sort of answer were you looking for, and how would scum answer differently from town?
Well because bananas cause the rollerskate (OR because Rayfrost just made up a term and I'm not privy to his inner most thoughts....how is this not obvious?
No. Words aren't just a collection of definitions. If you want to use definition 2a you (as your example shows) use an "of" and then a noun (in this case you would use "posts").RayFrost wrote:For Empking: This is the start of stream 9.
Definition 2a. Please, do say I'm making shit up in the future so I can educate you on what words mean.Empking wrote:Well because bananas cause the rollerskate (OR because Rayfrost just made up a term and I'm not privy to his inner most thoughts....how is this not obvious?
Stuff like the cost of Neighbourizers (and the like) are balance issues. Stuff like who benefits from quick days are issues of principle.RayFrost wrote:"Saying that we can't rely on the previous game, we can totally tell the seraphs are getting more battery boosts" - EmpkingEmpking wrote:I agree that looking at MoHO too much is the wrong direction. For example there are no lights or shadows thus far plus we've seen the new "165 faith" power. Saying that, I think we can presume that the town seraphs get more of the battery boost and stuff like that.
I fail to follow this logic.
inHimshallibe wrote:The first stuff brought to the table would be why you weren't on the lynch.VasudeVa wrote:Hmmm. Kito's lynch definitely brings some stuff on the table.
What do you guys think of the smoke on Magua's #526? I'm thinking that ye gods are telling us something.
I guess if Magua turns out to be scum, you have a sorta good reason. I GUESS. As for the smoke, was that determined to be a form of communication from the Good Gods in MOHO? I'm not going to go back and read it today, so it'd be cool if someone just said Yes/No.
Would you mind rephrasing that? (I think I know what you mean after thinking about it but I'd like to be sure.)Furcolow wrote:willing to vote magua for seraph, but that may be wifom
The flip ("Dark Demon" rather than "Shadowed Dark Demon") also suggests that that's the case.mothrax wrote:We seem to be forgetting that it is possible that there are two scum teams out there still. So saying a kitori flip makes Gude less likely to be scum is a nullpoint.
Going back to where my vote was.
Vote Guderian
Sooooooooooooo fake.RayFrost wrote:I suppose I should have said "respond to my point" instead of linking to it, eh? If you are going to merely avoid arguing your case, then you are admitting that your vote is based off of completely crap reasoning and is parked just to avoid being on the current likely lynch (aka: gud).
Thanks for at least not trying to hide the fact your vote is a throw away. Now I know who to look at next.
p.s. - you can make it easier for all of us by saying who your buddies are.
1. On the first day (by which I mean with 24 hours of day starting) 2 hours doesn't even approach "just". Anything under 10 minutes is not "just" and even then its probably a coincidence.AlmasterGM wrote:Empking's #277 comes just 2 hours after his abscense was noted.[snip]This REEKS of scum lurking and then coming when called.
You're basing that analysis on most of the town being wrong and Gud and Kit not being scum together right? You might want to wait for the flip before doing that.Page 13
Look at that Guderian wagon. Kitoari adding the steam, and then Empking furthering it. Helllllllllllllloooooooooooooooo scumteam.Vi wrote:Vote Count IV: Fierce clashes
Guderian (L-4) ~ inHimshallibe, Andrius, Kitoari, mothrax, VasudeVa, Empking
Jack (L-8) ~ Guderian, Magua
mothrax (L-8) ~ Baby Spice, RayFrost
Kitoari (L-8) ~ Equinox, Jack
Magua (L-9) ~ Nachomamma8
1. They weren't answered. At all. Fate was mistaken about thinking he answered my question and there were two other questions.Page 15
Empiking's #351 is scummy because, as Fate points out, he's just asking questions that have already been answered, and 2) It doesn't contribute FUCKING ANYTHING. Note: he later demonstates he is not reading the thread in #359.
You stole my hammer you dirty...Furcolow wrote:ray seems like snarky town in his latest post
i'll hammer, as replacing into this mess might be worse for the wear
vote: gud
two hammers in one day? priceless.
"Now I know who to look at next" - "look at" AKA might be scum.Empking wrote:Sooooooooooooo fake.RayFrost wrote:I suppose I should have said "respond to my point" instead of linking to it, eh? If you are going to merely avoid arguing your case, then you are admitting that your vote is based off of completely crap reasoning and is parked just to avoid being on the current likely lynch (aka: gud).
Thanks for at least not trying to hide the fact your vote is a throw away. Now I know who to look at next.
p.s. - you can make it easier for all of us by saying who your buddies are.
He didn't "feel is scum" he "knowAGar wrote:Because town has never suggested that a player they feel is scum should give up and turn in a list of names.
Seriously, that's the poorest analysis I could've expected from anyone...
No I mean "reducing". So the incenctive is still there (though reduced (but its not like people built mathematical models to work out whether we should quicklynch or not anyway.))Vi wrote:Empking wrote:Vi; Is therre a reason you're ignoring the really obvious solution: simply reducing the % difference in Battery Faith?You mean this?Vi wrote:I personally still think it's an issue. However, the obvious solution - simply get rid of the % difference in Battery Faith - isn't necessarily appealing because
1) it removes the incentive to play quickly, and
2) people actually LIKE the incentive to play quickly
