bobsnox wrote:I'm always suspicious of the first person to post/question the previous night's events, so I'm wary of posting first.
bobsnox wrote:O_O
4 deaths on Night Zero?
...
bobsnox wrote:Not liking the EPenguin nitpicking. I see scum do that all the time early in the game.
It's actually the reason I was voting Stels
(seen it from Stels before)
bobsnox wrote:VOTE: Stels
to see what reaction I get
WHY IS EVERYONE SO SCUMMY THIS EARLY ON
I CAN ONLY VOTE FOR ONE OF YOU
@MOD: CAN I BE GRANTED DOUBLEVOTING POWERS PLZ
---
36 is :goodposting:.
---
Cobblerfone wrote:Oi, I'm already sick of THB. And your gimmick, as I called it, is being two people in real life. It's annoying, because:
A. It's hard to fight two people with two different opinions.
I don't see how. Let's say I think someone is town and Fugi thinks the same person is scum. It's possible to find both of us scummy, be it my reasoning for the townread or his for the scumread, or both.
Cobblerfone wrote:B. You disagree with each other so no one will be able to get a proper read on you.
How do you know this? It's entirely possible to get reads on a hydra that has different opinions... have you played with a hydra before?
Cobblerfone wrote:These things lead to confusion, and I think we can all agree that confusion lets scum thrive.
Just because 1 (your points A and B) leads to 2 (confusion) leads to 3 (scum thriving) doesn't mean A always leads to C. There's a fallacy for this, I think.
Anyhow, you're basically voting us because we're a hydra. Nice to know.
I really wish I had multiple votes. Or bullets.
@MOD: CAN I GET SOME VIG SHOTS PLZ
~Pie