farside22 wrote:Oh and lets not forget he still is not anwsering the questions I asked. Hey Thor if it's not a scum tell why do you continue to ignore my questions?
Oh I see I finally get answers after harping (yes I admiting it's harping) that you chose to ignore the questions.
Wow, you're going to blast me for 'dodging" questions in the same post you admit I answered the (what - two repeated and one new question...yeah, my dodginess knows no bounds. SOmeday you'll go to those 'dodged' questions and explain the deep scum evidence they were hiding I suspect/hope/wonder.
This post is going to be tl:dr for most I suspect. The short summation is this - farside is very silly, but she's probably town in my eyes (town that will annoy me as long as we're both alive, probably - but still town) at this stage and consequently I'm obligated to go through these hoops with her to try to soothe her desperate black and white, by the numbers soul.
farside22 wrote:Lets go
Indeed.
========================================================================
========================================================================
farside22 wrote:Thor scum wrote:*cough*blatantwagoning*cough* I wasn't aware I needed to state that when I did it.
When you continue to push for the lynch of DK you sure as Smurf do.
And you're already ignoring later when I showed I had made cases and brought up opinions and issues. Almost as though I bandwagoned first...then added to my case as I kept my vote there...work with me here, it's not that strange.
farside22 wrote:You still missed what information we would get from a PL.
Um...it's a PL. I never claimed it wasn't. I think you missed the point of a PL, quite honestly. That's like asking me what my scum case was for a PL - derpy-doo. The information would be his flip, and him out of the game. Depending on the flip there might be a little extra to be had, but that would be about it.
farside22 wrote:Wow that's a case? That was your whole case on DK? Nothing with examples or reason's why you see his post that way over VI?
Oh if your using that as your "case" I'm sure I can find 2 or 3 you would claim where reason's too. Those where the lolololoing post by the way.
As noted - this is a playstyle issue. I have made a case and show where the case is. I understand it's not a case in the sense you wish it to be. You're probably never likely to see a case as you envision it from me. I don't agree with how MoI or Chesskid make cases - but I understand they can be town or scum regardless of that playstyle choice. Please open your eyes wider and look at the motive of the case, not the form. If you think the motive is scummy than that's fine and we can discuss it, talking about the form of a case is rather pointless.
farside22 wrote:This is a blantant lie as I pointed out. He never made a case he's just lololoing about lynching either DK or Mer.
The above is not a lie, it is an opinion. Shockingly enough, the thing you're calling a lie is also an opinion - it depends on whether you think my case is a case. Derpy-doo.
farside22 wrote:lazy scum thor wrote:I have a wiki, go search meta for yourself.
You should know your games better then me and can easily do this search but chose not to. Thanks.
Seriously?
In that case - everything I'm doing is totally within my meta as town and not within my meta as scum - AT ALL. Gosh, wasn't that helpful to you? Don't be crazy, meta needs to be researched by someone who isn't the person being meta read - that's why everyone makes fun of self meta. If it's not worth you researching for your case on me, I fail to see why it should be worth my time.
farside22 wrote:So all his VI behavoir so far in this game and you think he is smart enough to know this?
My mind boggles at that logic.
So you're saying he's too dumb to understand the rule that he specifically noted he understood?
My mind boggles at that logic.
farside22 wrote:I present to those who where in the game of American God's Ythill scum play!
I present to those playing this game - the player known as Thor665 who is not Ythill.
Another handy bit of meta advice - DON'T USE PLAYER X'S META TO SHOW THAT PLAYER Y IS SCUMMY FOR PLAYING THAT WAY.
Derpy, derp, derp, dumba-doo. Seriously.
farside22 wrote:I think Thor is scum. His reason's and attack on you is using others comments (oh look following from scum, you don't say).
I missed that you backtracked.
[/quote]
Your missing of the backtrack suggests that you are being immensely sloppy with your research on me - doesn't that worry you at all? It worries me. Maybe you should go read me again and see if it looks the same still?