A Case in Four Part Harmony
by
mothrax
First, you have quadz
ISO #2 which I have already waxed philosophic on once, but to restate: THIS IS SCUMMY! like uberscummy overreaction to one vote. "Is this serious because I need to know so I can play defense zomg"
Secondly, in
ISO 3 we have the lovely "quickvoteswitchingisbadgais!" No, no it is not. There is not only one scum in this game (one would assume) so this gives players the ability to pressure more than one scum read. Were you just worried they would catch your buddy too?
(side note:
ISO 7yes, yes it is, because it was overreaction and overdefensive.)
Third: to disect
ISO 9 piece by scummy piece:
The first line concerning DDD is scummy. The language in it is just begging for town approval before he goes all out. I for one use "reads scummy
to me
" much more often as scum. It gives you a chance to go back later and say "thats just me but since other people don't think so I am going to go back on that read"
His response to the Faraday/Magua/DDD quotenest is sooooo ubercontorted it isn't even funny. I skimmed that part once and could tell it was a joke... seriously? +scumpoints for trying to stretch a joke into a scumtell.
asking about alignments does not "not do us any good" IMO, and this reads like you are trying to push the town away from a line of questioning to cover your own rear. Setup speculation is good for the town (when used in conjunction with real scumhunting)
Also, your points on Dup and hito are "they are town but they could be scum." Do you enjoy waffles?
Oh look, you did it again with NS "I want to call him town but he is never town." You are just leaving all kinds of options open aren't you.
hmmmm... I actually agree with the bottom of
ISO 10. The top, not so much. How is Active Lurking a scumtell and Lurking not?
Quadzscum wrote:I've since admitted that the 'pressuring multiple players' bit is not scummy, and I don't know why my brain decided to tell me that it was.
Please show me where this was.
Brilliant! For the smashing finale we have this little gem from
ISO 15:
quadzscum wrote:btw, I would approve of a Parama lynch based on VI/anti-town-ness. See: Parama's most recent post.
This comes at the end of a rather long post that makes me lol. The entire post is defending himself and then tacked on at the bottom is this lovely piece of work. Let's translate this shall we?
"ohai guyz, lets get the attention of of me, oh look, a wild Parama appeared, Lynch it!"
And there you have it.