There's no reason to grieve...
The world that you need is wrapped in gold silver sleeves,
Left beneath Christmas trees in the snow...
~Pie
WeyounsLastClone wrote:Also, to get things right, is Pine now playing iso TwoheadedBoy? And if so, why?
DTMaster wrote:Huh everyone wants to survive independently of alignment. Thats a super weak tell to attack someone Pine. While scum has more desire to live then own in sheer numbers, it's kinda dumb to announce that. both as an argument and altogether when you preemptively claim this. It serves no purpose in scum hunting.
Tamuz wrote:@THB: If I were a vigilante, should I shoot someone at night, and if yes, who?
Espeonage wrote:BW claimed daycop?
TwoHeadedBoy wrote:This is a terrible post. Who can tell me why?
C-Tree wrote:TwoHeadedBoy wrote:DTMaster wrote:Huh everyone wants to survive independently of alignment. Thats a super weak tell to attack someone Pine. While scum has more desire to live then own in sheer numbers, it's kinda dumb to announce that. both as an argument and altogether when you preemptively claim this. It serves no purpose in scum hunting.
This is a terrible post. Who can tell me why?
~Fugi
It doesn't have a vote attached to it?
Oh and yay, we have a wagon on us. You guys are trying to quicklynch obvtown, I'm just saying. Sorry I wasn't around to give the game the awesomeness it deserves but I'm here now to make love to all of your faces.
- C-Worl
Tamuz wrote:Would you mind elucidating what exactly you dislike about my last two posts?
Don't you feel it is a wee bit past the point you should be making joke posts with non-game points in them?
You chose Out-of-game policy shots before your actual vote. That says something.
(who would think someone tries to take someone else's moniker).
DrippingGoofball wrote:TOWN
C-Tree (Pine)> #82 is a display of honest intent.
Espeonage> "Will jump on largest wagon after I go have a look at the votecount." = town
DIE SCUM
TwoHeadedBoy> fishy response to Tamuz #84. Lots of off-topic posts that should be PMs. Lurking in plain sight. "Katsuki was obviously a joke choice" = scum.
DrippingGoofball wrote:TwoHeadedBoy wrote:C3: How...? That's everything he's posted so far in this game... and half of it is irrelevant. Don't get what you mean by honest intent.
If I were a scum whose hydra account had just been approved, I wouldn't help the town by listing my previous post under my non-hydra account. Especially since it would be so easy to get away with. I wouldn't do extra work to make myself easier to detect. So I think he's town.
DrippingGoofball wrote:TwoHeadedBoy wrote:Espy: Not necessarily. Could be cautious scum, no?
Are you kidding me? He wants to jump on the biggest wagon. That's cautious scum? Sounds like you are not paying attention, you dastardly member of the informed minority.
DrippingGoofball wrote:TwoHeadedBoy wrote:THB: Define "fishy". Which of our posts should be PMs?
"Shoot whoever you want, or don't shoot at all. I couldn't care less."This is a forced I-don't-care from someone who needs to survive more than the rest of us.
DrippingGoofball wrote:TwoHeadedBoy wrote:Because aside from our first and third posts, every post of ours has game-related content. You sure you didn't get us and Pine confused?
True, all my posts are game-related. Thanks for noticing.
You, on the other hand:
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 5#p3029915
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 0#p3030030
DrCuttlenut wrote:TwoHeadedBoy wrote:This is going to be a long fucking game.
You're telling me.
Why are people following daycop inspects in a bastard game with multiple daycops?
C-Tree wrote:Why are you coming off an innocent townie hydra? Are you maybe jealous that you're not the only hydra in the game or are you trying to get ride of my other half before you slip up on your meta and he notices your scum actions coming out?
C-Tree wrote:THB is not allowed to use a picture of Natalie Portman in a game where he thinks I'm scum.
-C-Worl (153 was me too)
C-Tree wrote:*pic*
My picture will always be better than yours.
- C-Worl
C-Tree wrote:TwoHeadedBoy wrote:C-Tree wrote:*pic*
My picture will always be better than yours.
- C-Worl
Seriously though, respond to me facepalming your post. Of the two things I posted you went complete away from anything that could be topical. I expected you to at least inquire about why I was implying what you said was really REALLY stupid.
~Fugi
I'm indeed curious about how my other half's comment was facepalm-worthy. In your position, I'd feel a significant threat from me too. I've seen your strategy, I've actively worked a long con as your partner, and I have inside knowledge of your meta.
So. What exactly provoked the discrediting facepalm, rather than a conciliatory, "you might have a point" kind of response?
C-Tree wrote:The repeated facepalms come to mind. Facepalms come with a whole host of associated negative ideas, implying denigration, disdain, and dismissal.
The allegation of conceit, the playing up of the "jealousy" joke over the legitimate point, and the degree to which you stumbled over yourself to say "oh they don't really know what they're talking about".
C-Tree wrote:I'd feel a significant threat from me too.
DrippingGoofball wrote:C-Tree, we never argue with scum. We just lynch them. That's what votes are for.
DrippingGoofball wrote:TwoHeadedBoy wrote:DrippingGoofball wrote:C-Tree, we never argue with scum. We just lynch them. That's what votes are for.
How the fuck did you win a Scummy?
The credit goes to my team mates, obviously.
Scum is welcome to use these topics to lurk in plain sight
C-Tree wrote:Hey THB, I was going to make a case to show why your case against us is wrong but then I realized you don't have a case. You've not stated any reasons other than a stupid poem. If our posts are irrelevant then yours are a black hole in the face of humanity.
- C-Worl
Espeonage wrote:Don't ever try to read Vezok, it doesn't work. He wont be today's lynch either way.
DTMaster wrote:@THD
2. Null tell = scum how?. Also if Espeon is publically annoucing he's voting the biggest wagon, I don't see how checking the VC to do said action means he's cautious. Like, lol if he was cautious he wouldn't even publically say it. I just don't understand your position.
C-Tree wrote:@Tanstalas: The three people with the least content (by a wide margin) are Razgriz, Vezok, and tclawren. Razgriz came first alphabetically
tanstalas wrote:I see a lot of interactions with Vezok, in fact you have mentioned him in more of your posts than times he has posted himself. While my crazy theory's usually don't pan out, thinking Kise's 'daycop claim' on Kat was his bussing attempt, and I think you are probably scum with Vezok and Kise
C-Tree wrote:Fuck off Pine, I think DTM is scum and we can probably get a scum lynch on D1.
unvote; vote:dtmaster
- C-Worl
C-Tree wrote:Yeah, except that when you and Fugi fight, it's a feigned, intentional thing. You admitted as much to me in the TWBB scum QT. When C-Worl and I disagree, it's real. I chose him to hydra with because our markedly-different styles mean that we approach the same problem from different angles, and thus have more information. Our styles conflict, but also complement each other.
Ardelia Lortz wrote:vezokpiraka wrote:Um, hi. You are assuming every mover is town.
This is (quite obviously) not the case.
vezokpiraka wrote:I never said the thing about movers not being town. I don't know who said that , but it wasn't me.
TwoHeadedBoy wrote:C-Tree wrote:you're just butthurt.
~Pie
DrippingGoofball wrote:THE NEXT PLAYER THAT POSTS PICTURES, PICTURES WITH ONE-LINEI WILL DAYVIGAD HOMs, ONE-LINEAD HOMS, QUOTES A PICTURE, A PICTURE WITH A ONE-LINEAD HOM, OR QUOTES A ONE-LINEAD HOM.
And I will hit scum.
DrippingGoofball wrote:I can't believe people still fall for the dayvig trick. I guess it's one of the few things that don't go stale...
C-Tree wrote:Oh and yay, we have a wagon on us. You guys are trying to quicklynch obvtown, I'm just saying.
C-Tree wrote:Espeonage wrote:Unvote, Vote: C-Tree
With wagons forming, they need help to grow.
Oh hai. Who's jumping on with no reason? Espeonage. Who's admittedly hopping onto the wagon simply bc it's the biggest? Espeonage. Who's name is a misspelled word that reminds me of a Pokemon? Espeonage. Who do I think I should vote for?
Vote: Espeonage
Espeonage.
C-Tree wrote:Also, your vote on my primary account should be on C-Tree, and is pure, unadulterated OMGUS.
C-Tree wrote:Wait, can someone clear this up for me? I've been regarding all the daycop claims as joking and stating nothing more than a strong read, but it sounds like some of them are getting serious.
C-Tree wrote:I am very town and I don't like people coming after my super awesome towniness.
C-Tree wrote:I resent the fact that we're not scum together, THB. That was fun. It isn't fair that you get to be scum in this game and I don't.
C-Tree wrote:That all said, I'm going to re-evaluate my initial read of you as scum. I'm concerned that I've only ever seen you as scum, and that I'm only seeing those things that remind me of that performance. So I'm willing to back off for now.
C-Tree wrote:Hey THB, I was going to make a case to show why your case against us is wrong but then I realized you don't have a case. You've not stated any reasons other than a stupid poem. If our posts are irrelevant then yours are a black hole in the face of humanity.
C-Tree wrote:And what about you, Ardelia? Talk about anti-Town behavior, you have repeatedly lied, concealed, and obfuscated your history in an effort to make yourself harder to read. I can imagine several reasons for that, but most of them are pure scum. So either clarify or stop throwing stones in a glass house.
C-Tree wrote:Sorry for the ad hom. I wouldn't be using it if THB would actually present a case but they can't because we're not scum. So they post their little pictures, delivers ad homs of their own, and try to misrep our arguments as planned when they're not. I have talked to Pine and we will keep our disagreements out of the thread for now on. As for THB. Their senseless pursuit to incriminate a townie with no actual evidence is why I find them scummy.
C-Tree wrote:BTW, Pine is not robbing me of my RVS vote.
Unvote; Vote: Katsuki
It has nothing to do with people voting her. Honest. It's 100% random.
Ok fine.
Unvote
I love you Katsuki!
- C-Worl
C-Tree wrote:DrippingGoofball wrote:C-Tree wrote:Oh hai. Everyone needs to get off Katsuki, I loves her so and we must not kill her.
I love her too, but what if she's scum?
She's not. At least I hope she's not.
Hai Katsuki, are you scum?
Don't worry DG she'll be honest with me.
C-Tree wrote:See DG, I told you. Katsuki is Townie McTownsperson from Townville USA. And if she's not, I shall make her suffer very mucho. Also, Katsuki don't put scum suspects in the Up group. We want them in the Down group. Trust me.
C-Tree wrote:Why does Katsuki have a wagon that big on her? Vezok, Kise, HALPZ!
C-Tree wrote:Espeonage wrote:Don't ever try to read Vezok, it doesn't work. He wont be today's lynch either way.
I agree with this.
C-Tree wrote:@Hindu, you're getting no where. Vezok is a VI. Espeonage is pointing that out.
C-Tree wrote:The three people with the least content (by a wide margin) are Razgriz, Vezok, and tclawren.Razgriz came first alphabetically, and I have only one vote. Additionally, I've played with both vezok and TC before, and they're not exactly quiet. Ergo, if they're lurking, it's probably for a good reason.
C-Tree wrote:The above post, regrettably, has merit. Despite this, it is incorrect in its conclusion, which is our fault. C-Worl and I are both disruptive and dickish in pursuit of reactions when we play Town, and unfortunately hydra'ing has made this even worse. We're going to just shut the fuck up for a couple of days, reread, and do some actual scumhunting in our QT, and present the findings when we're done.
I would ask that everyone do as Pie suggests, ISO us, and separate out what is simply immature idiocy and what is actually game-related. We'll be sticking to the latter from now on.
~Pine
Pine in scum QT of an old game wrote:Read Post 169 again, Fugi
Basically, I got in [Mastin's] head while he was getting into my head. I -had- made some serious mistakes, and they would have been mistakes as Town, too. Mastin doesn't expect scum to take a few votes, get a little disheartened, and then critically (and publicly) analyze what they've done wrong. To him, that mindset only belongs to the genuinely wrongly accused.
Razgriz wrote:Honestly the only way THB isn't town is if he knew that DGB wasn't a dayvig, but that is a WIFOM war that should be avoided
DrippingGoofball wrote:TwoHeadedBoy wrote:
[18:30:17] <iPie> I'm thinkingshe's not a dayvig
[18:30:25] <iPie>anyways for reactionsshe'll probably shoot us
Do you not see the contradiction in the reported conversation?
Then you say:
"We went along with it on the VERY slim offchance she was truthful"
If you're not lying, you may be stretching the truth.
What is your agenda, THB?
DTMaster wrote:I'm going to spoiler everything to keep things nice and tidy for people who hate walls. "cough" So people might digest them easier.
Spoiler:
The key things in this chat that I notice are in bolded and underlined.
The bolded parts to me are scummy because it feels like you're using past meta evidence and twisting it to make yourself look townie. Especially the first part that's in bold because you've anticipated DGB's action to be a gambit, and then responded in a way where you two had to coordinate your own towny image. Townies, good townies, don't care about their own appearance in the manner that you've shown because if they are good they don't need to prove so. Their priorities aren't looking at ways to show how townie they are or thinking about posts to make themselves look more townie. That's a scum mindset when they blend in.
The underlined portions are reactions I would expect a townie to do. I'd expect a sense an apathy due to death (like, oh lame! reaction). I expect that the players are critical when faced with a person who just "killed them" (that person just shot me, but wait those reasons/actions are townie even though I think it was a bad move!). And You wanted to post reads pre-vig announcement just in case.
DTMaster wrote:Anyways what's Fugi's full username. I'll just dig up some meta from his posts to confirm. I'm assuming just Fugi?
C-Tree wrote:vezokpiraka wrote:unvote
vote C-tree
And I'm not claiming.
So you have a PR? Interesting.
- C-Worl
C-Tree wrote:even if I were it wouldn't be my first scum game.
C3 wrote:Before this post you hadn't made a case on us.
C3 wrote:Not everything that is true is mudslinging. Point out something in that post that wasn't true at the time I posted it.
C3 wrote:Bah. I'm on semi-V/LA for the next couple of days while I visit my girlfriend. BUt as it looks like we're going to be mislynched soon (for which I can't really fault you,) I have to tear myself away from her to commit my reads to the thread before it's too late.
C3 wrote:I have to play different cuz Pine gets onto me in the QT
Tazaro wrote:I see that people have flaked and my vote is on C-Tree who is a dedicated scum; look at him he loves to be scum, why would a scum flake? On the other hand, Katsuki scum could flake because she's a cupcake personality or else not liking this game. Improvement of program needed. I will nag at this group of people on the menu of making this game one of discussion without rotten pie level of crap and smelly negligence to the workings that we should have. Kise, You have a program of lurking when those two-headed creatures are participants of that and I want to say that you and Katsuki who has not connected with the game, and Ardelia who has not connected, are exemplars of the whole m*****f***ing program of hating this game as if it is a wife that you don't want to go to bed to very often. I on the other hand am a person who has his finger on the pulse, and see the pulse of those who flaked because of intolerance to the dislocation and crap. Why that level of intolerance? I'm a bit more tolerant, but look, alot of us want to lynch C-TREE. Why would anyone think there is a better one to lynch? Organize like the efficient terminators that could rule the world a la Swartzenegger enemies. Kill C-TREE, that's all because efficient game play means we are engaging the possibility that mafia theoretical approach of having a computer efficiency in town is to achieve the goal of getting CONSENSUS.
TwoHeadedBoy wrote:C3 wrote:Before this post you hadn't made a case on us.
Our ISOs 8 and 18. Along with the fact that you hadn't done anything to lead us to believe you are town, as we implied many times (notably due to lack ofunvote).