So, whats with the amount of rolefishing going on with Icey?
Doc should protect Icey. Everyone should vote Icey and unvote.
Kthxbai.
Beefster wrote:Bunnylover wrote:Can't I just already tell you I'm town therefore we don't spend 5 pages determining if I am town or scum?
Seriously though. I do believe everyone should vote Icey and unvote her to someone else. Unless your scum. Don't vote her if your scum.
Albert B. Rampage wrote:ITT we do what we are told because we don't use critical thinking
Vote: Bunnylover
This.
VOTE: Bunnylover
Mana_Ku wrote:BunnyLover wrote:Mana_Ku above post just reads as bussing scum.
Either read or read, before mentioning something like this.
Pine wrote:I would never play this suicidally as scum. It's just not a good idea.
I would link you to games where I've played this way as Town, but at least one is ongoing. I think there's an offsite game like this, I'll find the link when I get home
Soben wrote:BunnyLover, there's really no way you can see his claim and still believe he's mafia, I suggest you move your vote now.
IceyCupcake wrote:Bunnylover wrote:This whole talk about mod kill and etc should really stop. It makes my reading slower and makes me not want to read the thread so I'll miss something that I should have picked up on >_<.
Anyways I'm getting a town read on SGR.
Chesskid is chesskid, therefore null.
I haven't really seen anything that I can question, attack, defend against or anything in this thread mainly because 20 of these pages are focusing on if Pine was MK or not.
Although if we are going to go after a lurker, I wouldn't pick RBT to go after. If memory calls correct, the last game with her she did the exact same thing (lurk hard) and still flipped town. I would at least let some kinda damage role take her out.
And I don't remember the other lurkers. Where is ABR by the way?
No I've explained why this RBT is scummy as hell. Also if you don't think the fact you DON'T FUCKING REMEMBER anyone on my lurker list for people we should kill the hell out is a bad sign, I am HIGHLY dissapointed.
The claimed mason is null? Are you like... high?
Bunny, this post was bad. I take back my town read and Katsuki's too, just for this. Even if I have to argue with Katsuki over it.
Mana_Ku wrote:BunnyLover wrote:Claim mason from chesskid = WIFOM. If anyone else had hinted at them been mason, I probably would have taken it more seriously, but since its chesskid......can you take a lot of what he says seriously? Basically im not sure if he was serious or not, which it doesn't matter as I probably wouldn't lynch CK3 today regardless if he is a mason or not.
I've confirmed it ._. Normally, I wouldn't have liked it, had Chess played like that. But he had a good reason to do so.
After the recent posts, two new players stood out to me. One is lucky that he/she read town to me at the start. The other though...
Chess, we need to talk ._.
CryMeARiver wrote:Amrun wrote:And thx 4 the scumslip. Nice to know there are two scumteams. I'm assuming you're a mage.
Okay, then I'm right in thinking that was a slip.
HEY GUYS! SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH YOUR WALLS AND VOTE!
Vote: RBT
CryMeARiver wrote:Bunnylover wrote:CryMeARiver wrote:Amrun wrote:And thx 4 the scumslip. Nice to know there are two scumteams. I'm assuming you're a mage.
Okay, then I'm right in thinking that was a slip.
HEY GUYS! SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH YOUR WALLS AND VOTE!
Vote: RBT
Unvote, Vote CMAR
You of all people would know in the last game their was magekillers. RBT was in the last game. Therefore assuming the game has magekiller would be logical from a past player.
Whew wow. This is bad.
1) Of course after he said that I remembered there were magekillers. But there is no way in hell I was thinking about that throughout the first 40 pages of the game. Why the hell would I reference the last game? There is no way he was thinking of that in my opinion.
2) Welcome back. How was lurking?
3) 43 pages and you lay your vote a) on me b) for that reason? You're either a fucking terrible player or scum. Or both.
Soben wrote:regfan and i dealt with our hydra issues. We both share the interest in forming a town alliance this game that votes and works together so that scum don't direct the lynch. People who we think would be good members of said alliance: ABR, Manaku, CHesskid, WrathChild. We are interested in sharing our top 5 scum reads and coming to some sort of consensus about our scum reads so we can as a group direct a lynch towards a good target.
Here are our top 5 scum reads:
1. implosion
2. bunnylover
3. zdenek
4. lmp
5. riceballtail
(alternate: dryfit)
A Gaggle of Geese wrote:chesskid3 wrote:who the fuck would revive rbt
ISO purposes
sorry.
Anyway we need to lynch someone who is healthy
Bunnylover makes a great suggestion scummy as hell yesterday
A Gaggle of Geese wrote:grab dagger
Katy wrote:Bunnylover wrote:
lol. Lynch someone who is healthy? I see some logic in that, but most people who got hurt are by a town role more then likely.
Meaning healthy people can be town too, and more then likely will be town.
I think the idea is that people who are badly damaged don't need to be lynched because they can be vigged off at night.
Katy wrote:Bunnylover already alluded to this, but I am pretty sure that not all night actions hit their intended targets last night. So analyzing the night kill based on who the target was might not be reliable.
A Gaggle of Geese wrote:TARGETTING BEING OFF WAS CLAIMED AS A RESULT OF BUNNYLOVERS ACTION
OUR ROLEBLOCK OF HER ACTED BEFORE THAT
ERGO BULLSHIT
Katy wrote:A Gaggle of Geese wrote:
except for the part where we roleblocked her last night and she still claims an action that worked
Unless someone else revived RBT last night, then actions definitely went astray. I know my revive was used, and the target I chose did not revive. RBT did revive.
Baby Spice is right, I think. Either Bunny_Lover is telling the truth and your action hit someone else because of them, or some other effect caused actions to go astray and in that case your action didn't hit BL anyway.
Note in the rules:
When a player has an ability blocked or when an ability is prevented, it will know that its ability failed and the ability won't be used.
If BL was really blocked they would know it and so wouldn't have claimed to have done anything. I think the question to Bunny_Lover is - are you claiming a redirect? Ability resolution indicates that an RB can affect a redirect, but we still don't know exactly what BL is claiming to have done.
WrathChild wrote:Isn't the redirect of Katy by Bunny pretty much confirmed as occuring unless this is some elaborate scum-gambit (which would be pretty stupid considering they are unscathed as of now).
Bunny, was your ability a Mass-Redirect?
Beefster wrote:In my experience, I don't think mass redirection is a townie power. Unless it's on some sort of bastard mechanic.
What type of power did you think you were using?
Beefster wrote:Or rather, are you not told what exactly your spells do?
A Gaggle of Geese wrote:If anyone fucking considers lynching mana, we're replacing out.
I don't do fucktarded towns, and Faraday's still at Goofbash sooooooooooooo
IceyCupcake wrote:-Ability resolution: The order of resolution of abilities is (take note that not necessarily all abilities described here exist in the game): hide,mass-redirect, roleblock*, mass-roleblock, redirect*, protect, kill, damage, healing, investigate, recruit, affect other*, revive, miscellaneous abilities. Roleblock, affect other and redirect may switch place depending on who's the one being affected (the redirect takes place unless the roleblocker blocks the redirector; the same with affect other) Conflicting abilities of the same type will happen simultaneously.
Oh look, Bunny is confirmed mass redirector, Chess is confirmed roleblocker. Awesome. I love mod confirmation.
Snake will die today or tonight, we're not lynching him. Same with the Beef. I'll do an FOS count tonight, and then we can hear from replacements. I still like
Beefster wrote:SGRaaize wrote:Katy wrote:Let me quote again:
Snow_Bunny wrote:When a player has an ability blocked or when an ability is prevented,it will know that its ability failedand the ability won't be used.
If Bunnylover was roleblocked, they would have been informed. I find it really impossible that scum Bunnylover would not only have claimed an action that was causing people to speculate incorrectly about their night actions, but would have done so if they were notified that their action failed and the ability wasn't used, which is what should have happened if the roleblock really worked.
Hmm, great catch.
Another thing to consider is that although Chesskid3/AGOG look normal, Mana_Ku looked pretty fucking scummy to me.
To be honest, I'd like to kill Mana_Ku first, if he comes up as one of us, we can then all protect AGOG and deal with Bunnylover later.
Unfos
FoS: Mana_Ku (Whoever is to substitute him)
Think in terms of night kills. It would be more productive to lynch bunnylover- then if he flips town chaos sorcerer (or whatever), we nightkill AGOG and Mana_Ku.
PeregrineV wrote:FWIW, I neither attacked nor healed anyone all game.
@Bunny- You have random spells? That range from a one-hit kill to messing up everyone's targets? Can you explain why town would have this awesome ability to fuck itself over?
SGRaaize wrote:Alright, Bunnylover
You're an inventor, is that what this is?
Feysal wrote:
Oh look, we have another town death due to claiming. That makes seven total, excluding the one who got revived, nearly a third of the game. We cannot claim, because we would die.We cannot reveal our abilities out of fear of having them stolen, which also prevents us from sharing what we've done with them.We cannot know ourselves what our actions have accomplished because of the mass redirection. We cannot use votes to wagon and pressure our suspects, since we can't unvote if we're wrong.
This game should've had a bastard mod warning in big, red letters.
WrathChild wrote:SGRaaize wrote:Remember that plan I talked about?
We're basically doing it now, lolololol
Things are getting desperate, but I think we're right at least on this one.
FoS: DryFit
Why FoS the guy that's going to be replaced shortly. I believe a replacement for him has already been requested.
FoS: SGR
Also WTF Snake!? It was painfully clear you were town, why the hell would you suicide!? If we lose this game its going to be because dumb town keeps doing stupid things like claiming. PLEASE NO MORE DUMB CLAIMING!!!!!
Bunnylover wrote:Feysal wrote:
Oh look, we have another town death due to claiming. That makes seven total, excluding the one who got revived, nearly a third of the game. We cannot claim, because we would die.We cannot reveal our abilities out of fear of having them stolen, which also prevents us from sharing what we've done with them.We cannot know ourselves what our actions have accomplished because of the mass redirection. We cannot use votes to wagon and pressure our suspects, since we can't unvote if we're wrong.
This game should've had a bastard mod warning in big, red letters.
When did the bolded become an issue? When did it even happen?
I claimed an ability, yet haven't recieved in penalty (probably because i didn't do it directly).
What do you know?
Baby Spice wrote:Kind of curious that you forgot that one of the extreemly few votes today was AGOG voting for you Bunnylover.
SGRaaize wrote:I feel like absolutely nothing in this game counts for shit, due to all the insane mechanics going on, I feel like Mafia can easily hide amongst Town with these mechanic talk bullshit, after rereading a little, I got a headache, literally nothing stands out to me as scum or townie, the few people I think aren't scum due to role claims are acting just like everyone else is, then there's a fuckload of lurkers and nothing else to talk about.
This game is painful.
Vote: Dry-Fit
And yes, that's a vote, not a FoS, I'm not in the mood to discuss right now, nor am I in the mood to play more bullshit games related to the mechanics of this game instead of the actual players and what they say. Its time we advance, we don't need a big majority, the FoS count clearly indicated more people wanted to vote Dry-Fit last time I checked, and I am not waiting around when there are a few days left.
Unlike you guys, I only play one game at a time, and I don't like hydraing nor the concept of hydras, so this is particularly painful to me. Let's go
A Gaggle of Geese wrote:let's kill bunnylover imo tbh
IceyCupcake wrote:I mass roleblocked twilight actions. It's not my favorite ability, but we didn't earn any points, and frankly more deaths is all bad for the town.
A Gaggle of Geese wrote:the fact your not protecting spyrex ANYWAY just makes you a contender for worst role usage if you're town. so, yeah. you need to be told what to do. i'm okay with killing you if you don't play ball. there's no reason not to protect confirmed masons.
p.s. did katy take her info back WC??????????? LOL, make more bad calls on the game. if you're town here you should apologise to spyrex post game for not protecting him.
Baby Spice wrote:Icey, what did you roleblock or was it general?
Because gandalf and now Bunny claim not to have been RB'ed.
Unvote
A Gaggle of Geese wrote:fate should never won that game due to the fact masons (pretty much) flipped.
it's quite clear Spy has been soaking up damage, can you explain how that's working if we're not masons, eh?
there is no 'logical' reason to claim masons, but then scum claiming masons makes no 'logical sense either' sooooooooooooo?
WrathChild wrote:UNVOTE: Spyrex
Damage evidence indicates non-scum. Were you (the Masons) responsible for any of the night 1 deaths?
SGRaaize wrote:By the way, I still think AGOG is town, its just Mana_Ku was amazingly scummy.
If I had a way to know there's an ability in here that protects from a kill at 100%, I would probably just try to get Mana_Ku lynched and get AGOG protected and a clear until the end of the game, but there's so much shit that can happen at this point its best not to try to take control of Night actions
Zdenek wrote:I don't think that we can trust the night actions from last night at all, considering that Katy seems to have been both killed, resurrected and removed from the game all at once (notice that on the main page her listing in the dead list has been crossed out like RBT's was). So I won't be using the results of last nights actions to clear or incriminate anyone.
As a result of this, I don't think that Wrathchild's reasons for suspecting Spyrex hold water. Plus, I think it is highly unlike that scum would risk claiming as masons on day one. Similarly, I don't see why we should think that dead Katy confirms the masons.
PeregrineV wrote:@SGR- Well, since I get the distinct impression from the thread that I was handed a knife and sent into a gunfight, and someone has been hitting me since the game began, you'll understand if I don't threaten the shit out of anyone.
@Bunnylover- Did I understand that you added another player? As in, not a replacement but a player #25. It's good you confirmed them Sorceror, but, you know....
And I want to confirm that you did not pick Katy to remove, because Katy was confirmed town and reviver.
Tell me this isn't some weird cult stuff.
@BabySpice- If you are not hunting a wizard, then this sounds like a 3rd party admission. Do you win with the rest of town?
@Surye- You were almost lynched yesterday, yet haven't heard anything from you.
Vote: Surye
Vaya wrote:Grab: scroll
gandalf5166 wrote:Bunny, I would say exactly the opposite. Why would scum need to read the game more than town?
GreyICE wrote:Also, if we have a mass alignment claim, Vaya can detect evil as one of her powers. DryFit only managed to action once, but he proved that Mana_Ku was evil.
WrathChild wrote:Isn't Bowser supposed to be gone by now? Like, I thought he was only here for a Day or something.