TV Mafia Game Over - Scum Win
-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
1) Nero when I said confirmed I didn't mean literally confirmed. Zinger said "OH, how am I LITERALLY confirmed scum?" to which I basically said " you aren't confirmed you scum you're most likely scum". How doesn't that make sense to you? He was pretty much confirmed in my eyes by how scummy he was. You are misinterpreting the whole situation.
2) yes
3) Well DX kind of touched on it in that I was referring to yesterday as well, but not specific to the silver lynch. I'm talking about people voting blindly without stating reasoning in general, so while yes it does apply to the last day, it applies to mafia in a universal sense.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
@people who are confused at the fact that I chose Vezok, I'm fine with answering any questions regarding it.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Meransiel wrote:Junpei wrote:@people who are confused at the fact that I chose Vezok, I'm fine with answering any questions regarding it.
I have only 1 question. Have you played with vezok before?
No sir, I had no meta behind my reasoning for choosing Vezok anyway.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
ThAdmiral I have mentioned things that andrew and ZeL1nK have done day 1 and day 2 has just started. I've done nothing so far but try to explain my track on vezok so saying that I'm not exploring other options is idiocy as there has been no time.
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 9#p3293309
Andrew respond to this post as they are all important points of you saying things that make no sense.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
killerjester wrote:
I don't like this post. Yes the case on him exists, and it's very merit-able. But I'd consider voting him for this bit alone. Considering how suspicious everyone finds him, I feel he's harboring his vote by placing it on Nero. With the classic, "Just following my D1 play!" as his sole excuse.
Why do you single out Silver?
ThAdmiral doing it
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 3#p3306413
Hiplop doing it
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 6#p3306566
Rodion doing it
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 4#p3306594
Leonshade picking up on his list from yesterday
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 4#p3306984
Pappums post has nothing to do with Chevre, but votes her from voting her day 1
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 8#p3307108
drmyshotty doing it
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 4#p3309514
The only people with reasoning behind votes (well, new reasoning presented today) is Rainbowdash and Castle Bravo.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Killerjester your post strikes me as the following:
I proved your point wrong
You then said that for some unclaimed reason, Silver's action was scummier than the rest or that since silver had pressure his was the only one worth talking about.
This means that you NOTICED that others were doing this and still decided to only post silver's
This shows that you were intentionally making silver look worse than he is
This shows conflict of interest (not trying to lynch scum just trying to lynch silver who may or may not be scum)
Then spins post to say that I am discrediting the wagon.
I am not discrediting the wagon I am discrediting what you said. Not all those posts were on the same person.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Banshee I was a little suspicious of Vezok prior to my reread, however not as much as a few others (and I expressed this), so if scum was likely to redirect or something it probably wouldn't have been on Vezok. I did not read everyone, I told you I had little time. I looked over my list of players, quickly made the notes I made earlier, and skimmed my old thoughts on the players. But really it came down to me reading VEzok ISO and going "damn, this could be it". It was rushed and... had a little bit of gut...(I hate gut so I'm embarrassed to say this as it contradicts my belief in logic but alas I had no time).
No I don't think Vezok is most likely to be scum. Hydras are fucking me though as Silver and ThreeIsFrench(now hipaddict) and ZeL1nK are the three top people I find scummy, so Vezok didn't top the list by any means.
No no reason to suspect redirect other than I'm preparing for all possibilities.
Well I mentioned him off to the side as to show that I did suspect him during the day (Which is what the list was of) but that he wasn't someone who was a track option. Besides, you know that if I hadn't included Zinger it would have been "junpei you're distancing yourself from the previous mislynch by not including zinger on people who you suspected day 1".-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
The target being confused means nothing, the target isn't me and the target has made no direct inquiries more specific then "why me?" which I have already answered. Tracking the vig claim is ludicrous, if he is mafia then he just claims he shot the guy with a vigil shot.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
killerjester wrote:Junpei wrote:Killerjester your post strikes me as the following:
I proved your point wrong
You then said that for some unclaimed reason, Silver's action was scummier than the rest or that since silver had pressure his was the only one worth talking about.
This means that you NOTICED that others were doing this and still decided to only post silver's
This shows that you were intentionally making silver look worse than he is
This shows conflict of interest (not trying to lynch scum just trying to lynch silver who may or may not be scum)
Then spins post to say that I am discrediting the wagon.
I am not discrediting the wagon I am discrediting what you said. Not all those posts were on the same person.
Do you not see why silver is scummier than the rest of the people who's strategy he sheeped?
reiterate please I don't understand this post-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
chkballin wrote:VOTE: Silver
He should have been lynched yesterday. Also, on a separate note given the amount of activity we've decided to keep things brief. If we are tired of reading crap, we are sure there are others who are tired of reading it too.
I read this as "We are lazy so I'm sure everyone else is and yeah basically we don't want to give reasoning or any other thoughts than our vote so yeah ok?" Nice excuse but no.
Pinky, I had forgotten about the track report after I read responses, I was just answering and responding to them. Then you brought it up and I said what I would have said anyway.
Also I've explained why Andrew is scummy multiple times and andrew still hasn't responded.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Ugh, fuck sorry for double post.
But david I would also like to know if he feels that it was scummy for andrew to recruit that person or not. Try not to go into detail if you aren't going to announce who it is but give us your general opinion on the matter.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Holy shit. Nero I don't know if you are this dense or you're faking but I am going to go through and explain to you for one LAST time why you're wrong and I am right.
1) I was saying that he was confirmed non-town in that imo there was no way he'd flip town. That's from a scumhunting standpoint, obviously I cannot literally know that there is a 100% chance unless I was daycop which I wasn't as shown by my TRACKER claim. Stop taking things literally when they weren't meant that way.
2)
Zinger2099 wrote:
I didn't notice that ZeL1nK was so incessantly insisting that I was town. I believe he thinks I am town, but I do not think he is as '100% sure' as JLunpei seems to be about my scum status.Chevre wrote:@Zinger:If Junpei is wrong for being "allknowing" and incessantly insisting that you are scum, is ZeL1nk wrong for incessantly insisting that you are town?
However, if ZeL1nK did indeed insist that I am guaranteed town, this would be equally erroneous because he has no way of knowing that for sure.
I am town though.
Here is where Zinger implies that there is no way that I could be "100% sure" that he is scum unless I was scum. This is what prompted me to go on about how I wasn't really 100% sure just that I was using that figuratively. I never meant it was literally 100%, I'm not god jesus christ this is the third time I have told you this, hopefully this quote will persuade you to my point.
3) I wasn't defending Silver, I was pointing out how killerjester didn't properly evaluate the situation at all and hid information to make his point.
4) I don't give a fuck if you think Silver is scum if you can't back it up with reasoning. I don't like people swooping in and going "ok yea so silver was #2 yestaday so GOGOGOOGOGOGOGO".
5) THE DAY HAD JUST STARTED HOLY SHIT HOW AM I EXPECTED TO EXPLORE OTHER OPTIONS WHEN MOST PEOPLE HAVEN'T POSTED YET? I was pointing out that instead of hastling to vote yesterdays' number 2 that we should calm the fuck down and take a step back and look at everything as a whole. Andcontinue to scumhunt instead of living in what happened yesterday without being aware of what is being said today.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
A few things I should respond to, but I don't know if I should. Rodion I'm done discussing with you as you're a blundering idiot that makes me contemplate suicide when you constantly ignore what I said. END OF SUBJECT I'M DONE.
Andrew... ugh I'm almost done with this logic line too, Between you and silver there are probably 2 scum.
1) YOU SAID WAFFLING. Jesus, not that he said he'd do something and didn't. In fact, he didn't say that he'd do anything in that post at all. This response post by you is scummier than if you had said "I'll tell you tonight in mafia chat, Silver".
2) bullshit, you never implied anywhere anything about the very next PR claim, or the next PR claim in general. Scum points.
3) That is the most idiotic question I've ever heard. That's saying "HEY GUYS U KNO DAT GUY U PUT ON L-2 ND SHIT WEL IF HE SED SOMETHIN AND IT WAS PROOOFED WONG BAI VEZOK WEL WOULD YOU LYNCH VEZOK HUE?." If Vezok came out and said my report was wrong there is no doubt in my mind I'd be insta-lynched. The good news is that Vezok would be the next day.
Andrew don't even bother responding if you aren't serious about it, god.
Also I see the reasoning behind silver. I am not defending him in any way. That post to killerjester was to point out how he was hiding info. It was a "hey that's scummy" post. Only difference is unlike some people I explained WHY it was scummy. I find silver's gambit and post-gambit posts very scummy. To me it is up to Silver and andrew94 for the moment.
vote andrew94-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Just to point out, in post 1587 killerjester unvotes when he had no vote up to begin with. Could mean a lot of things, just pointing it out for others to see in case they missed it.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
I think that it is scummy that silver asks for a typed out investigation of his ISO that will provide no new evidence. It doesn't seem to make any sense as to why it should matter much at all to silver is what I'm saying, if he's town. Silver you should be scum hunting, discussing cases against you is a passive thing not an active thing. Prove you are town with future actions, not endless debate over the past that you won't win.
@Meransiel, why wouldn't they want to neighborize MoI?-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
andrew94 wrote:junpei seriously. hes first post. he just made a general statement that looked like he was doing something when he was not. that so hard to get?
Junpei wrote:
1) YOU SAID WAFFLING. Jesus, not that he said he'd do something and didn't. In fact, he didn't say that he'd do anything in that post at all. This response post by you is scummier than if you had said "I'll tell you tonight in mafia chat, Silver".
andrew94 wrote:im pretty sure i was attempting to say next time someone claims pr.
Junpei wrote:
2) bullshit, you never implied anywhere anything about the very next PR claim, or the next PR claim in general. Scum points.
andrew94 wrote:Junpei, your post 1527, where u find all these examples. i notice you missed out thadmiral and some others who did the same thing
2.5(I am adding this one): Bull fucking shit. I mentioned thadmiral, who did I miss?
andrew94 wrote:@everyone you know how you demanded junpei's track. and he said vezok. what if vezok said he did go somewhere. who would you believe.
Junpei wrote:
3) That is the most idiotic question I've ever heard. That's saying "HEY GUYS U KNO DAT GUY U PUT ON L-2 ND SHIT WEL IF HE SED SOMETHIN AND IT WAS PROOOFED WONG BAI VEZOK WEL WOULD YOU LYNCH VEZOK HUE?." If Vezok came out and said my report was wrong there is no doubt in my mind I'd be insta-lynched. The good news is that Vezok would be the next day.
NOW YOU KNOW.
You better not take 24 hours to respond, scum.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Also you don't log on once a day andrew. Or if you do you certainly don't post in the thread once a day. A quick look of your ISO shows this.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Did you shoot at all?-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
I agree with Hipaddict1, you are obligated to tell town who/if you shot, it is important information.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Junpei wrote:I agree with Hipaddict1, you are obligated to tell town who/if you shot, it is important information.
No, he's not. Unless someone has been at the precipice of being lynched (L-1) there is NO obligation for them to post any possible Night actions.
It tells us
1) Who was protected last night
2) If not 1 then a possible self-protection ability
3) He may have not shot which would be interesting
4) Hearing his logic on why he shot who he shot is good for scum hunting, especially since he obviously is expecting not to announce it.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
For clarity, 1 and 2 allow someone to confirm Zel1nK from their point of view, which is nice. Especially since in 1 it'd be a protective role. Of course when I say confirm I mean mostly confirm, but it is definitely helpful.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
killerjester wrote:You want ZeL1nK to give out more information than he has to AND the protective role to come out and confirm he's telling the truth?
For what? Two mostly-confirmed town?
No I don't want the protective role to come out. He'd be confirmed to the protective role as a killing role.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
izakthegoomba wrote:I've looked over this again, and with MoI's info, I think that andrew is scummier than silver.
VOTE: andrew
I find this post scummy as he just says "yeah I agree, VOTE".
drmyshottyizsik wrote:izakthegoomba wrote:I've looked over this again, and with MoI's info, I think that andrew is scummier than silver.
VOTE: andrew
How? I just don't see how Andrew is that scummy. He is bad yes, but he's not scummy,
I don't mind spelling it out again (Actually I do, but I'll do it anyway) if you will listen. Alternatively you could see what I've been discussing with andrew and all my points in said argument. I spell it out quite cleanly.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
killerjester wrote:Junpei wrote:izakthegoomba wrote:I've looked over this again, and with MoI's info, I think that andrew is scummier than silver.
VOTE: andrew
I find this post scummy as he just says "yeah I agree, VOTE".
And then you remember he's a neighbor. He looked at MoI's point of view, and he sees andrew in the same light. What else SHOULD he say?
I find it scummy to pick on such an easy target.
Ahem. I forgot that easy targets are always town targets and that I should only ever "pick on" hard targets. Don't be ludicrous.
Izak should have at least said a couple sentences of how/why it changed his opinion on the matter. He never went into detail on his silver read pretty much agreeing with what others said. So this would have been a great time to state his opinion on BOTH lynches.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
No one else regularly goes into detail on every read they get, I didn't expect you to want me to. But this is now a derail so unless you see some purpose to this conversation(articulate it if you do) then we should cease.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Pinky and the Brain wrote:ALIGNMENTS ARE RANDOMIZED YOU FUCKS. That means that there can damn well be two Town Neighborizers. Hell, there could be two mafia neighborizers.
unvote, Vote: izak
More likely scum than Silver imo.
Wait... wha...
You mean that the alignments were decided AFTER the roleset was made...? I don't understand I thought that a setup was made knowing which roles were mafi and which were town pregame (from mod's pov) but you're saying all roles could be any alignment in pregame and are randomized?
Cite your source!-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Rodion, what did you learn from that convo with Banshee?-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
David Xanatos wrote:Please explain how giving yourself up as a martyr is productive to Town.
To me, that's a mislynch, which means one less lynch used to actually hunt Scum, unless you are Scum, in which case you're getting yourself lynched for no reason, thereby hurting your team's chances, thereby not playing to your wincon.
this
There was nothing day 1 that should have made you so very confident that Zinger was indeed JK if you're VT.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
silverbullet999 wrote:It's called playing with and to extents being a fracking VI.
If Zinger was third party he could still be helpful.
If Zinger was scum he would not. A few people including myself were quite sure this was not the case and this was explained.
Simply put there was VERY little motivation for Zinger to claim third party and then switch it to town AS SCUM.
-Jun
There was nothing day 1 that should have made you so very confident that Zinger was indeed JK if you're VT.
What's the difference if I'm a VT or another town role?
--
I am again going to ask what the productiveness of this convo is... if you don't answer I'm moving my vote to you.
A cop serving himself up instead of Zinger would have been ridiculous even in theory and if a cop claim had done that we'd lynch him.
The point of this conversation is to investigate your d1 martyr action and determine if it was a town or scum thing to do. It is a very big point in the case against you and so far you've done nothing to show that you were so sure of Zinger.
Tell me silver in the posts you made after the martyr move, the posts where Zinger had gotten more votes, why didn't you acknowledge this fact and try to push the lynch onto yourself?-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Actually I'm going tovote silver
My reasoning is that andrew's neighborhood would do good to get 1 or 2 more people in it (not sure if he's recruited today or not yet) and we know his role. However if silver is scum we don't know his scumrole so it'd be more dangerous to leave him alive.
For the record, yes this means that I find them similar in that they both possess a lot of scumminess, I do find andrew more scummy however my above logic makes me decide to vote silver.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Nero, I wasn't trying to discredit the wagon, I was discrediting what Killerjester said. I thought it was scummy of killerjester to exclude those people.
Tell me nero do you think my post was wrong and that Killerjester wasn't intentionally hiding information? I think I proved in that post, and with his later post where he says that he did notice all the other identical votes but didn't feel they were as important that he did.
silver, 1 role has zero actions or other modifiers, one does. Is that seriously what you meant to ask?
@Rainbow softclaiming PR with inno on you is so stupid. The other thing he is claiming is masongroup with you and that is obvious to everyone who is reading it. Or perhaps he just meant you were really town to him via scumhunting. Not every read is from a report/mechanic.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Nero Cain wrote:@Jun I have no clue what you mean by "hiding information" Did you mean he was being selective about it? Sure I can see that. But it was early and there was nothing but yesterdays 50+ pages to go on. What were they supposed to vote on?
That isn't the point, Nero.
Killerjester said that Silver's post was scummy because he was harboring his vote on you using the ol "follow up from day 1" as his sole excuse. However I pointed out to him that six others have done the same thing! To which killerjester replied...
killerjester wrote:
I felt, following his play all game, his was the most condemning. Why are you discrediting silver's wagon so hard?
He felt his was the MOST condemning. That means that he knew of the six other cases and still decided not to point them out. The reason was to lynch silver, to make silver look worse than he is. I think silver is scum, I think we should lynch silver, but that is beside the point. Killerjester hid information intentionally to make his target lynch look good. This makes me less suspect Silver but given the possibility of more than 2 factions perhaps not so much.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Rainbowdash wrote:Junpei wrote:@Rainbow softclaiming PR with inno on you is so stupid. The other thing he is claiming is masongroup with you and that is obvious to everyone who is reading it. Or perhaps he just meant you were really town to him via scumhunting. Not every read is from a report/mechanic.
If he doesn't want to go into it, and there is no need for him to go into it, people aren't going to force him to go into it. That means drop it.
What is your current thoughts on oversoul?
Well I thought that his being open to us and legitimate to us about why he wasn't posting was a town tell. But it seems even now he isn't posting and is refusing to comment on this game. I did like some of his posting earlier too but it has come to "im here guys dw" and that is bad. So my read for him has turned to scummy as he isn't following up with what he said and refuses to comment on the current game.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
killerjester wrote:Junpei wrote:He felt his was the MOST condemning. That means that he knew of the six other cases and still decided not to point them out. The reason was to lynch silver, to make silver look worse than he is. I think silver is scum, I think we should lynch silver, but that is beside the point. Killerjester hid information intentionally to make his target lynch look good. This makes me less suspect Silver but given the possibility of more than 2 factions perhaps not so much.
I did not misrepresent Silver's actions in any way.
In comparison to everyone else's actions yes you did. You made it seem like he was the only one doing it which would bring emphasis to the tell, whereas if you had said that seven people had been doing it then it wouldn't look like such a cool little scumtell.
Vezok I would but it would be biased as fuck, you're better off reading a little, MoI claimed that andrew was neighborizer though and silver confirmed his VT claim are the two biggest events.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Oh and chkballin claimed to have been neighborized by someone other than andrew.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
killerjester wrote:Junpei wrote:In comparison to everyone else's actions yes you did. You made it seem like he was the only one doing it which would bring emphasis to the tell, whereas if you had said that seven people had been doing it then it wouldn't look like such a cool little scumtell.
I never said he was the only one doing it. Every point I mentioned was valid. The fact that other players were doing it too doesn't make it any less of a scumtell.
Let me walk you through it one more time. *note that I am saying this not for killerjester but for others reading, it is pointless to argue this with him but not to discuss with others*
order of events
-noticed 7 people were voting purely for continuation of d1
-noticed silver was 1 of them
- only pointed out silver
The fact that you only pointed out silver is hiding information, it is propaganda to make your lynch look better, ugh surely I'm not the only one who gets this, David? Silver? Anyone?
It doesn't matter if his tell is viable or not all that matters is that out of the seven people doing it he only pointed out silver.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
killerjester wrote:Junpei wrote:ugh surely I'm not the only one who gets this, David? Silver? Anyone?
If at least one other person agrees I was attempting to "hide information" in my "propaganda" against silver in this post then I'll take you seriously.
You're stretching at best, and I don't see why.
Deal, everyone please comment on my thoughts of this post!-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Silver you are one of the people who haven't answered yet... Was killerjester hiding information etc?-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
silverbullet999 wrote:Apologies thought I did.
but to me not really... just seems more like a case of tunneling
Yes he is tunneling I agree, but that doesn't directly correlate to what I was saying.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
David Xanatos wrote:Don't give yourself such credit, if I was at all inclined to want your lynch I'd vote for you. I think you're a VI, a particularly stupid one at that, which leaves me inclined to think "If he was Scum, his team would have told him to wind his neck in by now.".
So I frankly couldn't care less if you want to ignore me, I'm sure it will be bliss, not having to deal with your inane arguments.
Junpei > I can see where you're coming from.. I do agree that it seems weird he brought that up to the exclusion of other examples, but in this instance, Silver was the most recent example (Other than Shotty, but he pulled up Shotty for something in the same post, and I'd argue the implications apply to both), and was likely the one that drew KJ's attention.
No I think that drmyshotty portion was referring to the post restriction.
Also you do know that he had his attention on all of the instances right? He later says that he knew about the other instances of this happening but felt that silvers was.. hold on lemme grab the quote...
killerjester wrote:
I felt, following his play all game, his was the most condemning. Why are you discrediting silver's wagon so hard?
his was the most condemning of all my examples. Also notice "felt" meaning past tense and implying to the post I was responding to. Ergo he saw every example I showed prior to posting the post about Silver and yet he still didn't even mention them. Most condemning? Yeah it sure is when you only mention it.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
David Xanatos wrote:Hmm.. I must admit I overlooked that. That's.. a very good catch. KJ, can you define your stance on Silver? In honesty, in my fatigued state, I'm seeing you both saying that Town Silver wouldn't do this, and that Town Silver would do this because he's done it before.. humour me and clarify please.
*If the English doesn't make sense, read it in Yoda's voice and pretend it was funny, or send me caffiene.
Go to sleep and come back tomorrow
But if that is directed at me somehow, I am not saying town silver wouldn't do this. But I'm also not saying that he would. Simply put, I have no meta background on silver that pertains to this.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Uh, did he agree with me? I don't know if he did after reading his posts I'm still confused and if so your post clarified nothing for me.
If not, then we'll continue to wait for 1 person to agree I guess.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Ugh, sorry for double post, but isn't it obvious that out of 23 people at least 1 person will agree with me? It seems silly to make us wait for a serious response.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
I see your logic but.... silver and andrew.... Do we really have three scum here? Almost seems too good to be true.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
I'm sorry rodion but you still haven't told me what you learned from the Banshee conversation. Although this conversation with Castle Bravo seems like a pointless road to go down the thread is slow recently anyways and I have not much to add so I won't stop you from talking.
I will say that when Castle Bravo responded with "yes" and then called you out on not knowing what that meant as if it were a scumtell, it felt very much like scum leading you on.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Rodion wrote:Junpei wrote:I'm sorry rodion but you still haven't told me what you learned from the Banshee conversation. Although this conversation with Castle Bravo seems like a pointless road to go down the thread is slow recently anyways and I have not much to add so I won't stop you from talking.
I will say that when Castle Bravo responded with "yes" and then called you out on not knowing what that meant as if it were a scumtell, it felt very much like scum leading you on.
What I learned from my interaction with Banshee.
1 - She will not fight clearly lost battles.
Proof: she told me I parroted PLJ and I gave proof that my post happened before PLJ's. Banshee did not reply to that.but your proof for number 2...
2 - She will not admit defeat either.
Proof: when I asked why she didn't reply to the parroting accusation, she said it was due to lack of time, not due to being wrong.So it wasn't that she wouldn't fight it is that she couldn't fight. It appears to me that you are going from point A or point B without looking for a possible point C inbetween.
3 - She will accuse and refuse to explain. This means either that:
a) she is sure she can get a majority to lynch me without explaining because the majority of the players here can see how obvious of a scumtell that iswow, you learned a ton. Also it is heavily biased to say without explaining. Although I don't think she has explained as much as I'd like, I see why she thinks you're scummy.
b) she will not fight clearly lost battles, nor admit defeat (as can be seen in #1 and #2)repeat of 1 and 2, shouldn't even be here
Proof:Banshee wrote:This reads as if you're requesting that I explain the scumtell I detected in your posts. I'm not going to tell you that. Ask me after the game.Proof of what? This is exactly what you were talking about in number 4!
4 - She's smart enough to get her own "touchés". She actually made me slightly evolve as a player here.Yeah, I guess that's true, she's smart enough to know this fact, I assume that people are capable until they prove otherwise but maybe you don't. Interesting point I guess.
Proof:Banshee wrote:Why would you warn people not to do things that might be perceived as scummy? What if they ARE scum? Why would you be so certain that they are not?
5 - She will exploit those "argument victories" while trying to sweep her "argument losses" under the carpet. Shows lack of coherence.Biased as all hell. I will say yes she did take time to question you on MoI/Vifam. She wasn't here for that but I think that it is scummy that she unearthed something bad you did, but when you think about it now it isn't in perspective. She was trying to prove that you're mafia, and part of doing that was showing what you did earlier that was bad.
Proof: she took the time to continue questioning me on my MoI/Vifam "warning" after I conceded that I made a suboptimal move, the same time she didn't have to concede defeat on the parroting accusation.
6 - She got me to understand a little about (non-scummy) reasons on why a hydra conceals their identity. I'm not sure how serious/often this internet harassing thing is, but I'll not take my chances and just change my position towards more leniency when dealing with concealed hydras/alts (yes, it was a huge AtE on her part, but I'll buy it).
Banshee wrote:A viable reason for someone to hide their identity is if they are being stalked or otherwise harassed online. And that, as I said previously, wouldn't be any of your business, would it?
Basically I think you did the following
1) Mindlessly argued with Banshee because you're scum and you argue with town over anything. She was accusing you so you just decided to defend and never think "huh, maybe I shouldn't argue with someone over my scumminess forever and just stick to scumhuntin, I'll ignore her for now as since I've been scum hunting I've found some useful tid bits and tells". Note that this post implies you're scum, as I got shit for calling zinger 100% scum, I think you're scum now, I don't know it.
2) Didn't take notes on the conversation, as I said the conversation didn't have the meaning of understanding and reading Banshee for you.
3) Got asked by me to explain
4) Forgot about it (had no notes anyways, you panicked and just ignored it for a bit, then ended up not ever making anything up)
5) Finally we are at the now. You made up this post on the fly about things you noted from Banshee. We know this because you contradict yourself and repeat yourself more than you should. See citations for more details.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
izakthegoomba wrote:Ok I'm kind of in limited access and have a few pages to read but I'll do my best here.
I'm pretty sure andrew's scumminess has been discussed already, and there is very little to add to that discussion.
Thinking on it, I get some scummish vibes off of Rodion, but I'm not confident of this read.
silver is my second choice for today's lynch.
I will have to re-read sometime for more reads.
Your support in a lynch means nothing if you don't post more actual content.
Allow me to recap:
I think andrew, rodion, silver are scummy (those are the top 3 suspects today. anything else to add? lets find out) and i'm on v/la kinda sorta. (beautiful).-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Rodion you state that Banshee won't fight "clearly lost" battles. However you cited a post where Banshee essentially says that it wasn't that she won't fight that battle, but she physically couldn't respond timely at all. ergo, couldn't, not wouldn't
Responding quickly to hopefully get a quick answer to this point.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Ugh. Rodion once again you are ignoring my simple basic LINEAR logic. This is the last time once again I will post anything regarding this particular debate.
You said in your thread that she WOULDN'T defend herself when indeed the reason she didn't respond was because she COULDN'T defend the argument as said because there wasn't enough time to. You articulated this for me very clearly in your post.
Also if you know you're right and she refuses to acknowledge that, you do what I do and drop it, others will recognize the logic if it comes up again. Scumhunting is more important anyway.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Banshee wrote:I did miss your answer, and I apologise.
This game has been filled with people saying "_________ is town! 100% town. Guaranteed town!" in response to the cases made by others and with no explanations or responses when questioned on that. By no stretch of the imagination could Zinger's play be considered pro-town or understandable town play. I challenge anyone who will argue that it should have been obvious that he was a pro-town role based on his play; I accept that others may have seen things I didn't, but it wasn't OBVIOUS. And, as a result, you're getting people who are accusing other people of being scum based on their insistent and unexplained identification of various people as town without good justification and without actually addressing the case against those people.
tl;dr: People who insist that others are town without giving reasons look like scum trying for town-cred. I don't understand why Rodion is getting a full free pass while others are being nailed up for what I think is the same behaviour.
1) Stop acting like you're so much more intelligent and aware than us and that you would have been able to provide concrete posts that had shown Zinger was town.
2) You replaced in AFTER zinger flipped, that's why it's obvious to you.
Banshee, he isn't getting a free pass. There are so many people doing incredibly scummy pushes/posts that we can't pressure them all, it is simply impossible.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Top 3 would be in order:
Andrew
Silver
Zel1nK
I don't want to have to write up reasons why on all of them when I've articulated each of them already.
Yes i see the reasons for the other sixteen thousand scummy people, but there are too many lynch targets that look like scum. Note that I'm voting silver because Andrew if scum is very likely neighborizer, which isn't nearly as dangerous as whatever silver might be.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
I never said they were a scum team Peregrine, they are just the scummiest people in the game in my opinion. I can't form a scum team based on connection logic at this point.
Also how about giving a real set of reads like David and I did back in day 1?-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Meranseil, I don't really know what his case is. However I think I know why you find his post scummy (I believe his case is that you didn't explain this ergo scum? It's really confusing the way it's worded). But in that post Rodion does a few things.
Rodion wrote:I cut out the large chunk where he talks about his meta
Zinger is getting under my skin. His behaviour so far has been very anti-town, but I don't know if he's scum-aligned. My vote is on him to hopefully change his behaviour for the better. I could just as easily vote Meran, particularly after his #400 admission that he will contribute if pushed hard.
The first is he waffles "Zingers play is anti-town but I don't know if he is scum-aligned" to me sounds like he is saying zinger is scummy but he doesn't know if he's scum, which is waffling.
Then says that his vote is to hopefully change his behavior for the better. There are two things wrong with this.
1) In my opinion saying that your vote is put down for a specific purpose is a scum trying to get towncred. It was too early to say this anyway because Zinger had 3 posts between Rodion's vote and this post by Rodion so it is far too early to disclose why you voted as any effect it may have had on him is now gone and replaced with him thinking that you're being condescending. It isn't like Rodion's vote was going to turn on a switch, rather he should be hoping for a slow turn in Zingers "anti-town" play into a more "acceptable" tone for Rodion. So it goes back to 1 this post being just for towncred.
2) The original vote on Zinger was "for not answer [rodion's] request in #325", and post 325 reiterates a request from 200 which states that Rodion wants the game linked that shows bad blood between the hydra ZeL1nK and Zinger. First of all I see no reason why he'd want this so badly, as all it will do is unearth the hatred even more and start discussion regarding it that doesn't need to be made. So it is a bad request especially after ignored by Zinger the first time. However the fact that he later says it was to change Zingers' attitude and then discloses said motive in less than 24 hours (about 13-14 hours to be precise) contradicts this theory. There's no way zinger would change his behavior that fast.
SO this is my scum read on Rodion from that post which is what I think he was confused on. But I still am not sure what Rodion wants. Meranseil however I haven't really read his whole case on you at all to memory (looked at it when it was posted, never really thought much about it) I will read it tomorrow if you persist, however I think that this scummy post is the most useful piece of information I'd garner from it.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Nero what about Andrew? i noticed you haven't commented on that whole situation going on with the neighbors.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
David Xanatos wrote:Is noone else noting the obstinancy of Peregrine, refusing to actually give opinions or reads?
Getting anything out of him appears to be akin to pulling teeth, and refusal to actually condense reads into a clear post reeks of avoidance for me, trying to force anyone reading into his opinions, past and present, to dig through every damn post looking for the snippets of actual information on his stance..
I noted it yes. There are too many people doing things I consider scummy, I think though that Peregrine is trying to become a pillar of conversation by doing reads in this way, not sure if it's a scumtell or a towntell though.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
David Xanatos wrote:What's pro-town about hiding all his reads in the middle of posts? It gives me the impression of squirreling away his opinions so that if he's wrong, noone can pull them out and call him on them..
I honestly don't know his reads because when I read his posts I was sort of confused on what he was saying. Actually this may sound kind of weird asking another player to do this instead of asking Peregrine, but could you summarize his posts for me &.&.
I see he has a few people null or something so I think he's just waffling a bunch but the thing is I don't really see where he posted his reads. And now that I reread his ISO I see that he actually has done hardly more than waffle on reads and ask questions. But I may have missed a read so if so someone tell me.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
That's pretty much what I thought I saw but you missed where he says "David X: null".
PeregrineV wrote:David Xanatos wrote:And again Peregrine dodges the demands to give his reads on people, and tries to demand reads from others.
That's anti-town if not outright scummy.
UNVOTE: Andrew
VOTE: Peregrine
Reads. You've been dodging this and fence sitting for far too long. You have no right to demand of others what you yourself have provided sweet F.A of.
Reads: DavidX: null-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
A SLIGHT TOWN READ OH MY GOD HOLY LOGIC BATMAN (did I do it right?)
Elaborate on why-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Nero Cain wrote:David X-Jun link found.
Way to avoid the request.-
-
Junpei Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5226
- Joined: June 24, 2011
Are you crazy Rainbowdash?
I have already expressed my strong desire to lynch Silver and Andrew.
But I see what you mean about the thread getting clogged... and I'm sorry its just that I'm not used to having to worry about space filling up and having to trim down discussion because of it. I wish others didn't mind but I guess they do. We were just discussing other reads...