Encore Mafia: Mod Mayhem - ENDGAME: LORDS OF THE DUST

Empking · Post Post #6 (isolation #0) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:38 am

One-shot Cop/One-Shot Vig/Neighbourize

Vote: UK

Mod: Can you confirm that a vote for FL is a vote for UK?

Empking · Post Post #9 (isolation #1) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:41 am

In post 8, Andrius wrote:
In post 6, Empking wrote:
Mod: Can you confirm that a vote for FL is a vote for UK?

Who's FL?

UK

Empking · Post Post #11 (isolation #2) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:43 am

Unvote
Vote: FL

Will I go down in the VC as voting UK?

Empking · Post Post #16 (isolation #3) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:47 am

In post 15, Faraday wrote:Guys is there any reason I shouldn't fake a post restriction since you're not voting Katsuki?

?

FL: Why the vote then?

Empking · Post Post #20 (isolation #4) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:50 am

In post 17, Faraday wrote:Plum,Locke Lamora, Nobody Special, oobam Parama, xReckonerx, AlmasterGM

^ willing to bet there's PROBABLY at least one scum here. maybe.

LOL

Unvote, Vote: UK

But seriously Faraday, why the Katsuki comment?

Empking · Post Post #22 (isolation #5) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:52 am

In post 21, UncertainKitten wrote:@Empking: 'Cuz.

So it wasn't a serious vote?

@Faraday: Yes, you named almost half the playerlist. Your deduction that at least one of them is scum is astounding. Also it's Plum. She's always scum >=[! (That said I can see a line of reasoning that could make that list useful. I'll see if you want to push it or not)

Liking my vote now.

Empking · Post Post #26 (isolation #6) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:53 am

In post 23, UncertainKitten wrote:It was a serious vote.

What is your reasoning behind it then?

Your scumplaining isn't helping, Empking.

?

Empking · Post Post #32 (isolation #7) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:57 am

In post 26, Empking wrote:
In post 23, UncertainKitten wrote:It was a serious vote.

What is your reasoning behind it then?

Your scumplaining isn't helping, Empking.

?

FL: What is he trying to do?

Faraday: My games are on my wiki other than Dayless.

Empking · Post Post #36 (isolation #8) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:58 am

Dayless: http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=18907

Empking · Post Post #40 (isolation #9) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:05 am

In post 38, UncertainKitten wrote:@Parama: Me extending a conversation with Empking too long. You should vote him.

Where did I scumplain?

Empking · Post Post #45 (isolation #10) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:14 am

Parama

In post 23, UncertainKitten wrote:It was a serious vote. Your scumplaining isn't helping, Empking.

Empking · Post Post #53 (isolation #11) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:19 am

In post 47, Parama wrote:yeah I really don't like sorting through trash
whatever

If I did not scumplain (or say anything that could be construed as scumplaining) would accusing me of scumplaining be a scum tell? What about suddenly being mum about explaining what was meant by scumplaining?

Far; Why is UK a bad wagon?

Empking · Post Post #64 (isolation #12) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:46 am

The first three pages are

always

important.

Empking · Post Post #66 (isolation #13) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:50 pm

In post 65, UncertainKitten wrote:Hey Empking, who's scum? You've spent three pages managing to avoid telling us this.

Really? That's what you're going with?

You. I dfo not have enough information to make a better than RVS judgment on anyone else.

(Also Faraday was asked but Faraday gave the wrong answer. Did you notice how I waited for him to answer meaning my response had zero anti-town effect?)

Hey UK: How did I scumplain?

Everyone: UK is making up buzzwords inm order to justify a vote and to add fake content. UK can not justify these. This makes UK essentially confirmed scum. Is my reasoning off at any point?

Empking · Post Post #69 (isolation #14) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:57 pm

In post 67, UncertainKitten wrote:That's classified information, Empking. The fact that you've spent so much effort on "defending" yourself rather than proactively hunting scum like a townie would makes you pretty damn near confirmed scum.

Please die.

Hey is this post complete nonsense?

UK: Wouldn't scumhunting involve me questioning the player with my vote (i.e. you)? And defending myself involve interacting with the players voting me (e.g. AMG)? Which one was I doing?

Everyone: I say: "This makes UK essentially confirmed scum."
UK then says " makes you pretty damn near confirmed scum."
Souinds like someone faking it me. (And I know that sound.)

Empking · Post Post #70 (isolation #15) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:57 pm

In post 68, Nobody Special wrote:Well, this is gonna be fun.

Vote: Plum

Vote the confirmed bullshitter!

Empking · Post Post #72 (isolation #16) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:50 pm

If they don't actually scumhunt why wouldn't you show that rather than being too frightened to and trying to divert attention? That doesn't make much sense to me.

Empking · Post Post #74 (isolation #17) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:59 pm

In post 73, UncertainKitten wrote:Haha, cute. I've been voting you seriously since Page 1 for your attempts to distract from scumhunting.

1. Post where you gave that as a reason.
2. Example of the scumhunting I was distracting from.

Empking · Post Post #80 (isolation #18) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:23 pm

In post 75, UncertainKitten wrote:From your own scumhunting. You haven't done jack shit this game except scumplain.

I've found scum.
I've given reasons why they're scum.
That seems like something to me.

Also, cases are scummy. I don't need to provide reasons unless I wish it.

Unfortunately for you you accidently gave a reason

"scumplaining" so want to give an example?

NS: Thoughts on UK?

PEdit: So Faraday is scum with UK? I knew that disliking the grammar and silliness of his early posting made him scum!
PEditEdit: Giving advice to your buddy cool. Faraday: Thoughts on UK dodging questions and forced rhetoric and saying things she doesn't believe muliple times?

Empking · Post Post #84 (isolation #19) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:27 pm

In post 82, Nobody Special wrote:Emp: She's toying with us. I don't know why, yet.

Surely if you believe the first part then the "why" is obvious? We're playing Mafia and that's also her role.

Empking · Post Post #86 (isolation #20) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:28 pm

In post 85, CSL wrote:>implying I don't have other commitments and that I don't have a life

Vote: Empking

*sigh* Why?

Empking · Post Post #89 (isolation #21) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:30 pm

Reck: If Faraday i town why the refusal to comment on UK's alignment?

Empking · Post Post #96 (isolation #22) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:35 pm

In post 91, Faraday wrote:
In post 89, Empking wrote:Reck: If Faraday i town why the refusal to comment on UK's alignment?

3/4ths of this is inaccurate.

Why?
You were asked what you thought UK's alignment was. You refued to answer.

LL hasn't posted. What a great question.

Empking · Post Post #104 (isolation #23) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:39 pm

NS is the towniest player in this game. NS isn't afraid of anwering reasonable questions.

Far: That was before he made it unarguable that he was just saying what sounded pretty. "Confirmed scum" "Vote: CSL"

Empking · Post Post #106 (isolation #24) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:40 pm

Parama: My actions have no bearing on UK's alignment. Look at what UK has done and then say that UK isn't 100% scum.

Empking · Post Post #116 (isolation #25) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:43 pm

UK: What is scumplaining?

Preview: NS is town as all hells.

Empking · Post Post #133 (isolation #26) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:54 pm

In post 85, CSL wrote:>implying I don't have other commitments and that I don't have a life

Vote: Empking

Why?

NS: What reactions has UKL got other than getting people to ignore her after getting her attempts for towncred to fail?

Empking · Post Post #138 (isolation #27) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:56 pm

Aw your CSL distraction failled so soon.

Empking · Post Post #141 (isolation #28) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 3:00 pm

In post 140, UncertainKitten wrote:@dram: Think Ythill in Psychic Mafia. Empking sounding familiar? Less meta but still a similar attitude.

Am I right in thinking that if I asked for an explaination you'd ignore it knowing you'd already planted the rhetoric?

Empking · Post Post #147 (isolation #29) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 3:06 pm

Parama: What do you think of CSL calling me "confirmed scum" but when she wasn't getting traction leaping to CSL? What about when her distraction failled leaping off that wagon?

What about her just copying me? I call her confirmed scum her next post she calls me confirmed scum. I call her out for rhetoric guess what her next post accuses me of?

Empking · Post Post #150 (isolation #30) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 3:13 pm

In post 149, UncertainKitten wrote:Empking: That would be because you're accusing me of the scumtells you're committing. It's not copying so much as pointing out your hypocrisy, and the fact it's bullshit to boot.

Hey why didn't you mention that before? Because you're just making it up as an excuse?

"Discrediting" is what you call calling you scum? Really?

Empking · Post Post #152 (isolation #31) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 3:17 pm

Hey UK, who vote who first?

Empking · Post Post #154 (isolation #32) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 3:20 pm

Also define "activeness".

I don't recall calling someone scummy for not given a reason if nobody asked for one. Care to give a quote?

Empking · Post Post #157 (isolation #33) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 3:41 pm

In post 156, UncertainKitten wrote:EBWOP: Wait, don't bother answering. I'm ending the conversation here. You managed to trick me into arguing, you crafty little scum you. Congratulations on the page of noise you helped make!

Anyone who buys this is an idiot.

Empking · Post Post #163 (isolation #34) » Sun Sep 11, 2011 1:40 am

In post 161, Plum wrote:Yes.

Where?

Empking · Post Post #164 (isolation #35) » Sun Sep 11, 2011 1:44 am

In post 161, Plum wrote:What? This sort of thing can obviously be said sincerely. It is not necessary for one to be insincere and scum motivated. This is desperation painting itself into a corner.

If UK's thoughts are essentially the last thoughts I gave then that should be pretty good evidence that she's not being sincere. Why do you disagree?
Also, desperation for what?

Empking · Post Post #165 (isolation #36) » Sun Sep 11, 2011 1:47 am

Plum: If there hasn't been any questions that UK couldn't answer then

you

ask her when I !scumplained". Shje's too afraid (And give me a different motive if you can) to even say what her made up word means!

Empking · Post Post #176 (isolation #37) » Sun Sep 11, 2011 6:34 am

Plum has posted one post of contradictory fluff. Where are people getting a town read from her?

Empking · Post Post #200 (isolation #38) » Sun Sep 11, 2011 6:57 am

Don't think four scum was a slip. That was what I was presuming.

Reck: Plum claimed that only thing I posted that gave a townread was my first three pages comment. She then said that the first sentance of one of my posts was townie. Mopst of it was fluff "Reck is boring" (not an exact quote) for one and stuff like that.

Empking · Post Post #223 (isolation #39) » Sun Sep 11, 2011 7:33 am

Faraday: Why weren't you funny in Ooba's game? Or Neruz's?

Empking · Post Post #229 (isolation #40) » Sun Sep 11, 2011 7:50 am

In post 227, Nikanor wrote:Reck on page seven is obvscum.

Vote: xRECKONERx.

UK is also scum.

<3

Empking · Post Post #246 (isolation #41) » Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:16 am

In post 243, UncertainKitten wrote:Dram: Agreed. I still feel Empking is scum. Getting too many Ythill vibes from him to want to let it go.

Your Ythill vibes come from my calling you scum and in your world that's the same as trying to discredit and bait you.

PEdit: Who voted who first? "Cuz" is not a serious vote however much you'd like to pretend it is.

Empking · Post Post #251 (isolation #42) » Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:20 am

In post 247, UncertainKitten wrote:Except I said I was serious voting you BEFORE I said cuz.

Yes but you were mistaken if you though "cuz" was a serious vote. More likely you were lying for towncred but either way.

You can stop lying now, Empking.

When did I lie?

Empking · Post Post #261 (isolation #43) » Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:52 am

In post 258, Nikanor wrote:
In post 254, UncertainKitten wrote:Sold!

Unvote, Vote Nikanor

Kill with fire, thanks.

ohgeez.
What wishy-washy voting you have, grandma.

I fail to see why this post would not make UK think of Ythill.

Empking · Post Post #278 (isolation #44) » Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:34 am

In post 277, dramonic wrote:I think CSL is on unannounced V/LA, just sayin

Why do you say that?

Empking · Post Post #281 (isolation #45) » Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:33 pm

In post 280, Plum wrote:and from the start when you lashed out at the fact that UK refused to explain how her vote on you was serious

Quote please.

Plum, you seem to refuse to engage your brain if you were town.
She's scared of answering because she has no answer. She won't answer where I scumplained because she doesn't think I scumplained Why would town-UK lie about that?

Empking · Post Post #283 (isolation #46) » Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:40 pm

Is that m,eant to be me lashing out? Really?

Empking · Post Post #286 (isolation #47) » Sun Sep 11, 2011 4:28 pm

In post 285, UncertainKitten wrote:Plum: Nah, perfectly fine. I'm probably going to end up back on the empking wagon when we decide to lynch, but the Nika wagon is starting to look pretty too.

@Emp: Actually, it's not that I have no answer, it's just that answering you would more or less be adding to the noise in a game that's already had it's fair share of noise from myself and you. The questions you ask are more or less irrelevant to catching town or scum. I have answers, they're just self evident to...ah, what was it, anyone who's engaged their brain.

So you refuse to give examples in order to not create noise because you already created too much noise by not giving examples. Yes that makes sense.

And in order to not create noise you deliberately tried to get me riled up by doing somethiong I had already called you out for. Yes underhanded tricks. The calling card for all town players

Empking · Post Post #299 (isolation #48) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:43 am

In post 295, esuriospiritus wrote:I agree about the UK's posts being kinda contrived-sounding at times but I think at this point she's done more in an attempt to get the game rolling than anyone else, so she remains my strongest town read to me despite that.

What did she do?

PEdit: Why is Plum only hounarary scum?

Empking · Post Post #302 (isolation #49) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:48 am

In post 301, Faraday wrote:
In post 300, Faraday wrote:Actually looking back Uk's reasons for calling Empking scum are kinda awful.

Eh, to clarify she doesn't really post reasons but what I am assuming is her reasoning is bad.

No she does post reasons. She just doesn't believe them and is unable to back them up even in a reaching way. She's unable to even explain what one of her reasons mean! (scumplaining)

Empking · Post Post #304 (isolation #50) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 6:07 am

In post 303, esuriospiritus wrote:This is why UK would be a town read for me right now even if I thought her arguments were 100% contrived/invalid. Which I don't.

She doesn't even think her arguments have a remote relationship to the facts of the game! That's why she won't bring up any evidence or examples even when asked.

If we still need "moar wagons" despite being on page 12(?) then she obviously didn't do a very pro-town job of leading us out of RVS.

But again I'd like an answer to my question "What did she do?". Let's say we take your word that she put us in this gamestate. What did she to do to manage that?

Empking · Post Post #307 (isolation #51) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 6:18 am

In post 305, Katsuki wrote:Zoraster can hang once UK flips scum.

Zor is pretty obvtown.

Empking · Post Post #309 (isolation #52) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 6:21 am

In post 308, Katsuki wrote:
In post 307, Empking wrote:
In post 305, Katsuki wrote:Zoraster can hang once UK flips scum.

Zor is pretty obvtown.

I disagree.

He thinks UK is scummy, yet clearly doesn't want to bus.

Yeah I don't like the "a bit" part of his post but at least he's doing some analysis in this game. In this game thart's not a way for scum to blend in.

Empking · Post Post #313 (isolation #53) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 6:26 am

In post 310, Katsuki wrote:
In post 309, Empking wrote:In this game thart's not a way for scum to blend in.

Explain.

UK only has two votes.

It was my passive-agressive way of saying that practically nobody is trying to find the scum and looking at people's posts.

Empking · Post Post #315 (isolation #54) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 6:38 am

In post 314, Katsuki wrote:Eh, what does that have to do with Zoraster "blending in as scum"?

If town are going "Derp. Derp." then scum (if they want to blend in with the crowd) will go "Derp. Derp." too.

Empking · Post Post #321 (isolation #55) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 6:55 am

In post 318, Katsuki wrote:
In post 315, Empking wrote:
In post 314, Katsuki wrote:Eh, what does that have to do with Zoraster "blending in as scum"?

If town are going "Derp. Derp." then scum (if they want to blend in with the crowd) will go "Derp. Derp." too.

If town are going "Derp. Derp.", then scum have all the more reason to want to appear as the analytical obvtown.

1. But it still hurts blending in.
2. Zor's post didn't seem like an attempt for towncred to me. Just a motiveless post.

Empking · Post Post #326 (isolation #56) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 7:38 am

In post 325, dramonic wrote:I don't think we should lynch parama.

I agree with this.

Empking · Post Post #328 (isolation #57) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 7:44 am

In post 327, xRECKONERx wrote:UK isn't screaming at me all arrogantly

Has she done that to you as scum before?

Empking · Post Post #330 (isolation #58) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 7:52 am

In post 329, dramonic wrote:She's done it as town

But if she hasn't done it as scum and she's not doing it now. That would suggest she was scum. Its not as good as her obvious lying and insincerity but its a Reckocentric argument so might get his support.

Empking · Post Post #334 (isolation #59) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:09 am

In post 331, UncertainKitten wrote:@Faraday: Early game read. The way he was starting the game seemed far more interested in the voting mechanics, something not indicated to be weird, rather than actually trying to find scum. It felt like a distraction. As for why my scum read kept strengthening, he keeps trying to draw me into what is more or less a useless argument. Scum want to argue, town want to catch scum. Arguing cases just proves who is the better arguer, not who's actually scum. Scum LOVE proving who the better arguer is. So, while I've screwed up a few times and ended up engaging, I feel that Empking's posts have, on the whole, been 0% scumhunting and 100% attempts to discredit and engage me so that no one would think he's scum.

Anyone who buys this is an idiot.

You've "screwed up" a few times but curiously enough never in a way that lead to you answering any of my questions. Just screwing up enough to use unsubstantiated rhetoric. What a wierd turn of events

If UK doesn't want to be drawn in a useless argument surely she'd just refuse to let it happen by providing a quote where I "scumplained". Surtely putting an end to it is the easiest way to not screw up?

(Also, "the way he was starting the game seemed far more interested in the voting mechanics"

Y'mean more than the single null post that the rest of the thread consisted of. Gosh.)

Empking · Post Post #337 (isolation #60) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:18 am

In post 335, UncertainKitten wrote:@Empking: It was a weak start and your reaction just made it more obvious you were scum. Also, it was three posts.

This is objectively a lie by any standard. UK cannot possibly be town.

(also, I love how she "screwed up" again but still couldn't answer the question.)

1. How is whether me considering where I might've scumplained related to your inability to give an example?
Can you give an example of an ad hom?
Or a case by you? (Weren't they scummy anyway, that was your excuse before.)

PEdit: Look at page one. See how UK just knowingly lied to attack me. She's gotten cocky. Don't let her get away with it.

Empking · Post Post #338 (isolation #61) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:19 am

In post 6, Empking wrote:

Mod: Can you confirm that a vote for FL is a vote for UK?

Here's a link to the post where I questioned the mod since you're all incredibly lazy.

Empking · Post Post #340 (isolation #62) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:51 am

In post 339, UncertainKitten wrote:Fucking LIAR

Conf scum Empking! He considers lying scummy, right? So why is he doing it himself!

I don't recall "starting the game" with those posts. I'm pretty sure I started the game with the post I quoted.

I suppose I started the game with the one that came first. Which one was that, the one I linked to or one of your's?

Also, are you seriously trying to pretend that both those posts you linked to was the fourth post of the game. Seriously? Are you aware that that's impossible?

Empking · Post Post #341 (isolation #63) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:52 am

Ha neither of those posts were fourth. Fifth and seventh respectively.

Empking · Post Post #343 (isolation #64) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:55 am

In post 342, Faraday wrote:

Don't spam to protect your partner. Its pathetic.

Empking · Post Post #350 (isolation #65) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 9:09 am

In post 345, UncertainKitten wrote:Wow. You're seriously arguing semantics. How fucking DESPERATE are you, Empscum?

I don't recall starting the debate about how many posts there were before my question to Andy. Mind providing a quote?

I remember "Also, it was three posts." in 335 starting this off.

Or maybe I'm misunderstanding. Are you saying that there were three post before you voted me? I'm honestly at a lost.

Empking · Post Post #353 (isolation #66) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 9:24 am

In post 352, UncertainKitten wrote:OH! Right, Dram is town. I'm sorry ;_;

Empking: All right. I don't remember what started it either and I don't care because I think it's irrelevant. But yes, I meant three posts before my vote. I thought you might have been going somewhere with what you did but I decided you weren't after those three posts. It was a very weak reason, but still a reason. Your reaction felt very defensive and not in a townie fashion. And then the entire thing exploded into this. I still think you are scum, and that you're attempting to discredit/bait me. There's a lot of AtE in your posts (not that that's scummy), but it's to the exclusion of any actual analysis. You ask questions but they don't really lead to conclusions. It feels like fakery.

Of course they don't lead to conclusions you refuse to answer or even acknowledge them.

And they do lead to conclusions:

I'm pretty sure I posted something like this before.

Me: Where did I scumplain?
You: ...
Me: UK refuses to answer the question because she can't.
That means she doesn't think I was scumplaining but is only pretending to.
Therefore she is scum.

There my conclusion nice packaged for you.

UK: Who is refusing to answer questions? (Even simpler ones about terminology so I can at least know what I'm being accused of.)
Who is just parotting what the other person said?
Who is accusing who of "baiting" despite being guilty of the above sins?
Who is really baiting who here?

And: Where/how did I try to discredit you?

Empking · Post Post #355 (isolation #67) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 9:42 am

In post 354, UncertainKitten wrote:Ugh, that's work. Pretty much every post where you call someone an idiot for following me, for starters.

Quotes please.

Also quotes for where I refused to answer any questions.
Also quotes where I parrotted you.

Also, I have a hard time believing that you didn't notice me call Faraday scum which couldn't have been more that an hour ago

Empking · Post Post #356 (isolation #68) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 9:45 am

I also presented quotes in an earlier post, you can find it yourself.

If anyone can find a UK post with multiple quotes in it then I'll unvote. If you can't and UK is in no uncertain terms pretending to do something she hasn't and couldn't then everyone should vote UK and get this game off on a good start.

Empking · Post Post #360 (isolation #69) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:33 am

Unvote
Vote: Plum

Empking · Post Post #362 (isolation #70) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:41 pm

In post 361, UncertainKitten wrote:Why is Plum scum?

1. She's lurking.
2. She's clerarly not analysing the game (otherwise she'd understand why you would avoid a question that exposes you as an insincere sophist.
3. Her posts are full of fluff.

Why am I no longer scum?

1. I never said that was the case.

Since you enjoy questions so much, I'll ask them now.

Oh, so not to scumhunt or other pro-town intent. Cool.

Empking · Post Post #364 (isolation #71) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:12 pm

In post 363, UncertainKitten wrote:Then why are you voting her over me? Is your scum read of her stronger~?

I said I would.

Plus I felt dirty sticking to my guns for ages with barely anyone supporting me.

Empking · Post Post #391 (isolation #72) » Tue Sep 13, 2011 6:51 am

In post 385, Katsuki wrote:It's convenient that most of UK's scumlist consists of lurkers...

So no one is gonna vote UK with me?

UK is going to be a cheekyscumbag to the wrong player before this game is over. Don't bother wasting your vote.

Empking · Post Post #397 (isolation #73) » Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:21 am

In post 393, UncertainKitten wrote:@Reck: What matters more? Who "wins the argument" or who's scum? I already said I didn't care to argue, I care to catch scum. You'd do well to remember that.

If you don'ty care to argue then why would you prolong an argument by refusing to give a definition/example of scumplaining.

Empking · Post Post #404 (isolation #74) » Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:16 am

Unvote, Vote: Nik

- All my town reads agree on it plus Nik & UK have both called the other scum but, I don't think, haven't given eachother a vote.

Empking · Post Post #407 (isolation #75) » Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:24 am

In post 406, UncertainKitten wrote:I actually did vote him, Empking. Please learn to pay attention to the game before shooting off at the mouth.

My mistake.

Empking · Post Post #427 (isolation #76) » Tue Sep 13, 2011 1:55 pm

In post 426, Faraday wrote:(expired on 2011-09-15 20:47:49)

tick tock.

?

Empking · Post Post #432 (isolation #77) » Tue Sep 13, 2011 2:40 pm

In post 427, Empking wrote:
In post 426, Faraday wrote:(expired on 2011-09-15 20:47:49)

tick tock.

?

Empking · Post Post #436 (isolation #78) » Tue Sep 13, 2011 2:46 pm

In post 434, Andrius wrote:
In post 428, esuriospiritus wrote:

MOD:
Please prod CSL, ooba, and (probably by the time you get this) Plum.

(ooba and Plum are being prodded.)

That one actuallyh made me LOL.

Empking · Post Post #449 (isolation #79) » Tue Sep 13, 2011 4:54 pm

In post 448, Plum wrote:hat ought to suffice.

Suffice for what? I'm sure you're not asking for clarification "lashing out". So suffice for what?

As for the second part, I trust my knowledge of UK's general level of competency and playstyle not to think that this has anything to do with 'ohno I said something for no reason and am now being pressed and can't explaaaaaaaain oh crud'. I think I understand what she said about you scumplaining and I don't think UK's lying or scummy for not answering to your satisfaction.

Are you suggesting that she answered at all? Quote please.

Empking · Post Post #459 (isolation #80) » Tue Sep 13, 2011 5:40 pm

In post 458, Empking's Alt wrote:Uk came up with the "three" number. This was a lie. She lied for a reason. Can you giver me a town reason for it? There's the obvious scum reason of being
so
scummy in such large quantity that nobody can be bothered to read her. What's the town reason?

Empking · Post Post #464 (isolation #81) » Tue Sep 13, 2011 5:49 pm

In post 462, Parama wrote:why is emp voting plum someone explain to me

Plum is lurking.
Posting fluff
Not analysing

After the fact:
Being disenginious (Two posts is apparently a medicore number of posts.)
Refusing to answer questions (Also known as being caught in a lie but not (as town would do) admit it.

Empking · Post Post #468 (isolation #82) » Tue Sep 13, 2011 5:55 pm

In post 334, Empking wrote:

(Also, "the way he was starting the game seemed far more interested in the voting mechanics" Y'mean more than the single null post that the rest of the thread consisted of. Gosh.)

In post 335, UncertainKitten wrote: Also, it was three posts.

In post 352, UncertainKitten wrote:OH! Right, Dram is town. I'm sorry ;_;

Empking: All right. I don't remember what started it either and I don't care because I think it's irrelevant. But yes, I meant three posts before my vote. I thought you might have been going somewhere with what you did but I decided you weren't after those three posts. It was a very weak reason, but still a reason. Your reaction felt very defensive and not in a townie fashion. And then the entire thing exploded into this. I still think you are scum, and that you're attempting to discredit/bait me. There's a lot of AtE in your posts (not that that's scummy), but it's to the exclusion of any actual analysis. You ask questions but they don't really lead to conclusions. It feels like fakery.

Everything relevant. You did not conclusively prove that it was a lie. Its clear that she was saying that there were three null before I questioned Andy on the voting mechanics.

Empking · Post Post #478 (isolation #83) » Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:03 pm

OGAM?

Empking · Post Post #479 (isolation #84) » Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:06 pm

In post 478, Empking wrote:OGAM?

GHow pathetic is it that I had a warm feeling when I managed to remember it?

Empking · Post Post #488 (isolation #85) » Wed Sep 14, 2011 6:00 am

In post 486, AlmasterGM wrote:By the way, dramonic is a GIANT SCUMBAG for his bullshit post that I have been "posting elsewhere;" that is an OBJECTIVE LIE given the only other posts Ihave made on site are two vote counts and a random one liner.

YEAH THATS TOTALLY ON THE SAME LEVEL AS CSL'S CHEEKY 30+ POSTS

NOPE.JPG

That seems subjective to me.

Empking · Post Post #524 (isolation #86) » Wed Sep 14, 2011 6:55 am

Far: NS is too town to dayvig.

Empking · Post Post #531 (isolation #87) » Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:07 am

In post 529, xRECKONERx wrote:also if that was the crux of your case
and I've now pointed out why that's a misrep of what I've said

you're fucking scum

FTFY

(We need a rolling smilety by the way.)

Empking · Post Post #534 (isolation #88) » Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:10 am

In post 532, UncertainKitten wrote:Empking cutting me with jackaling on Reck's back because he smells blood. Expected.

Yeah totally never suggested suspicion of you before. Just incredibly opportunistic.

Empking · Post Post #559 (isolation #89) » Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:06 am

In post 551, zoraster wrote:
In post 550, Faraday wrote:
In post 548, zoraster wrote:AGM: Link to the game where you used this role please.

Um, Defcon 1, Defcon 2 and Defcon 3.

I click, but strangely despite the fact this is a response to my query, it doesn't appear to load a new page.

Greatest post ever written.

Empking · Post Post #580 (isolation #90) » Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:35 am

What would happen if we lynched in 72 hours?

PEDIT: Yay, AGM hit the unknown scum. Good job.

Empking · Post Post #595 (isolation #91) » Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:49 am

In post 593, Faraday wrote:CSL's probably town for the VT claim, btw.

Why?

Empking · Post Post #647 (isolation #92) » Thu Sep 15, 2011 1:43 am

In post 640, CSL wrote:If I were scum, suiciding now would help scum more.

But if you're town that shouldn't matter?

CSL: Whether you would rage I couldn't say. But it doesn't really matter siknce you didn't rage?

Empking · Post Post #663 (isolation #93) » Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:38 am

I hate to say it but IO think that's what she meant by "opportunism".

Empking · Post Post #676 (isolation #94) » Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:07 am

In post 673, Faraday wrote:gonna let ooba catch up and then claim as i have role based info that faraday is probably town

How does the second bit follow the first?

Empking · Post Post #678 (isolation #95) » Fri Sep 16, 2011 3:04 am

In post 677, Faraday wrote:Idk

You said it.

Empking · Post Post #700 (isolation #96) » Fri Sep 16, 2011 7:55 am

In post 699, UncertainKitten wrote:So...was the daykill real or fake?

What daykill. AGM's was pretty clearly true.

Empking · Post Post #716 (isolation #97) » Fri Sep 16, 2011 10:55 am

In post 711, Faraday wrote:i'm so obvtown

You're kinda not.

Reck: We're not going to lynch before page 30. I expect we'll go past 50 at this rate.

Empking · Post Post #730 (isolation #98) » Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:17 pm

Nik: Why aren't you being helpful?

Empking · Post Post #744 (isolation #99) » Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:07 pm

In post 743, dramonic wrote:I assume it's a fake daykill. It's a boring, useless post, but it doesnt come off as scummy to me.

Why isn't being "a boring, useless post" enough to make it scummy?

Empking · Post Post #747 (isolation #100) » Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:25 pm

In post 746, Faraday wrote:welp he's dead so

If he dies would you mind claiming so we don't have to look?

Empking · Post Post #757 (isolation #101) » Sat Sep 17, 2011 3:52 am

Don't say disinterested when you mean uninterested. Me no speak good english but that annoys even me.

(In case anyone checks: The dictionary is WRONG!)

Empking · Post Post #769 (isolation #102) » Sat Sep 17, 2011 9:19 am

In post 767, Parama wrote:Your relatives don't have enough time.
Also I haven't been paying attention to this game. It's kinda boring tbh.

It'll probably be more exciting tomorrow. You should probably vote Nik (LL is getting Daykilled plus Nik is the better wagon. Seriously the only problem with the Nik wagon is that you'd expect scum to bus and Nik's wagon is a who's who of townies.)

Empking · Post Post #774 (isolation #103) » Sat Sep 17, 2011 9:58 am

In post 773, UncertainKitten wrote:Awesome.

Yeah. Two town dead!

Empking · Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:06 am

In post 775, UncertainKitten wrote:Sarcasm, Empking.

It didn't look like sarcasm to me.

Empking · Post Post #832 (isolation #105) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:56 am

In post 831, Nobody Special wrote:
In post 825, Nikanor wrote:Okay ooba.

UK, NS is town. 100%.

The only way you can know this is if you're scum.

Vote: Nikanor

That's a

really

awful reason for a vote.

Empking · Post Post #834 (isolation #106) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:11 am

In post 833, Nobody Special wrote:Please, share your wisdom with me. I think it's a perfectly valid reason for a vote.

Its calling common hyperbole scummy. We don't even know if there's a Serial Killer or Traitor yet!

Empking · Post Post #839 (isolation #107) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:13 am

In post 836, Faraday wrote:
In post 834, Empking wrote:Its calling common hyperbole scummy. We don't even know if there's a Serial Killer or Traitor yet!

have you ever used a mafia traitor in your games

Yeah.

Empking · Post Post #843 (isolation #108) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:17 am

In post 840, Faraday wrote:why did you specifically mention the word traitor in that post?

Serial Killers and Traitors are the two roles that can be scum without the mafia knowing it (Cult too but we better not have a Cult). I was being thorough.

PEdit: Interest

Empking · Post Post #864 (isolation #109) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:11 pm

In post 862, Parama wrote:

Uncontrollable laughter.

Empking · Post Post #878 (isolation #110) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:43 pm

In post 877, xRECKONERx wrote:I saw that.
You're cute.

HoS: Reck

for pretending he didn't LOL.

Empking · Post Post #884 (isolation #111) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:11 pm

In post 883, Empking's Alt wrote:
In post 879, Plum wrote:UK. AGM. Another pointless catfight? Oh the game really needed more of that. Seriously.

Are there any common denominator in these "pointless catfight
". I'm trying to think.

Empking · Post Post #924 (isolation #112) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:42 am

Dram: Do you remember that Far is only one shot?

Empking · Post Post #926 (isolation #113) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:53 am

In post 923, dramonic wrote:especially with the dual daykill we've already seen

Empking · Post Post #928 (isolation #114) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:11 am

In post 927, dramonic wrote:...Fine, drop that line then.
DO you think we have a dual-killing Bulletproof SK that absorbs the abilities of his victims?

No.

Empking · Post Post #931 (isolation #115) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:11 am

In post 930, UncertainKitten wrote:Uh...in fact, wasn't there a thing that said that was NOT a thing that could happen unless you were playing *as* the hydra?

No. I thought that too but its a case that hydras only get from the hydra but heads get it from heads and hydras.

Empking · Post Post #932 (isolation #116) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:11 am

In post 854, xRECKONERx wrote:You're excluding any roles from a comodded game with me?

Cuz uh, I got one of our comodded game roles

Empking · Post Post #934 (isolation #117) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:26 am

In post 933, UncertainKitten wrote:Oh, by the way, I still think Empking MIGHT be a traitor because of what Faraday pointed out, but of all the people who've used a traitor role, he's probably the most likely to have said the word without being one.

Empking · Post Post #952 (isolation #118) » Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:57 am

In post 951, Faraday wrote:oh gawd 4 days till deadline gaiz

Stop wasting your vote then. Vote Nik.

Empking · Post Post #976 (isolation #119) » Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:27 am

In post 971, Faraday wrote:nobody special, locke lamora, csl, ooba ---> not really players in the gamethis is like a 12 player game so don't use the large excuse

Only its more difficult to secure a lynch.

Empking · Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:50 am

Unvote

Nik: Other that Cuttle is your wiki an exhaustive list?

Empking · Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:07 pm

Vote: Esur

Empking · Post Post #996 (isolation #122) » Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:19 pm

In post 995, dramonic wrote:Of course you're gonna jailkeep the one person that you can't prove is being jailkept
I'm gonna find the buddy of yours with a neighbour-maker power in his game Nik <3

Faraday

Empking · Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:30 pm

In post 1000, Lost Butterfly wrote:
In post 996, Empking wrote:
In post 995, dramonic wrote:Of course you're gonna jailkeep the one person that you can't prove is being jailkept
I'm gonna find the buddy of yours with a neighbour-maker power in his game Nik <3

Faraday

i just dayvigged someone you tool

A different secret dayvig. If Nik can claim your role you can claim someone else's.

Empking · Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:33 pm

In post 1004, Faraday wrote:
In post 1002, Empking wrote:
In post 1000, Lost Butterfly wrote:
In post 996, Empking wrote:
In post 995, dramonic wrote:Of course you're gonna jailkeep the one person that you can't prove is being jailkept
I'm gonna find the buddy of yours with a neighbour-maker power in his game Nik <3

Faraday

i just dayvigged someone you tool

A different secret dayvig. If Nik can claim your role you can claim someone else's.

lmfao

I'M NOT BEING SERIOUS
1. I'm not voting Nik
2. The role I'm think of was town in the game I'm thinking of.
get out

Empking · Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:38 pm

In post 1006, Empking wrote:
In post 1004, Faraday wrote:
In post 1002, Empking wrote:
In post 1000, Lost Butterfly wrote:
In post 996, Empking wrote:

Faraday

i just dayvigged someone you tool

A different secret dayvig. If Nik can claim your role you can claim someone else's.

lmfao

I'M NOT BEING SERIOUS
1. I'm not voting Nik
2. The role I'm think of was town in the game I'm thinking of.
get out

I'M NOT BEING SERIOUS
1. I'm not voting Nik
2. The role I'm think of was town in the game I'm thinking of.

Empking · Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:15 pm

In post 1011, dramonic wrote:Plum can lucid-dreamerize it, at the very least.

What game was that?

Empking · Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:26 pm

I'm kind of confused.

Can we just lynch Esure, UK or Plum now?

Empking · Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:30 pm

In post 1029, Faraday wrote:
In post 1023, Plum wrote:Deflect much?

Esurio, given the circumstances, what wagon would you push today?

DEFLECTION is a bad action

FTFY

Empking · Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:32 am

In post 1074, xRECKONERx wrote:ESURIO WAGON?
RECK IS NOT AMUSED

Is the Nik one any better?

Empking · Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:04 am

Zor:

In post 166, esuriospiritus wrote:Plus UK's 148 rings a bell fo sho.

Empking · Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:14 am

No Esur is claiming William Bell. She is claiming:

Plus UK's 148 rings a bell fo sho.

Is a breadcrumb.

Empking · Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:50 am

In post 1116, Parama wrote:agm why aren't you voting zor if you think he's scum
are we ever oging to decide on a lynch? I mean really now

It is kinda getting absurd.

Empking · Thu Sep 22, 2011 8:15 am

He said Faraday.

Empking · Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:50 am

We're waiting for Ooba to be replaced/ somebody on the three man wagons to budge.

Empking · Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:51 pm

In post 1175, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
In post 86, Empking wrote:
In post 85, CSL wrote:>implying I don't have other commitments and that I don't have a life

Vote: Empking

*sigh* Why?

Vote: Empking

*sigh* Why?

Empking · Sat Sep 24, 2011 2:43 pm

In post 1178, UncertainKitten wrote:Nah, she's just using her tired tell. Though she's right this time =D! Unfortunately...Empking isn't really wagonable today D:.

What's that tell?

Empking · Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:02 am

In post 1165, Andrius wrote:
Lady Lambdadelta
replaces
ooba
effective immediately.

I'm moving deadline back 48 hours to its final resting place at
Wednesday, September 28th, at 2:30pm PST
.

Empking · Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:05 am

In post 1201, Parama wrote:GODDAMMIT NEWPAGE

That shouldn't have made me laugh as hard as I did.

Empking · Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:15 am

Vote: Nik

- He fake claimed. This shouldn't be difficult.

Empking · Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:11 am

Hey if we could have a SK, would everyone claim whether or not it could be them (Encore)?

It couldn't be me, the only SK PM I released was an automatic Janitor one. (Going by what Ooba said.)

Empking · Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:36 am

Cool, you've claimed scum even more.

Empking · Thu Sep 29, 2011 8:02 am

In post 1271, UncertainKitten wrote:
In post 1264, Parama wrote:UK there's 11 alive

Then there's a mod error or something is wrong

Mod: ?

====[]

Empking · Thu Sep 29, 2011 8:32 am

ESPECIALLY IF THERE'S SPAM WITH IT

Empking · Sun Oct 02, 2011 10:54 am

Can we finish the SK claim?

Empking · Sun Oct 02, 2011 11:00 am

In post 1289, UncertainKitten wrote:Kay, I'm fairly convinced Reck is town now (or SK but )

I think LLD needs to post or die.

Um...does Nikanor have any mafia or SK roles that don't flip when killed?

He's still in the game (plus I think he's Minaj, right?) he wasn't lying about his role.

Empking · Sun Oct 02, 2011 11:48 am

In post 1298, UncertainKitten wrote:Nah, you can make your own accusations, I'm not going to hold your hand.

Vote; UK

Empking · Sun Oct 02, 2011 1:43 pm

In post 1311, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:so NS is useless as ever.

Reck/UK scumteam, calling it now. Parama was trying to distance from Reck massively while UK and Reck fought but never got on eachother.

When I die, you can lynch either of them. I'll pull a fate here, 2v1.

Claim: Bodyguard

What game?

Empking · Sun Oct 02, 2011 1:49 pm

In post 1314, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:What do you want? It's not MY game?

I'm a Wall Guard, I have NO IDEA what game that's from.

You are literally the first role in the first theme game on the modding part of Ooba's wiki?

Empking · Sun Oct 02, 2011 11:57 pm

The Cuttlefish game.

Empking · Mon Oct 03, 2011 4:42 am

In post 1391, dramonic wrote:Hmm...
Unless somebody wants to explain the lack of a second kill, I'm assuming Reck is conf.

?

Empking · Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:09 pm

Mod: Confirmation that the number of votes on Kats is correct?

Empking · Thu Oct 06, 2011 5:46 am

Reck; Were you right about the Tarot role?

Empking · Thu Oct 06, 2011 5:51 am

In post 1438, xRECKONERx wrote:
In post 1435, dramonic wrote:sick, for the most part.
I'm an innocent man from tarot mafia, with lovers and hanged man as my cards.
I used hanged man to make kills aimed at me hit parama.
I still have lovers, which either makes two player die together or be protected together, depending on how i wanna use it.

wait. this isn't how Tarot Mafia worked.

You choose
one
of the two to use, unless I'm fucking retarded. I got to choose which way I wanted to play the card, and the way I played the card determined my ability. I don't remember having two abilities in that game.

Disclaimer: I'm full retard right now due to 10 beers, 5 rum shots, and 2 screwdrivers. I could be remembering wrong and I'M WAYYY TOOOOO LAZYYEY to go check.k

Empking · Fri Oct 07, 2011 10:23 am

In post 1463, Katsuki wrote:Oh got prodded.

Just curious did the SK claiming ever get completed?

No.

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 2:36 am

Unvote, Vote: Esur

- No possible way that multiple townies are going to shyly remain on Kat without speaking.

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 3:28 am

In post 1480, UncertainKitten wrote:
In post 1479, Empking wrote:
Unvote, Vote: Esur
- No possible way that multiple townies are going to shyly remain on Kat without speaking.

Yes, there's totally NO WAY that esurio has not posted on site since her last post here. This might have been relevant if you didn't omit that key fact, Empscum.

Yes, there's totally NO WAY that the sky is blue. This might have been relevant if you didn't omit that key fact, UKscum.

Or do you consider "[ b]Unvote [/ b]" far too difficult an effort for somebody playing a lot of WoW?

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 3:36 am

In post 1483, UncertainKitten wrote:All I know is she hasn't been on site as far as I can tell, and that she was posting elsewhere when she was silenced. It's been 40 hours, and IIRC she's busy during the weekend (I could be wrong).

And how do you know that she hasn't been on the site? There's nothing at all to suggest that she wouldn't have access over the weekend straight after a bandwagoning vote. Nothing at all to suggest 0 access. Unless she mentioned it in your QT, there is nothing to suggest 0 access. Did she mention it in your QT?

Feels like you're trying to float a mislynch on shit and I'm calling you on it.

"Feels like" is the liar's tool.

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 3:44 am

In post 1486, UncertainKitten wrote:Gee, what I just quoted is a pretty good inidicator.

N

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 3:46 am

In post 1487, Empking wrote:
In post 1486, UncertainKitten wrote:Gee, what I just quoted is a pretty good inidicator.

No it wasn't. Despite taking it out of context and literally taking out the link to the post it doesn't mean that. That post said she couldn't remember all the facts not that she didn't have access.

Also: What crummy rhetoric?

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 3:48 am

In post 1484, UncertainKitten wrote:
esurio wrote:Hard to keep mafia on the brain when you're apartment hunting/job hunting/packing/cleaning/etc.

That would explain things quite nicely, I think.

Oh are you saying that you remembered this quote when making up your 0% access claim?

Unvote, Vote: UK

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 3:49 am

In post 1490, UncertainKitten wrote:
Empking wrote:"Feels like" is the liar's tool.

Empty rhetoric that does nothing except fling shit at me and hopes it sticks. I've said my piece.

How is that empty rhetoric?

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 4:00 am

In post 1493, UncertainKitten wrote:Yay, I got OMGUS'd! Which is basically the extent of Empking's abilities this game! He was OMGUSing esurio in some ways (not as clearly as a vote:vote situation, but she suspected him). And Empking, if you're too brain damaged to understand why the things you say are worthless shit, I pity you. That said, I'm pretty sure you're actually fairly aware and just playing like a dumbass to piss me off, because you're scum.

Hey where was my vote when you decided to vote me?
Hey what came first Esur's recent post or post 1002 (where I voted her first time)?
And how was pointing out that your use of "Feels like" made it obvious that you were bullshitting empty rhetoric?

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 4:17 am

In post 1495, UncertainKitten wrote:Hey look misdirecting questions that make the issue not about why Empking is scum! THIS WAS TOTALLY UNEXPECTED AND MINDBLOWING =D

That's the only issue in the entire game? A leading question is the only thing you care about?

And how was pointing out that your use of "Feels like" made it obvious that you were bullshitting empty rhetoric? Its an important question.

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 5:39 am

In post 1497, esuriospiritus wrote:Derp more Empking, I've had a big bold "V/LA weekends" in my sig for at least a month now.

Not that UK knew that when she rushed to your defense.

(Plus its hardly big

)

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 6:23 am

In post 1499, UncertainKitten wrote:No, but that would explain why I assumed limited access during the weekends. Had to come from somewhere, Scumking.

@esurio: You should vote Empking with me. He's scummier than the bottom of a god damn pond.

You can not support any arguments for me being scum. Support a single point.

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 6:24 am

In post 1500, xRECKONERx wrote:Empking's hop onto UK looks town. It's how I get genuinely frustrated with idiots and end up OMGUSing them, but it's an honest OMGUS. And come on UK -- you know OMGUS isn't really a scumtell, so stop going OH LOOK IT'S OMGUS like that's scummy or something.

unvote; Vote: esuriospiritus

It was not an OMGUS. I was on her first! You cannot OMGUS a player who you were voting when they vote you. It is literally impossible.

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:04 am

In post 1506, UncertainKitten wrote:@Empking: This entire game, you've been on the defensive asking pointless fucking questions and not doing a god damn lick of scumhunting on your own. Hell, I've never even seen anything RESEMBLING a case on me from you, much less a case in general. At best you're chaff and at worst you're scum. I'm placing my bet on you being scum.

Which players would you say have produced a case?
How do you define scumhunting?

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:05 am

How would you define a question as pointless? When it makes it unambiguous that a certain Tarfangirl is bullshitting scum?

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:06 am

In post 1509, Empking wrote:How would you define a question as pointless? When it makes it unambiguous that a certain Tarfangirl is bullshitting scum?

^ To UK.

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:08 am

In post 1511, UncertainKitten wrote:I'm not going to dignify any of that with an answer because they're all useless redirecting questions that don't actually advance the game. You're once again going on the defensive asking stupid shit so that people get off you.

Redirecting from what? LLD?

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:09 am

Also, what "people" do I want to get off me?

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:14 am

How come only I'm being accused of "REDIRECTING FROM [EMP0KING'S] SCUMMINESS" by you? Surely the vast majority of players are doing that?

In post 1513, Empking wrote:Also, what "people" do I want to get off me?

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:23 am

In post 1516, UncertainKitten wrote:The thing is, you're not actually looking for scum. You're asking pointless questions until I get a fucking anyuerism then disappearing again to do abso-fucking-lutely nothing.

Yanno what? Just go back to doing that, it's better for my head than actually talking to you.

Y'know it'd probably be easier just to answer one of my questions. How about this one that only requires a couple of names:

Also, what "people" do I want to get off me?

(also, just a tip: Your frequent "oh I can't take this anymore" would seem more sincere if they were less frequent.)

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:35 am

In post 1518, UncertainKitten wrote:Day 1. The people voting your wagon. You kept doing this redirection shit. As it stands, I'm the only person you're trying to beat off now. HOPEFULLY the actual townies will get brains and realize how scum you are.

And no, it is sincere, you're just either so stupid as to irritate the living fuck out of me, or you're VERY good at playing aggravatingly stupid as scum. For your sake I'm assuming it's the latter.

If it was sincere you wouldn't keep on responding.

And was it do difficult to say that you considered yourself "people". So the question for the rest of the town is whether you are clinically insane or just bullshitting scum. (if anyone is liable to write it off as a simple mistake then I'd draw your attention to me having to ask the question three times.)

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:45 am

In post 1521, UncertainKitten wrote:@Empking: It wasn't difficult, it was fucking pointless. And I have a bad habit of being easily baited, so sue me. And don't you DARE fucking call me clinically insane when you're either clinically retarded or scum.

I apologize. I was not trying to say you were clinically insane, I was saying that you were scum hence my vote on you.

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:51 am

In post 1526, UncertainKitten wrote:@Reck: I actually forgot the SK. And you know what esurio could be? The SK. That makes a LOT more sense.

She lacks a SK role.

(And no I haven't claimed.)

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:58 am

In post 1531, UncertainKitten wrote:Anyway, claim. I assume we're massclaiming, right?

I don't support that and I haven't seen support for that. Whether or not we have a Doc (or similar) is not something I want scum to know.

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:15 am

In post 1555, xRECKONERx wrote:Empking can be a SK. http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 55&t=12037

N

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:16 am

In post 1556, Empking wrote:
In post 1555, xRECKONERx wrote:Empking can be a SK. http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 55&t=12037

No role PMs so I can't be anything from that game.

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:26 am

In post 1560, xRECKONERx wrote:Hmmmm. In that case, it eliminates Empking from being SK. Did you ever use a SK besides that game?

Janitor-SK in Return to Gambits.

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:32 am

Yeah let's inform the scum about whether there's a Doc by massclaiming D3.

I'm a Mafia Goon with no special abilities.

(VT)

Empking · Sun Oct 09, 2011 11:08 pm

In post 1606, UncertainKitten wrote:@Reck: That's a good point about dram. There are at least four explanations for the NK resolution out there right now :S.

Agh, I don't know

In post 1609, UncertainKitten wrote:*Head desk*

In post 1615, UncertainKitten wrote:EBWOP: I just checked and most of her posting is once a day for her game..but...uh...still, you should at least have declared V/LA or something? Give us something to work with!

I concur.

Empking · Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:33 am

Ha, Dram letting us lynch Esur and UK would be totally fetch.

Empking · Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:04 am

In post 1633, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
In post 1632, Nobody Special wrote:But you would mind being linked to me? Why?

Well, I'm less certain on you being scum (you asking this question is ???), but the real reason is that town is going to end up lynching you eventually. I've seen Empking lurk to victory in games before. If I'm dying, I'd like to have his scummy ass come down with me.

So you don't want to be linked with NS because he's an easier mislynch.

Yeah, UK is untargettable so I'm cool with a LLD/NS pairing.

Empking · Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:39 am

In post 1635, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
In post 1634, Empking wrote:
In post 1633, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
In post 1632, Nobody Special wrote:But you would mind being linked to me? Why?

Well, I'm less certain on you being scum (you asking this question is ???), but the real reason is that town is going to end up lynching you eventually. I've seen Empking lurk to victory in games before. If I'm dying, I'd like to have his scummy ass come down with me.

So you don't want to be linked with NS because he's an easier mislynch.

Yeah, UK is untargettable so I'm cool with a LLD/NS pairing.

Look at Empking scramble to get out of this one.

I'm not in anything.

Letting scum pick who to spend our

essentially

second lynch on is really stupid.

Empking · Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:55 am

In post 1637, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:The same logic applies to you. Letting you say "LLD/NS" is bad, because YOU'RE scum, linking two townies together for bonus.

I was just expressing my opinion. As you kinda mea culpa'd you were demanding it.

Empking · Wed Oct 12, 2011 4:03 am

Dram, when you do the link vote.

Empking · Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:05 pm

Vote: UK

- 100%

Empking · Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:20 am

In post 1724, UncertainKitten wrote:Does PoE stand for Piece of Excrement? Because I'll be laughing my ass off when I flip town despite your ~*~logical conclusions~*~

Oh, wait, you're scum though. Funny how that alternate explanation fixes everything.

Out of curiosity, how does PoE make me scum? Please run through the numbers again. It'll tell me if you're just really dumb town or scum =D.

So much logical dissonance.

Empking · Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:38 am

In post 1726, UncertainKitten wrote:I do that a lot, Emp =D. I'm just too nice to outright call someone scum and stick to it! But, rather than taking pot shots how about you tell me who's scum after my esteemed self gets lynched? After all, it doesn't do for you to be as useless as the pokemon in your avatar =D

Plum.

Empking · Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:39 am

I'm pretty sure Plum has a Mafia Vig role.

Empking · Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:36 am

In post 1738, UncertainKitten wrote:Indeed. I wouldn't pursue an Empking lynch off this until we have a Plum flip. It just seems REALLY WEIRD for town Empking not to mention that after not one, but TWO kills appear to be missing.

I did mention it...? That's how this whole discussion started?

Unvote, Vote: Plum

Empking · Wed Oct 19, 2011 11:29 pm

Reck; Have you checked Dram's games?

Empking · Fri Oct 21, 2011 7:49 am

In post 1764, dramonic wrote:He's supposed to be replaced by a different account, yet what we are seeing here is two different account both playing in the game.
Reck, are you his buddy? =S

I think he explained it poorly rather than lying.

Empking · Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:02 am

In post 1767, dramonic wrote:not how it works.

Why would he lie as scum?

Empking · Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:05 am

In post 1769, dramonic wrote:Why would he lie as town?

I think he explained it poorly rather than lying.

Empking · Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:17 am

In post 1771, dramonic wrote:I understand that as a possibility. What I'm skeptical about is that while he can explain it poorly, I doubt Andrius would also apply the role differently than how it was created.

?