How dare you say such heresy!Glork wrote:Follow Mao Zedong Thought!
Vote: Bacdebecause obviously, he doesn't follow the great Mao Zedong.
Chairman Mao is the Great Leader, Great Helmsman, Great Supreme Commander, Great Teacher!
Shamrock wrote:Well, since I haven't posted here in a while...
I don't see the point in doing a no-lynch because we don't actually gain any information that way. As I don't see a better case and I can't find anyone else who I think is particularly scummy, I'm willing to go along with the Bacde bandwagon for today.
Unvote(was I voting?)Vote: Bacde
At least I didn't vote for Phoebus. I was torn between my two loves, winning, and Fritzler.Ameliaslay wrote:Again, this is not a total excuse for behavior, but in my experience, Bacde always follows Fritzler. Albeit, the other game I saw this happen in, Fritzler was scum and Bacde almost got lynched for it.thedocsalice wrote:"for the way he blindly followed a Fritzler vote."
Agains, 5 votes, max. You already pointed out yourself that all of them left immediately. You use contradictory arguments against me.Y wrote:5 votes in less than 12 hours with no other reason than "Fritzler said so" is a rapidly growing baseless bandwagon.Bacde wrote:A rapidly growing bandwagon? You moron, the most his votes were at was 5, soon overwhelmed by the bandwagon against me.
Yes. You found me out. Oh no. Now if you can find the place where I said 'Frizler has all responsibility for my vote', then I would understand this bandwagon.Y wrote:we did:Bacde wrote:You want the reason I voted for him? Heres a fucking hint: READ WHAT I'VE SAID.Your reason is "Fritzler said so".Bacde wrote:Actually Fritzler has a point.Unvote: Glork; Vote: Y
I'll honestly tell you that I didn't know they were random. Make what you want of it. At least I'm happy with my vote now though.Y wrote:Bacde wrote:Honestly, with LML and Fritzler and BJ on Y, I figured they were on to something, and I decided to help out the best players in our game.
So 3 random votes are really a good base to go on now days... Interesting...
Now that I think about that, LML had a not so random vote:Sorry for being mistaken. The votes did have a logical explanation.LML wrote:Yes, I'm lazy and only wanted to type one letter.
You forgot the pull factors, but thanks for trying to make me look stupid and scummy with your sass. Again, my current vote sucked, as it was random. And I wasn't feeling any of the idiotic (Twomz) wagons.Y wrote:Of course it's better, it has only one letter instead of a full name. And Fritzler said so.Bacde wrote:I've told both the push and pull factors in my switching my vote: my current vote at the time was stupid, the Y vote was better.
Then GTFO my bandwagon. I switched 1 vote. I didn't even try to get others on the freaking bandwagon. You are trying to get others on my bandwagon. THERE IS A MAJOR FUCKING DIFFERENCE.Y wrote:Not all of them. Just the ones that have good reasons.Bacde wrote:And how does me not feeling any other bandwagon make me less scummy? In your opinion, should I just jump on every single wagon there is? IS THAT progress to you?
Wait, people aren't allowed to defend themselves? I don't even know what you are trying to fucking say here, but I'll assume it holds more of your sass, craplogic, and sarcastic comical statements directed at me to make me look stupid here too. Yes, I will defend my vote that I have now. I have told you both the reasons why I switched my vote, and why I am keeping it. You aren't making yourself look better.Y wrote:So you do have a good reason after all. Too bad you got to it a week too late, basing yourself on the outcome of your own vote. I think we should do it all the time: We vote for someone, and if he defends himself we were right and our vote is a good one. Wait, someones calling me... Sorry to announce that the system already exists and it's called "Bacde wrote:Is no one suspicious of this retarded bandwagon against me, or how fast it has grown? Personally, I think Y is a good direction to go, mainly because his vote against me seemed only to be to save his own skin. That seems scummier to me than anything anyone else has done this game.Random Voting".
Yet to be answered...Y wrote:Sorry, this was at the end of your post. But if you want, you can read the post again, thinking that it's the answer to your question.Bacde wrote:You want to know what I want to hear? Tell my why my vote change was scummy? I've refuted all of your stupid, idiotic statements against me. What scummy actions did my vote change resemble? Tell me please how I was scummy.
So start using logic, and stop your 'wit' please. I'd also like to know why you even included this part, because it doesn't add to your case at all. You just had to finish your speech with a note of sarcasm to gain votes on me? Sigh.Y wrote:So stop being scummy.Bacde wrote:Too many people are just joining this idiotic backwards bandwagon just because they see it as the easy way to go. I doubt there is anything you can say to refute that, because that is the truth.I'm tired of being bandwagoned d1.So screw you.
I am not voting for chamber...Hop Shui wrote:Mmmm, student Hop Shui offers his most sincere apologies, as one half of him has been sick with bronchitis for the last few days and has not had the energy to cast a vote count
VOTE COUNT
Bacde: 7 (Cogito Ergo Sum, Y, Yosarian2, Pug89, thedocsalive, Shamrock, SOS).
Y: 2 (TSAGod, Bacde).
Twomz: 2 (chamber, Glork).
chamber: 4 (Fritzler, Bacde, Thok, Vaughn).
TSAGod: 1 (igota75).
BabyJesus: 1 (The Unwritten).
Cogito Ergo Sum: 2 (LML, Tamuz)
Tamuz: 2 (mystery meat of doom, Babyjesus)
mlaker: 1 (VisMaior)
Comrades, please point out any errors in this corrected votecount. It will be corrected as soon as any error is pointed out.
Also, if any of you want anyone prodded, feel free to ask.
Why would we not follow the cop if he has a guilty?LoudmouthLee wrote:I'll be honest.. I have lost total interest in nthe game. I've been bored with the follow the cop mechanic, definately after a minute of discussion.
This game has involved no logical reasoning whatsoever, so why start now? If the town could stop playing follow the cop, maybe I'll play.
Ugh. I am in the same position as shamrock, and I have been since day 2. I recieved a recruitment letter like this on N1. I said I did not want to join them, but I was forced anyway. Besides the fact that I now have to submit the name of someone everynight, my role and alignment has remained the exact same. Its an interesting twist of fate.Tamuz wrote:Anyone pro town want to come out as red gaurd?
Not fishing, but thats the only thing that can save shammy in my eyes.
Shamrock wrote:By the way, there's a special mechanic for how the Red Guards work. Every night, I submit someone I want to see die (and I assume all the other Red Guards do this as well). The leader of the Red Guard gets to choose between these submissions for a kill. I was asked for a submission by the mod on night 3, but I didn't send one. I was not, however, asked for a submission on night 4, which would seem to conform with our theory on Yunans recruiting on evens/killing on odds.
Yosarian2 wrote:Hmmm...intersting point.
Bacade, you want to clarify this? When, precisely, were you recruited?
Right after glork said that there were no recruitments last night.Bacde wrote:I'm not going for the masons, because I know for a fact that one of the things Glork has said today is false.
It makes me think.
Bacde wrote:Not if the recruitee says no.
Bacde wrote:Perhaps he doesn't want to give the scum information, seeing how he knows very little about what the scum actually know themselves.I beleive Shamrock, by the way.
And seriously guys, can we please try holding off on lynching the cop-confirmed innocents till later? There is no way in hell that I am a "neccisary lynch".Bacde wrote:If the general concensus agrees to lynching Shamrock, he should probably out the person he thinks was also recruited.