I can't believe so much of this was set up spec. Urgh.
Kdowns and Magua are town, along with DX that's alll I can tell.
In post 200, whispersilk wrote:The grammar in this statement suggests you think DX is town, yet you are voting for him. Can you clear this up, please?
In post 262, SleepyKrew wrote:I amThe Motherfucking Entire Imperial Skyfleet, Loyalist Macho X-Shot Bulltetproof X-Shot Dayvig.
Flavor stuff:
I'm Macho because nobody can defend better than the Fleet.
I'm Bulletproof cause of armor.
I'm Dayvig cause of weaponnz.
Not revealing number of shots because that would be stupid.
I crumbed it when I "shot" Otolia, because "Death from above" is the Fleet's motto.
In post 330, kdowns wrote:I doubt it, I am think possible One Shot Day Kill Scum Possibly if he was just throwing the kill around like that.
In post 332, Magua wrote:One-shot daykill scum keeps it for a claimed power role, not says, "Hey everyone, watch me kill this guy." Empking knows this.
In post 339, Magua wrote:So in your world, about-to-be-lynched-SleepyKrew-scum uses up his dayvig because lolswhynot...and doesn't shoot the claimed vigilante? Doesn't shoot an experienced player not on his team like you or StrangerCoug, but shoots samantha?Mmmm. No.Espeonage in ASoIaF's play was also incredibly horribly bad (not just his dayvig play), which is part of the reason he, y'know, lost.
In post 370, Otolia wrote:In post 369, Magua wrote:How do you think he's *not* playing to his wincon?
I have reasons to be he could have a special importance for me (considering some mechanics are not revealed to us). His WinCon definitely have a survive condition (even an shared one with the other claimant), so why he is bragging about beingtheheir when that is detrimental to his WinCon and the WinCon of theLoyalists?
In post 442, vezokpiraka wrote:Yeah.
We can lynch monk and david together for being scum.
"Third Legion Stormtroopers Allied to the true Heir of the Throne." - monk
I see neither loyalist nor House Argelev in your claim. You are scum my friend.
unvote vote monk
In post 447, David Xanatos wrote:Empking, read the end of Monk's post. "I have Factional Talk with David we are basically the House of Argelev from the west."
In post 471, EtherealCookie wrote:He's continued to just randomly vote with little reasoning and jumping back and forth from wagon to wagon. And then his silly claim that SK is a scum-day vig who revealed himself by shooting a rather poorly played townie? Yeah right.
In post 475, Otolia wrote:In post 458, Empking wrote:The Factional is IGMEOY but I understand the basically now.
Unvote, Vote: Ot
That was the most suspicious you ever done. Unless you are mixing this game with another one we are both in, you have absolutely no backing in your vote. And RVS is long gone now. So you better explained yourself on that.
In post 483, Empking's Alt wrote:
That is about the players in the flavour being random.
Magua: The army marching from the West. Monk.
EC: Hi was to Magua. It was sarcasm. Are you saying you can't answer my question?
PEdit: I'll look for the quote that game me my read on you.
In post 485, Empking's Alt wrote:Oh yeah. Your flavour matches DX suggesting you're not a Loyalist. You have claimed not be of House Arglelov (or whatever) making you non-town.
PEdIt: He asked for a vote. People just thought he was a liar.
In post 489, Otolia wrote:If you can't, then you voted for me in order to blend in and thus you are scum.
In post 513, Otolia wrote:In post 509, Empking wrote:Oto is deliberately misrepresenting me.
If Oto isn't a Loyalist and not of the right house then he's scum. Or in other words: He's scum.
You want me to claim I am a Loyalist ? You bet I am. Now and ever, my alignment can't be change. And don't start to whine about misrepresentation you are a better player than that.
In post 517, Magua wrote:@Empking: Hi. Now, mod complaining about the flavor aside (since the mod is in fact reinforcing what I've already been saying), when you were going on about the ports, did you believe that scum have no fakeclaims in this game? Or did you believe that scum were too stupid to use fakeclaims provided to them?
In post 529, Otolia wrote:In post 521, Empking wrote:"Who claimed the porthouse?"
Its the portcityif you want to play it your way. I specifically said House.
Then what post made you write that, and how is this post (mentioning the 'port house') made you vote for me ?
In post 533, Empking wrote:Claim your win condition as best you can. This is making sense to me.
In post 533, Empking wrote:Gandalf:Claim your win condition as best you can. This is not making sense to me.
In post 626, Otolia wrote:In post 622, Empking wrote:Heuy can people not vote me until we get another vote count. Thanks.
Translation : People don't hammer me before I can fake-claim.
In post 636, gandalf5166 wrote:I am not a member of House Argelev either. I'm town for the moment. You can be a Loyalist without being Argelev(such as the colonists living in America who were still loyal to Britain during the revolution).
In post 641, David Xanatos wrote:Oh, for the record, I'm inclined to believe Empking.
Emp, since you're outed, do you have someone in mind to scan (if so, don't say who), and if not, would you be willing to confirm either me and Monk, or otherwise be directed?
In post 645, Otolia wrote:In post 637, Empking wrote:In post 636, gandalf5166 wrote:I am not a member of House Argelev either. I'm town for the moment. You can be a Loyalist without being Argelev(such as the colonists living in America who were still loyal to Britain during the revolution).
Yes but he suggested he wasn't a loyalist either.
You have either to stop lying or to start reading the thread.
In post 513, Otolia wrote:You want me to claim I am a Loyalist ? You bet I am. Now and ever, my alignment can't be changed.
By the way, what you did wasn't a softclaim, it was just a maneuver to delay the claim. It's the thing scum are most inclined to do when they feel they will be lynch. You know it and it's a shame I can't prove that you know because it would need me to link an ongoing game.
In post 648, SleepyKrew wrote:Emp, didn't you say my claim was fake when I claimed a group instead of a single person? Yeah no die.
In post 650, SleepyKrew wrote:So you want to out the real cop (assuming we have one) on D1? NO
In post 653, SleepyKrew wrote:PEDIT: When you questioned me being the Skyfleet, it was because you misread? What did you think you were?
In post 655, SleepyKrew wrote:Oh hey. It was Otolia that said I can't be people, not you. Explain.
In post 658, SleepyKrew wrote:You.
In post 660, SleepyKrew wrote:You called it fake BEFORE Otolia did.
Furthermore, you never explained WHY it was fake.
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHH