Pokémon Generation II uPick — Game Over

dramonic · Post Post #183 (isolation #2) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 4:36 am

=I

vote: BBT

dramonic · Post Post #344 (isolation #3) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:48 pm

In post 184, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I know that's going to be accompanied with 'because...'

In post 208, DFC_Etna wrote:
In post 183, dramonic wrote:=I

vote: BBT

Why?
Also I hope you don't have a post restriction. If you do I won't mind wasting a D1 lynch a "utility lynch".

In post 215, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 214, DFC_Etna wrote:Would you like to have someone who has non-communicable post restriction at lylo?

This is not the right reason to utility lynch someone with a post restriction.

In post 217, DFC_Etna wrote:
In post 215, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 214, DFC_Etna wrote:Would you like to have someone who has non-communicable post restriction at lylo?

This is not the right reason to utility lynch someone with a post restriction.

In general probably. Not this one!
(Oh also, we still don't know if he actually has one anyway. If he prove that he doesn't have one I won't need to "utility lynch" him)

. . .

In post 230, lufan131 wrote:I used a list randomizer. I don't know what to say in response to that, lol.

unvote
vote: lufan

In post 233, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 230, lufan131 wrote:I used a list randomizer. I don't know what to say in response to that, lol.

The fact you made sure it was clear the vote was random tingles my spidey sense.

MattP wrote:

<3<3<3<3<3<3

In post 289, DFC_Etna wrote:I don't know who Dr.Phil and Randolph Caldecott are.

In post 302, Seiko x Naomi wrote:oh jesus christ.

I have a town read on lufan. it's a newb being honest and not giving a shit about making sure his posts are internally consistent.

In post 308, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I could vote Sleepy Krew or Dramonic.

In post 324, SleepyKrew wrote:Why does anyone. I ain't done jack shit.

In post 340, LucianRoy wrote:Why can't we post our pokemon lists SleepyKrew?
Won't that help with outing false-claims in the future?

dramonic · Post Post #345 (isolation #4) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:49 pm

In post 343, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 340, LucianRoy wrote:Why can't we post our pokemon lists SleepyKrew?
Won't that help with outing false-claims in the future?

I suspect that similar Pokemon will have similar moves. The scum already know each other's moves, so they've got a decent movepool. As such, I think Pokeclaiming would just help scum figure out people's attacks/powers.

dramonic · Post Post #355 (isolation #5) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:00 pm

In post 351, SleepyKrew wrote:I think it's modconfirmed that the available moves are level-up and egg moves? (not counting the TMs we can get)

In post 1, Professor Elm wrote:
Moves/actions were built based on all Pokémon's alignments and
available Generation II Level-Up Moves and Egg Moves.

dramonic · Post Post #359 (isolation #6) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:04 pm

...
<3 <3 <3

o <3 î
+ o

o </3 î
+ o

dramonic · Post Post #360 (isolation #7) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:05 pm

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-dp/attract.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #365 (isolation #8) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:15 pm

Items called TMs, short for Technical Machines, exist in this game, and each contain 1 Move that can be learned once by 1 Pokémon. A Pokémon cannot learn a TM Move if it has already learned a TM Move, or if it already knows the Move that that TM contains. Any TM is compatible with any Pokémon in this game (unlike in the actual Pokémon games, where certain Pokémon cannot learn certain TMs).

dramonic · Post Post #376 (isolation #9) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:55 pm

In post 370, LucianRoy wrote:
Is there any TM that could possibly cause this?
(@ Dramonic)

X

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-dp/disable.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #379 (isolation #10) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 3:01 pm

In post 378, LucianRoy wrote:
In post 232, lufan131 wrote:I've read the game, yet I doubt so far I comprehend, so I used the randomizer.

Ooooohhhhh, I really want to read this as scum since there's no way he could possibly prove that he actually randomized it, but I really don't know what to think about this. Is this a super Derp? Is that even plausible? He knew full-well that Seiko was the leading wagon, yet he just voted it anyway off the basis of randomization.

I don't even know.

dramonic wrote:unvote
vote: lufan

<3?

dramonic · Post Post #381 (isolation #11) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 3:03 pm

In post 380, LucianRoy wrote:
In post 377, Wisdom wrote:
In post 371, LucianRoy wrote:Way to risky early game.
A) We have investigative roles.
If any one of them is found to be scum aligned, that would just make things too easy.
B) If one of them flips town for any reason, then that basically confirms the other two as town.
If they were scum, they're either really gutsy, or they just want to trash their scum-game.

I don't think you understood my point - fakeclaim masons with townies, not with their partners

So you're saying scum would fakeclaim masons with other townspeople who aren't in their masonry?
Wouldn't the townspeople immediately discredit this as an untruth?

dramonic · Post Post #385 (isolation #12) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 3:06 pm

dramonic · Post Post #386 (isolation #13) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 3:08 pm

In post 385, dramonic wrote: =
=

dramonic · Post Post #387 (isolation #14) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 3:08 pm

dramonic · Post Post #411 (isolation #15) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 4:05 pm

In post 410, LucianRoy wrote:
In post 393, Wisdom wrote:Here, by Skrew himself

UT didn't go along with it, but point is it did happen

Lol, I remember randomly clicking on that game to see that claim in action.
I don't mean to be a butt, but doesn't that kind of prove my line of reasoning correct?

dramonic · Post Post #417 (isolation #16) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 4:16 pm

In post 1, Professor Elm wrote:

Follow these
Behavioral and Technical Rules
.

Do not use small, hard-to-read, or
encoded text
, or post in a language that cannot be understood by most people in the game.

=/

dramonic · Post Post #422 (isolation #17) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 4:27 pm

In post 420, LucianRoy wrote:
In post 417, dramonic wrote:
In post 1, Professor Elm wrote:

Follow these
Behavioral and Technical Rules
.

Do not use small, hard-to-read, or
encoded text
, or post in a language that cannot be understood by most people in the game.
=/

Does this count as a language I can't understand? It's really starting to look that way.

dramonic · Post Post #437 (isolation #18) » Thu Apr 16, 2015 4:59 pm

In post 436, Wisdom wrote:says a hydra head who doesn't sign either

I must be the only person who always signs in all hydras

dramonic · Post Post #511 (isolation #19) » Fri Apr 17, 2015 4:53 am

In post 473, Tere wrote:Dramonic, a few questions for you.

1. Is the post restriction for a limited time?
2. Can this post restriction be cured?

In post 493, zMuffinMan wrote:
In post 274, DFC_Etna wrote:
+===========+
| TOWNREADS |
+===========+
zMuffinMan

+===========+
| NULLREADS |
+===========+
zMuffinMan

+===========+
| SCUMREADS |
+===========+
zMuffinMan
There are 20 people in this reads list but only 18 people in the game. Something feels off here but I can't quite put my finger on what.

dramonic · Post Post #512 (isolation #20) » Fri Apr 17, 2015 4:55 am

3. Is the post I've quoted above you saying you think this is what caused the Post Restriction?

X

dramonic · Post Post #513 (isolation #21) » Fri Apr 17, 2015 5:02 am

=

dramonic · Post Post #565 (isolation #22) » Fri Apr 17, 2015 5:36 pm

In post 563, Seiko x Naomi wrote:I'm sorry. Yesterday I was looking at everything jaded and itching to pick a fight and you know I absolutely hate to do that to my friends. I asked pie to kick me in my shins because I knew what I was doing but I just didn't care. I didn't mean to unseat you and make you nervous, I was just itching for some type of confrontation yesterday and that was shitty of me.

dramonic · Post Post #572 (isolation #23) » Fri Apr 17, 2015 6:14 pm

In post 567, Seiko x Naomi wrote:
In post 566, notscience wrote:Shut the fuck up dram

dramonic · Post Post #607 (isolation #24) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:19 am

In post 574, DFC_Etna wrote:

+===========+
| NULLREADS |
+===========+
dramonic**

** Purely for lack of contents.

In post 582, lufan131 wrote:
In post 563, Seiko x Naomi wrote:I'm sorry. Yesterday I was looking at everything jaded and itching to pick a fight and you know I absolutely hate to do that to my friends. I asked pie to kick me in my shins because I knew what I was doing but I just didn't care. I didn't mean to unseat you and make you nervous, I was just itching for some type of confrontation yesterday and that was shitty of me.

Regardless, she's good at reading bulge.

I can vouch for that.

Possibly my favorite quote so far, since I like fights too. Also, I like the apologetic nature of it.

. . .

vote: lufan
vote: lufan
vote: lufan

dramonic · Post Post #613 (isolation #25) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 5:01 am

In post 609, Wisdom wrote:the latter most likely

dramonic · Post Post #707 (isolation #26) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 12:21 pm

In post 644, LucianRoy wrote:
In post 642, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I believe Metal Sonic will be replacing in.

That's cool too.

In post 655, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:At least we're finally on the way to forming a wagon.

Only took 27 pages...

In post 659, LucianRoy wrote:
In post 653, Mac wrote:Why? It also seems pretty irrelevant since Matt is replacing out.

That's exactly why it's relevant. I like to look for irony when I find scum. He stated he was keeping up with the game, and even followed along with SK's little masonry claim. Something he deemed to be town, and then slightly doubted.

Why is he replacing out now? What's provoked him to leave?

I'm curious to see what MS has to offer.

In post 667, Wisdom wrote:
In post 659, LucianRoy wrote:Why is he replacing out now?

oi oi now. Replace outs are null. Maybe something happened to him, unrelated to the game. We will not speculate on that.

In post 677, Wisdom wrote:I believe Xayzeck was first in line to replace, not MS

In post 686, Mac wrote:Lucian you're really weirding me out here.

In post 696, LucianRoy wrote:If you want me to stop pursuing it, then I see your reasoning. I probably shouldn't have brought it up in the first place. Only now am I regretting it because there are real life factors I should've associated with Matt. And BBT, you can criticise me if I ever use this as a foundation to vote that slot. I won't even do that, by the way.

I thought it would mean something. I guess not...

Mac, what's your read on DFC and Muffin?
Does muffin have a strong scum-game?

...
X.X

unvote

dramonic · Post Post #770 (isolation #27) » Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:06 am

unvote
vote: Seiko
unvote
vote: DFC
unvote

dramonic · Post Post #771 (isolation #28) » Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:07 am

In post 769, Wisdom wrote:Jeanne wagon

dramonic · Post Post #772 (isolation #29) » Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:09 am

In post 590, Professor Elm wrote:
Elm's Notes
Jeanne11
has been prodded.

dramonic · Post Post #774 (isolation #30) » Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:11 am

In post 773, LucianRoy wrote:
In post 770, dramonic wrote:
unvote
vote: Seiko
unvote
vote: DFC
unvote

Are you trying to say you think these people could be buddies?

dramonic · Post Post #776 (isolation #31) » Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:14 am

In post 775, LucianRoy wrote:Are you trying to say you think these two people in particular are suspicious?

dramonic · Post Post #778 (isolation #32) » Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:17 am

vote: BBT
unvote
vote: Jeanne
unvote

dramonic · Post Post #780 (isolation #33) » Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:24 am

In post 779, LucianRoy wrote:The first one I can see.
The second one is a bit confusing.
Who do you not like on the Jeanne wagon?

In post 776, dramonic wrote:
In post 775, LucianRoy wrote:Are you trying to say you think these two people in particular are suspicious?

dramonic · Post Post #818 (isolation #34) » Sun Apr 19, 2015 11:57 am

In post 777, LucianRoy wrote:You should vote and unvote some of the people you're town-reading.

In post 778, dramonic wrote:
vote: BBT
unvote

dramonic · Post Post #819 (isolation #35) » Sun Apr 19, 2015 11:58 am

In post 805, LucianRoy wrote:Dramonic, how long is this thing going to last? It's excruciating to communicate with you.

dramonic · Post Post #820 (isolation #36) » Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:01 pm

In post 782, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:don't understand the town read on Jeanne at all. There is no way you can be reading that slot as town.

dramonic · Post Post #822 (isolation #37) » Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:12 pm

In post 821, LucianRoy wrote:So, you're revoking your town read on BBT. Interesting.
Who should we focus on as an alternative?

=_=

dramonic · Post Post #831 (isolation #38) » Sun Apr 19, 2015 3:59 pm

In post 826, DFC_Etna wrote:when has this kind of activity ever been a town thing? she's posting elsewhere on site and in other games.

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex/encore.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #840 (isolation #39) » Sun Apr 19, 2015 9:04 pm

In post 838, DFC_Etna wrote:If you can post a link post a fake link with actually sentences decorated with dots and slashes with http:// at the front.

dramonic · Post Post #848 (isolation #40) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 3:27 am

In post 835, Metal Sonic wrote:VOTE: jeanne

In post 846, Tere wrote:
Vote: Jeanne 11

dramonic · Post Post #849 (isolation #41) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 4:00 am

In post 823, LucianRoy wrote:Also, you might've missed this, but were there any posts that pinged DFC and Seiko as scum to you? I'm just looking for a little more clarification on your reads there.

dramonic · Post Post #850 (isolation #42) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 4:01 am

1.07 (page 34)

1.08 (page 36)

vote: DFC

dramonic · Post Post #852 (isolation #43) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 4:11 am

In post 851, Tere wrote:You're going to have to give me more than evilquotes to persuade me, bucko. Have you looked at her cross site activity?

It looks dreadful that she's just picked up her role PM and ignored the game when she's clearly able to post elsewhere.

Dram:

1. Will you be able to communicate normally Day 2?
2. Will you be able to communicate normally Day 3?
3. Will you be able to communicate normally Day 4?
4. Will you be able to communicate normally later than Day 4?

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex/meditate.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #854 (isolation #44) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 4:21 am

In post 853, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Dramonic, does Jeanne have a post restriction with you?

Do you know of each other's restrictions?

dramonic · Post Post #856 (isolation #45) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 4:26 am

In post 855, Wisdom wrote:If you use Meditate your restriction will end?

...

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex/struggle.shtml

What was the point of linking Encore previously? Does Jeanne have it?

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex/encore.shtml

X http://www.serebii.net/attackdex/Encore.shtmlX

dramonic · Post Post #860 (isolation #46) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 4:44 am

In post 857, Wisdom wrote:you'll be modkilled

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex/struggle.shtml

In post 858, Wisdom wrote:Or is it you're only allowed to link moves from serebii?

dramonic · Post Post #862 (isolation #47) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 4:46 am

In post 859, LucianRoy wrote:I still don't quite understand why Dram is going after DFC. Dram, what's provoked you to vote her now of all times?

dramonic · Post Post #863 (isolation #48) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 4:46 am

In post 861, Wisdom wrote:struggle = you'll lose your moves?

dramonic · Post Post #865 (isolation #49) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 4:51 am

In post 635, DFC_Etna wrote:
In post 622, Jeanne11 wrote:Hello everyone.

...

you weren't even site MIA you posted elsewhere on site like two days ago i don't see why you didn't pop in to say hello... that almost seems like you were afraid to and just decided to lurk until a better moment. like a newbscum thing to do.

i disagree that n_m's vote itself is bad because i felt the need to do the exact same vote as soon as i read her post. pressure on her is going to be GOOD at this moment. she needs more of it but i need to check with GiF first.

In post 726, DFC_Etna wrote:
In post 724, Professor Elm wrote:
Elm's Notes
Metal Sonic
replaces MattP!

You have three posts to obvtown yourself or I'll bury you alive~♡

In post 727, DFC_Etna wrote:
In post 629, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:

In post 577, Mac wrote:do you think N_M would alter his scum playstyle knowing you have seen it first hand?

Could be. Or not because wifom.
My townread on him is getting pretty stale though.

In post 597, Wisdom wrote:Skrew - His tone doesn't make me think he is scum, wondering why people are townreading him and such. He might say that he would do the same things as scum but I don't find it that so likely, especially him stating that very fact. His worry about pokeclaiming seems to be town motivated too. I guess he could have come up with it prior to the game and bring it up anyway, but that doesn't seem as likely. His mason thing with Matt made me slightly paranoid, but it's probably nothing. He also needs to do more stuff anyway.

+ the way he went apathetic rings town as well.

In url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=6777980#p6777980]post 628[/url], Mac wrote:NM's vote is bad. Like horrible. Maybe not the recipient of the vote but given that he's been in and around the thread and still not produced much of anything, his vote on Jeanne is pot calling kettle black, if not worse since Jeanne has technically not been here.

This.

He is clearly reading/keeping up with the thread and choosing not to contribute to any of the current matters.

I'm guessing he is just going to hope that active town players (myself, Wisdom, DFC) are going to drown the game out and scum can slide by quietly.

NM should be receiving more pressure. I want to see more from him.

Hey I cut down my postings. I want no part of "drowning the game"
*Checks activity overview*
*2nd most poster*
Damn.

In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=6778869#p6778869]post 670[/url], BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Wow.

If NM wasn't so useless I'd vote you in a heartbeat.

Wrong =/= scum

I am the kindest mod. Quote tags fixed.

In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=6780468#p6780468]post 736[/url], DFC_Etna wrote:My motivation for this game suddenly dropped below zero.
See you d3.

In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=6782252#p6782252]post 826[/url], DFC_Etna wrote:
In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=6782020#p6782020]post 820[/url], dramonic wrote:
In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=6781745#p6781745]post 782[/url], BlueBloodedToffee wrote:don't understand the town read on Jeanne at all. There is no way you can be reading that slot as town.

null yeah.

town? uh...

when has this kind of activity ever been a town thing? she's posting elsewhere on site and in other games.

dramonic · Post Post #868 (isolation #50) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 4:55 am

In post 866, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:PEdit - I'm not seeing what is wrong with those posts? Can you bold the parts you're specifically referring to?

...
http://www.serebii.net/attackdex/torment.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #870 (isolation #51) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 4:57 am

In post 867, Wisdom wrote:I don't see what's the issue with any of these posts. He's actually right about Jeanne's behavior being a likely newbscum behavior (first and last quote). The others are just non-indicating fluff.

In post 856, dramonic wrote:
http://www.serebii.net/attackdex/encore.shtml
X http://www.serebii.net/attackdex/Encore.shtmlX

dramonic · Post Post #877 (isolation #52) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 5:47 am

In post 873, Wisdom wrote:
In post 869, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Dramonic, are the moves you have linked (Struggle, Encore, Attract) moves that you have available to you and you have chosen struggle for toDay?

No, he's using them as verbs. Like, 868 reads "Are you trying to torment me?" - Torment is a gen3 move and therefore definitely not one of his moves too.

dramonic · Post Post #881 (isolation #53) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 5:58 am

In post 876, McMenno wrote:prodge

dramonic · Post Post #883 (isolation #54) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:07 am

In post 882, Wisdom wrote:You don't like McMenno prodging but are ok with Jeanne..?

unvote
vote: Seiko
unvote
vote: DFC

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex/taunt.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #887 (isolation #55) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:10 am

In post 881, dramonic wrote:
In post 876, McMenno wrote:prodge

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex/taunt.shtml

unvote
vote: seiko
unvote
vote: DFC

dramonic · Post Post #888 (isolation #56) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:11 am

In post 886, Professor Elm wrote:
Elm's Notes
Jeanne11
has requested replacement.

dramonic · Post Post #893 (isolation #57) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:14 am

In post 891, Wisdom wrote:oh i get it

"look seiko and DFC, McMenno is prodging, better scumread him too"

is what he's saying

In post 892, Wisdom wrote:
In post 890, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Not fair for Xay to come into that slot.

I wouldn't want to lynch him immediately

true that

VOTE: jeanne

L-1

dramonic · Post Post #895 (isolation #58) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:16 am

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-xy/snarl.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #897 (isolation #59) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:16 am

In post 892, Wisdom wrote:
In post 890, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Not fair for Xay to come into that slot.

I wouldn't want to lynch him immediately

true that

VOTE: jeanne

L-1

In post 895, dramonic wrote:http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-xy/snarl.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #902 (isolation #60) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:21 am

In post 898, DFC_Etna wrote:1) he hasn't AVOIDED posting all together.

In post 886, Professor Elm wrote:
Elm's Notes
Jeanne11
has requested replacement.

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-xy/finalgambit.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #903 (isolation #61) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:21 am

In post 901, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Someone hammer!!

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-xy/roar.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #907 (isolation #62) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:23 am

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-xy/rage.shtml
http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-xy/rage.shtml
http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-xy/rage.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #908 (isolation #63) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:24 am

In post 906, DFC_Etna wrote:it is anti-town to replace out of a this slot.

...
...

vote: DFC

dramonic · Post Post #914 (isolation #64) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:27 am

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-xy/fissure.shtml
http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-xy/sheercold.shtml
http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-xy/guillotine.shtml

VOTE: DFC

dramonic · Post Post #917 (isolation #65) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:29 am

In post 912, DFC_Etna wrote:she had replaced out of a slot at L-2 without even saying anything.

how is that not antitown???

In post 915, Wisdom wrote:you forgot horn drill

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-xy/faketears.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #918 (isolation #66) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:30 am

In post 905, Jeanne11 wrote:I cannot keep up.

dramonic · Post Post #921 (isolation #67) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:31 am

...

In post 917, dramonic wrote:
In post 912, DFC_Etna wrote:she had replaced out of a slot at L-2 without even saying anything.

how is that not antitown???

In post 905, Jeanne11 wrote:I cannot keep up.

In post 915, Wisdom wrote:you forgot horn drill

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-xy/faketears.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #922 (isolation #68) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:35 am

In post 920, DFC_Etna wrote:she can still give us something. she can fight for her slot. she can explain why she didn't post earlier. she can answer some questions.

In post 905, Jeanne11 wrote:I cannot keep up.

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-xy/wake-upslap.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #924 (isolation #69) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:38 am

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-xy/lowsweep.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #925 (isolation #70) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:40 am

1.08 (page 36)

1.09 (page 38)

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex-xy/nastyplot.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #1069 (isolation #71) » Thu Apr 23, 2015 1:29 pm

In post 1061, Wisdom wrote:But I dunno if it was a counterwagon or just townies switching to a scummier town. I mean, N_M was at least posting, while Jeanne seemed like she was avoiding the game on purpose.

. . .

In post 1068, zMuffinMan wrote:catching up later today but just wanted to say you guys should prob not quicklynch like yesterday again... not because it's inherently bad or anything, just because I wanna see what the mod does after 100 vote counts. will he start repeating pokemon? doesn't seem like a lot of forethought was put into it

Vote: DFC

dramonic · Post Post #1071 (isolation #72) » Thu Apr 23, 2015 1:45 pm

...
http://serebii.net/attackdex-xy/teeterdance.shtml

dramonic · Post Post #1073 (isolation #73) » Thu Apr 23, 2015 2:57 pm

http://serebii.net/attackdex/painsplit.shtml?

dramonic · Post Post #1091 (isolation #74) » Thu Apr 23, 2015 3:29 pm

In post 1076, LucianRoy wrote:That's quite a plausible move; is it from gen II?

I still want to know the reasoning behind pairing you with him. No offense, but you're kind of a hinderance to the town , and he's pretty dang town.

Someone didn't want you to be lynched? Was it Zmuffin?

Was there anyone else who expressed the view of not wanting to lynch you day 1?

???

dramonic · Fri Apr 24, 2015 12:15 pm

DFC

dramonic · Fri Apr 24, 2015 12:16 pm

2.03 (page 48)

2.04 (page 50)

dramonic · Fri Apr 24, 2015 12:17 pm

vote:dfc

dramonic · Fri Apr 24, 2015 12:30 pm

http://www.serebii.net/attackdex/futuresight.shtml

vote: DFC

dramonic · Post Post #1206 (isolation #79) » Fri Apr 24, 2015 2:19 pm

dramonic · Post Post #1285 (isolation #80) » Fri Apr 24, 2015 7:17 pm

In post 1266, Flames682 wrote:
Please everyone answer in their next post if they have the move Bite.

In post 1271, DFC_Etna wrote:He must've because that "future sight" has no meaning in any other context other than claiming a move name.

http://www.serebii.net/pokedex-rs/178.shtml

In post 1276, zMuffinMan wrote:
"i'm a cop and i investigated DFC last night"

In post 1280, zMuffinMan wrote:also ability name

In post 1284, DFC_Etna wrote:Like, literally the only way he can get out of it after my town flip is to claim that it was all a joke and reaction test. I seriously hope you're not that dumb to believe that shit

dramonic · Post Post #1363 (isolation #81) » Tue Apr 28, 2015 5:40 am

Unfortunate.
To be fair, if I'd gotten an inno on their slot I would have assumed redirection, because nobody should be that full of shit and still flip town.

@Mac: I don't fake guilties tho. I got a guilty, so something mustve tampered with my result.

dramonic · Post Post #1365 (isolation #82) » Tue Apr 28, 2015 5:41 am

(Also yes I am talking now)

EDIT: It's MS. Why do you have expectations?

dramonic · Tue Apr 28, 2015 10:05 am

In post 1381, Wisdom wrote:I don't get why he didn't provide his last night result though

lufan town.
I don't really trust a result after the first failure tho.

dramonic · Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:53 pm

I'm fascinated by your inability to read. All these things have already been explained and explored.

dramonic · Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:54 pm

My PR was a restriction on Future Sight, which I've already said.
My guilty is not fake, which I've already said.

Although if you actually saw anything protown in DFC's posts, you're beyond saving.

dramonic · Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:55 pm

I've also already said I'm Xatu.
Do you post blindfolded?

dramonic · Post Post #1410 (isolation #87) » Tue Apr 28, 2015 1:40 pm

In post 863, dramonic wrote:
In post 861, Wisdom wrote:struggle = you'll lose your moves?

More specifically future sight.
I've more, but you don't need to know of it.

dramonic · Post Post #1411 (isolation #88) » Tue Apr 28, 2015 1:41 pm

It specified DFC, yes.

dramonic · Post Post #1414 (isolation #89) » Tue Apr 28, 2015 2:15 pm

It's not a defense, it's an observation.
Asking me three questions I've already answered shows you aren't paying attention.

@SK: Why?

dramonic · Post Post #1415 (isolation #90) » Tue Apr 28, 2015 2:25 pm

If yall want I can provide an alternate theory for the events.

After seeing how incredibly stupid and scummy the day 1 play was, I decided that there was no way DFC could be town, because town usually thinks before they post.
Then Day 2 happened, and it was still incredibly stupid, so I derailed it by calling a guilty on the stupid-circus' loudest voice, hoping that I was right and that they weren't actually as moronic as I thought and just really bad scum.
Unfortunately, my hopes were in vain.

I apologize to Bins tho.

dramonic · Post Post #1421 (isolation #91) » Tue Apr 28, 2015 2:51 pm

In post 1416, SleepyKrew wrote:Okay so that's a scumclaim.

Are you fucking kidding me

In post 1418, SleepyKrew wrote:I'm not thinking clearly though
So I'll humour you dram
Where did you explain why you can talk now?

For the nth time, I said back on Day 1 that if I posted normally I would lose my moves. I coulda posted normally from the started if I didnt want access to Future Sight.

In post 1417, LucianRoy wrote:Future Sight sounds like a made-up move for an investigative role, and I'm having a hard time believing that you have even more abilities, as implied in an earlier post.

p-edit, So you literally have nothing to benefit from your incorrect guilty apparently. Great.

1) Everyone has had 2 moves so far you clown.
2) Well I mean, it was either catch scum, or stop GiF from trainrolling this game to an automatic scum win, so really it hinders the scum regardless. Of course that hinges on the town not thinking DFC had a sliver of town cred. It worries me that that's not the fact here.

At least now I know I can play "lynch all lurkers" even though lurkers lynches are the most fucking retarded thing in mafia.

dramonic · Post Post #1422 (isolation #92) » Tue Apr 28, 2015 2:54 pm

In post 1419, Flames682 wrote:So instead of saying that at the start of D3 dram you decide to wait when everyone votes you.\

VOTE: dram

I ddint think anyone was dumb enough to vote me :/
wishful thinking.

dramonic · Post Post #1427 (isolation #93) » Tue Apr 28, 2015 8:05 pm

In post 1424, McMenno wrote:
In post 1421, dramonic wrote:For the nth time, I said back on Day 1 that if I posted normally I would lose my moves. I coulda posted normally from the started if I didnt want access to Future Sight.

Quote it.

So you fake a guilty because you thought DFC's play was bad and hoping to catch scum, then you keep fakeclaiming cop on D2? And now you keep insulting everyone.

In post 1410, dramonic wrote:
In post 863, dramonic wrote:
In post 861, Wisdom wrote:struggle = you'll lose your moves?

More specifically future sight.
I've more, but you don't need to know of it.

dramonic · Post Post #1428 (isolation #94) » Tue Apr 28, 2015 8:06 pm

Also I always insult everyone, you just didnt know cuz I couldnt use words

dramonic · Post Post #1429 (isolation #95) » Tue Apr 28, 2015 8:08 pm

In post 1426, zMuffinMan wrote:can you just full-claim, dramonic? or at least full-claim the details of your supposed post restriction and whatever future sight apparently does

What, do you believe me now?

dramonic · Post Post #1434 (isolation #96) » Tue Apr 28, 2015 9:19 pm

In post 1432, zMuffinMan wrote:
In post 1429, dramonic wrote:
In post 1426, zMuffinMan wrote:can you just full-claim, dramonic? or at least full-claim the details of your supposed post restriction and whatever future sight apparently does

What, do you believe me now?

if i believed you, i probably wouldn't be asking for full details

If you don't believe me, what's the point of humoring you?

dramonic · Post Post #1462 (isolation #97) » Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:17 am

In post 1437, Wisdom wrote:Funny, now I think he is. His bullshit about gif feel completely fake, gif was pretty town.

Sir you are high.

In post 1442, zMuffinMan wrote:
In post 1422, dramonic wrote:I ddint think anyone was dumb enough to vote me :/
wishful thinking.

i'm going to be blunt here

i would lynch you regardless of my read on you because i despise players like you

Policy lynches are anti-town

if you do happen to be town, you're absolutely fucking atrocious at mafia

He says, after quicklynching the replace-out slot.

you feel the need to fake guilties because, not only are you an atrocious player, you're an attention whore

It's not attention-whoring, it's the only way to be heard with a post restriction. If I didn't have to half-vanillize myself to get shit going I wouldn't just claim guilty.

and then you criticise others for being stupid

I do that all the time though. I'm old and bitter.

dramonic · Post Post #1463 (isolation #98) » Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:18 am

In post 1441, zMuffinMan wrote:
In post 1434, dramonic wrote:If you don't believe me, what's the point of humoring you?

i thought maybe i'd consider not lynching you if i could think of a reason and that reason certainly isn't coming from your play so...

If you decide not to lynch me based on my role as opposed to based on my play, you don't really get to say I'm atrocious at mafia. It's a vanilla-less game.

dramonic · Post Post #1466 (isolation #99) » Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:20 am

In post 1438, Wisdom wrote:And gif did say that dram is going to take the guilty back and claim it was faked

GIF said I was doing it for reaction test.
He was wrong.
I did it because it's impossible to lead a wagon while post-restricted, and his play was absurdly scummy.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:22 am

Three policy lynches in 4 days is not scumhunting.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:23 am

In post 1469, Wisdom wrote:
In post 1466, dramonic wrote:his play was absurdly scummy.

What was even remotely scummy about his play?

Can you unvote while I build a case?
I'll be really mad if I get lynched while building a case for a player who's already dead.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:40 am

In post 1472, Wisdom wrote:no, I don't care to hear a case on a flipped player. GIF was pretty town and you just look silly arguing otherwise.

Don't ask if you don't want something answered you moron. I just wasted like 15 minutes.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:40 am

You're also hilariously wrong, but that's k.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:44 am

Like seriously, you're calling a player who's entire ISO is "let's policy lynch" and "I'm not playing, im just vomiting meta garbage" pretty town?

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:45 am

THERE'S NOTHING TOWN IN THAT SLOT

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:47 am

It's useless.
Scum could have given you the same information.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:50 am

It's not null when you don't do anything else.
It's IIoA

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:51 am

And you're still ignoring the PL stance.
Which is, you know, kinda an important point.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:53 am

. . .
Ok say.
I don't mean to brutalize you.
But there was this player named Jeanne in the game day 1.
She got policy-lynched.

EDIT: WTF

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:55 am

Wait hang on.
Do you actually think the Jeanne wagon was a smart one?
Do you actually think she "scummily replaced out" even though she never caught up?

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:56 am

DON'T TRY TO GET CUTE ELM, I SAW THAT WOMAN IN THAT ICECREAM CONE

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:58 am

...
lol

vote: dramonic

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:58 am

It's a "I overwhelmed myself with games and forgot I was in this one. Oh shit it's 40 pages long" move.
Calling it scum is ludicrous.

EDIT: Because DFC is supposed to be a good player.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:00 am

Fuck, I thought id self-hammered.
Now I'm stuck with you clowns again.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:01 am

well, still, not again.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:05 am

the majority of that wagon was newbies.
I can give newbies a pass.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:09 am

The others are Seiko x Naomi, DFC_Etna, Metal Sonic, Wisdom, SleepyKrew

SK hammered, pretty sure he didnt even know what the situation was.
After Capcom, Seiko, MS and Wisdom are all pretty terrible.

EDIT: Lucian, NM, BBT and Tere are newbies as well.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:11 am

In post 1518, Wisdom wrote:also lol @ fakehammer AtE

My only emotion is disgust. I'm not appealing to anything here

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:11 am

In post 1520, Wisdom wrote:I'm terrible for beating you in Capcom? lol

I advocated your death in Capcom. I don't control the entire town.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:14 am

2 years, perhaps?
Unless they show significant presence I spose.
It's sorta relative.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:22 am

...
Yes, that happened before your vote too
Did you not feel like reading BEFORE you voted me?

See, this kind of proves my newbie point.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:22 am

that being the fast wagon, not my vote.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:25 am

So was voting Jeanne.

unvote

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:26 am

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:28 am

If I were a jester this would be the ultimate play!

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:35 am

EXTREME PROTOWN MANEUVER!

"because reasons!~"

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:36 am

But those short days are soooooooo protown!

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:53 am

You lynched him yesterday Flames.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:58 am

Day 3 started like... 30 hours ago.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 8:03 am

In post 1546, Flames682 wrote:that last post was a joke

you still waited till like the middle of day 3 to say that it was faked

There's really no point in saying it's fake if it's not being contested.
I DO have Future Sight, but it doesn't work that way. I've no interest in saying about that.

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 8:05 am

*saying more

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 8:12 am

In post 1552, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 1525, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:UNVOTE: UNVOTE:

That Dram wagon is bullshit.

Look at the speed of it.

Funny how quickly people tend to vote caught scum

humor me for a moment.
What's my scum motivation for this play?

dramonic · Wed Apr 29, 2015 9:11 am

In post 1557, SleepyKrew wrote:idk
You thought you could get away with it?

get away with what, purging the town?

vote: dramonic

finally.

dramonic · Mon May 25, 2015 6:50 am

In post 3567, Marquis wrote:I'm planning on running a Gen III non-uPick, traditional-style large theme sometime in the near future. (I'm staying away from uPicks for a while so there's a lot more time to work on balance and design.)

Other comments withheld.

You should probably be a bit more careful with setup balance, scum was a lot stronger than town :/
Not saying that's what cost us the game, the fucktrain of the first 3 days did that.

EDIT:

dramonic · Mon May 25, 2015 6:50 am

You're just mad not everyone is willing to put up with your BS.

dramonic · Mon May 25, 2015 7:02 am

The Day 1 lynch was very obviously scum-driven, I took a gambit and it failed.
Shit happens.

dramonic · Mon May 25, 2015 7:10 am

Yes, that's what I thought about that wagon too.

dramonic · Mon May 25, 2015 7:18 am

Emotions runnin high!

dramonic · Mon May 25, 2015 7:31 am

I didn't say the d1 lynch lost us the game?
I said the first 3 days lost us the game. Or put us behind anyways.

I did not blame you, or your slot, for this loss.

@Mac: Three of the four scums are on the wagon. Maybe scum-approved more than scumdriven.

dramonic · Mon May 25, 2015 7:44 am

The annoying thing is that you're not taking anything from this. The D1 lynch was ridiculous, but because of the fake guilty on your slot you're gonna ignore it.
I faked a guilty for a reason.
Was it bad play, yes.
Was it in response to bad play, also yes.

@Pie: If you're gonna devolve into personal attacks, you should really considering cooling off.

dramonic · Mon May 25, 2015 7:45 am

*really consider
or
*really be considering

<.<

dramonic · Mon May 25, 2015 7:46 am

In post 3593, dramonic wrote:@Pie: If you're gonna devolve into personal attacks, you should really consider cooling off.

dramonic · Mon May 25, 2015 8:03 am

You (general, not you specifically) lynched a 1-post slot. There is no information there.
And it's nobody else's fault you didn't unvote after the hops, size inflation and "THERES NO TURNING BACK" posts.

I know my play was bad, but you can't just scream TOWN CONCENSUS and call it not-bad play.

dramonic · Mon May 25, 2015 8:03 am

The town, overall, played this game poorly.
Scum used that well.
The end.

dramonic · Mon May 25, 2015 3:18 pm

I personally feel meta is null to anti-town, and neglecting gamestate in favor of meta is scummy.
You surfaced (to me) as the most adamant about what I perceived as a really really bad lynch.
I'm not saying calling a guilty was a right move, but it wasn't because you called for a utility lynch. I may be arrogant, but I'm not petty <_<

EDIT: Yeah, in retrospect the post restriction was fun for a while but overly crippling.