Lighten up, join the fray.
Ewwww, onions.
Something about this post bugs me. I still don't like the underlying philosophy.skitzer wrote:I think it will be critical to realize that it will take much oomph to get someone lynched. Also, it will become significantly harder as time passes. We will not have so much leeway to just toss stuff at everyone. We should probably learn now to conserve our food. For example, I'm suspicious of Yama, but I'm not throwing anything just yet.
My food IS odd. At least, an odd combination of things. I guess my parents hate me.Nightfall wrote:Skruffs > My food itself isn't odd, it's just not what I would expect my character to eat... or at least keep down.
Because I think he's doing it just to propegate a meaningless argument and make himself look like a team player.foolinc wrote:If you didn't care about jesters, why the did you throw food at someone who was testing out the rules of the game?Lowell wrote:1- I think Yama's claim is true. He clearly is suffering disproportionate damage from foodstuffs, and I doubt a scum would be made so weak
2- Why are we talking about jesters still? Who cares?
3-flicks fistful of onions at gorradI don't like his last series of posts. I think he's trying to take us for a ride. He's trying to set himself up as someone who would be useful to keep around. Taste some gross food!
On a side note, I don't have to work today so I get to have a siesta! Score! Or better yet... GOOOAAAAAALLLLL!
I thought I was missing something here, so I read back. I still don't understand.Gorrad wrote:Ha! Lunchlady, that's hilarious. Well, I'm still convinced at BM's scumminess, this only supports my case. BM, you're scummy as hell, probably because you're scum.Dumps all remaining gummy bears on Battle Mage.
This guy, however, is INCREDIBLY scummy, and I'm not sure why few people are stepping up to say so. CLEARLY the best choice for today.skitzer wrote:I think it is funny how Skruffs and BM have been seemingly scummy for the majority of the game and all I did was make 2 errors, one wasn't even noticed and the other was just noobish play.
I also very much agree with this. I don't think we'll get much information from role names.Gorrad wrote:If it was purely adults, we could lynch every adult and win, despite some being pro-town. There has to be a mix, otherwise it would be too easy. Do you really think there would be a game- a DGB game at that- where rolenames would be dead givaways?Skruffs wrote:Okay.
"1. The administration is out to get us, and is probably enlisting help from brownnosing students. "
Gorrad, where did you form this hypothesis - with the brownnosing students corollary?
Gorrad wrote:I'm not willing to count out Godfather, but I'll hold my fire for now. Thanks, Tar- that information is very useful. BM, it seems I *may* owe you an apology. However, I still think Skruffs is town. Your points against him have been poor, and I think y'all need to bury the hatchet- in scum.
Are there multiple scumgroups? Do you know this?The Fonz wrote:Hello? You already claimed. I'm interested in probing the veracity of it, and things like any indication there might be sanity issues, or your ability being limited to a specific scumgroup, and so on- stuff that a town needs to know.Tarhalindur wrote:Why are you fishing?The Fonz wrote:Tar- what is the flavour justification for your investigations? Can you detect any antitown forces, or just a specific scumgroup?
IIRC he said "two scumgroups", not "two killing factions". Which seemed odd. As well, despite the flavor of the nightscene, I'm not convinced that it couldn't be a scumgroup and a vigilante.cicero wrote:Clarification question: Do you count an SK as a scumgroup? We have two nightkills.Lowell wrote:Also, I'm still not thrilled at the way fonz just assumed we have two scumgroups. Nothing about this game so far has led me to believe that is the case.