Prisoner's Dilemma --- Congratulations to Sudo_Nym and Tamuz

somestrangeflea · Post Post #7 (isolation #1) » Sat Jun 23, 2007 11:36 am

I'm not to sure on the rules myself, but it has something to do with

who

they choose to betray.

somestrangeflea · Post Post #32 (isolation #2) » Sun Jun 24, 2007 9:41 am

Fact of the matter is, there's a much better payout for co-operation than defection, and so there is no real benefit from it, at this stage of the game! Co-operation will gain 2HP, provided that you aren't defected against.

Now, chances are, someone's gonna be nasty, and defect against the person who come's across most "Co-op"y.

I guarantee you all now, I will co-operate this time.

somestrangeflea · Post Post #38 (isolation #3) » Sun Jun 24, 2007 10:08 am

Oh here's a question.

Will you be told

who

defected against you?

somestrangeflea · Post Post #42 (isolation #4) » Sun Jun 24, 2007 10:14 am

Eventually though, for the game to go anywhere, it'll become so that the reward for defecting is greater than the reward for co-operating.

Co-operation will be the death of us later on.

somestrangeflea · Post Post #61 (isolation #5) » Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:10 am

Defecting is only a good idea when the payoff for defecting and not being defected against is bigger than the payoff for co-operating and not being defected against, which it currently is not.

Co-operation FTW.

somestrangeflea · Post Post #65 (isolation #6) » Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:18 am

Hey, I made it clear from the start of Round 1 that I was co-operating, and I've kept to my word.

Round 2, I have said that I'm co-operating, and I will, because defecting cannot gain me anything.

somestrangeflea · Post Post #82 (isolation #7) » Tue Jun 26, 2007 11:07 am

It is interesting to note that this current charge is identical the the first, apart from the increased risk of defection.

Logic would therefore suggest that there should be more people co-operating this round than in the very first round. I co-operated then, so guess what...

somestrangeflea · Post Post #92 (isolation #8) » Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:08 am

somestrangeflea · Post Post #108 (isolation #9) » Sun Jul 01, 2007 8:56 am

Khelvaster wrote:Somestrangeflea, I am hitting you this round and next round.

Great. See you there.

No-one else defect against Khel. It's pointless.

EDIT: Scratch that. Someone else defect against him. If I go down, I'm taking one of you with me...

somestrangeflea · Post Post #110 (isolation #10) » Mon Jul 02, 2007 2:02 am

Ah well, someone else probably would anyway...

somestrangeflea · Post Post #129 (isolation #11) » Sat Jul 07, 2007 3:32 am

Khelvaster wrote:why do people want to test me constantly...

I am going to defect against sudo nym.

Because you're winning.

somestrangeflea · Post Post #131 (isolation #12) » Sat Jul 07, 2007 9:09 am

Oh that's me isn't it. Bugger.

somestrangeflea · Post Post #141 (isolation #13) » Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:55 am

Hey, I'm nearly dead. What's that about?

EDIT: I also like how this is the second seventh charge...

somestrangeflea · Post Post #143 (isolation #14) » Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:42 am

Way to make me feel better...

Oh, and its E-I-G-

H

-T-H