Micro 956 | 2of4 | Dinosaur Comics™ - GAME OVER!
-
-
Hiraki
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Ignored question.In post 38, Hiraki wrote:Better question - why did you take it semi-seriously?
Weird question.In post 57, Umlaut wrote:Because last game you were obvtown, and this game you're not obvtown, and it makes me wonder if you're town at all.
That's probably unfair but I'm thinking it anyway.
Even weirder response. There's like a half-attempt to try and actually formulate a read here and then it goes into a random question. I have no problem with this "method" but I have a problem with the almost "threatening" attitude with it.In post 67, Umlaut wrote:
I definitely don't know everyone in this game. I have a few completed games with Hiraki, one each with you and Alisae, Nexus I know who he is, don't recognize anyone else. I think you are maybe reading more into the demeanor of the players here then there actually is. Every game has a different feel.In post 61, ClarkBar wrote:I really have no idea why I was so town-read last game. I'll tell you this: I am a little unsure of myself here. Way more so than last game where I figured I'd ask questions and try to suss things out. I don't know how to proceed in a game like this where everyone knows each other and seem to have a more fun/relaxed approach. I do feel I'm out of my depth here a little.
But, if you're asking if I'm town, the answer is yes. Unequivocally. By that token, our last game together I had no good read on you and you were scum. This game isn't too different. Are you going to ask irrelevant questions or are you going to scum-hunt this time?
I guess I can put you at L−1 if you say pretty-please but I don't see a reason to do so now, so asking irrelevant questions sounds good. What's your favorite vegetable?
Weird question part 17.In post 68, Alisae wrote:Why does the demeanor of the players stop you from proceeding?
What reads?In post 76, CreativeMod1 wrote:I suppose in a way I kinda get town vibes from Umlaut because they're trying to put out reads and stuff (even if I don't understand where the reads are coming from)
I didn't actually look at the VC there. It was random.In post 80, z3KIDNYSTONE wrote:ok so i'm reading page 2 and why tf are people voting clark bar
If this were the case, which it is not, what is so wrong with that?In post 82, z3KIDNYSTONE wrote:for now VOTE: hiraki is it just me or does he seem to be jumping on wagons with no reason-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Nope, it is for you.In post 101, Umlaut wrote:Wait, was that question for me? I thought it was for Nexus.
The game has been going on for less than 24 hours at that point.In post 101, Umlaut wrote:Yeah, it was, but there was basically nothing to go on and I wanted to do something instead of just waiting for someone else to do something. This game is a lurkfest.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Ali was already voting Umlaut, it's a fake vote. There's no need to stop talking until you do not need to talk.In post 118, CreativeMod1 wrote:Also Cult put Umlaut at L-1 and then Alisae voted Umlaut? so urm 1) shouldn't we stop talking, like isn't that a lynch?
I don't understand the rationale of caring if he missed it or not. If he did, then it's just a rookie move. If he didn't, no one is giving him town points.In post 121, Umlaut wrote:Can't decide if CM1 really missed that or not. Fakehammers happen every damn game now and I just habitually check the VC when I see them before posting any kind of reaction.
I disagree with this but I have a better answer. Would like to see things play out a bit more before I speak.In post 120, Nexus wrote:CM1 is Umlaut ur buddy?-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Why is 90% of this post not about Nexus? Who is supposed to agree with you here?In post 132, SleeperSoul wrote:I reread the opening of the game, and I get the impression that Nexus is a little over-eager to lynch. His responses to people questioning his early pressure do not give me townie vibes.
Also, Umlaut was ever so slightly scummy with his 'vengeful' RVS vote, but the strength of the wagon that formed on him so quickly seems a bit iffy to me.
So far Nexus seems to be the scummiest person in the game. Athena, Hiraki, zKS and Alisae seem townie.
VOTE: Nexus
Correct. There are also only 3 days left (if not a hair more) and no other wagons. If you think he's not good, then why not do something rather than complain about it?In post 133, CreativeMod1 wrote:Anyways, so now that Umlaut is at C-1, now what? like are those who are voting on him really think he's scummy?
Not answering for him but risk should not be a giant factor in scumminess.In post 133, CreativeMod1 wrote:Also to the person who said that maybe me and Umlaut are buddies, like surely it'd be very risky for me to be buddying up so hard on day 1?
But you've done nothing to address what people have said about him either and your vote is on Z3.In post 133, CreativeMod1 wrote:Unless someone gives me good reason as to why we should vote Umlaut, I personally won't be voting there
You can't just come in here say that something is bad and then leave without doing anything more. That is the problem that Umlaut rightfully (yes, I take it back - this game is stagnating) said. If everyone does nothing, then scum will walk over everyone.
@Mod: Any chance you'd consider cutting down the prod times? I thought about this and someone could technically post twice in one day phase and get away without a prod. Since we're splitting the "normal" day times to 6 days. Can we compromise on a 36 hour prod limit rather than the standard 48?
I don't know if the above will help but it's a little telling when the mod currently has the second highest amount of posts in the game (22 - Ali currently leads with 29) with the whole page-top obsession. I'd think that this game basically has 2-3 pages of content rather than 6. I also think that this game started at a bad time (4th of July) which isn't helping anyone either but it's starting to worry me.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Furthermore, doing a quick rundown -
Umlaut - I see a scumflip here
SleeperSoul - No read here.
Nexus - No read here - weird to see that other people drop reads here and then don't say much more. Both on the town and mafia side.
Alisae - Scum lean but barely at that
CreativeMod1 - Only real TR this game atm
ClarkBar - No read
z3KIDNYSTONE - No read, promised content2 days ago for a game that is only 6 pages long as if that would really change everything and hasn't delivered
CultOfAthena - I actually really enjoy the content coming from this slot. TR but nothing solid for me to grasp on, yet.
Gotta move folks.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
No - it's not characterizing your post at all. It's trying to figure out what the point of it is. Your thoughts are bleak at best. Furthermore, telling me that I can come up to my own conclusion on it and then also saying that my conclusion is a mischaracterization of the post is contradictory.In post 138, SleeperSoul wrote:
The first question is a mischaracterization of my post. Nobody is 'supposed' to agree with me, I'm just providing my thoughts on the game and everyone is free to come to their own conclusions.In post 134, Hiraki wrote:Why is 90% of this post not about Nexus? Who is supposed to agree with you here?
My entire point is that you're voting someone yet you have said nothing about them. Does the vote matter? Are you actually trying to get people to join your wagon? My answer to both of these is no but you are welcome to solidify your points whenever you like. If someone quotes that post and says that they'll vote Nexus on it, then perhaps I'm wrong. I do not believe I am wrong in this scenario though and I do not have evidence otherwise.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
no, in fact you said the opposite in your postIn post 140, CreativeMod1 wrote:looking at their posts now I'm more 50/50-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Hope for improvement.In post 151, CultOfAthena wrote:Calling CM1 your only real townread this game doesn't exactly seem in line with your directly previous post. What is 134 supposed to be if CM1 is your only real townread?
Most people who I don't have a read on also haven't said anything of substance for me to read them on.In post 151, CultOfAthena wrote:Why spend time and all those words on him rather than someone you don't have a read on?
That's not what he was saying though.In post 151, CultOfAthena wrote:Those aren't contradictory. You can come to whatever conclusion you like – what that conclusion is and whether or not it makes any sense is another story.
Okay - and here is what he said -In post 151, CultOfAthena wrote:This post in general is pretty weird. I don't understand the accusation that Sleeper is voting someone who he hasn't talked about when 132, the post where he made that vote, is basically exclusively about Nexus.
Great - I don't agree with this. It would be nice to know where this happened and how it's scummy. Saying something is scummy and showing it are two different things.In post 132, SleeperSoul wrote:I reread the opening of the game, and I get the impression that Nexus is a little over-eager to lynch. His responses to people questioning his early pressure do not give me townie vibes.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Duly noted.In post 157, SleeperSoul wrote:Okay, this is something I can work with. I suggest as an alternative to your first 2 stilted questions, that something like "You did not provide enough evidence to back up your read on Nexus" would be a more beneficial form of communication for everyone.
Lack of confidence is a scumtell? Throwing a read out is a scumtell?In post 157, SleeperSoul wrote:He just repeats that I'm newbscum with no explanation. And then also concedes that he might be wrong. That to me directly contradicts his seeming confidence, that he displayed in his post directly before this one.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Correct, so the change in confidence is your scumtell. That is the contradiction that you are seeing. You can phrase it any way you like, it is what it is.In post 160, SleeperSoul wrote:The scumtell is the seeming contradiction made in two posts that directly follow eachother. At first he seems confident for no reason. Then he seems not so confident for no reason. THAT contradiction, with nothing stated in between, is what gives me a slight scumping. More familiarity with his meta would certainly help solidify my read.
Correct!In post 162, Nexus wrote:Meta is bollocks anyway smileyface
Not really.In post 171, Umlaut wrote:Does it not affect your read on me at all, when you initially suspect me for something I say I did mostly to get the game moving because it was stagnating, and then it turns out the game really is stagnating?
Nothing actually - I wanted to solidify my read on Sleeper. Get an idea where his thoughts are coming from.In post 173, Umlaut wrote:
I can't understand what you're trying to say here. It looks almost like arguing Nexus is TStbS but I don't really believe you would make an argument like that, so whatIn post 159, Hiraki wrote:And before you make the obvious next move here, as you don't seem to enjoy conversation, Nexus isn't dumb. He's clearly pushing on you with no reasoning. If scum were always so obvious, this game would not be a challenge.areyou trying to say about Nexus?
I also did not recognize that acronym.
No - that's not my argument. He's just pushing with no reasoning. Pushing with no reasoning is null. It is the reason behind having no reason of which is important.In post 176, Umlaut wrote:(as in, that's what Hiraki's argument superficially resembles which is why I'm asking him to clarify)-
-
Hiraki Survivor
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Okay - play this game for a second. Let's say you're right about all of this. Is your reason for voting someone now due to lying about experience in other games? Someone who already admitted that they don't play a lot of games of mafia but play a lot of LSG? Not really something I think I'd want to follow through with. It's a dumbtell that I wouldn't vote for.In post 193, ClarkBar wrote:You don't see the rationale? I'm becoming more and more obsessed with 118. I'm not really keen at looking at old games because I'm dubious about using a player's meta, but I might make an exception in this case. Less to look at CM1's meta and more to ascertain if it's plausible that he would not recognize a double-vote and if he really believed that if that were an actual hammer that town should not talk. Alisae even eludes to the nature of her double-post in 110.
No, patience is not necessary here. CM1 seems to mimic a lot of Umlaut's opinions. Umlaut even mentioned this in his above post. I will admit that I'm not certain of this but I would find it more reasonable that CM1 is copying rather than sheeping. The former identifies that CM1 doesn't really know what to do in this case (which is fine) rather than sheeping is knowingly doing that. I can go more into detail about this, if you want. I don'tIn post 193, ClarkBar wrote:I need my hand held a little here. Why would Nexus ask that question of CM1 in the first place, why do you disagree with it, and what needs to play out? Or will I just have to be patient?knowif that makes him scum but I am definitely passing on a D1 lynch on that slot.
In post 188, Umlaut wrote:his first real comment on the game was 118 going "oh gee Umlaut got lynched" and oh-so-tentatively suggesting that might be scummy of Alisae.yuck-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
You never did. Not sure why you had to say that. I was responding to tehe question there.In post 201, Umlaut wrote:
Huh? Where did I say that CM1 is mimicking my opinions? The only place I even see CM1 offering real opinions is 140, and looking at that the only place you could see him mimicking me is on ClarkBarIn post 195, Hiraki wrote:No, patience is not necessary here. CM1 seems to mimic a lot of Umlaut's opinions. Umlaut even mentioned this in his above post. I will admit that I'm not certain of this but I would find it more reasonable that CM1 is copying rather than sheeping. The former identifies that CM1 doesn't really know what to do in this case (which is fine) rather than sheeping is knowingly doing that. I can go more into detail about this, if you want. I don't know if that makes him scum but I am definitely passing on a D1 lynch on that slot.maybe.
Yeah that was a slip up by me. Gonna take time to get used to the new vocab. You can continue to say you need more data but once you get it, you will agree with me. If not, you will just be wrong.In post 205, ClarkBar wrote:Definitely passing on the execution/cancelling (there needs to be an official replacement for the term "Lynch") on a player who, according to you, is mimicking the player you find scummy and have your vote on? Yeah, I need more detail.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
I agree more with this than anything up there.In post 235, Nexus wrote:That’s a bad old unvote there fella.
I'm watching this mostly.In post 233, ClarkBar wrote:I need to reread and generate some questions (which will undoubtedly thrill Alisae) and those questions will likely come with a vote.
I appreciate the thinking here but the amount of assumptions in this post is setting off some alarms.In post 253, CreativeMod1 wrote:At this point there's enough traction on the Umlaut wagon that you can distance yourself from it and make yourself look townie.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
noIn post 276, pisskop wrote:
ughIn post 133, CreativeMod1 wrote:C-1
does this mean im old now that i scoff at new things?
why don't you do it thenIn post 281, pisskop wrote:in spirit i'm voting for umlat or sleeperslot.
wow, so braveIn post 290, Formerfish wrote:Neither of you have solid reads. Ali I've seen you play like complete shit with the same overconfident attitude, like in your invitational with pine. Your reads were hot fucking garbage that game but you were so sure of your reads that you made that game impossible to play.
Maybe you should be better?
very good, we may disagree on the above but this is very goodIn post 291, pisskop wrote:sooo, you think theyre town tho?
wow, super brave, so nobleIn post 292, Formerfish wrote:It's cool though. Y'all Muppets can't handle me, and therefore must push to get me out, or I'll spend to much time thinking about the game and will solve it with a showable proof unlike Nexus and their p1 d1 shit solve.
i think these setups are harder than ones with PRs, tbh. and i think PRs are hard / usually mess them upIn post 293, Umlaut wrote:Damn there are a lot of oldbies in this newbie setup
ill take the slight jab with GRACE thank YOUIn post 302, Nexus wrote:please stop comparing e-peen sizes. we all know hiraki is our god player in this game-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
i haven't seen this amount of giant e-cock in awhile WOWIn post 315, Formerfish wrote:If you really have no idea of what might be happening here do you at least have a modicum of trust in me to let me see this through?
no - it doesn't matter if you didn't try, you did flame and you were 100% a dickIn post 319, Formerfish wrote:I'm not just trying to flame you Ali, I'm just having bad flashbacks to you being 100% wrong but being unable to get out of your own way.
yeah i haveIn post 331, Umlaut wrote:Hiraki is voting me for some early-game stuff that seems weak (ignoring a question that wasn't obviously meant for me, thinking the game was slow when it actually was slow) and hasn't seemed to reconsider that at all
In post 331, Umlaut wrote:CultOfAthena hasn't even mentioned me at all, except in passing to talk about other players
fair that it hasn't been awhile but his last post was in the 150's and he just got proddedIn post 108, CultOfAthena wrote:Hiraki's 89 is alright. The analysis of Umlaut's one post is probably the most poignant part. Also, I never thought I'd see the day where I'm the one recommending against being snarky and antisocial, but it feels like people are being pretty short with the newbies in the playerlist.
very poor characterizationIn post 332, Umlaut wrote:I don't know what's supposed to be yuck about this.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
From the newbie? Why does everyone ignore that CM1 is clearly not experienced?In post 339, Umlaut wrote:Looking at the CM1 post again maybe "tentative" is the wrong word (he does say "that's kinda scummy of you" which may not be a strong statement but is at least a definite one) but it strikes me as absurd and phony-sounding. The town reaction I'd be looking for from someone who believed the hammer is more along the lines of "Alisae wtf???" than an explanation of why hammering with zero warning halfway into the day is "kinda scummy."-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Okay - then play this game. Let's say he's not new but somewhat new. Is his next step to act new or is it to actually be newish? I'd like to think it is the later than the former.In post 341, Umlaut wrote:Maybe my expectations of newbies are just higher than yours. When I joined MS I hadn't played a game of Mafia of any sort for at least ten years, and that was on a forum with wildly different standards of play, and I picked up things like "quickhammering is massively scummy" pretty much immediately and if I had questions that the wiki could answer I asked the wiki instead of other players. Most other newbs I've seen have managed to jump right in in exactly the same way.
i don't even use ringtones anymore, it's all vibrations for meIn post 347, pisskop wrote:but which one would be less offensive as a ringtone? this is getting reduced to 5% volume at meetings, so hearing it at all is a mild concern.
What is the point of this?In post 349, ClarkBar wrote:
So this is you playing well?In post 344, Alisae wrote:
Its fine, my early game isn't anything amazing and I play worse in large themes compared to micros.In post 319, Formerfish wrote:I'm not just trying to flame you Ali, I'm just having bad flashbacks to you being 100% wrong but being unable to get out of your own way.
Even if I thought you were town, this would be a hard veto.In post 355, Umlaut wrote:Thought about trying and push a last-minute wagon on COA based on my master scumhunting technique, "sort by post count," but I have a feeling she's flaked which, if so, makes the low activity NAI-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
what if i told you that mine isn't an animeIn post 373, petapan wrote:i am deathly serious, about killing the animes-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
yeah but it's not ANIMEIn post 383, Alisae wrote:NieR Automata is in fact a weeb game
i feel this, i really do - especially with other interactionsIn post 391, petapan wrote:last i saw clarkbar's vote on my slot is because..sleepersoul sheeped hiraki? and formerfish entered in a hostile way? that's not a town thought process
but at the same time, i feel he is a cocky newbie with the emphasis on newbie. but im glad you brought this up as i want to see who takes this bait, i'm pretty confident in my clarkbar TR
like thatIn post 395, Umlaut wrote:
Is it weird that reading things I already knew, but with question marks after them, is actually a fairly effective persuasion tactic?In post 391, petapan wrote:p-edit: you are definitely right that it is a snap townread that doesn't feel like it's earned and it's a common thin for scum to handout townreads for bad reasons
last i saw clarkbar's vote on my slot is because..sleepersoul sheeped hiraki? and formerfish entered in a hostile way? that's not a town thought process
VOTE: ClarkBar
bad jokeIn post 397, pisskop wrote:it was clearly an attempt to pocket you
yeah im feeling good about my readsIn post 403, ClarkBar wrote:I admit I don't have the same zeal in this game that I might have demonstrated in my last one. It's tough for me to get my hooks into this one. The pace is slow, posting feels irreverent, wagons don't make a bunch of sense to me. The discourse is strange. You're not wrong though, I need to put in more of an effort here.
yuckIn post 406, petapan wrote:had a think to myself and realized nexus fading from the game is probably due to rust and is therefore null but he needs to start having some real content
this is how you let an N_M riseIn post 417, petapan wrote:pisskop standing his ground and refusing to actually provide content is kinda townish? or are they just always like this
agreedIn post 433, petapan wrote:also, creativemod1 needs to get off his alisae vote, i don't agree with the case and it's not going to happen
sweet child, fear not, i will lead you to victoryIn post 434, ClarkBar wrote:
Coaching much?In post 433, petapan wrote:also, creativemod1 needs to get off his alisae vote, i don't agree with the case and it's not going to happen
if u vote clarkbar after reading this post 5 times, you've got to apologize to me at the end of the game when he's townIn post 440, ClarkBar wrote:
Why not? I didn't take day-talk into account, but throwing signals in-thread happens, I'm sure.In post 435, Umlaut wrote:This isn't your first newbie game so you're aware that scum have daytalk. This can't be something you actually believe is happening.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
It shows he doesn't care about his slot and cares about finding scum (i.e. the post before that honed in on a very small technicality in language - too lazy to quote it/relook it/sorry if i'm thinking about it wrong) rather than caring about himself. It is a townping for me.In post 508, Umlaut wrote:I guess Hiraki liked it too but I really don't get what's so good an answer about 93, this whole exchange looks NAI to me and I can't see anything in it that would affect my read on either slot.
perhaps it's just me but i'm worried that i'm thinking clarkbar is scum due to tone which never ever has very good results and that is the reason why i hesitate to fully SR him because otherwise, it's just "looks" that are bad rather than anything that's actually bad
yeah, see - this i agree with but i don't know if this is a good enough basis to vote, i am conflictedIn post 518, petapan wrote:you're just flinging mud at the people voting you and trying to take down their reasons (b/c u feel u didn't deserve to be caught like this). not indicative of a town mindset here.
feels staged
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Originally, I was super lax in handling this (i.e. this is post-edit hiraki here) but I want to be extremely here that this is just a flat out lie. There is no place in my ISO (I checked!) where I call Clarkbar scum in the entire game. I've been very consistent with a TR on him and my post above this one only sympathizes why I believe people voting him are wrong and I even did that earlier in the day here -In post 536, Alisae wrote:Hiraki's feels of being conflicted look super fake here in light of the Clark flip
The fact that this post isIn post 442, Hiraki wrote:
if u vote clarkbar after reading this post 5 times, you've got to apologize to me at the end of the game when he's townIn post 440, ClarkBar wrote:
Why not? I didn't take day-talk into account, but throwing signals in-thread happens, I'm sure.In post 435, Umlaut wrote:This isn't your first newbie game so you're aware that scum have daytalk. This can't be something you actually believe is happening.completelyignored from the buttchug of "Hiraki looks town but actually he's not! See more below (nothing is below)" is the most annoying part about reading through the slog of Ali posts.
Porkens gets it here but also there is something that I wanted to expand on if the day wasn't over -
Let me be clear, I do not think the Clark part was staged, I have a ton more issues with the Peta unvote. it is ironic thatIn post 527, Porkens wrote:The whole exchange between Clark and petapan felt like performance to me. I anticipated the unvote.Iam conflicted yet Peta gets a pass from Alisae because Alisae won't drop this weird read on me.
Ah, you are learning. Good.In post 551, CreativeMod1 wrote:I agree about Peta, it kinda looks like he knew it would be a town flip and is trying to distance himself from being a Clark voter knowing that we'll be looking into Clark voters today
Wow, what a stupid fish.
To gain clearly super easy town points? How is it Townie to almost cause a NL hours before the deadline?
Yeah, it'sIn post 566, Alisae wrote:and "but mwah towncred" is only a reason if he knows that its going to end up in a lynch, which he has no way of knowingprettyunreasonable to leave a cancel at C-1 or C-2, hours before the deadline, and not expect people to flop to cancel,totally
Hold on, let me find my eyes off the floorIn post 572, Alisae wrote:it looks like a town perspective its not actually a town perspective
I am so glad you replaced COAIn post 575, Porkens wrote:Why are you bending so far back to defend petapan, Alisae?
Oh my god, I could kiss this postIn post 579, CreativeMod1 wrote:The point in which Peta unvoted there were 4 votes on Clark with a clear view from the town that Clark was the best lynch and the deadline was very low. The other votes were 2 on Umlaut and 1 on Pisskop and 1 on Peta, very little chance of the vote flipping to one of them instead unless someone did something.
B-R-I-L-L-I-A-N-TIn post 579, CreativeMod1 wrote:if he really thought that Clark was town he should've done something to try and save them. His unvote looks much more like he's trying to save himself from scrutiny.
That's the entire fucking point Ali. How can you give someone town credit for unvoting (i.e. showing that they don't think they're scum and trying to do something about it) and then saying that scum wouldn't unvote because they had no reason to? You cannot play both sides of this argument here.In post 582, Alisae wrote:he literally had no time to save him hello?
In post 584, petapan wrote:you are right that i failed to communicate my feelings effectively, that was a mistake. i feel fucking terrible about it! that said i'm not sure why you believe this was an attempt to garner towncred after driving the wagon hard myself. what is unvoting without saying anything supposed to earn me? you are wrong but it's okay.In post 584, petapan wrote:i feel fucking terrible about it!y/i/k/e/s
You're being just as bad as formerfish here, FYI.In post 592, Alisae wrote:its a terrible take that shows your lack of understanding of the game
I don't agree with this but perhaps D1 me was wrong about your slot.In post 597, Umlaut wrote:When someone is about to be cancelled, an unvote can easily just mean "I don't want a hammer right this second" and not "I actually think this person is town," and it's on the unvoter to explain which it is.
Please, let me be the first to ever say that if anyone dwindles, tries to shut you up, or does anything of that sort (even me because it could be me one day), theIn post 598, CreativeMod1 wrote:
Struggling to see which bit is my lack of understanding? I apologise for scum hunting, next time someone does something suspicious I'll leave it be.In post 593, Alisae wrote:its a terrible take that shows your lack of understanding of the gamelastthing you do is shut up or go away if you have pings.
Cancel: petapan-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
except if someone was going to say that he's townie for unvoting, how do you not see the circular here?In post 605, Alisae wrote:
they have no reason to because scum just stay on the wagon and push it through. Things are already going his way if he's scum so no reason to hop off.In post 601, Hiraki wrote:That's the entire fucking point Ali. How can you give someone town credit for unvoting (i.e. showing that they don't think they're scum and trying to do something about it) and then saying that scum wouldn't unvote because they had no reason to? You cannot play both sides of this argument here.
?????????????????????????????????In post 610, Alisae wrote:also it looks fake because the feelings of being conflicted feel too overdone.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
yeah, do you want to reference the vote counts too where there's only one major wagon at that time?In post 703, petapan wrote:there was over a day before deadline, but how are you going to simultaneously accuse of unvoting for towncred and nearly causing a no lynch? It can't be both. That's incoherent.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
In post 732, petapan wrote:you can't possibly be telling me that was THE ONLY POSSIBLE WAGON when no one treated it that way (not to mention: look where you are in that VC)
oops!In post 515, petapan wrote:yeah i'm fine with a hammer-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
I'm not trying to claim it, you even saw it. You only unvoted, didn't do anything, and then he got canceled. There was already intent to hammer the wagon. If you unvoted and said "nope, this isn't it chief" and went somewhere else that would have been fine. Instead, you just unvoted on a wagon that was clearly getting to an execution and moved a little to the left out of the way.In post 739, petapan wrote:
i don't understand what the hell your problem is, then. are you trying to claim there was too little time left to possibly change targets for the day?In post 737, Hiraki wrote:that is correct, you did not. that's also why we're talking about this-
-
Hiraki Survivor
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
In post 747, petapan wrote:and made a mistake in not clearly communicating my intentions because i was waiting for responses from other players and did not anticipate a hammer occurring so soon.In post 515, petapan wrote:yeah i'm fine with a hammer-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
I have thought about this too.In post 753, Umlaut wrote:Commenting on the current exchange, I was going to say petapan's unvote is a lot 'safer' for scum if the secondary wagon was town as well, and try to form a read on someone that way. But it turns out I was the secondary wagon so this is useless to me; maybe it's useful to someone else but I don't necessarily expect you to see me say "look I'm town" and believe me. It does at least tell me there's no reason to think petapan's unvote was in any way risky if he was scum.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
-
-
Hiraki
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
do i know if ali is right here? do i know if someone actually tried to kill nexus? do i know if ali is scum? i would consider these to be risksIn post 980, Porkens wrote:Why do you describe this as a risk?
no it doesn't, that's your bias. optimal play doesn't mean it has to happen, it means that's the optimal play to make me doubt that nexus flips scum here. also no one mentioned the optimal play so by nexus not doing it doesn't mean that nexus is town, it means nexus did not do the optimal scumplay hereIn post 981, Porkens wrote:My point is this: your post seems to assume nexus will flip town.
i have had literally zero nexus town pingsIn post 981, Porkens wrote:Also, if claiming VT is suboptimal for scum, how does that make you think she’s scum? Is she scum playing suboptimally or is she more likely town?-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
-
-
-