[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 12916290 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 1023 - The Coalition: TBotITGBSMoD [game over] - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #44 (isolation #3) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 10:06 am
Postby Vulture »
Hmm.
Is it better for scum to have two people in the coalition or one in and one out? I can see sides of both but depending on what scum are good at as scum it might not mean a lot to talk this out.
Is it better for scum to have two people in the coalition or one in and one out? I can see sides of both but depending on what scum are good at as scum it might not mean a lot to talk this out.
I think they'd both try to get in making it more likely at least one get in. It's an interesting idea that they could patsy one to get the other one in though. I like it.
~ C
I think it depends on whether or not they can both go the distance with townreads. If one flips there is some benefit to the other in there, but keeping up a consistent town persona as the numbers dwindle might be hard.
I do think this setup is slightly... breakable? Leashable...?
they were like "oh what townreads do u disagree with"
I don't recall anything that remotely resembles charitability
Ok, let's start over. Let's say GL has never interacted with you, ignoring those posts and looking at what's left, why do you think he's scum?
~C
This is a... strange question.
I'm a strange person.
Why do you call such?
~C
I don't quite know why yet and I'm trying to figure it out.
It feels weird, maybe, to remove the context of interactions from an ISO? It feels like you're trying to maybe play good cop for Coalition when no one's really on their side which... eh. I don't know.
Post
Post #191 (isolation #17) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 2:01 pm
Postby Vulture »
HURT: GuiltyLion
Your case feels a little reach-y in a way that doesn't jive with me. Given that you were the topic of conversation I read over your iso and thought it was fine but meh. Might just be early game.
they were like "oh what townreads do u disagree with"
I don't recall anything that remotely resembles charitability
Ok, let's start over. Let's say GL has never interacted with you, ignoring those posts and looking at what's left, why do you think he's scum?
~C
This is a... strange question.
I'm a strange person.
Why do you call such?
~C
I don't quite know why yet and I'm trying to figure it out.
It feels weird, maybe, to remove the context of interactions from an ISO? It feels like you're trying to maybe play good cop for Coalition when no one's really on their side which... eh. I don't know.
I'm playing good cop because I see myself in them. I get tunneled, but sometimes the tunnel is right but I can't get taken seriously because omgus. I think GL could be scum, and am legitimately interested in coalition providing a valid point other than "only scum think I'm scum"
Alright. I can't really argue with the self-comparison.
In post 191, Vulture wrote:Your case feels a little reach-y in a way that doesn't jive with me. Given that you were the topic of conversation I read over your iso and thought it was fine but meh. Might just be early game.
Post
Post #202 (isolation #21) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 2:10 pm
Postby Vulture »
I don't think they're the type to accept an olive branch unless it's on their terms. Maybe I'm being too harsh, but that's the impression they leave on me.
A bit tired to explain this in detail but wanted to give people an idea of where my head's at.
GuiltyLion I keep going back and forth on, but I thought his recent posting was rather good and more of what I expected from his posting, having looked through some old stuff of his. I'm forgiving the lapse I had the other day and hoping it doesn't bite me.
Art might be a controversial pick but looking at the pictures the interpretations I come to from his art I agree with.
Pooky is towny. I don't have a lot to back this up except 'energy' and am aware that this, too, might bite me. But compared to everyone else I feel better about it.
Uncle Shelby's towny as well.
The only scumreads (and even that is eh) that I have are implosion and CheekGamma. Imp admitting to fence sitting openly but it just feels like he's saying that we caught him doing it, trying to damage control. It doesn't feel as natural as I'd want, but having never played with him and only read a few things I find him a hard read regardless. CheekGamma have also felt a little stilted and I've disliked the amount of questioning; it feels like the amount that they are probing, to me, overwrites the amount of things they're really saying. And what they say I shrug at.
Black Ranger and Kobalition are fine. If I had to include one I'd include Kobalition just because they have more stuff to read.
In post 408, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:cuz my boy Prism told me Implosion's a scumbag and I can always blame him if the read is wrong.
Also I'm just sticking to townteaming the people I think I have a decent read on and I'm not gonna bother trying to read people I might not be able to read well.
>:/
so you're just reading implosion based on the say-so of your predecessor? That seems like a pretty shitty way to play. If your predecessor is wrong, it allows for no correction of the read because there's no effective way to change the mind of someone who has left the game.
you've netted a demerit to your townpoints, because tbh this feels like how scum!menalque tried to SR me off my predecessor's meta in Pokemon Ruby Mafia
-G
This comes across like a punishment for not townreading implosion more than an effort to get Pooky to think critically.
Post
Post #519 (isolation #28) » Sat Jul 31, 2021 7:24 pm
Postby Vulture »
Busy day. Sorry.
I've been thinking about implosion based on the read of Art and not wanting him in the coalition, as well as Art's own feelings now about not wanting to be in the coalition (?). I read a snippet of a post where he made a good point about how Art would feel like an obligation to kill if the coalition fails (though I disagree on principle) and thus making it a bit of an issue to include him. However, as a whole I walked it back some. Unsure.
I feel that [Vulture, Art, GL, Pooky] is a good core of four and we're trying to stick one more person in this. If Art doesn't want to be in it that's more of a headache honestly but, well, I get it. I suppose Uncle Shelby/Black Ranger would work for me but Ranger's posts about the former is interesting.
Post
Post #529 (isolation #29) » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:53 pm
Postby Vulture »
In post 526, implosion wrote:Vulture, you called Uncle Shelby towny earlier - why?
There wasn't too much 'good' logic there honestly. I thought they had a sincerity in posting for a while when they were catching up and engaging but then Ranger made a point that made me step back from it to reassess.
Really, though Art doesn't want to be in the coalition I do want him to be because it makes the game easier for me where (Me, Art, GL, Pooky) are all probably town and if it fails we just yeet the fifth. Hopefully though whoever is the fifth is just town though and then easy win.
