[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 13595967 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 1067: Is There a Doctor in the House? - Game over! - Mafiascum.net
In post 192, Galron wrote:I don't mind being leashed at night as long as it makes sense, and I'm not pretending to understand any of the plans I've read so far. I'd rather avoid mountainous though.
In post 192, Galron wrote:I don't mind being leashed at night as long as it makes sense, and I'm not pretending to understand any of the plans I've read so far. I'd rather avoid mountainous though.
was ur vote on abnegation rvs?
Rvs. I didn't see a slip.
Isn't now a bit too late for RVS?
also i think ur scum. u need some explaining to do . what type of doctor are u?
Post
Post #336 (isolation #10) » Tue Jan 03, 2023 11:09 am
Postby Freedom »
In post 330, Gimli wrote:if we can protect the nurse, it's even more important for it to be outed d1, as the inherited ability will be the only confirmed ability and increases our n2 impact immensely. not outing the nurse can get it killed at night.
Why do you say this?
We don't know what each flipped Doctor actually does.
Post
Post #337 (isolation #11) » Tue Jan 03, 2023 11:10 am
Postby Freedom »
In post 331, Gimli wrote:also, not outing the nurse can have the bandwagoned scum claiming nurse, which will get cc'ed anyway, but then we might have less time to coordinate our NAs.
I disagree with this.
I think that they're most likely to claim Doctor, knowing that they can't be CCed.
Post
Post #459 (isolation #19) » Wed Jan 04, 2023 9:50 am
Postby Freedom »
In post 458, Elements wrote:Targeting town reads guarantees one won't die and likely the other won't die. Scum probably won't kill either target because of the chance the JK is on them and then it's only a 9/35 chance to kill which are chances I'd take over just letting mafia pick me.
If we target scum, unless we choose both scum exactly the scum pair will know which of them is being targeted so the other can perform the kill. and there's only a 9/35 chance to kill one of them.
Post
Post #467 (isolation #20) » Wed Jan 04, 2023 11:33 am
Postby Freedom »
In post 464, Gimli wrote:okay. I still don't like it, but if everyone is fine with it, sure.
@freedom you're agreeing with mech talk but you're not bringing up at all that we're assuming you flip today? you're not defending yourself?
I missed that part.
I would prefer an elimination on Vanders tbh but it doesn't tha feel like hat wagon will get much traction.
I think that the plan is fine by itself in that I agree that we should be targeting TRs.
In post 464, Gimli wrote:okay. I still don't like it, but if everyone is fine with it, sure.
@freedom you're agreeing with mech talk but you're not bringing up at all that we're assuming you flip today? you're not defending yourself?
I missed that part.
I would prefer an elimination on Vanders tbh but it doesn't tha feel like hat wagon will get much traction.
I think that the plan is fine by itself in that I agree that we should be targeting TRs.
why do you think we should target trs???
bruh is this too scum to be scumm. make sure to include why
In post 464, Gimli wrote:okay. I still don't like it, but if everyone is fine with it, sure.
@freedom you're agreeing with mech talk but you're not bringing up at all that we're assuming you flip today? you're not defending yourself?
I missed that part.
I would prefer an elimination on Vanders tbh but it doesn't tha feel like hat wagon will get much traction.
I think that the plan is fine by itself in that I agree that we should be targeting TRs.
why do you think we should target trs???
bruh is this too scum to be scumm. make sure to include why
im surprised u haven't used chatgpt
In case we protect them, obviously.
why aren't you pushing vander ?
Did you miss the part where I tried to?
I got called OMGUS for doing that.
In post 464, Gimli wrote:okay. I still don't like it, but if everyone is fine with it, sure.
@freedom you're agreeing with mech talk but you're not bringing up at all that we're assuming you flip today? you're not defending yourself?
I missed that part.
I would prefer an elimination on Vanders tbh but it doesn't tha feel like hat wagon will get much traction.
I think that the plan is fine by itself in that I agree that we should be targeting TRs.
why do you think we should target trs???
bruh is this too scum to be scumm. make sure to include why
im surprised u haven't used chatgpt
In case we protect them, obviously.
why aren't you pushing vander ?
Did you miss the part where I tried to?
I got called OMGUS for doing that.
But I was the only person who said you were OMGUSing, right? Am I forgetting someone?
So why would that be an issue if the heat you're getting is from the person you're pushing on?
Also, you didn't really push me, you just agreed with someone else's case on me and then voted me.
Scol's case summed up my problems with you so I didn't add to it.
In post 464, Gimli wrote:okay. I still don't like it, but if everyone is fine with it, sure.
@freedom you're agreeing with mech talk but you're not bringing up at all that we're assuming you flip today? you're not defending yourself?
I missed that part.
I would prefer an elimination on Vanders tbh but it doesn't tha feel like hat wagon will get much traction.
I think that the plan is fine by itself in that I agree that we should be targeting TRs.
why do you think we should target trs???
bruh is this too scum to be scumm. make sure to include why
im surprised u haven't used chatgpt
In case we protect them, obviously.
why aren't you pushing vander ?
Did you miss the part where I tried to?
I got called OMGUS for doing that.
But I was the only person who said you were OMGUSing, right? Am I forgetting someone?
So why would that be an issue if the heat you're getting is from the person you're pushing on?
Also, you didn't really push me, you just agreed with someone else's case on me and then voted me.
Scol's case summed up my problems with you so I didn't add to it.
Ok, can you respond to my other points in this post?
All right.
You were the only one calling me OMGUS and you're right it isn't a big issue.
However, I feel like I'm getting more heat than a lot of people.
In post 552, Freedom wrote:TBH I am willing to vote Tabibitos as a compromise, considering how much they've actually contributed to solving transparently.
ok this confirms freedom as scum.
if you dont realiez what i have been doing for the past few posts -- i have been hinting at one of my scumreads to turn out tabibitos (for example me saying oh they are lacking, they havent contributing -- it feels like I was setting up a read)
i purposefully did that to see if anyone fall in the trap oh bringing the idea of tabibitos being scum with my SAID reasons.
scolosis also did the same thing in the beginning of the game and (probably also gave tabibitos the benefit of the doubt too) -- i instantly saw that and continued on the tabibitos train (also my real read on tabibitos -- is still a very hard null now not scum or town like i had before)
so hearing this coming from freedom that they want tabibitos because of the lack of posting is basically scum finding out that we were discussing tabibitos's alignment because of MY TRAP i set out and therefore tyring to find the right opportunity to say they are willing to vote tabibitos because they believe they will get towncred for not only pushing them but also having other people on board as well.
Post
Post #557 (isolation #31) » Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:40 pm
Postby Freedom »
I was rereading Tab's ISO after seeing them in Gimli's PoE and realised that other than a lot of mech stuff and planning, they haven't been transparent at all regarding their solving.
Which is why I don't TR them that much anymore.
Also, they don't seem to have much reads which feels odd given almost everynbody else having at least some sort of SR.
Their reasoning in 541 also felt off and like they were trying to make something up.
Post
Post #560 (isolation #32) » Thu Jan 05, 2023 6:37 pm
Postby Freedom »
In post 558, Tabibitos wrote:Here's a hot take: if you're town why don't you talk about an original read or explanation for a read on someone rather than just parroting what others say?
Well.
I could explain my Galron read if you want.
He's mainly nullscum for me as he hasn't really done much but he's on V/LA and he didn't really anything super scummy.
Post
Post #570 (isolation #35) » Thu Jan 05, 2023 8:03 pm
Postby Freedom »
Sure.
My reads rn are:
Town
GrandpaMo (Listed reasons in 561)
Gimli (Seems solvey) | Elements (Seems to be coming up with ways to help Town)
Scoliosis (Nulltown)
Enchant (Null)
Galron (Listed reasons in 560) | Vanderscamp (I don't really like the timing of vote but seems all right otherwise.)
Tabibitos (Listed reasons in 557, though I feel like a lot of my problems is to do with me not liking Lumine's posting)
GrandpaMo (Listed reasons in 561)
Gimli (Seems solvey) | Elements (Seems to be coming up with ways to help Town)
Scoliosis (Nulltown)
Enchant (Null)
Galron (Listed reasons in 560) | Vanderscamp (I don't really like the timing of vote but seems all right otherwise.)
Tabibitos (Listed reasons in 557, though I feel like a lot of my problems is to do with me not liking Lumine's posting)
Mafia
were you able to relook the game ?
I did relook the game for most of the reads which is why I don't SR Vanders that much.
On the other hand, I did just realise now that I meant to put Tabibitos on the same tier as Galron and Vanders.
When we talked she mostly had similar takes to mine like Grandpa being "bubbly" (as she described) in a towny way, and we also agreed on suspecting Vars.
It wasn't quite clear if Vars was her
biggest
suspect, but for me it is.
Now that I'm here and with a lovely keyboard on my hands, I can proclaim and will explain why I believe Vars is the most likely slot to be scum in this game for me and why I think either Freedom or Elements is his partner.
Post
Post #607 (isolation #40) » Fri Jan 06, 2023 2:05 pm
Postby Freedom »
In post 604, Tabibitos wrote:Can we talk a bit about Vanders this game, i feel like all he's been doing is agreeing with everyone else. Like when he claimed our plan was so great and he townread us and also when he loved Grandpamos scum case. I don't really see him doing much other than react to what everyone else is doing.
- Lumine
Sure.
Though, I would say that 429 seems like an original thought to me.
In post 606, Tabibitos wrote:Freedom how long have you been playing mafia? I thought you might be a newb at first but you said you were an alt earlier.
Post
Post #624 (isolation #43) » Fri Jan 06, 2023 11:18 pm
Postby Freedom »
In post 622, Elements wrote:This game is feeling almost too easy on the reading people side.
I have Gimli, Enchant, Grandpa, Tabibitos as pretty solid town reads and there are lots of crossing town reads within this group