Micro 611: House of Cards Season 1 [GAME OVER]
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
Just in case it's not announced, I'm the new Beeboy, who was the new Antihero. I'm posting now because I don't want to hold the game up, I hope this is OK
So here's what I noticed D1:
Dislike Maxous in 6 saying that it doesn't matter whether the whip is scum or town. Even though the whip can be held accountable for their actions, better to have a townie hammer honestly and maybe hit scum, than a scum hammer who they want to, no? Not that this is alignment indicative, but I just think he's got the wrong end of it. Not that it matters now, I suppose, since D1 is over and he's dead.
Dislike the quick hammer on the whip vote, it seems ... unsportsmanlike. Shos's reaction at 36 feels a bit forced and OTT, especially compared with 62 in which Shos starts to believe Bella and basically says 'oh well, maybe it was for the best'. Not thrilled with Bella in 46 48 56. She seems defensive and a bit too aggressive for what she claims was a simple, low-stakes mistake. I think SirCakez 55 pretty much sums up what I think about it. It's not about the one extra vote, it's about the process. (Hi SirCakez! How nice to get to play with you after you just finished modding my newbie game )
Not loving the vibes I get from Chilled Tea. Dislike in particular the stuff around the fake hammer. 237 "Well. I actually hammered anna and I didn't even realize it.
I didn't know anna was on L-1, I guess it doesn't matter. shos post where he "unvotes" anna probably doesn't count so she's hammered." - But Anna wasn't hammered. So did CT miscount or just stuff up here? Also, what's going on in 254, I can't make sense of that post full of half words and misspellings. Is nonsense the point? Because he goes back to normal in 255.
Actually, 255 really pings me because we had a very similar situation in the last game I played, but it was with L-1/L-2 not L-1/dead. The person who made the 'mistake' was my scum partner, so CT sticks out to me as scummy here.
In post 255, chilledtea wrote:Yeah, for some reason I thought others were more knowledgeable than me regarding the wagon. Should have calculated the votes before voting. Would have stopped this unnecessary misunderstanding.I've played three newbie games and in two of them there has been some kind of 'voting confusion', and in both cases it was a deliberate scum ploy. Not saying that I have a huge wealth of information to back me up or anything, but based on the game I've seen so far, CT is on my scum list.
Initial reads:
Townier: SirCakez
Neutral so far: Copper, Expedience
Scummier: Chilled Tea, Bellaphant, Shos
If I had to guess the team right now I'd say it was CT and Shos, but it's a wild guess.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
Are snakes good (like the snek kind) or bad (like the bitey kind?). I will do my best not to embarrass myself in more experienced company, but I make no promises!In post 402, shos wrote:Aww snakes! Newbscum!-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
In response to Copper 407:
I've read all of this stuff between you and Cakez. If there's more, please point me to it.
Spoiler:
OK, so Cakez could be part of a scum team with Shos, looking to take control of the Whip position for their own nefarious ends ... But if he's doing that, why bother to call you out for (what he saw as) wanting to use the position to yolo hammer someone, and then choose a player who (you say) wants to do exactly that? I mean if it were me and I was going to vote for my partner who said that they'd use the hate mechanic, I wouldn't call someone else out for also saying they were going to use hate straight away. I honestly think it's an oversight and/or Cakez got confused, but it's certainly worth keeping an eye on Cakez to see if it becomes a pattern.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
In response to Chilled 409
I definitely don't endorse dreams as a scum hunting technique. That was actually a bit weird, but I don't think it was scummy. I think Cakez's view of Anna genuinely changed, if we can take 222 at face value. He explains in 322 that he doesn't think ScumAnna is capable of planning that kind of response to a faux hammer, and since she did actually flip town I think we have to take it as a genuine change of mind.
I can't see what the scum motivation would be in moving off a lynch of Anna, I mean, pretty well everyone was happy to push Anna even after she faux-flipped, so it's not like Cakez would particularly be in the firing line for lynching a townie. And it's not like anyone is town reading him for attempting to nobly save the poor mislynched Anna. So for ScumCakez, there's no benefit in changing mind like that - and it could even be detrimental, because now we're all talking about it
I don't do meta dives in to ISOs or anything like that, I'm still trying to learn the game without complicating it too much. So if you think my read of Cakez is wrong, based on what you know of his play, you should definitely point out why.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
In post 415, shos wrote:Hey newguy, could you elaborate further about hwy you scumread me, because I don't recall saying what you said I said
OK, so what I said was "Shosstarts to believe Bellaand basically says 'oh well, maybe it was for the best'".\
and an actual quote from 62 was
"I kinda sorta believe bella actually. It makes much sense to nit read anything at all that is ij the first page or two.
But at least this got us talking, and i kinda think the whip is scum by the way hes talking about it."
So I think I was right about 'starting to believe Bella'. I was too strong in equating 'maybe it was for the best' with ' at least this got us talking', and I retract my comment. It wasn't my intention to misrep you, and I should read more closely.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
OK, so it seems I'm being scumread because my slot's predecessor wasn't night killed, even though he replaced out ... right. I can't answer for either of my predecessor's reads, but I'll go back and ISO Shos so he knows why I am leaning the way I am.
Shos, why do *you* think three of us (all happening to be in this slot) have scum read you? Do you imagine a Grand Scum Conspiracy to Eliminate Shos, Even Though That Would Be Super Obvious, or is it something else?-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
I agree that it shouldn't have happened this quickly, but this feels like an over-dramatic and fake reaction.
Something about this just feels wrong to me. You're either the BP player, or you're scummy and frustrated. IDK. How would you react if I"d said this to you, now you're whip and makingIn post 90, shos wrote:Make me hated, i care not. You diemehated?
A few things here:In post 152, shos wrote:In post 143, chilledtea wrote:We should do shos today.
While his original rage may or may not be fake, he later changed his viewpoint regarding anti - his push on anti that anti is scum because he got the whip so early is silly. It is also omgus and doesn't feel like the kind of omgus you see from town.
Are you reading the same game?In post 145, chilledtea wrote:His initial argument was that it matters a lot whether we elect town or scum as the whip.
I don't see how it was realistic to expect us to come to a good conclusion on day 1 regarding this anyways. I feel like we might have randomly selected someone to be the whip, and I don't really see any problem with it.
Shos's reaction was opposite. He was upset about it and that itself isn't really indicative of anything. What is indicative is that shos was pushed by anti - for this particular reason. And shos gave a very weak reasoning for an omgus vote. That bella is anti's partner and that anti has to be scum for him to be elected.
It looks more like he manufactured this reasoning than naturally reaching this conclusion.
like at all?
you say that I attacked anti, and then he attacked me, and you say that I omgus? xD
in case you didn't read, I voted anti mainly for his reactions to my push on him. Yes, I think that him getting the whip so easily DOES make him more likely scum, but that was not the reason for the vote.
You guys are all about how the whip is useless and oh look how it doesn't matter at all, but then again, I'm now at L-1 which can be made past hammer this easily because of it. And will he get flak for it? I dunno.
Like, this game is p6, and I remember only two names of the participants, and we're *this* close to day ending. Do you guys still not realize these quick wagons are scum driven?
I'll let anti doublehammer me, no harm done - but make sure you get that dead later
1) I agree with CT's analysis, though I've said I'm scum reading him, I think it could be some distancing going on from the scum team (or I could be wrong about him - but I'm feeling righter about you)
2) The fact that you didn't get hammered, even though at L-1, might suggest that it wasn't a scum wagon. (What would be the point of scum rushing a wagon on anyone, if they aren't going to hammer?)
Here's your big read list in case you die -
But your voting habits don't reflect this.In post 161, shos wrote:current reads, for in case I die:
scum #1 is antihero
scum #2 lies within {sircakez, copper}.
likely sircakez, because he was also on the antihero wagon p1.
I feel Expedience is town, and inB4 antihero starts throwing shit again, it's not only because he is townreading me, but rather because of WHY. Posts 81 and his latest feel genuine. He's the first to actually ask anna for reads and all, too.
Maxout gets a slight townread there too, for his post 51.
The rest of the game is nothing.
It bothers me that you have a three person scum list and yet voted outside it.
In post 218, shos wrote:considering post 216, which is correct, AND considering the entire anna scene, I find the expedience vote by chilled on 215 very wierd. VERY.
This is also not the first tim eI find his play wierd/bad in a way.
Policy lynching Anna makes sense for this D1 I think. But I can really settle on a chilled lynch right now, that is, of course, assuming an antihero wagon is completely unviable,.In post 283, shos wrote:UNVOTE: chilled
So this was a vote to gain a response, and a response was gained.
sadly I think it's town.
Can we go back to lynching Antihero's slot?In post 307, shos wrote:VOTE: Anna
admittedly, this is a compromise, but I really don't see anything much better.
According to my count, you've voted Bella for the quick whip, Antihero for being whip, (given a read list of Anti, CT, and Cakez as scum), then voted Anna, CT, Anna. So if you were really trying to lynch Antihero, I'd expect much less jumping around and 'reaction testing' votes. I think you are being disingenuous. I think you knew Anna was town and you were trying to distance yourself from the lynch, first by doing other 'reaction test' votes, and secondly by calling it a compromise. 'Can we go back to lynching Antihero's slot' makes no sense to me; in all the vote counts, he has no one on him at all. (Caveat: you could have voted and then unvoted between counts, but I didin't notice it if you did). It looks like you were desperately looking around for any town target to lynch, and realised you had scum read Anti and had to account for that somewhere in a hurry, so you called it a compromise. (And why would you compromise on a slot that you called 'nothing'? Why not try for Cakez or make a decent attempt on CT?). I can only see scum motivation here.
Also, if you were so suspicious of Beeboy/Antihero in your big scum list, why join the Anna wagon that Beeboy was on? Surely you'd have to suspect him of voting for a townie? Especially since your other two players from your 'scummiest' list (Cakez and Copper) weren't on that wagon, and could have rushed in and hammered? And then when Cakez posts about town reading Anna, you accuse him of distancing ... I think this is a cover for your own fake-scum reading of him, and he genuinely did change his mind about her.
See, the thing is that I was scumreading both your predecessors. This makes sense, as replacing in and out does not change anything.In post 418, shannon wrote:In post 415, shos wrote:Hey newguy, could you elaborate further about hwy you scumread me, because I don't recall saying what you said I said
OK, so what I said was "Shosstarts to believe Bellaand basically says 'oh well, maybe it was for the best'".\
and an actual quote from 62 was
"I kinda sorta believe bella actually. It makes much sense to nit read anything at all that is ij the first page or two.
But at least this got us talking, and i kinda think the whip is scum by the way hes talking about it."
So I think I was right about 'starting to believe Bella'. I was too strong in equating 'maybe it was for the best' with ' at least this got us talking', and I retract my comment. It wasn't my intention to misrep you, and I should read more closely.
But the wierd thing is
That all three (!) of you scumread me?
I mean, that is just a coincidence?
Now you retract your statement, yeah, but see, the supposed thought in your head was upon reading that post. It did not depend on how you explained it in thread.
So please. Explain to me further on why you scumread me in the first place. Looks waaaaay too orchastrated. Also dat 405 looks extremely like an attempt to step back and out of spotlight.
make me not make you hated this day?[/quote]
All of the above is what makes me scum read you. That, and you are now using the 'hated' mechanic as a sort of OMGUS vote, which is dodgy in itself. Here's what scum might do: Declare an OMGUS-based 'hated' decision, then build a bullshit case based on several players (who only happen to be in the same slot) scum reading you for independent reasons that can't possibly be known by any of them. I can't answer for why my predecessors thought you were scummy, and no doubt the game looks different to me as an outsider than it did to them being part of it. But rest assured, I really do genuinely scum read you. It is my honest town opinion. It's not orchestrated in the least.
If you're not scum, you need to stop looking so scummy!
Also: I noticed something about CT's voting pattern when I reviewed the vote counts, can anyone else take a look and see whether they think it's dodgy?-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
In post 425, shos wrote:
Just in case it matters, I am in Beeboy's slot so there are no votes on Bella-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
Copper, this is the part I felt was off about CT's voting.
In 151, he votes Shos and says it's probably L-1 unless Anti has made him hated already.
In 232, he votes Anna and gives no L-1 warning. (Why the inconsistency?). Then there's the weird follow up in 237, where he thinks he's hammered Anna (which would have made her L-1 *before* he posted), and yet also says he 'was thinking that she was on L-2' - - in which case, he should have given the L-1 warning when he voted in the first place. Something stinks here.
As you say, Copper,
I would have expected CT to give a L-1 warning if he thought it was L-2, and I would have expected him to give a hammer warning if he honestly thought it was L-1. I think I've said this before, I've seen this sort of thing in two of my three games, and both times it's been a scum move.In post 253, chilledtea wrote:
Then this really weak looking defense -In post 244, copper223 wrote:It would have been better if she replied immediately, but chilled preemptively justifying his "hammer" tops the charts for me.
Considering it wasn't the hammer, and that I indeed miscalculated votes what other reaction did you expect?.
There was no L-1 indication, (I guess because it wasn't L-1) and I didn't actually want to hammer
In post 255, chilledtea wrote:Yeah, for some reason I thought others were more knowledgeable than me regarding the wagon. Should have calculated the votes before voting. Would have stopped this unnecessary misunderstanding.Again, why not post 'this puts Anna at L-1' like you did for Shos, instead of saying 'I think I've hammered'?
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
Yep, I'm new, don't feel like you need to dignify my newbie post with a response if it tires youIn post 442, shos wrote:I was reading about hakf of your oost and got tired in the middke. Ckearky youre new in this, kok, but I wikk anaswer. From comouter though, so kater.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
I'm having a look at Expe right now, and I'm leaning town.
158, though against someone in my slot (Antihero), seems genuine.
I like this response to Max, it seems confident.
I also feel like his response to Anna's lynch (was it faux lynch at this point?) was fair in 301, and his callout of CT's voting in 388 also seems pretty genuine.In post 187, Expedience wrote:
I mean, of course. Anyone with a scumread could be "scum trying to mislynch". Is there anything I've done which actually makes you consider this possibility, or are you just giving meaningless statements to cast doubt?In post 178, Maxous wrote:Expedience might be scum buddying shos.
I have a gut feel (and it really is just gut) that Expe is being honest, and I can't see an obvious or consistent scum motivation in what he's saying, so I have to go town for him.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
Regarding Max, I think some of his earlier posts are pretty weak - especially the convo with Bella that went from 6, 12,17. It feels like Max made a pretty weak claim to be able to read Bella, and then abandoned it as soon as Bella asked when they'd played together before. Like maybe it wasn't a genuine claim to start with? Bella calls him out in 73, and then Max gives a vague response and tries to deflect by referring back to CT.
There's another weird post about Copper. In 57 Max says he's voting Copper for being too cautious, which seems quite weak itself (especially when other people are being called out for active, overt scumminess), but then he doesn't really answer Copper's follow up on it and I think he tries to deflect again.
I don't see any scum hunting from this slot, only wishy-washy agreement and disagreement with others. He could be weak town but I feel like all the deflection is scummy. I guess null-scum for now? That puts Max, Shos, and CT at the scummier end of the spectrum for me.In post 68, Maxous wrote:
i just felt it was rather stoic.In post 59, copper223 wrote:@MaxThis is the only post I made before your vote, what do you find overly cautious about it?
Anyway you ignoring the shos-antihero thing for a reason?-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
True, I don't dive ISOs at this point, I have a hard enough time keeping up with the regular game.In post 446, shos wrote:Itnisnt a bad oost, you just arent famikiar with ne
Thus concludes tonight's wall of posts to myself!-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
Shos: Loads of content of course doesn't mean town, but you asked me why I scum read you and I wanted to give you everything. I'm not one for sitting on things and using them as 'gotchas' later on. I am also not one for lurking, as you can probably tell.
If you can't see what's wrong with threatening someone for making you hated, you're coming from a really different perspective than I am and I don't think we're ever going to see eye to eye completely. Which is fine, as long as we're both on the same team... which I am unsure about. And I guess you are too. I really can't account for my predecessor's reads, for all I know the first one was genuine and the second guy just sheeped him for consistency. Maybe they pulled names out of a hat. I really don't know.
It has been ages since I have seen anyone write WTF BBQ, thanks for the chuckle-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
Catching up as much as I can before work starts, if I miss anything I either ran out of time or didn't see it; please re-post your question if I've missed it.
First, another thought on this:
Townies can also be motivated to justify their predecessors. Not that I am doing any justification - I have no idea what the others were thinking. But I've previously subbed in to a slot that was scum read the whole game, and had to try to prove that I was town. In that case, it was really really hard, as I was reading the game I had to keep checking my role PM to make sure it really was VT, because damn, that player looked scummy (I think it was The MM). Anyway, just food for thought.In post 451, shos wrote:Obviousky, if they are scum, they have the motivation, and need to justify their oredecessors. Either way, im not rushing with the hated. Ket me get home and answer and we'kk think-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
I always post as much as I can, I think it's only helpful to town. I did it in my first game where I was Tracker (I even logged on from an airport during a layover), and I did it in the dying days of my other game, when I subbed in during a 4P MYLO in a really scum-read slot. I only have four games including this one, and only the one Cakez refers to I've played from the start, so ISO diving me isn't very hard if you want to go there.In post 457, Expedience wrote:
I was going to townread her but yeah, I just looked at that game and she had a lot of posts. I might have to actually evaluate all the spam now...In post 406, SirCakez wrote:Hello Shannon!
I'm wary after your domination in aforementioned Newbie game but I thought Beeboy was town so hopefully we are town together.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
That's just it, any advantage would be really, really superficial. I mean, posting that he dreamed Anna flipped town has got to be the most attention-attracting move so far, so why would you do it as scum? Why not let the lynch just go through quietly? I have no idea how much experience Cakez actually has, but if it's enough to mod a newbie game I imagine it's enough to know that the move he made isn't going to be doing him any favours if he's scum. I guess we can get all WIFOMy with this and think well, maybe ScumCakez thought there's no way that scum would do it, so he did it ... but yeah, I don't see it. It looks like he's heading toward a lynch today so I guess we'll see how it shakes out (unless I've misunderstood something else, and we're still voting for whip?).In post 458, Expedience wrote:
The idea would be that SirCakez didn't want to appear implicated with the lynch, so he was in a superficially "better" position at the start of the next day.In post 417, shannon wrote:I can't see what the scum motivation would be in moving off a lynch of Anna, I mean, pretty well everyone was happy to push Anna even after she faux-flipped, so it's not like Cakez would particularly be in the firing line for lynching a townie. And it's not like anyone is town reading him for attempting to nobly save the poor mislynched Anna. So for ScumCakez, there's no benefit in changing mind like that - and it could even be detrimental, because now we're all talking about it
And even if nobody's townreading him "for attempting to nobly save the poor mislynched Anna", couldn't he be scum who thought that it would?
I'm not trying to convince you of what I'm saying, or even convince myself. I'm just interested what your opinion is.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
Right, here's my post thingy on Copper - fingers crossed that he is alive at time of posting I'll try to make this a bit shorter because I worry that I'm now overrunning the thread.
Starts out with a sensible non-scummy strategy for whip voting in 31. Spends a fair bit of D1 responding to Max and calling him out for weak posts, e.g. 59, 69 75 98. I am a bit surprised that Max wasn't a lynch target D1, I guess Anna must have looked really bad.
The next bit that I find interesting is his response to CT's faux-hammer.
^ This post made me go back and re-read the game description. I thought it was weird to suggest that a scum buddy had told CT how to react, but now I realise that scum have day chat. So that changes things a bit, I probably need to go back and look for connections between people's posts. I broadly agree with Copper's assessment of CT's faux hammer, I think it's really dodgy. And now knowing that scum have day chat, I think it's worse.In post 304, copper223 wrote:
One possibility is that your buddy told you you had hammered and that was a panic reaction post, I can't escape the feeling it was made in preparation of an Anna town flip.In post 298, chilledtea wrote:This is a very specific question and I am not sure about this, but it was probably because of me looking at possible associations - I went back and looked at mod's latest post and realized that two more people voted anna when she was L-2, and thought she got lynched.
I see thought that some of you don't agree with me on chilled, if we don't reach a consensus the way to go is Anna, maybe I'm just overestimating my fake hammer brainchild.
Another thing I noticed is that Copper is seemingly unafraid of defending players, not necessarily defending their towniness, but defending against bad cases made against them by others. I'm not sure whether this is a scum trying to look nice thing, or a genuine town play, but on face value it's towny.
I just thought this was interesting, I'm not at the point of being able to keep track of meta ISOs yet, so I didn't realise that asking for the whip was a WIFOM thing.In post 437, copper223 wrote:@Bella/Chilled
Anti wanting the whip from the get go is a WIFOM play, he is signaling he is not the BP and scum can try and kill him N1 if they want to, if he is scum why does he make that play given he is usually killed early?In post 432, Bellaphant wrote:Ok, the wifom comment was mainly the thing chilled just picked up on: i was super surprised the anti slot wasn't nked. While I was posting, i'd forgotten that anti had replaced out: i've not had a game with anti recently where he wasn't nked n1 as town, so i was suspicious he wasn't the nk. course, he'd been replaced and i forgot, like a derp.
Copper is a town read for me at the moment, possibly there's a bit of gut feel in there but mostly I think his actions look transparent and he's sharing info in a towny sort of way.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
OK, this is where I miss having an IC - can someone explain to me (maybe Cakez himself) why Shos' use of the whip thing on Cakez could be perceived as either rushed or anti-town? All I get from it is that he's whipped someone he thinks is scummy, and it's not like he's used it as a sneaky hammer, so ???
(Also, unless I missed something, Cakez is not at L-1...?)-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
Well yeah, I was trying to make sure my scum game didn't stick out for lack of posting! Would have been pretty suss last game if I'd not posted much, given how my other two games wereIn post 497, shos wrote:I've managed to skim your other games. you do that as scum too.
@cakez: I made you hated, and as such, lynch threshold lowered by 1 = doublevote.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
Mmm, I'm not quite convinced, but OK. I could see how Cakez voting elsewise than Anna is a bit weird given the timing. But it's not like there was a wagon on Cakez to distract attention from, and Anna flipped town, so what was the scum motivation for it? I can see that maybe TownCakez wanted to vote with his conscience since the lynch was going through anyway, but I can't work out what the scum motivation is.In post 495, chilledtea wrote:Regarding anna's fake lynch, my mind was more interested in voting expe at that time.
The reaction from others practically messed with my head and I decided that going for a compromise lynch is for the best.
The reason why I scum read cakes although it is a tiny reason, is his actions around anna's lynch were weird since there was so little time left, there could have been no other lynch possible. His vote on exp didn't achieve anything, and couldn't have achieved anything. My vote on exped was to start a conversation around scum-expedience. It backfired and people started scum reading me for it, I decided to leave it alone.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
^^Wow, that is a really big difference between Bella's plays! Although if she's aware of that herself, she could be using it to her own advantage. I don't feel like I've seen many posts from her.
With two of you on Expe I'm going to have to go back and re-read everything again tomorrow, I have a feeling that a lot is going over my head. So Expe is now at L-2, and if he was hated it would be L-1, right? And one vote on Cakez. And no one is officially hated yet.
@Expe do you think Copper or CT's votes are directly connected with your town read on Cakez, as part of some larger scum plan by one/both of them? Or do you think that they're genuine-but-wrong?-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
In post 509, copper223 wrote:@Shannon
Did you read expe's case? That should tell you all you need to know.
1. Again he connects me questioning Cakez with himself, I asked him why before and he didn't answer. Why do you think? Cakez is crumbling and expe. is hard defending.
2. The "clear opinion" I gave just now is that it's expe. and cakez, not expe and shos, which failed to register apparently, so the second bolded is even more absurd, it would be scummy anyway.
3. The last bolded sentence just isn't a possible belief to have if you are being honest, I have been vocal about shos from the start of D1 and expe. was aware of it at the time, so why has he now decided that I don't have an independent read on shos (whom by the way is not even relevant to the conversation of expe. cakez)?
Regarding Bella, yes I considered it especially after she made that WIFOM post, but it's not easy to alter all your game-play to fit your town meta as scum so I don't think that's the case especially given he above.
1) I don't think it tells me all I need to know, otherwise I'd be persuaded by now. I would not characterise Cakez as 'crumbling'.
2) I don't agree with your read on Cakez (yet). I'm still looking at CT and Shos, but I'm less sure than I initially was - hence, I need to re-read as I'm sure things are going over my head.
3) I guess this is a rhetorical question, but I don't know, you'll have to ask him!
Does this make Bella one of your strongest town reads?-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
Why are you town reading CT, and scum reading Copper?In post 510, Expedience wrote:
I don't think there is any scum plan, I think SirCakez is town, chilledtea is town, and copper is scum.In post 508, shannon wrote:^^Wow, that is a really big difference between Bella's plays! Although if she's aware of that herself, she could be using it to her own advantage. I don't feel like I've seen many posts from her.
With two of you on Expe I'm going to have to go back and re-read everything again tomorrow, I have a feeling that a lot is going over my head. So Expe is now at L-2, and if he was hated it would be L-1, right? And one vote on Cakez. And no one is officially hated yet.
@Expe do you think Copper or CT's votes are directly connected with your town read on Cakez, as part of some larger scum plan by one/both of them? Or do you think that they're genuine-but-wrong?-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
Can confirm it's a real stuff up, completely forgot that Max was dead in between posts. I definitely need to pay more attention and drink less wine while posting.In post 514, Expedience wrote:Chilledtea, good catch, but that makes it null rather than a towntell because shannon made that mistake as either alignment. I seriously don't expect a newbie to fake that.
I can understand why CT is voting me for it, and it's actually quite clever of him to do so. He's one of my scum reads, but now I can't vote him without it looking like OMGUS.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
I didn't assume it was true, but when asking someone about their beliefs you have to work from their own premises and draw out contradictions if any are to be found. In this instance, I'm trying to work out whether Copper town reads Bella.In post 516, Expedience wrote:Actually no, you're more right because of the third post.
It's still not entirely clear because she could've forgotten who was killed. I didn't like her most recent post either tbh, with the part assuming copper's statement about meta was accurate.
It's like when someone tells you about how their God is omnipotent, and instead of questioning whether their God exists, you ask them whether he can make a burrito so hot he can't eat it. (That's a bad metaphor but I hope you get the idea. I didn't accept Copper's statement, I just had to work from his belief to see what the consequences of it were).-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
CT I'm quite flattered that you think I'd have the foresight or ability to pull a gambit like that, but I really did just stuff up.
I think the first game I subbed in to no one was dead yet (it was like the longest day 1 ever with like a tonne of replacements), and the second one I subbed in to was in MYLO and only three others were alive. So in those cases it's easy to tell who to ISO. I actually did forget that Max had died. I've got no excuse except my own stupidity, but it is genuinely noob town stupidity. Of course, I can't convince you of that until I die and flip town, but for obvious reasons I'm not willing to die to prove this one point! If you are not scum then there is someone out there quietly waiting for you to push this lynch on me, and rubbing their hands together because they don't have to do anything.
I don't think anyone can accuse you of misquoting or misrepping me at all, I said what I said and I said it because I'm a noob who needs to work on reading comprehension and memory skills.
Unless someone has direct questions for me, I think I"ve said all I can on the topic, I'm never going to be able to prove my intentions to you so I understand if you need to keep your vote on me.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
I have read and re-read and I agree somewhat with Copper, itisweird that Expe connects himself with Cakez. If Expe and Cakez aren't scum together, then it could be that ExpeScum is trying to associate himself closely with what he knows will be a town flip.
I am not sure about my read on Shos any more. I think today he has threatened me, Cakez, and now Copper with being made hated, which seems like town reaction testing, i.e. too scummy to be scum. In this game I don't see anyone as obviously town, so I'm not sure I can meet Shos's request for a town case on Copper. So FWIW I think that Copper's points against Expe have been fair, and in reading back his ISO I can see how his thoughts have progressed through the day. And I'd personally prefer to see someone made loved than hated, but YMMV.
I know CT now scum reads me, but I can see it's for a genuine reason - if one that's been blown wildly out of proportion. I feel like if he were scum, he'd have a bigger and more complicated case to make on me, just to really sink it in, so he's moving toward my town reads because he hasn't done that.
Bella ... I've got nothing on Bella. I almost think the team could be Bella and Expe, with Expe telling her to keep quiet in order to fit the meta that Copper has pointed out. I guess Expe and Cakez is a plausible team for the reasons Copper points out, but I still think Cakez is town.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
There's no subtext. If CT is scum, then voting me first on a minor point is a good way of making me look bad if/when I vote him.In post 540, Expedience wrote:
I'm not sure how to interpret this.In post 526, shannon wrote:I can understand why CT is voting me for it, and it's actually quite clever of him to do so. He's one of my scum reads, but now I can't vote him without it looking like OMGUS.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
What I mean is that CT has brought up a relatively weak point against me, and one that's plain for all to see and involves no misrepping or interpretation - I forgot who was dead and who was alive, and he's voting me for it. That alone, I think, is not enough to get anyone else to vote on me. (Fortunately, because there's real scum out there to be caught). So I think it's a vote for pressure and to generally let me know he's watching.In post 541, Expedience wrote:
snippy snip
Is chilledtea now a townread? Can you go into detail about that? That part bothers me, I don't see why scum would have a bigger or more complicated case on you.
Part of it is also that I know I'm not doing a great job at the moment, I've been working really big days and not taking days off, and my attention to detail isn't what it needs to be. I'm aware that I'm not exactly an asset to town at the moment, which could make other townies misread me.
If CT was scum and genuinely wanted to get rid of me today, I'd expect him to be doing a bit more than just bringing up one little point. I would expect him to be picking on every single little thing I've ever said, and finding some way to spin it. (Maybe that post is still coming!) (Maybe that's based too much on what I do as scum, and not what he does). He's not a town read of mine, exactly, more like I'm ... not neutral, but confused. I can't call him Town for voting me, but it seems to be coming from a towny place. So I'm not sure whether he's doing a great job as scum, or whether he's town.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
In post 548, Bellaphant wrote:Fuck.
I'm literally the worst. I'm gonna give it 24 hours, a re-read, and then replace out if my slot is still crap.
I think shos is town. I'm kinda ??? on copper: his reasons for his town-reading me are weak, and based on shitty meta: cakes is...more accurate.
I'm totally weirded out by the fact that chilled just put forward case/arguement on shannon and voted me.
cakes, can you maybe throw some points/questions my way.
What do you mean, 'if your slot is still crap'? You're the one playing it, isn't it up to you whether or not it's crap? (I mean, I subbed in to a slot that had been scum read by lots of people, which is crap, and I'm still here playing and trying to turn things around).
Agree with the Chilled thing, the only thing I can think is that he's realised he's wrong about me, even though he thinks his point was strong. I think he's just realised that he's accused me of something I'm currently not experienced enough to actually do.
Why are you asking Cakez for questions and not anyone else?-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
In post 547, copper223 wrote:
Because Copper's flip is a given now?In post 545, SirCakez wrote:Expe is developing into a nulltownread now. His posts on this page feel like town, specifically 539 and 541. This could change depending on the Copper flip though.
This game is driving me nuts between trying to figure out which of you are scum and which shouldn't be allowed to tie their own shoes.
@CT
That read comes directly from Antihero's sister, but hey you know better and your reads are not "weak", like saying I am the weird one in expe/shos when expe claimed at the start of D1 with shos at or apporaching L-1 (can't be assed to check) thathe would never lynch him this game as he feels genuine on a gut levelor that I didn't have an independent read on shos (I want to know what you guys are smoking...).
Yeah, I was pinged a little bit by the phrasing of 'the Copper flip', like do you know something we don't Cakez?
I am probably in the velcro shoes category this game
Who is Anti's sister?!
Expe, does your gut still say not to vote Shos under any circumstances?-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
I am actually not sure at the moment.In post 555, chilledtea wrote:
Who do you want lynched then?In post 551, shannon wrote:On the Bella vote, she's expressed intention to replace out in 24 hours, can we please not get rid of someone whose replacement might contribute more? I just feel like it's the wrong time to lynch for 'thread avoidance' when there is lots happening that could be legit scummy.
I think I mentioned that ScumBella could be keeping quiet for meta reasons, but whoever her partner is would still have to be among the active players. Your recent actions look towny to me, but your early stuff still seems scummy. I will have to go back and re-read you looking for town evidence only and see what shows up.
I was thinking that Expe might be scum but now I kind of think his thing with Copper is TvT because (I think I said earlier) I think Copper's thought process is genuine ... but Expe seems really confident in his replies. Expe could be bluffing, Copper could be bluffing, IDK!
Shos is ... confusing to me. He seems like a really strong player (not that the rest of you aren't) and could be working with just about anyone else.
So that leaves Cakez, I think. Given that everyone else is looking townier, I'm wondering whether I was wrong about him... I think I need to do the opposite with him, and go back and read everything as though it comes from scum, and see what makes sense.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
Alright, this is everything I could find that hinted at ScumCakez. If the analysis doesn't seem convincing that's because I'm not convinced by it, I still think Cakez is town. Short of some massive slip o his part, I can't support a lynch on him today. (Spoilers so as not to clog up the thread).
Spoiler:-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
This is all the CT stuff that I think points to town. Lots of it is just exemplary of the kind of questioning and responding he's doing, it's a matter of style rather than any one thing that screams town. Reading CT as town makes his criticism of Expe genuine, and if (if) Copper's case on Expe is also genuine then I would be looking harder at Expe. I think I'll leave things here for tonight and revisit tomorrow when the rest of you have had a chance to post.
Spoiler:-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
I didn't realise we had so many players at a vote apiece.
Copper and Expe cross voting could be a team trying to make sure their partner gets away, or could by TvS. I would lean more towards Expe as the scum, but I could see it could go either way - it could even be TvT and I would not be shocked.
I don't support a lynch on Cakez today.
I dislike Shos's enthusiasm for the VC just to see Copper whipped, I think it's mean-spirited. Shos if you really think Copper is scum I'd like to see a case that I can be persuaded by, not just snarky comments.
I asked that we not vote Bella off until her replacement had a say, so we can work out whether it's a scum slot or just absenteeism. Given that it's now replaced (hi Ceph, welcome), I could support a lynch of that slot if we can't establish obvious towniness or if no one else starts looking really scummy - but I think we should hunt around a bit more first.
Someone asked why I was trying to meta people as certain roles, like reading CT as town - it's to try to make sure my conf bias isn't getting in the way. I need to literally ask myself, if this person was (opposite of what I think they are), would their posts make sense? I can't do that if I'm just reading generally, I need to write it down. I guess I could use a notebook or something instead of using the thread as my diary, so I appreciate that this might have been the implied point.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
In post 585, Expedience wrote:
I'm sure it could be anything, ever.In post 558, shannon wrote:Copper and Expe cross voting could be a team trying to make sure their partner gets away, or could by TvS. I would lean more towards Expe as the scum, but I could see it could go either way - it could even be TvT and I would not be shocked.
Hi Cephrir.
Oh right, so being openly unsure and trying to look at people fairly is now scummy. I think there's *something* going on with CT and Copper, but I'm not sure what it is. I've got mixed feelings about both of them. If I'd kept getting stuck in to CT you would no doubt have accused me of tunnelling, or bussing, or whatever. If I'm going to be mislynched it's not going to be because of bullshit like this.
VOTE: Expedience-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
It's because it's been so quiet, I think.In post 603, Cephrir wrote:also, it's weird that my slot isn't getting suspected more.
Sorry I am in the Antihero slot, FWIW.In post 604, Cephrir wrote:i wish i was a patient enough person to carefully assess each shannon post but they're just too long and i end up skimming, it's almost pathological.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
OK, this is interesting.
Cakez and Ceph are both calling me obv town (Ceph's opinion is based on Anti's slot). Expe has unvoted me in the time it's taken me to make this post.
CT (who I'm unsure about) doesn't understand the town meta read on me and thinks at least one of {cephrir, cakez, copper} is scum just for that 621. CT is scum reading both Ceph and me.
Copper wants a lynch of Shos or Cakez today. Cakez wants Copper. CT and Ceph seem to have opposite reads.
Cakez and Copper, is there any way the two of you can agree on some candidate that's not each other? Then we can see what Ceph thinks.
Also, UNVOTE: Expedience because fair's fair.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
Expe whatever Copper flips, I can't believe you just did that. Hammering without notice is super scummy. I just asked Copper to think about lynches outside of Cakez, were you thinking he'd incriminate you so you hammered?
I don't know what to think but you better hope he flips scum or you're toast tomorrow Expe.-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
Hopefully the mod is offline and we get a few more posts.
Copper if you're town I want to know your reads.
Expe if you're town I want a genuine reason why you hammered without a warning.
If Copper flips scum I'm still going to be looking at you Expe, wondering whether you were bussing hard in order to preserve your own town reputation.-
-
shannon
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
I'm glad you were right about it, if we'd lost someone today I feel like we would have been in real trouble with only a bulletproof PR role. You also saved me from potentially forming a 'town block' with a scum member, so I should be grateful for that.
But it was still a shitty thing to do. Don't do it again!-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-
-
shannon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: March 20, 2016
-