Mini 588: Achewood Mafia - Game Over!
-
-
Musher333 Goon
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
well seen as you have been doing alot of joking around i don't see how that is helping discussion so one question for you;OG Smokedank wrote:
hey yo maybe you should add something to the discussion instead of likeMusher333 wrote:Well at the moment the discussion is basically OG swearing about mafia... i don't know about you but that isn't the type of discussion i like to have when we should be playing mafia....
just sayin you want discussion
anyone can just say they want discussion but what you do is what counts
Are you hypocritical much?-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Yeh, i never mentioned your speedlynching, trying to get 1 step ahead of town, mafia's job.OG Smokedank wrote:
did you read my points against alabaska j or what?Musher333 wrote:To be honest i agree that OG looks quite scummy right now, not wuite enough to be worth a vote or FoS but i would advise everyone to keep a watch on what she says.
again i offer this as a challenge: find me where i was "speedlynching" or "trying to start up a bandwagon" if you think i am so scummy-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
If you mean your blatant OMGUS of a vote on him then saying he is replacing scum that we clearly have no way of knowing yet then yeh, i think you do seem scummy, your points have no point and your main point is an OMGUS.OG Smokedank wrote:
first up you lost me somewhere here homieMusher333 wrote:Yeh, i never mentioned your speedlynching, trying to get 1 step ahead of town, mafia's job.
but also you didnt comment on my points against alabaska j (lol sounds like a weed name) anything to say about them??
Vote: OG-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Opportunistic? i am just getting sick of OG slagging everybody off and expecting that that is a good enough reply.Alabaska J wrote:
sigged. lolOG Smokedank wrote:
i have reasoning with my vote now but i suppose its hard to read if youre illiteratePBuG wrote: He's not trying to speedlynch, he's trying to lynch without reasoning. Sppedlynching is piling votes on very quickly causing an extremely fast lynch.
Also, just wanted to point this out: Musher333's posting and voting as of late seems opportunistic.-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Yet again you go calling us stupid, you are not helping yourself here because town have no reason to call each other stupid when they have evidence to back up theiralignment, your evidence is based on your vote being random that lasted to long for a random vote.Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Well exactly she played bad game which made us think he as scum which makes it look less likely to her being a cop.Alabaska J wrote:
What makes you not believe her? She played very poorly, but we have no evidence to the contrary that she is not the cop.Musher333 wrote:Im not sure if i believe OG but all the same i willunvote
Also,FoS: populartajofor being so vote shy. You afraid of your scumbuddy being lynched?-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Wow, just got on and seen that their is a fair but to read, but as to why would the scum not NK OG if she is cop, maybe they know there isnt a cop-like player and because of this don't have a RB'er or otherwise she is scum.Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
This happens all the time.... you can't call it false, i know i would have investigated you to make sure you were cop but whatever.OG Smokedank wrote:
hmm this sure is convenientDragonsofSummer wrote:I investigated PBuG. It turned out not to matter since he got nked but yeah. I had a small suspicion of him when things got hectic for me, and so I investigated him.-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
It was mentioned in mine and if i remember correctly OG's (presuming she didnt make it up and is scum with a cop claim)lulu muumuu wrote:
or musher is scum since he is assuming drinking is in mentioned in everyone's pm.Musher333 wrote:Only town could know it tells you in role pm, any1 else think this means populartajo is scum because he didnt know?-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Cipher wrote:Ok, CipherFacts! I'm hoping we can at least get agreement on these as a starting point, and then go from there. For the purposes of the first part, I'm assuming that everyone is telling the truth in their claims - I'll address who may or may not be lying at the end.
Roles
OG has an investigative role which tells her whether a player drinks.
DoS is a cop - his result is in the form of the player's alignment. His sanity is thus far unproven, but his innocent result on PBuG shows that he is either sane or naive.
Drinking
OG's result indicates that Alabaska doesn't drink.
Alabaska's PM states that he drinks.
populartajo doesn't drink. 323 implies that this is not in his PM.
My PM states that I don't drink.
lulu's PM doesn't specify whether she drinks, but she believes that she does.
mustafa15 drinks. 340 says that this is implied in his PM.
Greasy Spot's PM doesn't state whether he drinks, but 334 implies that he does.
DoS clearly doesn't drink at the bar, since he's not actually in the comic. 347 confirms that his PM doesn't mention drinking.
Musher believes that information on drinking is in the town PM, but hasn't said whether he drinks or not.
Conclusions
Drinking is not indicative of alignment, unless a number of the scum just voluntarily outed themselves.
Barring outside interference, one of Alabaska and OG is probably lying. The only other reasonable explanation that I can see is the existence of a role that switches night actions around (e.g. bus driver).
OG is probably sane, unless NabNab is a complete bastard.
DoS will be proven sane if he gets a guilty result on anyone at all.
um... look again, i said i drink when someone asked me, i quoted them and said yes i do drink.-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Just to add to this this seems like quite a bad case of role-fishing, we have no proof of OG being the bartender or if she is that they are pro-town, although i hope she is so then we have some type of power role to help us (with the cop being dead they can't) find out who the SK'er is.mustafa15 wrote:
I don't see how claiming doctor would be a good thing, as the doctor is busy saving you at night and would be killed by the sk...OG Smokedank wrote:if you have a power role, you guys should be claiming it.-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Well i researched to see as you were in that post who could be lying and i found that my character was with someone, i thought it might be helpful due to flavour so i added it into my claim.populartajo wrote:I am Philippe's Mother. Vanilla Townie.
Bah. As I thought the majority of the roles left are vanilla townies, besides OG. However, the way we have claimed and our name claims tell us big information of who could be lying and who isnt. A principal character that isnt counterclaimed is pretty much confirmed, IMO.
I did a bit of research to find out whose claim seems more believable. For now, we have.
mustafa15tina (ray's girlfriend), vanilla townie.mmmm, not so confirmed @mustafa15 did you research, do you have any acknowledge of the flavor?
populartajoPhilippe's Mother , vanilla townie.I know Im confirmed
lulu muumuumolly sanders, vanilla townie.Pretty much confirmed
Musher333Cassandra (Roast Beef) (Molly's Boyfriend) Vanilla TownieI'd like to say confirmed although I dont know if "Molly's boyfriend" was added in your PM. @Musher did you research, do you have any acknowledge of the flavor?
Greasy SpotI am Teador.Pretty much confirmed
thinktankEmiril: Townie.mmmm, not so confirmed
OG Smokedanki'm cornelius the bartender, my role is basically cop, every night i get to see if someone is a drinker there or not.Pretty much confirmed
Ok, so far we should look to these three guys : thinktank, mustafa and Musher. Greasy, lulu and OG have believable claims and they were the first to claim.-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
lulu muumuu wrote:okay... check this out guys-- now if you go back and read, when OG claimed "cop" able to see if someone drinks or not, MAFIA scrambled to say they drink or don't drink. many townspeople (or at least who i am assuming are townspeople) say it's mentioned (but offhandedly to the point where they didn't think it was important) or not even mentioned at all.
why would there be a flavor cop around whose results can't accurately indicate alignment?
also:
hmmmm mafia certainly DID have a roleblocker (alabaska)!in post 235, Alabaska J wrote:
Actually, it is the only reason I can think of why a "Cop" would post a guilty result on a townie. Unless you are dumb enough to be roleblocked and post anyway…OG Smokedank wrote:
hahaha listen to this scum telling us what scum should have or would have done.Alabaska J wrote:OG Smokedank wrote:vote alabaska jguess who doesnt drink!vote OG Smokedankbecause the real cop would have been roleblocked! And I strongly believe the mafia has a roleblocker if we have a cop (balance reasons). If anyone can give information that can refute my theory, I will immediately recede my vote, but until then, nice fakeclaim, buddy!
and i think it's pretty obvious that alabaska was trying to tell us who he tried to roleblock.
show of hands: who else thinks alabaska tried to role block OG N1?
*raises hand*
by that logic, does that mean that OG is our SK and that's why we had only one kill that night?
vote: OG Smokedank
Its plausible i suppose but at the same time if we have a doctor they could have protected her and the SK was stupid enough to try and kill the person who was most likely to be protected due to a unchallenged claim.-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
No i mean its possible that OG is a cop-like person and the doctor protected her, the SK'er then tried to kill her (which to me is stupid as she is the obvious person to protect).lulu muumuu wrote:
who do you think that protected person was? and so far we have no claimed doc. unless emeril (thinktank) or teodor (greasy spot) is our doc, as everyone else has claimed vanilla townie.musher333 wrote: Its plausible i suppose but at the same time if we have a doctor they could have protected her and the SK was stupid enough to try and kill the person who was most likely to be protected due to a unchallenged claim.
i still think alabaska was trying to tell us he'd blocked OG. alabaska had a good reason to want to try and block OG, and i feel it's a lot less likely OG and the doc targeted the same person.
Either of these 2 things could be true though or neither, we won't know.-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
I was under the impression that they are third party because to win they would need scum to be dead aswell.mustafa15 wrote:
Oh, they aren't? I assumed they were because they weren't pro-town, but I might be mistaken, I've only played around 5 gamespopulartajo wrote:
SKs are considered a scum group?mustafa15 wrote:
Two people died in the same night, one of them was scum, and nobody claimed a killing role.populartajo wrote:where did we get the conclusion that there were two different scum groups?-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
But if one is a flavour cop there is no substantial information at this point to say that only town aligned people drink.mustafa15 wrote:
Yeah I suppose. In that case, let me fix this.Musher333 wrote:
I was under the impression that they are third party because to win they would need scum to be dead aswell.mustafa15 wrote:
Oh, they aren't? I assumed they were because they weren't pro-town, but I might be mistaken, I've only played around 5 gamespopulartajo wrote:
SKs are considered a scum group?mustafa15 wrote:
Two people died in the same night, one of them was scum, and nobody claimed a killing role.populartajo wrote:where did we get the conclusion that there were two different scum groups?
I realize that it would normally be odd to have two cops, but keep in mind that there are 4 or 5 people that are anti-town, and that two people are being killed in a night. The game would feel a bit too stacked against the town unless the town had some other advantage, such as two cops.mustafa15 wrote: I realize that it would normally be odd to have two cops, but keep in mind that there are two different scum groups, for a total of 4 or 5 scum. The game would feel a bit too stacked against the town unless the town had some other advantage, such as two cops.-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
By flavor cop i mean the fact that normally there isn't a bartender thus if there is it is due to the flavor of the game at hand.mustafa15 wrote:
What do you mean by flavor cop? Every result that OG has gotten so far has been confirmed correct...Musher333 wrote: But if one is a flavour cop there is no substantial information at this point to say that only town aligned people drink.-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
How can you look at us in the meantime? I am guessing by this you meant on a night but there is only 1 night left unless we lynch the SK due to the next day being Lylo.OG Smokedank wrote:
vanilla claim, someone who has changed their mind a lot during the game (especially to me, who i know is a townie). lulu's claim matches the investigation; the wiki article said she barhopped and stuff. so i'll look into the other three in the meantime, probably starting with masher.populartajo wrote:
Why lulu huh?OG Smokedank wrote:lulu muumuu drinks.
I agree with the lynch being quick and unprovoked, there wasn't too much evidence that would make us think thinktank was the sk, this could be the sk getting reckless or it could be just a bad move by town, i am thinking its the first one how about the rest of you?lulu muumuu wrote:
i'm concerned that Greasy Spot hammered thinktank and was joking about hammering alabaska (he was the second to last vote). This lynch i want some real input. the rest of us have at least 2 pages worth of posts.Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Just one question, if im the sk then who is Beef? He is too important to not include.populartajo wrote:I think Musher is the SK. He speculated with you, lulu, too much about a possible doctor.
lulu muumuu wrote:
musher do you have something to add?
Not realy, i still find Greasy's hammer as irrational but even somebody who hadn't played anti town before (not saying he has or hasn't just pointing out) wouldn't be daft enough to do a blatant anti town tell (using that term as it seems only SK is left. I think its enough to go on for now, its risky but if it turns out that Greasy is the SK then we will have won.
Vote: GreasyMusher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
No, any1 that isn't actually mafia is a third party person, i know the only difference is the technicality of when you say it but still....OG Smokedank wrote:
did you forget what game were playing? serial killer is still scum and can be found like other scum: through posting which is what i'm gonna be looking atMusher333 wrote:
How can you look at us in the meantime? I am guessing by this you meant on a night but there is only 1 night left unless we lynch the SK due to the next day being Lylo.
Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
But someone mentioned a nice pete earlier in the game and said he sounded like an SK, does that mean there are 2 SK's?lulu muumuu wrote:EBWOP to add:
and not that beef isn't in the game, but he wouldn't have to be vanilla. he could be a doc, or a vig, or an SK...Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Agreed, apart from the claim that im sure the non-flavor cop didn't confirm, that being i can't remember him saying that she was confirmed, it seems odd to have two cops but at the same time one is flavor and might not function the same plus we have two separate groups of anti town (i guess the second one can't be called a group but i couldn't think of another word)Greasy Spot wrote:Can't think of any right now...Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
I agree with a doc claiming (if there is one), if that happens then we have one almost certain townie (the SK could fake claim but it would be obvious when they didnt die at night unless the SK wants to screw us over mentallyMusher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
I think the exchange is a bit suspicious, there are three possible reasons for it however
1) OG is cop and wasn't rb'ed exchange was for this kind of discussion
2) OG is the sk, the exchange was Alabaska trying to tell us this without 100% ridding scums chance of winning
3) OG is town that decided to lie about being cop to try and confirm themselves, bad tactics but OG is quite new to this forum, i think i remember her saying this was her first game. The exchange was again for the same reason.Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
What accusation... that i voted for her because she was being a pain in the arse and swearing for no reason which basically takes the point out of playing this to enjoy ourselves as for playing the game you get swore at?populartajo wrote:
Nothing to comment about her accusations?Musher333 wrote:Still with the swearing i see....
No i have nothing to say apart from i would rather lose in a nice environment then win in a one full of people i hate.Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
So i have focused on you... yeh what are you doing to me?
You should be replaced because im sure one of the rules is a bit of swearing is ok but over-swearing should not be tolerated, you created a new account... we don't even know if this is OG playing. Nice reply to my i don't think swearing is a professional comeback (that is what i was trying to say) post by calling me a faggot, why not try to do some real defense instead of swearing is my best comeback.
To me i think it is OG, the only comeback/ defense she ever gives includes alot of swearing, as she says how old are you? the point is how old are you OG, you should know that people with half a brain have more wit and can make better comebacks than, they think im the SK lets call them a fucking faggot. As i have already pointed out there isn't any proof that this is the real OG (swearing isn't hard to fake).populartajo wrote: Musher, who is the SK for you?
Im gonnaunvote vote og, see how many insults are in her next 'comeback'Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Yet again you prove to be retarded at defending yourself, the second quote of mine you gave never mentioned Alabaska once, i said it was odd for the SK to lynch scum as if you are the SK you would lynch people you think are town, my question to you OG is if i am the SK how come i havn't tried to kill you, its evident that the SK didnt as someone was killed. Now i think about it Alabaska wasn't even in the game at the point of the second quote given, this sound like anti town grasping at straws to anyone else?Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
yeh but my point is that although its bad we have an SK if we didn't we would have still had the same amount of anti town to kill (as he NK'ed the last scum)lulu muumuu wrote:i can't shake my suspicions about OG. otherwise probably mush. i think if i realized there were an SK i'd be a bit more scared rather than congratulatory.Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Hows that? Think of what other roles are even remotely possible to include, theres not many, just because a fairly main character has no real flavor doesn't make it false, i don't see how a bar tender can be a cop but theres still a chance of it.og smokedank2 wrote:
see theres no way musher doesnt have any flavor as roast beeflulu muumuu wrote:oh my bad.
paraphrase:
i'm molly sanders; given that i'm dead and just an applebees waitress, i don't have much else to contribute other than a vanilla function. i win when only townies are leftMusher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Well i thought you weren't allowed to put directly what is there so instead of putting when only town is left i put when all threats to town are stopped.populartajo wrote:So far.
b)Musher's seems a little elaborated. And why did you change it?
Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Im away before then, i will play up to friday if possible but i go away on saturday. Could i be replaced if the need arises please, thanks.NabakovNabakov wrote:This game is moving far too slowly.
A deadline has been set for Noon (12:00 EST) on Wednesday, July 23Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
hey did you ever tell everybody why you think i'm scummy?og smokedank2 wrote:
Didn't realise you were voting for yourself
oh wait i think your argument was "townies dont swear" if i remember correctly[/quote]
No there was more than that, firstly you seem to pray on weak players:
day 1you start on demonking for no reason, say its random then press on even though you have no reason, he is replaced by Alabaska and you continue till people start on mathius.
Day 2With Mathius dead you restart on Alabaska who tries to tell us that she role-blocked you on Night 1 so thus your investigation is false, when she tries to tell us this you push harder.
Day 3You weren't the reason behind the lynch.
Day 4You see that i am not the best at defending myself and push on me, i continuously show that what you are saying is daft, like when you say
hey did you ever tell everybody why you think i'm scummy?og smokedank2 wrote:
Didn't realise you were voting for yourself
oh wait i think your argument was "townies dont swear" if i remember correctly[/quote] Well actually ive pointed on Alabaska saying this before and you said as your 'awesome defense' something along the lines of omg you bullshitting faggot. heres my question, do you think if you swear it improves the chances of people believing you? and seen as you ask why i think your scummy i cant seem to remember why you think im scummy, care to say or is it coz im a 'bullshitter'.
Nearly forgot, as lulu put it earlier, you seem to be investigating people to show results that suit you eg lulu is against you so you 'prove' she is town by your investigation, you think alabaska will be easy to topple so you 'investigate' her and find her scum (this was right but your reasons for saying so are a bit misty)Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
There is a difference between scum hunting and preying on weak players, taking out players that aren't too good at defending solely for that reason and faking results from them and to others at your liking isn't being town.og smokedank2 wrote:musher you havent said anything that proves i am scummy, you say i prey on weak players but how is that scummy? alabaska was a weak player? so i'm scummy for finding/lynching scum? in other words, i'm scummy for successfully scumhunting?
basically your argument is that scumhunting is scummy, but i guess doing nothing all game is ok by you
And doing nothing? Im pretty sure if you take out swearwords which provide nothing to the case you are presenting then i have contributed more than you have.Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Yet you havn't restated your case against me, i can't remember it being anything apart from not voting much (no more substantial than your convinient investigations).
@Greasy- I counted the SK as a second group, they aren't scum but are anti town thus are a second group, that ain't half twisting my words >.<Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Im pretty sure im pursuing your lynch, i hadn't added much content before hand but then again there wasn't much about Alabaska or Mathius to comment on that hadn't already been said.og smokedank2 wrote:^^^^^^
dont read any of that post, og smokedank SWORE in it! clearly it is not content!
my case against you is basically you havent bothered to do anything this game,
musher same challenge i gave greasy, if you were me and had the role i claim to have, who would you have investigated every night?
Night 1- I would have probably investigated Alabaska, mathius was lynched and there were small links linking them together
Night2- DoS to check if he was realy a cop
Night3- If i were you then things wouldn't have panned out the same, i find you scummy but then i would know you s false as i would be the cop, so it would have depended then.Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220-
-
Musher333 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 480
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.