Mafia 82: International (Game Over)

wolframnhart · Post Post #20 (isolation #0) » Sat Aug 16, 2008 4:24 am

/confirm

wolframnhart · Post Post #29 (isolation #1) » Sat Aug 16, 2008 5:19 am

Korts wrote:I'm suspicious of any "pact". It smells too much like an informed minority. SCUMZ DIE NOW PACT IS SCUMZ! We shall not have a self-appointed bunch of leaders manipulating wagons! Let us rebel! Join me in the ANTI-TREATY COALITION!

LoL so lets see... pact is scummy smelling... so we should join forces (form a pact?) to kill off people in a pact? LoL

wolframnhart · Post Post #35 (isolation #2) » Sat Aug 16, 2008 5:26 am

But we should follow you in the anti-treaty coalition?

wolframnhart · Post Post #50 (isolation #3) » Sat Aug 16, 2008 6:10 am

i'll give the treaty a shot, at least it gives you outs if you end up not agreeing with how its run or you feel its scum run.
/treaty

wolframnhart · Post Post #60 (isolation #4) » Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:18 am

When 1 signatory feels they have caught the scent of a scumbag, they may request the assistance of other signatories, in running them upto a claim, and possibly a lynch. Other signatories must answer this request affirmatively, or have a very good reason not to. For the purposes of organisation, all willing members will then Proxy their vote to said signatory, for the duration of the wagon.

yes but there Opposed it at least says that you have to present a case, much like anyone would when hunting scum, then everyone must agree or give a very good reason why they don't. If this is done properly it should work well.