Mini 663 - Mind Screw Mafia II - Over

Cyberbob · Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Sun Aug 24, 2008 7:05 pm

Hay guise

Cyberbob · Post Post #46 (isolation #1) » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:32 pm

I'm pretty sure both those infractions were for double posting.

Anyway,

Vote: dahill1

for that avatar. It looks calm, but I can tell it's just itching to reach out from my screen and bite my head off.

Cyberbob · Post Post #48 (isolation #2) » Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:18 pm

Wall-E wrote:
Vote: Cyberbob
for bandwagoneering.

lolwut

Cyberbob · Post Post #78 (isolation #3) » Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:54 pm

Wall-E wrote:Jebus has not answered my question despite having an opportunity. Jebus if you don't answer I will FoS you.

You do realise that this is not much of a threat, right? I'm pretty sure FoSes don't count for anything unless there is a tie in the voting.

Cyberbob · Post Post #84 (isolation #4) » Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:37 am

I'm still giggling at the fact that Wall-E thought my vote on dahill wasn't random, to be honest.

Cyberbob · Post Post #85 (isolation #5) » Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:39 am

EBWOP:

Two votes doth not a bandwagon make (this was before the whole votes-not-being-removed mechanic was discovered, remember), and I'd be very interested in your explanation for how you arrived at the conclusion that I was attempting to get other people on board.

Cyberbob · Post Post #161 (isolation #6) » Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:57 pm

Jebus wrote:Just a guess, but someone here, Battousai, has been given a character whose origin is Fullmetal Alchemist.

what

Unvote, Vote: Jebus

Cyberbob · Post Post #164 (isolation #7) » Fri Aug 29, 2008 1:32 pm

Jebus wrote:Random speculation

Don't do that.

Cyberbob · Post Post #166 (isolation #8) » Fri Aug 29, 2008 1:50 pm

malthusis wrote:You should have read the rest of the sentence. (I'm sorta starting to get annoyed from all the people not reading).

Please explain how your sources (apart from guesswork) mitigate your speculation, which is heavily anti-town.

Cyberbob · Post Post #167 (isolation #9) » Fri Aug 29, 2008 1:50 pm

Jebus' sources, that is. I got a little confused.

Cyberbob · Post Post #173 (isolation #10) » Fri Aug 29, 2008 5:33 pm

Count me in.

Cyberbob · Post Post #203 (isolation #11) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:16 pm

My win condition is that I win with the town; I am not a member of any kind of anti-town informed minority or a serial killer.

Cyberbob · Post Post #208 (isolation #12) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 4:00 pm

I never got an answer to my response, by the way.

Cyberbob · Post Post #304 (isolation #13) » Mon Sep 01, 2008 7:21 pm

Dragon, that makes 6 votes. If the number required to lynch in this game is indeed the normal majority vote, that was the hammer.

I will be taking a nice long look at you tomorrow, my boy.

Cyberbob · Post Post #308 (isolation #14) » Mon Sep 01, 2008 8:18 pm

DragonsofSummer wrote:Nice of you to show up Cyber

Hey, I don't get a huge amount of time each day for mafia. I would say given the time I

do

get I've been doing fairly well.

Nice

attempt at deflection, though.

Cyberbob · Post Post #312 (isolation #15) » Mon Sep 01, 2008 8:31 pm

DragonsofSummer wrote:A whole bunch of one liners that have no scum hunting at all is pretty well huh?

Reading is helpful when you make accusations like these. I attacked Jebus and voted him over his extremely suspicious speculation of Battousai's role.

DragonsofSummer wrote:And anyway I'm not trying to deflect, you just disappeared for a while, and show up again to condemn me? I felt that was ludicrous and still do.

Have a tissue. Whether or not my activity level has been outstanding doesn't have any bearing on this at all. It

would

if I was accusing you of lurking, but I'm not.

Cyberbob · Post Post #318 (isolation #16) » Mon Sep 01, 2008 8:51 pm

DragonsofSummer wrote:you called him anti-town for role speculating.

Your problem with this is...?

Cyberbob · Post Post #324 (isolation #17) » Mon Sep 01, 2008 9:07 pm

DragonsofSummer wrote:I don't feel that speculation in and of itself is anti-town.

...

FOS: DragonsofSummer

Cyberbob · Post Post #339 (isolation #18) » Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:31 am

Battousai wrote:Cyberbob, your post does seem opportunistic, along with Wall-E. Condoning a hammer during twilight is scummy.

Condoning

a hammer? Good grief. I did no such thing, and neither did Wall-E.

Unless you're looking for some other word?

Cyberbob · Post Post #360 (isolation #19) » Tue Sep 02, 2008 3:20 pm

DragonsofSummer wrote:I think the word he was looking for was condemn... but that is irrellevant. I wasn't trying to say the action was scummy Batt, and I will state again, I truly believe that it is just AWKWARD timing.

What the hell is "awkward timing"? Are you doing what I think you are, which is some twisted form of OMGUS without actually putting your money where your mouth is? Give me something other than your "awkward timing" (a scummy accusation if I ever saw one; it gives nothing to defend against) and then we'll talk.

DragonsofSummer wrote:Cyber I really am interested why you think speculation in general is scummy.

It paints a massive target on the object of the speculation's back for the scum, as it shows them that at least one person sees the potential for a power role (or at the very least confirmed status as a townie). It really isn't healthy for anyone except the scum.

Battousai wrote:You may not say it is scummy, but I do.

Why?

Cyberbob · Post Post #362 (isolation #20) » Tue Sep 02, 2008 4:13 pm

DragonsofSummer wrote:I am not accusing you of anything. The timing of your post was awkward, I am not calling it scummy.

If it truly means so little, why do you keep repeating it? Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.

Cyberbob · Post Post #364 (isolation #21) » Tue Sep 02, 2008 4:23 pm

Alright then.

Also, please respond to my answer to the role speculation question.

Cyberbob · Post Post #441 (isolation #22) » Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:51 pm

Well, seeing as Jebus has not been struck down I think it's safe to say that voting Tar was not forbiddanlight's cause of death.

MafiaSSK might as well hammer, though I'm unsure whether it

will

be the hammer - Jebus wasn't lynched when DoS took him to 6 votes, remember?

Cyberbob · Post Post #456 (isolation #23) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 12:38 pm

Jebus wrote:12 people on the voted-list, 7 is majority.

Unvote Tar then.

Cyberbob · Post Post #467 (isolation #24) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:38 pm

One more vote should do it.

Cyberbob · Post Post #479 (isolation #25) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:37 am

Sorry for taking a while, I had to go to bed.

I'm from Real Life.

Cyberbob · Post Post #532 (isolation #26) » Tue Sep 09, 2008 8:27 pm

Oh, hey guys. Apologies for not posting in a few days; school's been really really retarded.

Anyway, thoughts on today so far:

-

FOS: Wall-E

for some seriously dodgy handling of his vote. His explanation for it feels kinda forced, but that's a gut reaction and I don't like voting based purely on my gut (as it has been proven more often than not to be incorrect).
- It will be interesting to see how this all-daytalk business affects the game.

Cyberbob · Post Post #574 (isolation #27) » Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:43 pm

A mod suggesting that votes be laid on a player is... strange. It will be interesting to see how that came to pass once the game is over, but for now I guess there's nothing for it but to take a look at Wall-E's interactions and see what comes up (especially as nothing really ever stood out to me as scummy yesterday).

Cyberbob · Post Post #596 (isolation #28) » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:09 pm

I'm a bit wary of blindly voting Natirasha.

DGB, I'd be more than happy to oblige you but I'm going to need something more than "DO IT DO IT DO IT", sorry.

Cyberbob · Post Post #621 (isolation #29) » Wed Sep 17, 2008 7:31 pm

Hi again guys. I'm sorry to say I won't be able to post anything substantive until tomorrow night (my time), as this last week of term has been especially hectic. Rest assured, though, that I have been reading and I have been thinking.

Cyberbob · Post Post #636 (isolation #30) » Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:10 pm

You're exactly right that you've been incredibly generous, Tar, but now that the holidays are here I've got plenty of time for mafia.

I have been reading (like I said earlier), so I will get cracking on posting my reactions and such pronto.

Cyberbob · Post Post #654 (isolation #31) » Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:22 pm

OK. I've read through the last couple of pages a few times, and I'm really not liking malthusis for a few reasons. One being the Wall-E-could-be-a-Jester fiasco; I rarely buy the "I did it to spark discussion!!!!1" explanation and this is no exception - combined with the FOS he put on him (agreeing with IAUN here) it looks rather like distancing to me. Then there's his desperate attempt to pin suspicion on DGB and DoS; I might agree that DoS is being a little weird, but these kinds of grand revelations in an attempt to save one's skin are never really all that convincing, particularly given the rather large leaps of logic he's trying to make.

Vote: malthusis

.

Cyberbob · Post Post #662 (isolation #32) » Tue Sep 23, 2008 1:48 am

Shall I oblige, or do is there anything else to be discussed today?

Cyberbob · Post Post #673 (isolation #33) » Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:22 pm

Tarhalindur wrote:Arr...well, I be thinking to meself that ye might be wanting to lynch yesterday. I wouldn't be saying it was a GOOD idea, but I can't be showin ye scurvy dogs any favoritism. However, the good news is ye forgot to count me in yer count, matey. With 7 players, and assuming yer two scum (Ye ain't getting anythin outta me!) we townies have one more mislynch. However, I'd like it if we weren't using that option. But we'll see what ye do on your own before I weigh in...arr.

What be the meaning o' this, mateys? Mayhap this scurvy dog was the source o' the "invisible votes", yarr.

Cyberbob · Post Post #689 (isolation #34) » Wed Sep 24, 2008 7:27 pm

...

These be mighty confusing times, that's fer sure.

Cyberbob · Post Post #699 (isolation #35) » Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:04 pm

Harr, I ain't too sure about this 'ere plan, mates. Still, Tar 'asn't led us astray yet -

Vote: No Lynch

Cyberbob · Post Post #705 (isolation #36) » Fri Sep 26, 2008 7:15 am

Seeing as we're in LyLo, I might as well claim too so we don't make a horrible mistake...

I'm Friederich Nietzsche from Real Life. I am able to engage a player in debate throughout the night, effectively roleblocking them (they keep taking time to respond to my arguments). Unfortunately, due to my rather controversial views I come up guilty to any investigation made on me.

In effect I'm a roleblocking miller. *shrug*

Cyberbob · Post Post #718 (isolation #37) » Fri Sep 26, 2008 5:38 pm

Well, that kinda blows. Nailed by two investigative roles... the horror...

Ah well, I tried my best.

Cyberbob · Post Post #746 (isolation #38) » Sat Sep 27, 2008 7:54 pm

This game was... weird. Which is sort of the point I suppose, but... yeah.

Cyberbob · Post Post #761 (isolation #39) » Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:52 pm

Tarhalindur wrote:... so Cyberbob and Wall-E instead decide to both use Mafia Falseclaim and deny that they were Masons, wasting all of the potential in their roles (including a big fat wasted opportunity for Cyberbob to clear himself after Wall-E died) in the process. Sigh. (This after I didn't give them safeclaims - hint for future Mafiosos in Tar games - if I don't give you a safeclaim, that's a big hint that you're probably better off claiming your real role.)

Wall-E and I talked about whether or not I should have flavour-claimed Stargate in the massclaim. We decided against it in case either one of us died, in which case the other would have had a rather tough time convincing the town that they were not aware of the other one's alignment.