lord_hur wrote:... Most of this is at least partially wrong in my opinion, but anyway, what's your point? Well, except trying to belittle me to get people to back you up even more?
Once vollkan brought it up, and you responded, I noticed it as a fairly vague reason by you to be suspicious of remus. Your response here doesn't do much for me either: your main reason for finding "certainty" to be a scumtell is that scum know everyone's alignments; but that doesn't apply in this game, so your attack on him was flawed. If something is "at least partially wrong" you can explain why.
lord_hur wrote:Repeating a lot of? I won't reread my own posts for this, but I'm pretty sure I only said that two very consecutive times, stop making things up. But maybe you're overfocusing over this one worrying thing?
I like how you refuse to read your own posts to check it whilst simultaneously accuse me of making things up. Classy. Anyway, I count 3 times, with underlining in the latest case. My point is you've been repeating that without decent backing.
lord_hur wrote:1. Experimental games have design flaws ;
Yeah yeah yeah. Pretty much anything is technically possible, however unlikely. The point is to make informed guesses, and I think you know that an SK existing in day 1 of this game is pretty unlikely.
lord_hur wrote:2. It is always possible that one of the newcomers was another werewolf (actually, it would explain why you're still kicking). Just as it is also possible there wasn't any. I'm not even sure *you* know.
Fair enough answer, though I wouldn't be an SK in that case.
lord_hur wrote:Because I wanted to see how much you would insist to defend not yourself, but an antitown role you did not claim to be.
I did not say *you* are a SK, I said the werewolf is (and as such, werewolf-hunting should be the priority over mafia-hunting). It is *you* who slapped that wolk skin over your back, assimilated you and it, and defended it, instead of hunting for it like I tried to.
There is absolutely no reason to defend the werewolf's position (about his lynch's attractivity) unless you do it unconsciously, because you are it.
Wow, you think you can get away with this one? You've accused me a number of times of being a werewolf; reading through the filter you did it in your posts 53, 55 (where you accuse me of trying to explain away "my" gory kills), post 56, post 57, 61, 63 (indirectly) and maybe others I've missed. In several other posts you've accused me of being an SK, so it's clear you're accusing me of being a werewolf-SK. No assumptions made by me there, no "slapping werewolf skin on my back". LOL, did you think I wasn't going to bother checking your posts to expose these lies?
lord_hur wrote:Also, but it is secondary, you again avoid accusing me of being it. I am quite sure that not once have you said I might be the werewolf, while it would have been the most obvious defense against my accusations. Maybe are you still thinking you can pretend tomorrow that there never was a werewolf, perhaps at the cost of a no-nightkill play? I sure hope that they will not be fooled by it and hang you good tomorrow, if you do manage to get me lynched today.
I've said multiple times that I think you're scum (and we know that my definition of scum is any anti-town role). In my isolated post 20 I also said that the only way you can be town is if the vengeful vig was behind the gory attacks (if not, then it must be you). Even if I don't say "lord_hur is a werewolf" that hardly means I'm dismissing it. And working out exactly what flavour of scum you are at this point isn't terribly important; more important is that you die.