TemporalLich's Grand Idea [Game Over]

[Jingle]

NDmath, I thought about posting this in twilight:

"Ok ndmath, you dont shoot me I dont shoot you. You shoot town A I shoot town B"

But I still would have shot you. Would you have still shot me too?

Not sure if this would have been allowed tho....

Slight improvement:

I'm not going to shoot anyone, if you kill me you will lose.

Of course, you still kill them.

[Jingle]

in a 2v1v1 if both scum are outed and one scum shoots town they can joint elim town for the victory the next day.
If both scum shoot town same result.
If one scum shoots scum town wins.
If both scum shoot each other town wins.
If one scum shoots town and one scum shoots scum the scum who shot scum wins.

Claiming you're going to holster theoretically puts your opponent in "Shoot town or lose" with a slight possibility of No kill letting them have the exact same decision to make again (depending on the mod's HEA choices) which means they should never shoot you. If they actually holster and you shoot them you lose, but they should never shoot you because that is a loss 100% of the time.

[Jingle]

Oh, I’m not saying I would actually have holstered. I play to win and consider a draw a loss. I’m saying that arguing that you would holster gives you a better leg to stand on if you’re already intending to betray the other scum.