Oh i just realized i'm thinking abt this backwards whoopsIn post 18, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:what risk are you talking about?In post 12, skitter30 wrote:(after all would scum take the risk etc etc etc)
Initially i thought: oh self trusts are legal but scum wouldnt want to do that since then they's be out of the game (was thinking abt trusts like flips)
Why
No i want to know why you think i'm obvtownIn post 87, T3 wrote:I'm looking for a specific tell that (as far as I've seen) is rarely used but works.
Yeah i thought ur tone was a little weird when u asked thatIn post 88, Vulture wrote:Okay.
My question was twofold albeit somewhat silly, if not a question but a request more curt in “if you can” meant to goad in a very small way. I think there is merit to an idea that scum are setting themselves up to fight certain people earlier if they feel they can punch back and I was curious if you would do so.
That being said your pings don’t actually help me discern where your head’s at from the explanation but thank you all the same.
I thought if someone else trusted you too it would work, no i'm not sure why that made sense to me, but that's what i was thinkingIn post 90, Datisi wrote:could you explain what you thought by "self-trusts being legal"? like, it requires two people for a fall, how did you think this would work?
Meh not a good reasonIn post 94, T3 wrote:There was almost "extra wording" that made this post towny to me. Like scum usually doesn't feel the ned to clariy naively or purposefully.
Oh i dont think u were aggresive enuf to trip that meterIn post 98, Vulture wrote:I viewed it as a condescending/forceful way to request an explanation; I would have scumread a reaction where you pressed on me for being aggressive towards you if it was in the context of, “Vulture is being aggressive towards me because I outed gutpings on them.”
And that’s okay. I have those feelings at times but these ones specifically just don’t mesh with me. Maybe because I’ve tried to be a bit more confident/headstrong and it wasn’t it for me but was it for Ich. So the metric just isn’t working.
You feel v concerned about how i'm reading u and i dont know why you would care so much at thia point (hey remember the (?) ? This is sort of tripping the same thing)In post 105, Datisi wrote:why are you ~a little suspicious~ of me? and uh, because this game is about townies getting correct townreads, and town!me is kinda... good at getting townread?In post 103, skitter30 wrote:I am still a little suspicous of you though. Also why would scum-me make sure you dont get townread?
what's the t3/dats/ich read?
i mean, from my (admittedly wrong) pov do you understand why i found your entrance to be scummy at that point?In post 122, Datisi wrote:i'm not concerned about my own image, i'm concerned about yours. basically, you started off the game calling me scummy for my intro - which by itself made me suspicious of you because i didn't think you can get a scumread on me for that. but maybe you saw something i didn't, so i'm gonna ask you about it to try to figure out if you actually *saw something* or if your read was *made up bullshit*
like, i kinda feel it's disingenuous to compare this to the "(?)" when that was much deeper into the game (where i was townread, but you were also townread, and we were basically playing white flag, and god help me if town!skitter is about to turn on me), while this was like, literally page two (where most reads are pretty much blank slates)
what do you think town!me would be focusing on here?
and /shrug on the vulture take
and because again, i'm decently good at getting myself townread as town, and because you gotta start somewhere, and arguably my intro was the only one / the most weird enough to go after?
In post 127, Datisi wrote:like ok uhhh this actually bothers me more than i initially thought. like this feels like some sorta bad-faith question, because the answer is obvious - i was one of the only people that posted so far, and arguably had the weirdest entrance.In post 118, skitter30 wrote:And i get why scum would undermune townreads in general but why would i start the game doing so *on you*?
but like, this is bothering me because it's implying that scum!skitter would need to have a ~super special reason~ to push exactly me, and i feel like it's also trying to undermine any read on me by implying that i'm wrong for implying that scum!skitter would have to have a ~super special reason~ to push exactly me when like, i never did that, i just said it generally
idk if i'm getting across what i'm thinking, but i feel like it's implying that i said there's a much bigger level of "planned push" into skitter's og scumlean on me, and then debunking that "planned push", when that was not something i ever actually said. i found her og scumlean "weird" first, and then i thought of "they give a vibe of not wanting me to get townread", but i didn't imply that was her Original Plan when scumleaning me
jesus fuck this is a word salad that is not getting out correctly
does anyone understand what i'm trying to say
?In post 90, Datisi wrote:at first i thought skitter is scummy because her "scumpings" on me felt very much forced,or like she's making sure i don't start getting townread
meh not sureIn post 171, Something_Smart wrote:From what I know about T3, I think it's plausible that he would do this without asking me.In post 164, skitter30 wrote:don't really think ss/t3 does this as scum together
this is the tell?In post 200, T3 wrote:Having a similar gut reaction or thought off the top of your head to another player.
and if this was the tell what post prompted thatIn post 200, T3 wrote:Having a similar gut reaction or thought off the top of your head to another player.
In post 204, skitter30 wrote:and if this was the tell what post prompted thatIn post 200, T3 wrote:Having a similar gut reaction or thought off the top of your head to another player.
The mindmeld thing tends to apply more in real timeIn post 210, T3 wrote:In post 40, Something_Smart wrote:Srs read on Ich?These on a reread.In post 140, Something_Smart wrote:How often does this tell actually work?In post 109, Datisi wrote:arguing mech / semantics / setup strategy is a thing scum often does because it's posting and presence but it's actively stopping game progress.
Dont think soIn post 229, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:also if the scum team is actually SS/T3 I'm going to be laughing so hard
Dont think they're the scumteamIn post 232, PenguinPower wrote:You don’t think you would be laughing or you don’t think they are the scum team? Because the statement relies on them not being the scumteam.
Ehhhhhhh i would lf i thought it would be beneficial
Was talking abt a hero svs pairingIn post 253, Almost50 wrote:I am not following. You do NOT think Ich is scum, but you do NOT want them to leave??In post 83, skitter30 wrote:Also dont really like t3
I dont really think ich is scum at this point, wouldng really want him in a trust pairing
Maybe t3 instead
Ss is def going before you, and you probably aren't getting trusted at all at this rate
Which partIn post 301, Ich Troje wrote:this post gives me massive scumpings. I dont know why it just vibes so wrongly with me.In post 217, skitter30 wrote:Ig we can force t3 to trust different people and see what happens / if they take it ...
I feel like t3/dats would be interesfing but also like maybe a50 shouls do stuff before we force pairings i'm realizing
Can you explain why you reached this conclusion here skitter?
Dont knowIn post 296, T3 wrote:How can I redem myself?In post 295, skitter30 wrote:Ss is def going before you, and you probably aren't getting trusted at all at this rate
I dont believe i said he should randomly trust peopleIn post 308, Ich Troje wrote:The part where you want T3 to randomly trust people, as well as the T3/Dats pairing.
I was kinda thinking that if you're partnered with t3, you would want to avoid trusting him since you, like, literally cantIn post 316, Datisi wrote:i still don't get the idea behind this. like i get that scum wants a townie to trust them. but if you want to avoid that, then have an agreement to only have consensus townreads pair. i get it's fun and all to want to do a hero scum pair, but like. the most likely way that ends is with a free scum leave, because odds are you don't have the hero solve. (and right now you don't have it.)
hmm - what are the odds this is scum!s_s getting the trust of a townie, then galaxy brain not accepting it? he's still likely to leave the game early, but upon his redflip, t3 has a huge target on his back.
removing the tinfoil, i am getting scumpings from a50's posts. not sure why. very low confidence on it considering i blunder my read on him about always.
Ig i'm having a hard time understanding why you arent just going: yeah he's scummy i think he's scumIn post 320, Datisi wrote:i'm not, i have no clue how to read him
i can agree the stuff he's posted is scummy but i also know he's a Wacky Town Player so i won't even pretend to know what i'm talking about
Feel better!In post 348, Ich Troje wrote:also im sick asf rn, brain not working too well.
I sometimes just get Good Town Vibes from him, and those are the sort od vibes i'm getting rnIn post 349, Ich Troje wrote:I'm not seeing why people are townreading PP here because it doesn't feel like they've really reached out of either their town or scumrange here. While I *do* see traits I've seen from town PP before I don't think they should be first choice yeeted here because thus far I don't see any real complexity coming from the slot.
I just misread him, actually, but other than that!In post 353, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:skitter has never mis-read pengy in her life
her streak of correctly townreading him is at like 29 games in a row.