Mafia 29: Mafia - Game over!

olliep13 · Post Post #10 (isolation #0) » Sun Dec 12, 2004 8:57 pm

Random

Vote Commify

olliep13 · Post Post #68 (isolation #1) » Tue Dec 14, 2004 2:23 pm

Unvote, Vote HairyMezican

[/b]

olliep13 · Post Post #103 (isolation #2) » Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:09 pm

Unvote, Vote No Lynch

I agree that we didn't have enough reason to vote HairyMezican and his role claim seems credible. A No Lynch today is a better idea.

olliep13 · Post Post #118 (isolation #3) » Thu Dec 16, 2004 2:08 pm

HairyMezican:
I disagree with the way you've listed suspects in your last post.

Firstly, I don't think I "haven't posted much". I'm sure there are other people who havent posted as much as me. Yeah, and this is my first mafia game.

Secondly, there should be nine people on your "no lynch list". Only 12 people currently have votes on people.

Then you put me on the list for voting you, even though i unvoted you. I think that you should redo your lists and then you will realise that I don't deserve to be a suspect.

Still not voting. I still think that we dont have enough cause or evidence to lynch someone and we should wait til tomorrow.

olliep13 · Post Post #122 (isolation #4) » Thu Dec 16, 2004 4:36 pm

Locus, do those odds include killings at night by assassins, serial killers etc

olliep13 · Post Post #124 (isolation #5) » Thu Dec 16, 2004 4:43 pm

Well if they don't, then I'm pretty sure that the odds are better to not lynch today. Say there are three townies and 18 mafia, then:
If we lynch then we lose 1 and 6/7 mafia and 1/7 town, resulting in a ratio of mafia/town to be 5.65
If we don't lynch we lose 1 mafia and no town, resulting in a ratio of mafia/town to be 5.67

I still think we should wait til tomorrow when we have more info before we try lynching someone.

olliep13 · Post Post #150 (isolation #6) » Fri Dec 17, 2004 8:20 pm

Well my attempt at no lynch is clearly not working. So I'll

vote zoneace

. He still won't post. I guess he seems more scummy than Hairymezican.

olliep13 · Post Post #158 (isolation #7) » Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:49 pm

Firtst of all, Commify, you say that I've been vacillating when it comes to my votes but your vote history is: Bloojay, No Vote, Joe, Olliep13.

I wanted to go with a no lynch but since you guys kept saying how stupid that idea was i thought i'd vote someone. After being considered scum for voting no lynch, I decided to vote Zoneace because at that stage he was hardly posting anything which seemed pretty scummy.

Yeah and Mastermind of sin, my votes were justified. I voted Hairymezican because of his bandwagonning, No Lynch because I realised the odds would be better for a mafia victory and Zoneace because of his lack of posting.

I have an important role in the game, but it's not a good idea for me to announce it at this stage. Of course, if you demand it, I will give it to you.

olliep13 · Post Post #164 (isolation #8) » Sat Dec 18, 2004 2:02 pm

I am 16 years old

olliep13 · Post Post #273 (isolation #9) » Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:55 pm

"No Lynch" is also a safe lynch (and also strictly better, if everyone is 100% sure that I am a goon), and we all know that "No Lynch" isn't good for the town.

I was saying that before Hairymezican, but then you put me on your suspect list.

HairyMezican wrote: "No Lynch" camp - normally I've only seen mafia promote this, I would be surprised if there were no evil townies on here
Uraj45
olliep
GenocideHeart

The two posts sort of contradict eachother, don't you think?

olliep13 · Post Post #359 (isolation #10) » Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:30 pm

I get the feeling that Hairymezican is a serial killer... however for now, i will go for one of the people who voted with Melchizedek.

Vote Bloojay

olliep13 · Post Post #373 (isolation #11) » Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:19 pm

bloojay wrote: I'm confused by the with. Do you mean that i voted for similar people as melchizedek or that i voted FOR him?

I meant you voted for the same person that melchizedek did.

olliep13 · Post Post #377 (isolation #12) » Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:29 pm

Mastermind of sin, when you say that "there's reasonable evidence against him [coron], as presented by LosCs", what evidence are you talking about??

olliep13 · Post Post #398 (isolation #13) » Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:15 am

So Mastermind of Sin, so far today you have voted for Jdtay, Coron, KingEnigma, Bigbenwd and now Maximus. Is there any reason as to why you keep changing your vote? You seem pretty townish at the moment so I'm going to

unvote , vote Mastermind of sin.

olliep13 · Post Post #449 (isolation #14) » Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:48 pm

My Vote's staying on Mastermind of sin.

olliep13 · Post Post #482 (isolation #15) » Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:56 pm

Mastermindofsin, just so it's clear, i was the first person to vote for you. I didn't try to be part of a bandwagon, since one didnt even exist. I voted for you because of the way you kept changing your vote and i still think that you are the most suspicious person.
I also agree that your last post sounds pretty desperate. My vote is staying on you.

olliep13 · Post Post #542 (isolation #16) » Fri Feb 04, 2005 3:10 pm

I really wanted MoS gone yesterday. I'm pretty sure hes not the doctor.

vote MoS

olliep13 · Post Post #543 (isolation #17) » Fri Feb 04, 2005 3:13 pm

Also:

People who have had final votes on proven innocents twice:
MoS
Jdtay
Coron
Darklight
Lazarus

olliep13 · Post Post #551 (isolation #18) » Sat Feb 05, 2005 6:23 pm

Coron wrote:I feel like he stole my reasoning, when it was convinient.

That's crap coron. It was my first post of the day and i voted for him 5 minutes after you. Its not like I was waiting for someone to point out that he was supposed to die last night and then agree with them "when it's convenient". I wanted him gone yesterday and knew that if he didn't die then i would vote for him the next day.
I don't think you even gave reasoning anyway...

olliep13 · Post Post #552 (isolation #19) » Sat Feb 05, 2005 6:24 pm

Coron wrote:I feel like he stole my reasoning, when it was convinient.

That's crap coron. It was my first post of the day and i voted for him 5 minutes after you. Its not like I was waiting for someone to point out that he was supposed to die last night and then agree with them "when it's convenient". I wanted him gone yesterday and knew that if he didn't die then i would vote for him the next day.
I don't think you even gave reasoning anyway...