RealTime Mafia (Game Over due to too many modkills.)
-
-
Narsis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4, 2008
-
-
Narsis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4, 2008
-
-
Narsis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4, 2008
-
-
Narsis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4, 2008
alvinz95 wrote:Too much "WASTING WORDZ" bullshit. In this game, scum will use that argument too many times. Stop voting people just cause they wasted 1 word. Take note of that. Start scumhunting, not tattling from wasting words. Now you can rattle on me for wasting alot of words but what I said is necessary.
Vote: animorpherv1Based from above.
agreed.Plum wrote:You'd rather give scum a free excuse to vote a townie without analysis or explaination?FOS: Animorpherv
Vote: animorpherv1
1, 1463/12000Record:
Town: 1W/3L
Mafia: 1W/0L
Other: 0W/0L-
-
Narsis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4, 2008
-
-
Narsis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4, 2008
-
-
Narsis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4, 2008
-
-
Narsis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4, 2008
-
-
Narsis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4, 2008
anyway since discussion seems to have moved on...i'll share my suspicions.
this was first post that caught my attention. he's subtlely defending ani. nothing wrong with defending someone...but way he does it seems scummy to me.ortolan wrote:According to Natirasha we've only used ~1/6 of our words so no need to hurry into a lynch
the bandwagon against animorpherv doesn't seem much stronger than that against anyone this game has been for wasting words
I dislike him claiming to have "lost his role pm"- this is lame regardless of him being scum/town. This alone makes him a decent default lynch when the time comes.
Raging Rabbit wrote:
12000 word posts will result in modkill, obviously mod's capable of applying judgement.Special Rule 4 wrote:[4] Fuck with the rules, and I will fuck back. This includes looking for loopholes.
Ani's lynch should at least wait 'till we discuss stuff more. Can anyone link to another game of his?
these two quotes just rub me wrong way. saying we should hold off lynch for sole purpose of discussion and unvoting to prevent premature lynch just doesn't seem right. i agree discussion is good, town needs it to win, but last time i saw people hold off of L-1 for sake of discussion...no lynch resulted. lynching townie, although not good in it's own right, is better then no lynch.Plum wrote:
Agreed.Raging Rabbit wrote:
12000 word posts will result in modkill, obviously mod's capable of applying judgement.Special Rule 4 wrote:[4] Fuck with the rules, and I will fuck back. This includes looking for loopholes.
Ani's lynch should at least wait 'till we discuss stuff more. Can anyone link to another game of his?Unvote, prevent premature hammer, though stillHOS Animorpherv.
now as for my latest post...i was hoping to get a read on some people by how they reacted. considering only two people bothered to say anything about my post...i must say i didn't get good read.
overall: ort, RR, and ani = most scummy. plum = possible scum. everyone else = no read.
now vi, i do agree it technically is bandwagon on ani, but my vote wasn't wagon vote(depends on your defenition of wagon vote though), or rather wasn't meant to be one. it was, and still is, based on ani's actions. also, last time i saw someone defend himself like ani he turned out scum. thus my vote stands.
235, 3512/12000Record:
Town: 1W/3L
Mafia: 1W/0L
Other: 0W/0L-
-
Narsis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4, 2008
this is my first game on these forums. i have yet to get to know how people play. thus i must base how people react on previous experience.ortolan wrote:
False dichotomy. You drew a link between what happened in a previous game and this game as though it will happen again. There is no good reason not to use more of our 6,000 words on discussion before lynching, especially as the case against animorpherv isn't watertight atm. animorpherv please post in the thread, with content or a case against someone or something so it can be decided if you're worthy of a lynch or not. No crappy "lost role pm" comments.these two quotes just rub me wrong way. saying we should hold off lynch for sole purpose of discussion and unvoting to prevent premature lynch just doesn't seem right. i agree discussion is good, town needs it to win, but last time i saw people hold off of L-1 for sake of discussion...no lynch resulted. lynching townie, although not good in it's own right, is better then no lynch.
actually, yes. first, if the player is lurking and/or refusing to defend himself then it would be better to lynch him now. lurker at LYLO = bad. secondly, we learn 100% that he is townie. this allows us to more accurately read people based on how they reacted to the wagon against him, and after, how they react to his lynch.Percy wrote:
No.Narsis wrote:lynching townie, although not good in it's own right, is better then no lynch.
on the flip-side, a no lynch, particularily on day 1, gives the town little to no information and the scum a free kill. yes, pro-town power roles can do stuff, but compared to good old fashioned scumhunting, they are worth little.
139, 4089/12000Record:
Town: 1W/3L
Mafia: 1W/0L
Other: 0W/0L-
-
Narsis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4, 2008
-
-
Narsis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4, 2008
-
-
Narsis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4, 2008
-
-
Narsis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4, 2008
-
-
Narsis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4, 2008
-
-
Narsis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4, 2008
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.