More of fhq:
Not going to dedicate much time on the Atlas awol issue. If he's going to be replaced, it means we still have a null-read on him.
While zazier's initial argument wasn't too convincing to me, stef's counter arguments has made him look more suspicious to me.
Stef, here's how you attracted MY attention: Overzealous random voting; defending of this and trying to tell us it served a purpose. I am sorry, arguments on the length of the random voting period doesn't convince me and is, in my opinion, moot at the moment. I would have overlooked it if you claimed you voted atlas because he's lurking or even if you admitted to being a bit silly and carried on with actual gameplay. But you have, by now, made sure we know that vote was an intentional RANDOM vote. Why would you hammer on that so much?
Btw, random stage was over because the vote zachattack made before you was a serious vote.
If I have to explain to you why your vote was OMGUS, you either don't understand the concept, or you are being stubborn. She made a case against you. You voted for her because she made a case against you (fine, you voted because you thought the case weak, but it is OMGUS nonetheless).
You seriously think the argument "you rely on meta too much" is a strong one on page two and a full 8 posts by Zazier? You REALLY are going to argue her case is flimsy and misleading and countering with that?
Stef wrote:
It was the RVS. In that stage things don't have serious or individual use for that matter.
So explain to me again, why is it beneficial to stay in the RVS for longer?
Avoiding votes by means of the spelling of my name.