When inquiring into potential constructive feedback, i.e., ideas on how to implement an enrichment/prune off nuisances that parasite the site (or at least trap their influence in a priority void quarantine, instead of parading a high regard for it), I advise in favor of avoiding the worst of both asking regulars for advice on how to entice influx (necomings/re-envigorations translating into experiencings of fun or otherwise worthwhile interaction) and having newcomers/potential re-envigorators who've kept to the shadows have to have their suggestions endorsed by regulars to a higher degree than those of those inside or outside that very pool of regulars competing for the attention to get their input elevated to noticeable and consequential levels, below which one would arguably only waste effort/tryhard; lest the hivemind covers its ears like a kid and goes la-la, la-la-la-lah-la la-la, like Picard during idk whose incredibly unbroken sentence accommodating, moving from topic to topic with noone having had a chance to interrupt speech ...
h
t
t
p
s
:
/
/
r
a
v
e
.
d
j
/
g
9
w
l
c
a
2
0
V
K
i
9
f
g
--regardless of community steering helpfulness' caliber.
It's best to skip that next time and ask idea-apt-looking users directly; or, even people you meet and wind up conversing with in RL. There are allegedly a bunch of them out there, and, if you believe you can provide a should-be valuable service to them, there's no reason to be coy about transcending the screens in your ambition to render it such. Fuck the "community" and their numerical-topic-icon-spearheaded wishlists' second-and-turdings--and turn & cater to members of the community-to-be, instead. Anything less would fail to befit your, my and other idea-apt-looking people's imagination--hence, it persists to stay still-unsurprisingly dormant to this pseudo-celebration-day-sequence-dragging juncture in cyberspace-time.
